10
Pharmaco-economic issues for diabetes therapy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2007.08.002Get rights and content

A systematic review was undertaken to analyse pharmaco-economic issues in diabetes, with evidence selected on the basis of relevance and immediacy. Pharmaco-economics in diabetes primarily relates to making choices about antidiabetic pharmaceuticals, and this is being influenced by global trends. Trends include increasing numbers of patients with diabetes, with increasing costs of caring for people with diabetes, and an ever-present focus on the costs of pharmaceuticals which are predicted to increase as the pace of development of new medications parallels the increasing incidence of the condition. These developments have influenced the demand for health care in diabetes in the last decade, and will continue to determine this in the coming decade. Recent national experiences are cited to illustrate current issues and to focus specifically upon the challenges facing a raft of new diabetes treatment options now hitting the marketplace, although supported by fewer completed long-term trials. It can be anticipated that these newer agents will be appraised for their cost-effectiveness or value for money. Economic analyses for some of the new technologies are summarized; in general, the peer-reviewed publications using well-accepted and validated models have reported that these technologies are cost-effective. Endorsement of any technology in a national setting is not awarded simply because the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) falls below the threshold regarded as value for money. In most national observations the reviewers expressed concerns about assumptions used in economic modelling which resulted in the ICERs being deemed optimistic at best, generally highly uncertain, and resulting in the cost-effectiveness appearing better than it really would be in clinical practice. This has often led to the authorities concluding that the price advantage of new technologies over comparators could not be justified, essentially leading to restrictions in use compared to their licence. In general, a paucity of robust evidence on longer-term outcome data together with a lack of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data collected in a reliable manner in appropriate patients and amenable to utility (and hence quality adjusted life year or QALY) estimation have resulted in problems for these new drugs at the so-called fourth (cost-effectiveness) hurdle. In the light of these findings, the implications for generating credible fit-for-purpose cost-effectiveness analyses of new technologies in diabetes are discussed. Throughout this chapter, the interested reader is referred to a number of excellent review articles for further details.

Section snippets

Increasing numbers of people with diabetes and ‘pre-diabetes’

The last decade has seen a meteoric rise in the incidence and prevalence of diabetes worldwide.4 In the USA, from 1995 through 2005 the numbers diagnosed with diabetes increased from 8 to 15.8 million5; including undiagnosed cases, this is estimated to exceed 20 million people or 7% of the population6, and this trend is set to continue. Type-2 diabetes accounts for over 90% of cases of diagnosed diabetes, and is associated with older age, obesity, physical inactivity and race/ethnicity.7 The

Increasing societal burden of diabetes and ‘pre-diabetes’

The socioeconomic consequences of diabetes and ‘pre-diabetes’ are huge.9, *12 People with type-2 diabetes can anticipate a life expectancy shortened by 10 years compared with the general population, due mainly to an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke.13, 14 Type-2 diabetes has been defined as a state at risk of premature CV death associated with hyperglycaemia and microvascular disease15, because more than 65% of deaths are from CV causes.16 The

Impact of treatment options on complications and cost

The aim of treating type-2 diabetes is to delay or prevent the complications, and it is well known that improving glycaemic control and associated CV risk factors substantially reduces the risk39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 and associated costs51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65 of long-term complications. Importantly, treatment of risk factors has been associated with a positive impact on HRQOL in newly diagnosed patients19, 66 as well as people with more

Pharmaco-economics and type-2 diabetes

The growing interest in the optimal allocation of health-care funding in prevention of type-2 diabetes and its complications is reflected in four reviews of economic evaluations in diabetes. The first three had different perspectives and inclusion criteria and spanned different periods.*27, *84, *85 The latest systematic review86 focused on studies concerning the more costly macrovascular complications and drew a number of conclusions in terms of efficient use of health-are expenditure (see

Increased choice: new treatment options in diabetes

Metformin and sulphonylurea as monotherapy or combination therapy have tended to be the mainstay of first- and second-line therapy in type-2 diabetes, although some clinicians are increasingly advocating use of at least two drugs to obviate the monotherapy failure that accompanies long-term metformin in most patients. Stringent glycaemic control is important to the management of type-2 diabetes; reducing HbA1c levels down to the normal range is considered the Holy Grail of diabetes treatment.*7

Cost-effectiveness of newer technologies for diabetes

This chapter concentrates on the newer (more expensive) classes of drugs with economic analyses in type-1 and type-2 diabetes, summarized in Table 2, Table 3, respectively. We have identified recent evidence relating to long-acting insulin analogues, inhaled insulins (Exubera®), incretins (exenatide, Byetta®) and rimonabant (Acomplia®). The appearance of these newer medicines is not yet supported with longer-term clinical trials, and the published economic literature to support these

