Research paper
Factors influencing quality of sleep among non-mechanically ventilated patients in the Intensive Care Unit

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2016.02.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Aim

To investigate the self-reported quality of sleep of non-mechanically ventilated patients admitted to an ICU, and to identify barriers to sleep in this setting.

Method

Patients admitted to the ICU of Frankston Hospital over a two month period who had spent at least one night in the ICU, and had not received mechanical ventilation were surveyed as they were discharged from the ICU. This survey required patients to rate the quality of their sleep in the ICU and at home immediately prior to hospitalisation on a 10 cm visual analogue scale; and to identify perceived barriers to sleep in the ICU and at home prior to hospitalisation.

Results

56 respondents were surveyed during the study period. Median age was 74 years (range = 18–92 years); median ICU length of stay was 1 day (range = 1–7 days).

Overall, respondents rated their quality of sleep in ICU (median = 4.9/10) as significantly worse than at home immediately prior to ICU admission (median = 7.15/10; Z = −3.02, p < 0.002); however 44% of respondents rated their quality of sleep in ICU as better, or no worse, than at home immediately prior to hospitalisation. Sub-group analysis revealed that among patients with reduced quality of sleep (<5/10) prior to hospitalisation, 71.4% rated their quality of sleep in ICU as better, or no worse, than at home prior to hospitalisation, with no significant difference between sleep quality ratings in ICU and at home (p = 0.341).

Respondents identified the following as barriers to sleep in the ICU: noise levels overnight (53.6%); discomfort (33.9%); pain (32.1%); being awoken for procedures (32%); being attached to medical devices (28.6%); stress/anxiety (26.8%); and light levels (23.2%).

Conclusion

Pre-hospitalisation sleep quality appears to be an important influence on sleep in ICU. Many barriers to sleep in the ICU identified by respondents are potentially modifiable.

Introduction

Sleep has long been recognised as essential for good health, allowing for both physical and psychological restoration and recovery from illness. Poor quality sleep has been associated with impaired immune function and associated susceptibility to illness and infection, decreased energy levels, delirium, delays in recovery, and disturbed cognitive, respiratory, cardiac, and endocrine function.1, 2 Good-quality sleep is therefore an important part of recovery from critical illness.

Numerous studies have reported that patients admitted to ICU regularly experience reduced quality and duration of sleep with frequent awakenings and loss of circadian rhythm.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 The environment of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) itself poses numerous barriers to sleep.2, 3, 6, 7 Critically ill patients admitted to the ICU are subject to disrupted day/night routine, high levels of noise (e.g. staff conversations and alarms) and light levels overnight, invasive and painful procedures, noxious smells, numerous physical restraints (such as monitor leads, catheters, and oxygen masks or mechanical ventilation), and stress, in addition to illness and pain associated with their health condition.1, 7, 8, 9

Research utilising self-report measures has consistently found that patients experience poor quality of sleep (QoS) and increased daytime sleepiness whilst in the ICU.1, 3, 7, 10 These findings have been largely attributed to the nature of the ICU environment and the numerous barriers posed to sleep by routine care in this setting.

Few studies have attempted to examine and account for the quality and patterns of patients’ sleep prior to ICU admission. Chronic illness and pain may predispose individuals to poor sleep prior to ICU admission, and inadequate or fragmented sleep may exacerbate the acute deterioration of an individual's health state, necessitating hospitalisation.3, 11 Bihari and colleagues3 found that QoS at home prior to ICU admission was a significant predictor of QoS in the ICU; however QoS at home only accounted for 6% of variability in reported sleep quality throughout ICU stay. This relationship is further called into question by Ehlers and colleagues,7 who found that 82% of ICU patients reported that they slept well or ‘very well’ at home, despite 71% reporting inadequate sleep in the ICU. It is therefore important to investigate whether individuals admitted to the ICU have poor baseline sleep quality preceding ICU admission, in order to better-account for the influence of the ICU environment on the quality of patients’ sleep.

This study aims to examine the self-reported QoS of non-mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the ICU of Frankston Hospital (Victoria, Australia), particularly in relation to their pre-hospitalisation QoS. This study also aims to examine the factors identified by patients as barriers to gaining sufficient sleep whilst in the ICU.

