Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
10Pharmaco-economic issues for diabetes therapy
Section snippets
Increasing numbers of people with diabetes and ‘pre-diabetes’
The last decade has seen a meteoric rise in the incidence and prevalence of diabetes worldwide.4 In the USA, from 1995 through 2005 the numbers diagnosed with diabetes increased from 8 to 15.8 million5; including undiagnosed cases, this is estimated to exceed 20 million people or 7% of the population6, and this trend is set to continue. Type-2 diabetes accounts for over 90% of cases of diagnosed diabetes, and is associated with older age, obesity, physical inactivity and race/ethnicity.7 The
Increasing societal burden of diabetes and ‘pre-diabetes’
The socioeconomic consequences of diabetes and ‘pre-diabetes’ are huge.9, *12 People with type-2 diabetes can anticipate a life expectancy shortened by 10 years compared with the general population, due mainly to an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke.13, 14 Type-2 diabetes has been defined as a state at risk of premature CV death associated with hyperglycaemia and microvascular disease15, because more than 65% of deaths are from CV causes.16 The
Impact of treatment options on complications and cost
The aim of treating type-2 diabetes is to delay or prevent the complications, and it is well known that improving glycaemic control and associated CV risk factors substantially reduces the risk39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 and associated costs51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65 of long-term complications. Importantly, treatment of risk factors has been associated with a positive impact on HRQOL in newly diagnosed patients19, 66 as well as people with more
Pharmaco-economics and type-2 diabetes
The growing interest in the optimal allocation of health-care funding in prevention of type-2 diabetes and its complications is reflected in four reviews of economic evaluations in diabetes. The first three had different perspectives and inclusion criteria and spanned different periods.*27, *84, *85 The latest systematic review86 focused on studies concerning the more costly macrovascular complications and drew a number of conclusions in terms of efficient use of health-are expenditure (see
Increased choice: new treatment options in diabetes
Metformin and sulphonylurea as monotherapy or combination therapy have tended to be the mainstay of first- and second-line therapy in type-2 diabetes, although some clinicians are increasingly advocating use of at least two drugs to obviate the monotherapy failure that accompanies long-term metformin in most patients. Stringent glycaemic control is important to the management of type-2 diabetes; reducing HbA1c levels down to the normal range is considered the Holy Grail of diabetes treatment.*7
Cost-effectiveness of newer technologies for diabetes
This chapter concentrates on the newer (more expensive) classes of drugs with economic analyses in type-1 and type-2 diabetes, summarized in Table 2, Table 3, respectively. We have identified recent evidence relating to long-acting insulin analogues, inhaled insulins (Exubera®), incretins (exenatide, Byetta®) and rimonabant (Acomplia®). The appearance of these newer medicines is not yet supported with longer-term clinical trials, and the published economic literature to support these
Increasing scrutiny of the cost-effectiveness of diabetes treatments
There are increasing demands by decision-makers in different countries, particularly in the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) arena, to justify the cost-effectiveness of new and existing technologies in health care in real-world settings (Figure 1). In order to make funding or reimbursement decisions, payers or national agencies such as the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) require robust and relevant outcome data, including HRQOL and costs to address patient
Clinical guidelines in type-2 diabetes will increase medication use
Over the coming decade, cost containment pressures will increase (Figure 1), and emerging evidence will continue to influence the pharmaco-economics of diabetes. In relation to cost-effective prescribing, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) guideline recommended7: (1) lipid-lowering treatment provides a cost-effective way of preventing complications; and (2) tight control of hypertension is cost-effective. These findings resonate with
Significant increasing spend on medicines to treat diabetes predicted
US spending on diabetes treatments could soar by 70% from 2007 through 2009 due to rising obesity, an aging population, increasing prevalence of diabetes, more aggressive treatment of diabetes, and a pipeline of new (and more costly) treatment options.136 During 2006, diabetes treatments were the second largest contributor to prescription drug spends, trailing only cholesterol-reducing drugs. Increased usage was largely driven by expansion of the treatment population rather than intensive
Pharmaco-economic issues to address in future appraisals
Endorsement of any technology is not awarded simply because the ICER falls below the threshold for cost-effectiveness. Common problems identified in the pharmaco-economic literature for diabetes (and other disease areas) and HTA experiences are summarized in Table 4.
A paucity of robust evidence on relevant longer-term outcomes measures, together with a lack of HRQOL data collected in a reliable manner in appropriate patients and amenable to utility (and hence QALY) estimation, have resulted in
Generating and interpreting the right clinical evidence?
To be fit for purpose, relevant RCTs available in a timely fashion and reflecting clinical practice must include HRQOL tools such as the EQ-5D which translate into utility and QALY gain associated with the technology in question. The RCT is the gold standard source of quality clinical evidence137 and recommended to populate models.138 However, the relevance of the RCT as a source of clinical efficacy has been challenged139, largely because the question posed is not the goal of the economic
Geographical and ethnic generalizability of cost-effectiveness data
Decision-takers are aware of national variations in terms of medical resource utilization and clinical outcomes, and are increasingly enquiring of the implications of this.145, 146, 147 Trial-wide cost-effectiveness results may not be directly applicable to any of the countries collaborating in a multinational study. In addition, study variability may arise from differences in baseline event rates, costs and utility.148 The importance of accounting for between-country differences in tailoring
Summary
The last decade has witnessed a markedly increased prevalence of diabetes with increased associated costs. Many trials with different endpoints complicate comparisons between therapies. Pharmaco-economics is now at the leading edge in terms of securing the most efficient use of precious health-care resources in diabetes. Recent relevant trends report rapid growth of national drugs expenditure, an environment in which the cost control mechanisms are anticipated to intensify, and where scrutiny
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Beata Kloska BSc (Hons) MSc, MCLIP, Information Specialist, Library Services, Royal Society of Medicine, London, W1G 0AE, UK for her assistance with literature searches.
