Elsevier

Archives of Oral Biology

Volume 52, Issue 8, August 2007, Pages 761-767
Archives of Oral Biology

In vitro biofilm formation of Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida species under dynamic and anaerobic conditions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.01.009Get rights and content

Abstract

An understanding of biofilm behavior of Candida species under different environmental conditions is key to the development of effective preventive measures for candidal infections. Hence in this study we assessed the impact of the environmental milieu on Candida biofilm formation using polystyrene, flat-bottomed 96-well microtiter plates. A total of 20, comprising 10 clinical isolates each of Candida albicans and, non-albicans species of Candida were compared for their biofilm forming ability both under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, and static and dynamic conditions. XTT reduction assay was used to quantify the sessile growth. Biofilm formation of all 10 C. albicans isolates differed significantly between dynamic and static states under both atmospheric conditions (P < 0.05). For non-albicans Candida species, a significant difference in biofilm growth between dynamic and static states was noted only when incubated aerobically (P < 0.05), and no significant difference in biofilm formation was noted between aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that C. albicans produced a compact multilayered biofilm embedded in noticeably higher quantity of extracellular polymeric matrix in aerobic/dynamic conditions compared with anaerobic/static conditions. Our data indicate that biofilm formation of C. albicans and non-albicans Candida species is modulated by hydrodynamic conditions and ambient oxygen gradients. However, further work is required to fully elucidate how Candida biofilms persist within the oral milieu under such challenging ecological pressures.

Introduction

The yeast pathogen Candida, the most prevalent fungal species in the human oral cavity, has the ability to grow under diverse environmental conditions. Their conversion from commensalism to parasitism and exuberant growth is usually associated with intraoral environmental changes (e.g. unhygienic prostheses, xerostomia) and/or systemic factors such as diabetes and immunodeficiency.1 A classic example of fungal biofilms in the oral cavity is the denture plaque in Candida-associated denture stomatitis.2 Here, the yeast appears to thrive and proliferate in the space between the denture and the mucosa in a milieu low in environmental oxygen.3 Furthermore, recent clinical reports indicate candidal growth and persistence within root canal systems causing polymicrobial infections4 and, in periodontal pockets.5 These eco-niches are necessarily anaerobic and the growth of Candida species under such conditions has not been well studied.

The phenomenon of biofilm formation by microbes on inert surfaces has been extensively studied in the last decade and there appear to be a direct relationship between the ability of the organisms to form a biofilm and its pathogenicity.6 Further, it is thought that the nature of biofilm architecture favors the lowest oxygen levels near the central core area7 although how such conditions modify the biofilm growth is yet unclear, particularly for Candida species. A few workers have investigated the growth of Candida under anaerobic conditions with conflicting results.8 In early studies, Samaranayake et al.9 found faint, yet discernible surface growth of Candida albicans on Sabouraud's dextrose slopes under strict anaerobic incubations. In a later study, Webster and Odds,10 demonstrated variable anaerobic growth of seven Candida species including C. albicans, except for C. guilliermondii and C. parapsilosis which were dormant, under anaerobiosis. Very recently, Biswas and Chaffin11 attempted to develop C. albicans biofilms anaerobically and found that static or mild shaking conditions did not support such fungal biofilm growth on plastic surfaces or denture acrylic. Apart from the foregoing, there are no detailed studies on the biofilm development of C. albicans and other non-albicans Candida species under anaerobic or static/dynamic conditions. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to evaluate quantitatively the effect of aerobic/anaerobic as well as static/dynamic conditions on biofilm formation of C. albicans and six different non-albicans species of Candida namely, C. krusei, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. guilliermondii, and C. kefyr. The opportunity was further taken to evaluate the biofilm ultrastructure of C. albicans and C. glabrata (one strain each) under the foregoing environmental conditions using scanning electron microscopy.

Section snippets

Candida isolates

A total of 10 oral isolates of C. albicans comprising C. albicans F-1 and F-2 from HIV-infected patients, N-1, N-2 and N-3 from nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, C-1 from a leprosy patient, B-3 and B-8 from denture stomatitis patients, and a C. albicans SC-5314 were selected for the first part of the study. C. albicans strain ATCC 90028 served as the reference strain. For the second part, the following 10 non-albicans Candida isolates were used namely, C. krusei C-12b and H-25, C. glabrata G-2

Biofilm formation by C. albicans isolates under aerobic/anaerobic and static/dynamic conditions

A total of 10 isolates of C. albicans were assayed for biofilm formation after 48 h incubation under different experimental conditions (Fig. 1). In the pilot study, the biofilm activity of each isolate of C. albicans increased and reached a plateau within 48–72 h incubation, irrespective of the anaerobiosis (data not shown). Hence, biofilm activity quantified at 48 h was selected as the mature biofilm activity of all Candida isolates examined. In general, all tested isolates of C. albicans

Discussion

This study has demonstrated that Candida species and strains differ in their ability to form biofilms under varying environmental conditions. As far as we are aware, ours is the most comprehensive study to date which addresses this issue and encompasses evaluation of multiple strains of C. albicans and non-albicans species of Candida.