Section snippets

Ethics

Ethical approval for this project was granted by the Low Risk Research Sub-committee of the Peninsula Health Human Research Ethics Committee (ref.: LRR/14/PH/13).

Study design and setting

Frankston Hospital ICU is a 15-bed Level-3 Metropolitan medical and surgical ICU located in Victoria, Australia. Approximately 1100 patients are treated in this ICU each year, of which approximately 60% do not require mechanical ventilation.

Participant population and data collection

All adult (≥18 years) patients admitted to the ICU of Frankston Hospital (Victoria, Australia)

Patient demographics

Fifty-six respondents completed the survey during the two-month study period. Median age was 74 years [range = 18–92 years], and 43.4% were males. Median ICU length of stay was 1 day [range = 1–7 days].

A substantial proportion of respondents reported comorbidities that may have influenced their sleep prior to hospitalisation, with 29% experiencing depression and anxiety (each), 27% experiencing chronic pain, and 14.5% experiencing insomnia. The proportion of patients receiving drugs that may affect

Discussion

This study found that patients who were admitted to our ICU but not mechanically ventilated experienced a significantly worse QoS in ICU, compared to their QoS at home immediately prior to ICU admission. However over 40% of respondents rated their QoS in ICU as better, or no worse, than at home immediately prior to hospitalisation. Factors that influenced the QoS in ICU included noise levels overnight, discomfort, pain, being awoken for procedures or attached to medical devices, stress/anxiety

Conclusion

The results of this study indicate that QoS among non-mechanically ventilated patients admitted to ICU is generally poor. The finding that those with poorer baseline sleep immediately prior to hospitalisation do not report further-reduced QoS in ICU does not suggest that sleep promoting measures in ICU are unnecessary for these patients. Despite being no worse, or even better, than their sleep immediately prior to hospitalisation, it is reasonable to suggest that their quality and duration of

Ethical approval

This project was reviewed and approved by the Low-Risk research subcommittee of the Human Research Ethics Committee of Peninsula Health (ref. LRR/14/PH/13).

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Author contributions

CG and John S. were responsible for conceptualising, designing, and performing the research; CG analysed the data; John S., CG, RT, and Joanne S. wrote the paper; RT assisted with drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors have read and approved of the final manuscript.

References (25)

  • R. Friese et al.

    Quantity and quality of sleep in the surgical Intensive Care Unit: are our patients sleeping?

    J Trauma

    (2007)
  • V. Ehlers et al.

    Factors contributing to sleep deprivation in a multi-disciplinary intensive care unit in South Africa

    Curationis

    (2013)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Sleep assessment in critically ill adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2022, Journal of Critical Care
      Citation Excerpt :

      After title and abstract screening, 280 articles were included for full-text assessment. Finally, 132 studies (8797 patients) were included (Fig. 1) [12,23-153]. Results on sleep assessment method and their characteristics are elaborated in detail and tabulated in supplemental material S3-S13.

    • Holistic Approaches to Support Sleep in the Intensive Care Unit Patient

      2021, Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Indeed, So and Chan13 found the inability to sleep in critical care units as a primary concern of both patients and nurses and suggested the need to revisit current practices in the promotion of sleep. Stewart and colleagues3 found sleep quality in the ICU to be poor and noted that because there is an association between recovery and sleep, finding ways to improve sleep quality is essential to good patient care. Holistic approaches as independent nursing actions are of particular interest to ICU nurses who seek to “put the patient in the best condition for nature to act upon him.”14(

    • Intensive Care Unit Environment and Sleep

      2021, Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      The total duration of sleep during 24 hours period can be normal, but it is highly interrupted, with nearly 50% of a total sleep time occurring during the daytime. There is considerable information in the literature presenting the evidence that patients admitted to the ICU repeatedly experience poor sleep quality and circadian rhythm disruption.4 The latter can be described as sleeping during the night and being awake during the light time.

    • Sleep in the Intensive Care Unit: Biological, Environmental, and Pharmacologic Implications for Nurses

      2020, Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, medication reconciliation, appropriate use of sedation, sedation and pain scoring systems, and sleep tracking can all improve ICU patient sleep.30 Health care systems have yet to fully appreciate the negative impact of sleep disruptions on ICU patients and its importance in recovery.3 Poor sleep quality in the ICU directly and negatively impacts several body systems.31

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text