Elsevier

Biotechnology Advances

Volume 25, Issue 1, January–February 2007, Pages 57-74
Biotechnology Advances

Research review paper
Synergy between Competitive Intelligence (CI), Knowledge Management (KM) and Technological Foresight (TF) as a strategic model of prospecting — The use of biotechnology in the development of drugs against breast cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.10.001Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the synergy between Competitive Intelligence, Knowledge Management and Technological Foresight, and to emphasize the proposal of a strategic model of data prospecting as a mechanism to support decision-making in regard to three approaches for sustainable development and innovation: technological, social and economic. The use of biotechnology in the development of drugs against breast cancer is the case study. The article shows the results of data and text mining in specialized medical and patent databases, identifying the most frequently cited drugs, as well as the authors of research, and the inventors of new technology at the beginning of the 21st century. In addition, the study includes reference to Brazilian competence in breast cancer area, the international trends in drugs for treatment of this cancer, leading international institutions and Brazilian competencies. A framework is presented, which could serve as a guide and support for the decision-making process.

Introduction

Knowledge Economy has shown that understanding innovation consists of a process of searching and learning dependent on interactions and specific situations is a complex approach and a challenge to the future, mainly considering the exigencies of a globalized market. The economic success of any country, region or place increasingly depends on its capacity to specialize in activities which allow it to establish effective and dynamic competitive advantages, based on local competencies and capacities to learn, in the sense of creating an environment of transformation and progress, as well as the capacity to cooperate, which has become key in innovation.

In this context, to understand the synergy between CI, KM and TF and the application of these methodologies is important in building a vision of the complex relationship of a given sector, with the goal of generating value-added information about technological, social and market trends and thus feeding the cycle of the creation of new wisdom, emphasizing the need to prioritize action in the short, medium and long terms. (Canongia et al., 2006).

Moreover, as Salicrup and Fedorkova (2006) emphasizes, biotechnology will be a key driver of sustainable growth and development, and some developing economies with enormous human capital, such as India, China, Brazil, and Korea, have been able to demonstrate their capabilities and accomplishments through several biotechnology R&D activities.

Section snippets

Knowledge era: the challenge of gloCalization

In the current era success is defined by the way in which innovation is managed and valued, as this factor is currently considered dominant for local economic development and for patterns of both local and global competition. Local specific capacities are strengthened, leading to global dynamics which retrofeed local dynamics – gloCalization – think globally, act locally. (Humbert, 2005). The management of innovation is thus essential, and will increasingly be a challenge in the years to come,

Why intensive sectors in R&D?

National innovation systems can be understood as the coming together of different agents, with specific functions, who establish amongst themselves a series of coordinated relations in order to attain the objective of meeting the demands of sustained development and competitiveness. If, on the one hand, technical progress increases the capacity for wealth accumulation and income generation, on the other the search for balance between technological progress, competitiveness and social inclusion,

The model of a prospecting strategy for R&D-intensive sectors

The challenge for the future is the development of models capable of: a) increasing capacity for analysis of R&D-intensive sectors; b) having a greater focus on simulation and modeling; c) forming collaborative networks; d) datamining with increasing application to R&D, with generation of knowledge maps. For this, the concepts of IC, GC and TF, seen in a synergistic fashion are extremely important as support for the strategy of prospecting.

In proposing a strategy model for prospecting

Application of the strategic model of trends and prospecting: the use of biotechnology in the development of drugs against breast cancer — a vision of the potentialities and opportunities for Brazil

The relevant arguments for a focus on breast cancer and biotechnology were presented in detail in the paper “Technological Foresight — the use of biotechnology in the development of new drugs against breast cancer”,2 when the doctoral thesis studies have been developed. One of the important things to emphasize is that among women worldwide, breast cancer appears as the second most common malignant neoplasm, as well as being a

Final considerations

This article presents evidence that foresight studies based on the methodology used here are of great value when employed in the development of R&D and innovation in scientific areas with social applications, as in the present case of biotechnology for the development of breast cancer drugs.

It is evident that technological foresight has a common base in the process of gathering and treatment of strategic information, the implementation of analytical and reflexive capacities, and the creation of

References (25)

  • Alan L. Porter et al.

    Technology Opportunities Analysis

    Technol Forecast Soc Change. New York

    (1995)
  • Luis A. Salicrup et al.

    Challenges and opportunities for enhancing biotechnology and technology transfer in developing countries

    Biotechnol Adv

    (2006)
  • R.M. Wilson

    Patent analysis using online databases: technological trend analysis

    World Pat Inf

    (1987)
  • Agência Nacional De Vigilância Sanitária....
  • A. Antunes et al.