Increasing scrutiny of the cost-effectiveness of diabetes treatments

There are increasing demands by decision-makers in different countries, particularly in the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) arena, to justify the cost-effectiveness of new and existing technologies in health care in real-world settings (Figure 1). In order to make funding or reimbursement decisions, payers or national agencies such as the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) require robust and relevant outcome data, including HRQOL and costs to address patient

Clinical guidelines in type-2 diabetes will increase medication use

Over the coming decade, cost containment pressures will increase (Figure 1), and emerging evidence will continue to influence the pharmaco-economics of diabetes. In relation to cost-effective prescribing, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) guideline recommended7: (1) lipid-lowering treatment provides a cost-effective way of preventing complications; and (2) tight control of hypertension is cost-effective. These findings resonate with

Significant increasing spend on medicines to treat diabetes predicted

US spending on diabetes treatments could soar by 70% from 2007 through 2009 due to rising obesity, an aging population, increasing prevalence of diabetes, more aggressive treatment of diabetes, and a pipeline of new (and more costly) treatment options.136 During 2006, diabetes treatments were the second largest contributor to prescription drug spends, trailing only cholesterol-reducing drugs. Increased usage was largely driven by expansion of the treatment population rather than intensive

Pharmaco-economic issues to address in future appraisals

Endorsement of any technology is not awarded simply because the ICER falls below the threshold for cost-effectiveness. Common problems identified in the pharmaco-economic literature for diabetes (and other disease areas) and HTA experiences are summarized in Table 4.

A paucity of robust evidence on relevant longer-term outcomes measures, together with a lack of HRQOL data collected in a reliable manner in appropriate patients and amenable to utility (and hence QALY) estimation, have resulted in

Generating and interpreting the right clinical evidence?

To be fit for purpose, relevant RCTs available in a timely fashion and reflecting clinical practice must include HRQOL tools such as the EQ-5D which translate into utility and QALY gain associated with the technology in question. The RCT is the gold standard source of quality clinical evidence137 and recommended to populate models.138 However, the relevance of the RCT as a source of clinical efficacy has been challenged139, largely because the question posed is not the goal of the economic

Geographical and ethnic generalizability of cost-effectiveness data

Decision-takers are aware of national variations in terms of medical resource utilization and clinical outcomes, and are increasingly enquiring of the implications of this.145, 146, 147 Trial-wide cost-effectiveness results may not be directly applicable to any of the countries collaborating in a multinational study. In addition, study variability may arise from differences in baseline event rates, costs and utility.148 The importance of accounting for between-country differences in tailoring

Summary

The last decade has witnessed a markedly increased prevalence of diabetes with increased associated costs. Many trials with different endpoints complicate comparisons between therapies. Pharmaco-economics is now at the leading edge in terms of securing the most efficient use of precious health-care resources in diabetes. Recent relevant trends report rapid growth of national drugs expenditure, an environment in which the cost control mechanisms are anticipated to intensify, and where scrutiny

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Beata Kloska BSc (Hons) MSc, MCLIP, Information Specialist, Library Services, Royal Society of Medicine, London, W1G 0AE, UK for her assistance with literature searches.

References (155)

  • A.J. Palmer et al.

    Intensive lifestyle changes or metformin in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: modeling the long-term health economic implications of the DPP in Australia, France, Switzerland and the United Kingdom

    Clinical Therapeutics

    (2004)
  • K.M. Fox et al.

    Prevalence of inadequate glycaemic control among patients with type-2 diabetes in the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database: a series of retrospective analyses of data from 1998 through 2002

    Clinical Therapy

    (2006)
  • M.C. Riddle

    Glycemic management of type-2 diabetes: an emerging strategy with oral agents, insulins, and combinations

    Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America

    (2005)
  • Guidelines for computer modeling of diabetes and its complications. American Diabetes Association Consensus Panel

    Diabetes Care

    (2004)
  • S. Wild et al.

    Global prevalence of diabetes estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030

    Diabetes Care

    (2004)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Surveillance System. Prevalence of Diabetes. Accessed 9...
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    National Diabetes Fact Sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2005

    (2005)
  • The task force on diabetes and cardiovascular diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European...
  • Diabetes Atlas

    (2006)
  • Dr Foster's case notes

    Obesity and type-2 diabetes in children, 1996-7 to 2003-4

    BMJ

    (2005)
  • N.A. Roper et al.

    Excess mortality in a population with diabetes and the impact of material deprivation: longitudinal, population based study

    BMJ

    (2001)
  • T. Almdal et al.