References (155)
- et al.
Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices – modeling Studies
Value in Health
(2003) - et al.
Age-specific impact of obesity on prevalence and costs of diabetes and dyslipidemia
Value in Health
(2007) - et al.
The global spread of type-2 diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents
The Journal of Pediatrics
(2005) - et al.
Economic burden and risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes in patients with different cardiometabolic risk profiles
Value in Health
(2007) - et al.
Do people with type-2 diabetes and their carers lose income? (T2ARDIS-4)
Health Policy
(2003) - et al.
Cardiovascular risk factor clusters and employment in the United States
Value in Health
(2007) - et al.
Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type-2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial
Lancet
(2004) - et al.
Effects of intensive blood pressure lowering and low dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principle results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group
Lancet
(1998) - et al.
Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type-2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled trial
Lancet
(2005) - et al.
Acarbose for prevention of type-2 diabetes mellitus: the STOP-NIDDM randomised trial
Lancet
(2002)
Intensive lifestyle changes or metformin in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: modeling the long-term health economic implications of the DPP in Australia, France, Switzerland and the United Kingdom
Clinical Therapeutics
Prevalence of inadequate glycaemic control among patients with type-2 diabetes in the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database: a series of retrospective analyses of data from 1998 through 2002
Clinical Therapy
Glycemic management of type-2 diabetes: an emerging strategy with oral agents, insulins, and combinations
Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America
Guidelines for computer modeling of diabetes and its complications. American Diabetes Association Consensus Panel
Diabetes Care
Global prevalence of diabetes estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030
Diabetes Care
National Diabetes Fact Sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2005
Diabetes Atlas
Obesity and type-2 diabetes in children, 1996-7 to 2003-4
BMJ
Excess mortality in a population with diabetes and the impact of material deprivation: longitudinal, population based study
BMJ
The independent effect of type-2 diabetes mellitus on ischaemic heart disease, stroke and death: a population-based study of 13,000 men and women with 20 years of follow-up
Archives of Internal Medicine
Diabetes: a state of premature cardiovascular death
Practical Diabetes International
Coping with type-II diabetes: the patient's perspective
Diabetologia
Modelling EuroQol health-related utility values for diabetic complications from CODE-2 data
Health Economics
Estimating utility values for health states of type-2 diabetic patients using the EQ-5D UKPDS 62
Medical Decision Making
Valuing health-related quality of life in diabetes
Diabetes Care
Revealing the cost of Type-II diabetes in Europe
Diabetologia
CODE-2*UK: Our contribution to a European Study of the costs of Type-2 diabetes
Practical Diabetes International
Patterns and costs of hospital care for coronary heart disease related and not related to diabetes
Heart
An economic model of the long-term health care burden of Type-II diabetes
Diabetologia
The projected health care burden of Type-2 diabetes in the UK from 2000 to 2060
Diabetic Medicine
Lifetime costs of complications resulting from type-2 diabetes in the US
Diabetes Care
The economics of screening and treatment in type-2 diabetes mellitus
Pharmaco-economics
Diabetes in America
Assessing the impact of complications on the costs of type-II diabetes
Diabetologia
Managing care of type-2 diabetes. Learnings from T2ARDIS
British Journal of Diabetes and Vascular Disease
Impact of type-1 and type-2 diabetes on patterns and costs of drug prescribing: a population-based study
Diabetes Care
Diabetes. A new world order?
British Journal of Diabetes and Vascular Disease
Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. American Diabetes Association
Diabetes Care
The cost of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) in England and Wales
Diabet Medicine
Diabetes: the cost of illness in Sweden
Journal of Internal Medicine
Too important to ignore. Informal caregivers and other significant others
Pharmacoeconomics
Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type-2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)
Lancet
Effect of intensive blood glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type-2 diabetes: UKPDS 34
Lancet
Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type-2 diabetes
The New England Journal of Medicine
Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type-2 diabetes. (UKPDS 38)
BMJ
Effects of long-term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people with type-2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial
Lancet
Cited by (27)
Effects of low-carbohydrate diet and ketogenic diet on glucose and lipid metabolism in type 2 diabetic mice
2021, NutritionCitation Excerpt :In all, 90% of diabetes is type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which is characterized by hyperglycemia and insulin resistance (IR). T2DM brings many complications in the long term, so it's no exaggeration to say that diabetes shortens people's life span by ≥10 years [3]. With the significant health and economic burdens, it is clear that prevention and intervention of T2DM are urgently needed.
The Direct Economic Cost of Pharmacologically-Treated Diabetes in Italy-2006. The ARNO Observatory
2011, Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular DiseasesConducting cost-effectiveness analyses of type 2 diabetes in low- and middle-income countries: Can locally generated observational study data overcome methodological limitations?
2010, Diabetes Research and Clinical PracticeHypoglycemic and antihyperglycemic effect of Begonia malabarica Lam. in normal and streptozotocin induced diabetic rats
2009, Journal of EthnopharmacologyCitation Excerpt :The number of adults with diabetes in the world will rise to 300 million by the year 2025 and the major part of this numerical increase will occur in developing countries (King et al., 1998). Trends in the last 10 years are influencing the supply and demand for healthcare in diabetes (Bottomely and Raymond, 2007). The UK perspective diabetic study (UKPDS) had indicated that the intensive glycemic control reduced the disease complications and mortality (Adler et al., 2000; Stratton et al., 2000).