6Markers for predicting severity and progression of acute pancreatitis
Introduction
Acute pancreatitis (AP) can still – despite optimised treatment – be a life-threatening illness. Although in the majority of cases the disease is relatively mild and associated with low mortality, 10–25% of patients present with a severe course of the disease and significant mortality. In 1992 the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis distinguished and defined mild and severe acute pancreatitis, based on clinical, laboratory and anatomical/pathological changes of the pancreatic gland.1 Distant extrapancreatic organ failure and the development of local or systemic complications determine the course and outcome of severe acute pancreatitis.
Two peaks of mortality in acute pancreatitis are recognised: early (within the first 2Â weeks) and late. The mortality rate is strongly associated with the degree of multi-organ failure, but the causes in early and late mortality are distinct. The reported relative mortality rates in the early phase of AP range from about one third to more than a half of the deaths,2, 3, 4 and are due to the systemic inflammatory response. Complications due to sepsis, in most cases caused by infection of pancreatic necrosis, also result in multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and are the major cause of deaths in the late course of the disease.2, 3, 5, 6, 7 It is crucial to recognise patients at risk of developing severe acute pancreatitis at an early stage in order to optimise therapy and intensive monitoring. Several tools have been introduced and tested for early and easy stratification of severity in acute pancreatitis; they include clinical signs, biochemical markers, imaging methods, and complex scoring systems.
This review gives a critical up-to-date overview on current knowledge on markers for predicting severity and progression of acute pancreatitis, with special emphasis on those applicable in current clinical routine.
Section snippets
Clinical factors predicting severity and mortality in acute pancreatitis
Intensive attention has focused on careful description of the clinical course of severe acute pancreatitis and to characterising patients at risk for the development of complications of the disease. Several independent factors for predicting fatal outcome have been proposed by applying multivariate analysis.
The detection of pancreatic necrosis by definition leads to severe acute pancreatitis. Therefore the application of most markers aims at the early recognition of necrotising acute
Clinical assessment
Some authors were able to show that the clinical examination of the patient – although still of course the basis and the centre of diagnostic work-up and medical treatment – is not helpful in predicting the severity of the disease, even in the hands of an experienced gastroenterologist, as the clinical symptoms and the findings on physical examination vary in nature and degree.18 On admission, clinical examination is not able to identify more than 44% of the patients who develop severe acute
Biochemical markers
The search for individual biochemical markers to stage the severity of acute pancreatitis and to allow prediction of the further course of the disease is rather like the search for the Holy Grail. Many markers have been evaluated for their usefulness in severity stratification in acute pancreatitis during recent decades, some of them measuring systemic inflammatory response (e.g. acute-phase proteins, cytokines, leukocyte-derived proteases, markers of oxidative stress), others measuring
Computed tomography
Computed tomography (CT) is the current imaging reference method for severity stratification in acute pancreatitis, since Balthazar and co-workers developed a severity index (CTSI) based on morphological changes depicted by CT and showed a strong correlation with the clinical outcome in patients.53, 54, 55 The initial scoring system was based on the detection of pancreatic changes due to acute pancreatitis and was further on improved by adding information on the extent of pancreatic necrosis
Scoring systems
The knowledge on factors associated with high mortality in acute pancreatitis have led to the use of multifactorial clinical scoring systems, each representing the knowledge on severe acute pancreatitis at the point of development. The drawback of the multifactorial scoring systems in clinical use nowadays is that they are of course lagging behind the growing knowledge on factors predicting mortality in severe acute pancreatitis. None of the established systems, for example, takes into account
Summary
Several tools for severity stratification in acute pancreatitis have been developed. They include single biochemical markers, imaging methods, and complex scoring systems, all of them aiming at an early detection of severe acute pancreatitis in order to optimise monitoring and treatment of patients as early as possible.
Among single biochemical markers, C-reactive protein remains the most useful. Despite its delayed increase, peaking not earlier than 72Â h after the onset of symptoms, it is
References (97)
- et al.
Fatal outcome in acute pancreatitis: its occurrence and early prediction
Pancreatology
(2001) - et al.
Natural history of organ failure in acute pancreatitis
Pancreatology
(2003) - et al.
Association of extent and infection of pancreatic necrosis with organ failure and death in acute necrotizing pancreatitis
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
(2005) - et al.
Relationship of necrosis to organ failure in severe acute pancreatitis
Gastroenterology
(1997) - et al.
Factors predicting mortality in severe acute pancreatitis
Pancreatology
(2003) - et al.
Obesity increases the severity of acute pancreatitis: performance of APACHE-O score and correlation with the inflammatory response
Pancreatology
(2006) - et al.
APACHE-II score for assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis
Lancet
(1989) - et al.
Useful markers for predicting severity and monitoring progression of acute pancreatitis
Pancreatology
(2003) - et al.
Early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis by urinary trypsinogen activation peptide: a multicentre study
Lancet
(2000) - et al.