    The independent effect of type-2 diabetes mellitus on ischaemic heart disease, stroke and death: a population-based study of 13,000 men and women with 20 years of follow-up

    Archives of Internal Medicine

    (2004)
  • M. Fisher et al.

    Diabetes: a state of premature cardiovascular death

    Practical Diabetes International

    (2001)
  • American Diabetes Association. Complications of diabetes in the United States. Accessed 12 June 2007, at...
  • M. Koopmanschap

    Coping with type-II diabetes: the patient's perspective

    Diabetologia

    (2002)
  • A. Bagust et al.

    Modelling EuroQol health-related utility values for diabetic complications from CODE-2 data

    Health Economics

    (2005)
  • P. Clarke et al.

    Estimating utility values for health states of type-2 diabetic patients using the EQ-5D UKPDS 62

    Medical Decision Making

    (2002)
  • J.T. Coffey et al.

    Valuing health-related quality of life in diabetes

    Diabetes Care

    (2002)
  • B. Jönsson

    Revealing the cost of Type-II diabetes in Europe

    Diabetologia

    (2002)
  • R. Williams et al.

    CODE-2*UK: Our contribution to a European Study of the costs of Type-2 diabetes

    Practical Diabetes International

    (2001)
  • C. Currie et al.

    Patterns and costs of hospital care for coronary heart disease related and not related to diabetes

    Heart

    (1997)
  • A. Bagust et al.

    An economic model of the long-term health care burden of Type-II diabetes

    Diabetologia

    (2001)
  • A. Bagust et al.

    The projected health care burden of Type-2 diabetes in the UK from 2000 to 2060

    Diabetic Medicine

    (2002)
  • J.J. Caro et al.

    Lifetime costs of complications resulting from type-2 diabetes in the US

    Diabetes Care

    (2002)
  • M. Raikou et al.

    The economics of screening and treatment in type-2 diabetes mellitus

    Pharmaco-economics

    (2003)
  • National Diabetes Data Group

    Diabetes in America

    (1995)
  • R. Williams et al.

    Assessing the impact of complications on the costs of type-II diabetes

    Diabetologia

    (2002)
  • Bottomley JM on behalf of the TARDIS Steering Committee and UK Centres

    Managing care of type-2 diabetes. Learnings from T2ARDIS

    British Journal of Diabetes and Vascular Disease

    (2001)
  • J.M. Evans et al.

    Impact of type-1 and type-2 diabetes on patterns and costs of drug prescribing: a population-based study

    Diabetes Care

    (2000)
  • C. Day

    Diabetes. A new world order?

    British Journal of Diabetes and Vascular Disease

    (2007)
  • Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. American Diabetes Association

    Diabetes Care

    (2003)
  • A. Gray et al.

    The cost of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) in England and Wales

    Diabet Medicine

    (1995)
  • F. Henriksson et al.

    Diabetes: the cost of illness in Sweden

    Journal of Internal Medicine

    (1998)
  • W.B.F. Brouwer

    Too important to ignore. Informal caregivers and other significant others

    Pharmacoeconomics

    (2006)
  • The UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group

    Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type-2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)

    Lancet

    (1998)
  • The UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group

    Effect of intensive blood glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type-2 diabetes: UKPDS 34

    Lancet

    (1998)
  • P. Gaede et al.

    Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type-2 diabetes

    The New England Journal of Medicine

    (2003)
  • UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group

    Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type-2 diabetes. (UKPDS 38)

    BMJ

    (1998)
  • The FIELD study investigators

    Effects of long-term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people with type-2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial

    Lancet

    (2005)
  • Cited by (27)

    • Effects of low-carbohydrate diet and ketogenic diet on glucose and lipid metabolism in type 2 diabetic mice

      2021, Nutrition
      Citation Excerpt :

      In all, 90% of diabetes is type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which is characterized by hyperglycemia and insulin resistance (IR). T2DM brings many complications in the long term, so it's no exaggeration to say that diabetes shortens people's life span by ≥10 years [3]. With the significant health and economic burdens, it is clear that prevention and intervention of T2DM are urgently needed.

    • Hypoglycemic and antihyperglycemic effect of Begonia malabarica Lam. in normal and streptozotocin induced diabetic rats

      2009, Journal of Ethnopharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The number of adults with diabetes in the world will rise to 300 million by the year 2025 and the major part of this numerical increase will occur in developing countries (King et al., 1998). Trends in the last 10 years are influencing the supply and demand for healthcare in diabetes (Bottomely and Raymond, 2007). The UK perspective diabetic study (UKPDS) had indicated that the intensive glycemic control reduced the disease complications and mortality (Adler et al., 2000; Stratton et al., 2000).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text