Multimodal Pain Management and Arthrofibrosis
Section snippets
Materials and Methods
The implant registry at the Orthopedic Institute at Mercy Hospital (Miami, Fla) was used to select all patients with a minimum follow-up of all cases being 2 years (range, 2-9 years). The patients were divided into 2 groups. Group A consisted of 778 procedures performed using a traditional approach to pain control that consisted of contemporary techniques used at the time, including patient-controlled analgesia pumps and opioid medications on demand. Patients received cruciate-retaining devices
Statistics
We used descriptive statistics to examine our results and describe incidence of manipulation and time to manipulation. An independent t test was used to assess for differences between groups with respect to incidence of manipulation. We also used independent t tests to compare active and passive knee flexion and extension range of motion between those who had manipulation after having the traditional pain protocol and those who had manipulation while previously having the multimodal pain
Results
Group A had an incidence of manipulation of 4.75%: 37 of 778 cases required manipulation within the first 6 weeks postoperatively (Fig. 1). Thirty (78.9%) were female, and 7 (21.1%) were male. The average age of this group was 63.2 years (range, 31-93 years), and their mean BMI (weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) was 31.2 kg/m2 (range, 23.2-40.2 kg/m2). Twenty-six were Hispanics (70.2%), 9 (24.3%) were white, and 2 (5.4%) were African American. The average time
Discussion
Arthrofibrosis after TKA continues to be a significant complication for orthopedic surgeons [4]. In some series of revision TKA, arthrofibrosis has been present in almost 17% of cases [4]. The reported incidence of manipulation after TKA shows inconsistent rates 10, 11, 12. The threshold for manipulation, on the other hand, is relatively consistent with most authors manipulating the knees that do not bend past 90° at 4 to 6 weeks. Our study showed 37 manipulations in the group of 778 patients
References (16)
- et al.
Maximizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: the need and the pitfalls
J Arthroplast
(2002) - et al.
Predictive risk factors for stiff knees in total knee arthroplasty
J Arthroplast
(2006) The stiff total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and management
J Arthroplasty
(2002)- et al.
Pain perception and its relation to functional status post total knee arthroplasty: a pilot study
Orthop Nurs
(2006) - et al.
Multimodal analgesia without routine parenteral narcotics for total hip arthroplasty
Clin Orthop Relat Res
(2006) - et al.
Analgesia for total hip and knee arthroplasty: a multimodal pathway featuring peripheral nerve block
J Am Acad Orthop Surg
(2006) - et al.
Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?
Clin Orthop Relat Res
(2002) The stiff total knee arthroplasty: causes and cures
Orthopedics
(2001)
Cited by (0)
Financial support has been received by the corresponding author. Institutional support: Mercy Hospital, Miami, Fla; Zimmer, Inc, Warsaw, Ind; and the Arthritis Surgery Research Foundation, Inc, Miami, Fla. Royalties: Zimmer, Inc, Warsaw, Ind.