    Prospecção Tecnológica da Indústria Farmacêutica Nacional: Prospecção Tecnológica e Mercadológica das drogas por Classes Terapêuticas, dos Medicamentos de Alto Custo e dos Genéricos da RENAME. (Study in 8 volumes undertaken for FIOCRUZ as part of the Innovation in Health Project)

    (2004)
  • Canongia C. Modelo de estratégia de prospecção: sinergias entre inteligência competitiva (IC), gestão do conhecimento...
  • C. Canongia et al.

    Foresight, Inteligência Competitiva e Gestão do Conhecimento: instrumentos para a gestão da inovação

    Revista Gestão Produção

    (2004)
  • Claudia Canongia et al.

    Technological Foresight: the use of biotechnology in the development of new drugs against breast cancer

    Tech J

    (2004)
  • C. Canongia et al.

    Modelo de estratégia de prospecção de setores intensivos em P and D: sinergias entre Inteligência Competitiva (IC), Gestão do Conhecimento (GC), e Foresight (F)

    DataGramaZero

    (2006)
  • Mario Cimoli et al.

    Institutions and policies shaping industrial development: an introductory note

  • Ernst et al.

    Economics consulting and quantitative analysis

    The economics contributions of the biotechnology industry to the US economy

    (2001)
  • FOREN — Foresight for Regional Development Network. A Practical Guide to Regional Foresight. [Report EUR 20128 EN]....
  • Cited by (21)

    • Competitive intelligence practices in hotels

      2016, International Journal of Hospitality Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the few articles that have been published are spread out among a number of journals. The studies have hitherto focused on definitions (Calof and Wright, 2008; Juhari and Stephens, 2006; Cartwright et al., 1995; Prescott, 1995); linkages with other topics, including ethics, knowledge management (Canongia, 2007), and performance (Adidam et al., 2012; Hughes, 2005); practices in developed economies, including the United States (Subramanian and IsHak, 1998), the United Kingdom (Wright et al., 2002), Greece (Priporas et al., 2005), France (Smith and Kossou, 2008), Germany (Michaeli, 2004), Australia (Bensoussan and Densham, 2004), Canada (Brouard, 2004), and New Zealand (Hawkins, 2004); and practices in developing countries, including Singapore (Wee and Leow, 1994), China (Bao et al., 1998; Tao and Prescott, 2000), South Africa (Viviers et al., 2005), Belgium (De Pelsmacker et al., 2005), Turkey (Koseoglu et al., 2011), Tunisia (Nasri, 2011), Russia (Flint, 2002), Portugal (Franco et al., 2011), Finland (Hirvensalo, 2004), India (Adidam et al., 2012), Lithuania (Stankeviciute et al., 2004), and Latin America (Price, 2000). However, even though CI practices have been found in several specific industries, such as the retail banking sector (Wright et al., 2009; Heppes and du Toit, 2009), the furniture retail sector (Gatsoris, 2012), healthcare (Miree et al., 2007), professional sports (Hughes and Beashley, 2007), higher education (Liu and Oppenheim, 2006) and the pharmaceutical industry (Aspinall, 2011; Badr et al., 2006), there is a dearth of CI research particularly in the hospitality field that has fierce competitive environments and tremendously influential issues, including political, business, social, and technological issues.

    • Current state of competitive intelligence in South Africa

      2014, International Journal of Information Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      The economic success of a country depends on its capacity to apply activities which create a competitive advantage, its ability to create an environment of transformation and progress, and its capacity to innovate (Canongia, 2006: 58).

    • Exploring the impact of technology foresight studies on innovation: Case of BRIC countries

      2012, Futures
      Citation Excerpt :

      The foresight programs have to cover both the technology status in the world and in host country. Brazilian scholars have used the term “gloCalization” to describe the strategy of “think globally, act locally” [34]. This idea perfectly matches the goal of technology foresight studies today.

    • Assessment of factors affecting innovation policy in biotechnology

      2020, Journal of Innovation and Knowledge
      Citation Excerpt :

      Scientific-related biological research is currently in the field of two scientific and industrial cycles and provides a compression mechanism through an efficient technology transfer stream (Bishop, D’Este, & Neely, 2011; Schmoch, 2007). Companies have changed their strategies based on the fundamental research network, which is associated with multi-disciplinary and decentralized dynamics, has increased the connection between the results of scientific outputs, led to the emergence of specialized biotechnology technology firms and requires inter-industrial cooperation as well as university - industry connections (Canongia, 2007; Salicrup & Fedorková, 2006). Given the role of innovation and commercialization of scientific achievements in biotechnology, biology and medical fields, however, there was not much interest in investing in the knowledge and innovation produced at universities in this industry (Siontorou & Sidiras, 2011).

    • Competitive Intelligence in Healthcare

      2024, Dimensions of Intelligent Analytics for Smart Digital Health Solutions
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This paper is part of the doctoral thesis of Claudia Canongia. The supervisors were Adelaide Antunes DSc, titular professor of the School of Chemistry (EQ/UFRJ) and Maria de Nazaré Freitas Pereira PhD, expert in the Information Society area.

    View full text