Hemoconcentration: an early marker of severe and/or necrotizing pancreatitis? A critical appraisal
Am J Gastroenterol
(2001)
Hemoconcentration as an early risk factor for necrotizing pancreatitis
Am J Gastroenterol
Urinary trypsinogen activation peptide is more accurate than hematocrit in determining severity in patients with acute pancreatitis: a prospective study
Am J Gastroenterol
Computed tomography severity index is an early prognostic tool for acute pancreatitis
J Am Coll Surg
Abdominal computed tomography prolongs length of stay and is frequently unnecessary in the evaluation of acute pancreatitis
Am J Med Sci
Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of acute pancreatitis
Gastroenterology
Staging of severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging-A comparative study
Dig Liver Dis
Combination of APACHE-II score and an obesity score (APACHE-O) for the prediction of severe acute pancreatitis
Pancreatology
Predicting fatal outcome in the early phase of severe acute pancreatitis by using novel prognostic models
Pancreatology
Identification of severe acute pancreatitis using an artificial neural network
Surgery
Machine learning can improve prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis using admission values of APACHE II score and C-reactive protein
Pancreatology
A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis
Arch Surg
Multicentre audit of death from acute pancreatitis
Br J Surg
High early mortality rate from acute pancreatitis in Scotland, 1984–1995
Br J Surg
Death due to acute pancreatitis. A retrospective analysis of 405 autopsy cases
Dig Dis Sci
Risk of death from acute pancreatitis: role of early, simple ‘routine’ data
Int J Pancreatology
Bacterial infection and extent of necrosis are determinants of organ failure in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis
Br J Surg
No strict correlation between necrosis and organ failure in acute pancreatitis
Pancreas
When should we be concerned about pancreatic necrosis? Analysis from a single institution in Mexico City
World J Surg
Is severity of necrotizing pancreatitis increased in extended necrosis and infected necrosis?
Pancreas
Chronic alcohol consumption is a major risk factor for pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis
Am J Gastroenterol
Risk factors in acute pancreatitis
Am J Gastroenterol
A comparative study of methods for the prediction of severity of attacks of acute pancreatitis
Br J Surg
PMN-elastase in comparison with CRP, antiproteases, and LDH as indicators of necrosis in human acute pancreatitis
Pancreas
Inflammatory mediators in human acute pancreatitis: clinical and pathophysiological implications
Gut
Sensitivity of antiproteases, complement factors and C-reactive protein in detecting pancreatic necrosis. Results of a prospective clinical study
Int J Pancreatol
Laboratory markers of severe acute pancreatitis
Dig Dis
Role of procalcitonin and granulocyte colony stimulating factor in the early prediction of infected necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis
Gut
Serum amyloid A, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein in early assessment of severity of acute pancreatitis
Dig Dis Sci
Serum amyloid A versus C-reactive protein in acute pancreatitis: clinical value of an alternative acute-phase reactant
Crit Care Med
Serum amyloid A is a better early predictor of severity than C-reactive protein in acute pancreatitis
Br J Surg
Procalcitonin, soluble interleukin-2 receptor, and soluble E-selectin in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis
Crit Care Med
Does serum procalcitonin have a role in evaluating the severity of acute pancreatitis? A question revisited
World J Surg
The potential role of procalcitonin and interleukin 8 in the prediction of infected necrosis in acute pancreatitis
Gut
Early assessment of pancreatic infections and overall prognosis in severe acute pancreatitis by procalcitonin (PCT): a prospective international multicenter study
Ann Surg
Prognostic values of IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 in acute pancreatitis
J Clin Gastroenterol
Serum interleukin-10 in human acute pancreatitis
Dig Dis Sci
Elevated level of interleukin-6 predicts organ failure and severe disease in patients with acute pancreatitis
J Gastroenterol Hepatol
Cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, TNF): early and reliable predictors of severe acute pancreatitis
J Clin Gastroenterol
Cited by (77)
The Prognostic Role of Peripheral Lymphocyte Subsets in Patients With Acute Pancreatitis
2019, American Journal of the Medical SciencesCitation Excerpt :For SAP versus MAP and MSAP, the AUC was 0.859 (95% confidence interval 0.745-0.973), and when the value was less than 5.27%, specificity was 0.919 and sensitivity was 0.786. The early identification of SAP and possible complications is one of the most difficult aspects of the treatment of AP.18 Regional inflammation and pancreatic necrosis can result in the discharge of a variety of inflammatory mediators.19
Deficiency of cathepsin C ameliorates severity of acute pancreatitis by reduction of neutrophil elastase activation and cleavage of E-cadherin
2019, Journal of Biological ChemistryEarly prediction of persistent organ failure by serum apolipoprotein A-I and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with acute pancreatitis
2018, Clinica Chimica ActaCitation Excerpt :In our study, interestingly, SIRS is the only poor clinical outcome that showed both significant correlation with APO A-I and HDL-C in patients with SAP and MSAP or in AP patients with organ failure. SIRS developed from AP can affect the function of distant organs due to the imbalance of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines [1,17]. Increased cytokines will reduce the generation of HDL and APO A-I in the liver [18].
The epidemiology of acute pancreatitis in a tertiary care hospital in Dubai
2024, Annals of African MedicineCharacteristics and clinical significance of bacterial culture of pancreatic juice in early stage of acute pancreatitis
2023, Chinese Journal of General Surgery