6
Markers for predicting severity and progression of acute pancreatitis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2007.10.013Get rights and content

Several tools have been developed for severity stratification in acute pancreatitis. They include single biochemical markers, imaging methods, and complex scoring systems, all of which aim at an early detection of severe acute pancreatitis to optimise monitoring and treatment of patients as early as possible. Among single biochemical markers, C-reactive protein (CRP) remains the most useful. Despite its delayed increase, peaking not earlier than 72 h after the onset of symptoms, it is accurate and widely available. Many other markers have been evaluated for their usefulness, and for some of them very promising data could be shown. Among them interleukin 6 seems to be the most promising parameter for use in clinical routine. For the detection of pancreatic infection, procalcitonin is the most sensitive, and can be used as an indicator for the need for fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic necrosis.

Regarding imaging, contrast-enhanced computed tomography is still the reference method for the detection of necrotising acute pancreatitis. Pancreatitis-specific scoring systems have been shown to be of value for the prediction of severity and progression of acute pancreatitis, but cannot be applied any earlier than 48 h after admission to hospital. The APACHE-II score has not been developed specifically for acute pancreatitis and is rather complex to assess, but has been proven to be an early and reliable tool. Indication, timing and consequences of the methods applied need to be carefully considered and incorporated into clinical assessments to avoid costs and harm to the patient.

Introduction

Acute pancreatitis (AP) can still – despite optimised treatment – be a life-threatening illness. Although in the majority of cases the disease is relatively mild and associated with low mortality, 10–25% of patients present with a severe course of the disease and significant mortality. In 1992 the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis distinguished and defined mild and severe acute pancreatitis, based on clinical, laboratory and anatomical/pathological changes of the pancreatic gland.1 Distant extrapancreatic organ failure and the development of local or systemic complications determine the course and outcome of severe acute pancreatitis.

Two peaks of mortality in acute pancreatitis are recognised: early (within the first 2 weeks) and late. The mortality rate is strongly associated with the degree of multi-organ failure, but the causes in early and late mortality are distinct. The reported relative mortality rates in the early phase of AP range from about one third to more than a half of the deaths,2, 3, 4 and are due to the systemic inflammatory response. Complications due to sepsis, in most cases caused by infection of pancreatic necrosis, also result in multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and are the major cause of deaths in the late course of the disease.2, 3, 5, 6, 7 It is crucial to recognise patients at risk of developing severe acute pancreatitis at an early stage in order to optimise therapy and intensive monitoring. Several tools have been introduced and tested for early and easy stratification of severity in acute pancreatitis; they include clinical signs, biochemical markers, imaging methods, and complex scoring systems.

This review gives a critical up-to-date overview on current knowledge on markers for predicting severity and progression of acute pancreatitis, with special emphasis on those applicable in current clinical routine.

Section snippets

Clinical factors predicting severity and mortality in acute pancreatitis

Intensive attention has focused on careful description of the clinical course of severe acute pancreatitis and to characterising patients at risk for the development of complications of the disease. Several independent factors for predicting fatal outcome have been proposed by applying multivariate analysis.

The detection of pancreatic necrosis by definition leads to severe acute pancreatitis. Therefore the application of most markers aims at the early recognition of necrotising acute

Clinical assessment

Some authors were able to show that the clinical examination of the patient – although still of course the basis and the centre of diagnostic work-up and medical treatment – is not helpful in predicting the severity of the disease, even in the hands of an experienced gastroenterologist, as the clinical symptoms and the findings on physical examination vary in nature and degree.18 On admission, clinical examination is not able to identify more than 44% of the patients who develop severe acute

Biochemical markers

The search for individual biochemical markers to stage the severity of acute pancreatitis and to allow prediction of the further course of the disease is rather like the search for the Holy Grail. Many markers have been evaluated for their usefulness in severity stratification in acute pancreatitis during recent decades, some of them measuring systemic inflammatory response (e.g. acute-phase proteins, cytokines, leukocyte-derived proteases, markers of oxidative stress), others measuring

