Infection Burden for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.017

The Journal of Arthroplasty

Volume 23, Issue 7, October 2008, Pages 984-991

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.017 Get rights and content

Abstract

We quantified the current and historical incidence of periprosthetic infection associated with hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, as well as corresponding hospitalization charges and length of stay. The rate of infected knee arthroplasties was 0.92%, significantly greater than that of infected hip arthroplasties with 0.88%. Length of stay was significantly longer for infected hip (9.7 days) and knee (7.6 days) arthroplasties compared to uninfected procedures (hip, 4.3 days; knee, 3.9 days) (P < .0001). Hospitalization charges were also significantly greater for infected joint arthroplasties than for uninfected arthroplasties (hips, 1.76 times; knees, 1.52 times) (P < .0001). Urban-non–teaching hospitals experienced the highest burden of infection with 1.18% for hips and 1.26% for knees compared to rural (0.61% for hips and 0.69% for knees) and urban-teaching hospitals (0.73% for hips and 0.77% for knees). We found an increasing number of joint arthroplasties being diagnosed with periprosthetic infection.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database [6], which is collected as part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. The NIS is an annual federal-state cooperative program designed to compile a representative sample of hospital stays in the United States. The NIS is the largest publicly available database of hospitalization records in the United States and is not limited to any particular insurance payer source. In 2004, the NIS had a sample size of about 8 million records

Results

Based on the NIS data, the number of knee procedures diagnosed with periprosthetic infection has consistently been greater than the number of infected hip arthroplasties since 1991 (Table 5, Table 6, Fig. 1). For example, in 2004, which was the most recent data currently available, an estimated 3352 hip arthroplasties were treated for infection (Table 5) compared to the estimated 5838 knee arthroplasties (Table 6). As a proportion of the total number of primary and revision arthroplasties

Discussion

The results of this study demonstrate that, relative to the total number of arthroplasties performed in the United States each year, an increasing number of hip and knee arthroplasties are being diagnosed with deep infection. The reasons underlying these apparent changes in nationwide reporting of infected total joint arthroplasty are difficult to infer from the NIS data alone. On one hand, the decreases in periprosthetic infection in primary procedures could be associated with successful

References (15)

M.E. Charlson et al.
A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation
J Chronic Dis
(1987)
E. Losina et al.
Accuracy of Medicare claims data for rheumatologic diagnoses in total hip replacement recipients
J Clin Epidemiol
(2003)
C.J. Wang et al.
Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction in aseptic and septic revision total knee arthroplasty
Knee
(2004)
T.P. Sculco
The economic impact of infected joint arthroplasty
Orthopedics
(1995)
J.N. Katz et al.
Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(2001)
N.N. Mahomed et al.
Epidemiology of total knee replacement in the United States Medicare population
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(2005)
K.J. Bozic et al.
The impact of infection after total hip arthroplasty on hospital and surgeon resource utilization
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(2005)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (819)