We used XTT method in our study as it is considered ideal for quantification of Candida biofilm mass15 and, it strongly correlates with other quantitative

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Joyce Yau for excellent technical support. We acknowledge gratefully the help of Mr. Shadow Yeung of the Biostatistics Unit of the Faculty of Dentistry for his assistance with the statistical analysis.

References (26)

  • J.F. Siqueira et al.

    Fungi in endodontic infections

    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod

    (2004)
  • Y. Jin et al.

    Biofilm formation of Candida albicans is variably affected by saliva and dietary sugars

    Arch Oral Biol

    (2004)
  • L.P. Samaranayake

    Essential microbiology for dentistry

    (2006)
  • E. Budtz-Jorgensen

    Ecology of Candida-associated denture stomatitis

    Microb Eco Health Dis

    (2000)
  • L.P. Samaranayake et al.

    Oral candidosis

    (1990)
  • A.H. Reynaud et al.

    Yeasts in periodontal pockets

    J Clin Periodontol

    (2001)
  • J.H. Shin et al.

    Biofilm production by isolates of Candida species recovered from nonneutropenic patients: comparison of bloodstream isolates with isolates from other sources

    J Clin Microbiol

    (2002)
  • M.E. Davey et al.

    Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics

    Microbiol Mol Biol Rev

    (2000)
  • F.C. Odds

    Candida and candidosis

    (1998)
  • L.P. Samaranayake et al.

    Growth and acid production of Candida albicans in carbohydrate supplemented media

    Microbios

    (1983)
  • C.E. Webster et al.

    Growth of pathogenic Candida isolates anaerobically and under elevated concentrations of CO2 in air

    J Med Vet Mycol

    (1987)
  • S.K. Biswas et al.

    Anaerobic growth of Candida albicans does not support biofilm formation under similar conditions used for aerobic biofilm

    Curr Microbiol

    (2005)
  • S. Silverman et al.

    Laboratory diagnosis of oral candidosis

  • Cited by (92)

    • In vitro antifungal and antibiofilm activities of novel sulfonyl hydrazone derivatives against Candida spp.

      2023, Journal of Medical Mycology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The pellet was washed three times with sterile PBS (pH = 7.2) and diluted to a standard suspension of 107 cells/ml in RPMI 1640-MOPS medium (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). To allow cell adhesion, 200 μl of the standardized yeast suspensions were transferred in triplicate to the plate and incubated at 37 °C for 90 min in an orbital shaker at 75 rpm [21,22]. After this initial 1.5 h adhesion phase, the non-adherent cells were replaced by washing three times with PBS (pH 7.2).

    • Antimicrobial and protective effects of non-thermal plasma treatments on the performance of a resinous liner

      2020, Archives of Oral Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, conclusions from these findings should be drawn with caution, as this study used only one brand of soft liner, and simulated biodegradation without the action of other aging procedures (e.g. cleaning, disinfection, occlusal load) and microorganisms present in the oral environment. Additionally, since biofilm formation of C. albicans is known to be modulated by hydrodynamic conditions of saliva (Thein, Samaranayake, & Samaranayake, 2007), the biofilm behavior of the microorganisms would be different under different environmental conditions; thus, future in vitro studies testing the effect of the NTP treatments developed on the liner under static and dynamic conditions of saliva would be of great interest in the field of microbiology and dental materials. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, in summary, non-thermal plasma treatments were successfully developed on a resinous liner and reduced C. albicans counts without affecting the commensal health-associated bacteria S. oralis.

    • Correlation between antifungal resistance and virulence factors in Candida albicans recovered from vaginal specimens

      2019, Microbial Pathogenesis
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, differences in the experimental settings influence the formation and architecture of Candida spp. biofilms. These factors include, for example, medium [63], surface material [64,65], surface pre-incubation [65,66] and a continuous-flow or static system to analyze biofilm formation [67]. Last, but not least, the limited number of isolates used in some studies might not consolidate a comparative and reliable conclusion [62].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text