Computed tomography

Computed tomography (CT) is the current imaging reference method for severity stratification in acute pancreatitis, since Balthazar and co-workers developed a severity index (CTSI) based on morphological changes depicted by CT and showed a strong correlation with the clinical outcome in patients.53, 54, 55 The initial scoring system was based on the detection of pancreatic changes due to acute pancreatitis and was further on improved by adding information on the extent of pancreatic necrosis

Scoring systems

The knowledge on factors associated with high mortality in acute pancreatitis have led to the use of multifactorial clinical scoring systems, each representing the knowledge on severe acute pancreatitis at the point of development. The drawback of the multifactorial scoring systems in clinical use nowadays is that they are of course lagging behind the growing knowledge on factors predicting mortality in severe acute pancreatitis. None of the established systems, for example, takes into account

Summary

Several tools for severity stratification in acute pancreatitis have been developed. They include single biochemical markers, imaging methods, and complex scoring systems, all of them aiming at an early detection of severe acute pancreatitis in order to optimise monitoring and treatment of patients as early as possible.

Among single biochemical markers, C-reactive protein remains the most useful. Despite its delayed increase, peaking not earlier than 72 h after the onset of symptoms, it is

References (97)

  • J.D. Baillargeon et al.

    Hemoconcentration as an early risk factor for necrotizing pancreatitis

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (1998)
  • Z. Khan et al.

    Urinary trypsinogen activation peptide is more accurate than hematocrit in determining severity in patients with acute pancreatitis: a prospective study

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2002)
  • P.W. Vriens et al.

    Computed tomography severity index is an early prognostic tool for acute pancreatitis

    J Am Coll Surg

    (2005)
  • F. Fleszler et al.

    Abdominal computed tomography prolongs length of stay and is frequently unnecessary in the evaluation of acute pancreatitis

    Am J Med Sci

    (2003)
  • M. Arvanitakis et al.

    Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of acute pancreatitis

    Gastroenterology

    (2004)
  • M. Arvanitakis et al.

    Staging of severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging-A comparative study

    Dig Liver Dis

    (2007)
  • C.D. Johnson et al.

    Combination of APACHE-II score and an obesity score (APACHE-O) for the prediction of severe acute pancreatitis

    Pancreatology

    (2004)
  • K.I. Halonen et al.

    Predicting fatal outcome in the early phase of severe acute pancreatitis by using novel prognostic models

    Pancreatology

    (2003)
  • R. Mofidi et al.

    Identification of severe acute pancreatitis using an artificial neural network

    Surgery

    (2007)
  • C.B. Pearce et al.

    Machine learning can improve prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis using admission values of APACHE II score and C-reactive protein

    Pancreatology

    (2006)
  • E.L. Bradley

    A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis

    Arch Surg

    (1992)
  • D.V. Mann et al.

    Multicentre audit of death from acute pancreatitis

    Br J Surg

    (1994)
  • C.J. McKay et al.

    High early mortality rate from acute pancreatitis in Scotland, 1984–1995

    Br J Surg

    (1999)
  • I.G. Renner et al.

    Death due to acute pancreatitis. A retrospective analysis of 405 autopsy cases

    Dig Dis Sci

    (1985)
  • G. Talamini et al.

    Risk of death from acute pancreatitis: role of early, simple ‘routine’ data

    Int J Pancreatology

    (1996)
  • R. Isenmann et al.

    Bacterial infection and extent of necrosis are determinants of organ failure in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis

    Br J Surg

    (1999)
  • P.G. Lankisch et al.

    No strict correlation between necrosis and organ failure in acute pancreatitis

    Pancreas

    (2000)
  • J.M. Remes-Troche et al.

    When should we be concerned about pancreatic necrosis? Analysis from a single institution in Mexico City

    World J Surg

    (2006)
  • A. Perez et al.

    Is severity of necrotizing pancreatitis increased in extended necrosis and infected necrosis?