Recurrent Periprosthetic Joint Infections: Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes
2024, Orthopedic Clinics of North America
Impact of Positive Cultures During the Second Stage of a Two-Stage Exchange: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
2024, Journal of Arthroplasty
Two-stage exchange is a frequently performed procedure in patients who have a periprosthetic joint infection. Positive cultures when performing the second stage are perceived as a risk factor for reinfection. This study aimed to determine the impact of positive cultures during the second stage on the outcome of patients undergoing a 2-stage septic exchange and the impact of stopping the antibiotic treatment before reimplantation.
We systematically searched four databases. We performed a meta-analysis on the risk of complications after positive cultures during second stage and a subgroup analysis by antibiotic holiday period. We included 24 studies.
Failure in the positive group was 37.0% and in the negative group was 13.7% with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.05. In the subgroup analysis by antibiotic holidays, failure rate without holidays was 15% and with holidays was 17.3% (P = .21). Failure in each group was higher when cultures were positive (without holidays, 25 versus 12.2%, P = .0003, and with holidays 41.1 versus 12.7%, P < .0001), but the risk of failure when cultures were positive was higher in the holiday group (OR 4.798) than in the nonholiday group (OR 2.225) in comparison to those patients who were culture negative at the second stage.
Microbiological eradication at second stage was not obtained in 18% of cases and it was associated with a higher failure rate. In patients with positive cultures, withholding antibiotic treatment was associated with lower failure rate. Further studies to define the antibiotic strategy in 2-stage exchange procedure are necessary.
Floating Knee Arthrodesis After Prosthetic Knee Infection: A Report of 48 Cases
2024, Journal of Arthroplasty
Knee arthrodesis is a means of avoiding above-knee amputation after a prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The objective of this study was to analyze the results of floating knee arthrodesis in patients who had a history of aprosthetic knee infection. The analysis consisted of determining reinfection rates, functional results, and the survival of arthrodesis.
There were 48 patients who underwent a cemented floating knee arthrodesis in cases of PJI retrospectively included in the study, having been operated on between 2012 and 2020. In addition to being evaluated clinically, analytically, and radiographically, the patients were assessed functionally by means of a newly-created scale.
At a mean follow-up of 4 years (1 year to 9 years), 7 patients suffered reinfection (14.6%). The recurrence of infection was not observed to be significantly affected by sex (P = .16), age(P = .09), or the type of surgery previously undergone (P = .18), nor was the McPherson Host Grade (P = .4) observed to have a significant effect. Patients who had a McPherson Limb Grade 3 were more likely to suffer reinfection than those with a McPherson Limb Grade 2 (P = .034). There were 26 patients (54%)fully evaluated and scored on the Knee Arthrodesis Functional Scale(BAOR). For 11 patients (42%), the results were evaluated as excellent, for 11 (42%) acceptable, for 3 (12%) low, and for 1(4%) poor.
The arthrodesis nail is an effective and safe procedure for patients who have a recurrent PJI, providing an effective alternative when the criteria for a new revision total knee arthroplasty are not met.
Statistical Outcomes Guiding Periprosthetic Joint Infection Prevention and Revision Are Fragile: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
2024, Journal of Arthroplasty
Dichotomous outcomes are frequently reported in orthopaedic research and have substantial clinical implications. This study utilizes the fragility index (FI) and fragility quotient (FQ) metrics to determine the statistical stability of outcomes reported in total joint arthroplasty randomized controlled trials (RCTs) relating to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).
The RCTs that reported dichotomous data related to PJI published between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2022, were evaluated. The FI and reverse FI (RFI) were defined as the number of outcome event reversals required to reverse the significance of significant and nonsignificant outcomes, respectively. The FQ was determined by dividing the FI or RFI by the respective sample size. There were 108 RCTs screened, and 17 studies included for analysis.
A total of 58 outcome events were identified, with a median FI of 4 (interquartile range [IQR] 2 to 5) and associated FQ of 0.0417 (IQR 0.0145 to 0.0602). The 13 statistically significant outcomes had a median FI of 1 (IQR 1 to 2) and FQ of 0.00935 (IQR 0.00629 to 0.01410). The 45 nonsignificant outcomes had a median RFI of 4 (IQR 3 to 5) and FQ of 0.05 (IQR 0.0361 to 0.0723). The number of patients lost to follow-up was greater than or equal to the FI in 46.6% of outcomes.
Statistical outcomes in RCTs analyzing PJI are fragile and may lack statistical integrity. We recommend a comprehensive fragility analysis, with the reporting of FI and FQ metrics, to aid in the interpretation of outcomes in the total joint arthroplasty literature.
Extended Prophylactic Antibiotics for Primary and Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis
2024, Journal of Arthroplasty
There is growing interest in extended antibiotic prophylaxis (EAP) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA); however, the benefit of EAP remains controversial. For this investigation, both oral and intravenous antibiotic protocols were included in the EAP group.
The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Ovid Embase, Elton B. Stephens CO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were queried for literature comparing outcomes of primary and aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients who were treated with either ≤24 hours of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (standard of care [SoC]) or >24 hours of EAP. The primary outcome was periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). A pooled relative-risk random-effects Mantel-Haenszel model was implemented to compare cohorts.
There were 18 studies with a total of 19,153 patients included. There was considerable variation in antibiotic prophylaxis protocols with first-generation cephalosporins being the most commonly implemented antibiotic for both groups. Patients treated with EAP were 35% less likely to develop PJI relative to the SoC (P = .0004). When examining primary TJA, patients treated with EAP were 39% and 40% less likely to develop a PJI for TJA (P = .0008) and THA (P = .02), respectively. There was no significant difference for primary TKA (P = .17). When examining aseptic revision TJA, EAP led to a 36% and 47% reduction in the probability of a PJI for aseptic revision TJA (P = .007) and aseptic revision TKA (P = .008), respectively; there was no observed benefit for aseptic revision THA (P = .36).
This meta-analysis demonstrated that patients treated with EAP were less likely to develop a PJI relative to those treated with the SoC for all TJA, primary TJA, primary THA, aseptic revision TJA, and aseptic revision TKA. There was no significant difference observed between EAP and SoC for primary TKA or aseptic revision THA.
Intraarticular vancomycin decreased the risk of acute postoperative periprosthetic joint infection without increasing complication in primary total joint arthroplasty—a prospective study
2023, International Journal of Infectious Diseases
To investigate the preventive effect of intraarticularly administered vancomycin on acute postoperative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total joint arthroplasty (TJA).
Consecutive patients who underwent unilateral primary TJA were prospectively enrolled. The patients were divided into vancomycin group and control group according to whether 1 g of vancomycin powder suspended in 30 ml normal saline was intraarticularly administered after arthrotomy closure. Acute postoperative PJI and aseptic wound complication were evaluated within 3 months postoperatively. Vancomycin-associated toxicity including acute renal failure, ototoxicity and anaphylaxis was also evaluated.
In terms of demographic parameters and comorbidities, no significant difference was found between the two groups. Intra-articular vancomycin significantly lowered the risk of acute postoperative PJI after primary TJA (P = 0.015) and primary total knee arthroplasty (P = 0.031). However, for patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty, the PJI rate was comparable between the two groups. Overall, the risk of aseptic wound complication between the two groups was also similar. Vancomycin-associated acute renal injury, ototoxicity, or anaphylaxis was not observed.
Intra-articular injection of 1 g of vancomycin suspension after arthrotomy closure during TJA lowered the risk of acute postoperative PJI without increasing the risk of aseptic wound complication and vancomycin-associated systemic toxicity.

View all citing articles on Scopus

: No benefits or funds were received in support of this study.

View full text

Original ArticleInfection Burden for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States

Abstract

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

Results

Discussion

J Chronic Dis

J Clin Epidemiol

Knee

The economic impact of infected joint arthroplasty

Orthopedics

Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population

J Bone Joint Surg Am

Epidemiology of total knee replacement in the United States Medicare population

J Bone Joint Surg Am

The impact of infection after total hip arthroplasty on hospital and surgeon resource utilization

J Bone Joint Surg Am

Original Article
Infection Burden for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States