    Pancreas

    (2002)
  • G.I. Papachristou et al.

    Chronic alcohol consumption is a major risk factor for pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2006)
  • S. Bank et al.

    Risk factors in acute pancreatitis

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (1983)
  • M.J. McMahon et al.

    A comparative study of methods for the prediction of severity of attacks of acute pancreatitis

    Br J Surg

    (1980)
  • W. Uhl et al.

    PMN-elastase in comparison with CRP, antiproteases, and LDH as indicators of necrosis in human acute pancreatitis

    Pancreas

    (1991)
  • J. Mayer et al.

    Inflammatory mediators in human acute pancreatitis: clinical and pathophysiological implications

    Gut

    (2000)
  • M.W. Buchler et al.

    Sensitivity of antiproteases, complement factors and C-reactive protein in detecting pancreatic necrosis. Results of a prospective clinical study

    Int J Pancreatol

    (1986)
  • B. Rau et al.

    Laboratory markers of severe acute pancreatitis

    Dig Dis

    (2004)
  • C.A. ller et al.

    Role of procalcitonin and granulocyte colony stimulating factor in the early prediction of infected necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis

    Gut

    (2000)
  • R. Pezzilli et al.

    Serum amyloid A, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein in early assessment of severity of acute pancreatitis

    Dig Dis Sci

    (2000)
  • B. Rau et al.

    Serum amyloid A versus C-reactive protein in acute pancreatitis: clinical value of an alternative acute-phase reactant

    Crit Care Med

    (2000)
  • J.M. Mayer et al.

    Serum amyloid A is a better early predictor of severity than C-reactive protein in acute pancreatitis

    Br J Surg

    (2002)
  • M.L. Kylanpaa-Back et al.

    Procalcitonin, soluble interleukin-2 receptor, and soluble E-selectin in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis

    Crit Care Med

    (2001)
  • S. Purkayastha et al.

    Does serum procalcitonin have a role in evaluating the severity of acute pancreatitis? A question revisited

    World J Surg

    (2006)
  • B. Rau et al.

    The potential role of procalcitonin and interleukin 8 in the prediction of infected necrosis in acute pancreatitis

    Gut

    (1997)
  • B.M. Rau et al.

    Early assessment of pancreatic infections and overall prognosis in severe acute pancreatitis by procalcitonin (PCT): a prospective international multicenter study

    Ann Surg

    (2007)
  • D. Stimac et al.

    Prognostic values of IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 in acute pancreatitis

    J Clin Gastroenterol

    (2006)
  • R. Pezzilli et al.

    Serum interleukin-10 in human acute pancreatitis

    Dig Dis Sci

    (1997)
  • G. Sathyanarayan et al.

    Elevated level of interleukin-6 predicts organ failure and severe disease in patients with acute pancreatitis

    J Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2007)
  • N. Pooran et al.

    Cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, TNF): early and reliable predictors of severe acute pancreatitis

    J Clin Gastroenterol

    (2003)
  • Cited by (77)

    • The Prognostic Role of Peripheral Lymphocyte Subsets in Patients With Acute Pancreatitis

      2019, American Journal of the Medical Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      For SAP versus MAP and MSAP, the AUC was 0.859 (95% confidence interval 0.745-0.973), and when the value was less than 5.27%, specificity was 0.919 and sensitivity was 0.786. The early identification of SAP and possible complications is one of the most difficult aspects of the treatment of AP.18 Regional inflammation and pancreatic necrosis can result in the discharge of a variety of inflammatory mediators.19

    • Early prediction of persistent organ failure by serum apolipoprotein A-I and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with acute pancreatitis

      2018, Clinica Chimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      In our study, interestingly, SIRS is the only poor clinical outcome that showed both significant correlation with APO A-I and HDL-C in patients with SAP and MSAP or in AP patients with organ failure. SIRS developed from AP can affect the function of distant organs due to the imbalance of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines [1,17]. Increased cytokines will reduce the generation of HDL and APO A-I in the liver [18].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text