Elsevier

Appetite

Volume 156, 1 January 2021, 104852
Appetite

Understanding the food-family relationship: A qualitative research in a Chilean low socioeconomic context

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104852Get rights and content

Abstract

Our life is comprised of, among other things, many food and eating decisions. Therefore, we are in a constant relationship with food. Although many health providers and researchers have recommended having a positive relationship with food for better health and well-being, what the human relationship with food entails is still unclear. The aim of this study is to explore the relationship with food among families in Chile, a country that has the highest rate of obesity among OECD countries. In this qualitative study, we conducted eight focus groups in three regions of Chile (North, Center, and South). We recruited women living with their partners and children who represented the family point of view. For data analysis, we used the Atlas.ti program and conducted a thematic analysis. We found that the family relationship with food had five dimensions: (1) An identity dimension that allowed families to describe themselves or some of their family members; (2) an emotional dimension in which family expressed feelings and emotions through food; (3) a social dimension in which family members got together through food; (4) a health dimension in which family related to food to obtain benefits from it or to avoid enemy food; (5) a practical dimension in which families were organized around food tasks. Our findings show that the relationship that Chilean families have with food is a complex phenomenon. All the dimensions should be taken in consideration to create or improve interventions that seek to improve eating habits or prevent nutrition-related diseases from a family perspective.

Introduction

Food plays a central role in our lives. Eating is one of the most important activities we experience daily (Delormier, Frohlich, & Potvin, 2009; Kauppinen-Räisänen, Gummerus, & Lehtola, 2013; Macdonald, Murphy, & Elliott, 2018). Eating is not only a way to satisfy our needs for nutrients and energy; it is also a way to connect with others, in a social and cultural manner (Antin & Hunt, 2012; Ma, 2015; O'Kane, 2016; Sobreira, Garavello, & Nardoto, 2018). Furthermore, we make more than 200 conscious or unconscious decisions related to food daily (Wansink & Sobal, 2007). Ultimately, eating is linked to our relationship with food, and since this relationship is linked to social and cultural connections, it is certainly motivated by more than hunger.

Block et al. (2011) introduced the term “food well-being,” which means “a positive psychological, physical, emotional, and social relationship with food at both the individual and societal levels” (p. 6). In a world where the prevalence of nutrition-related diseases is increasing (Schulze, Martínez-González, Fung, Lichtenstein, & Forouhi, 2018; World Cancer Research Fund International & The NCD Alliance, n.d.), it is necessary to understand the implications of this relationship with food.

For Bulblitz et al. (2011), the relationship with food is essential for food well-being. It has been recommended that people should have a positive relationship with food for better health and well-being (Bauer, 1993). Furthermore, this relationship with food has been linked to food literacy and other factors, such as social, cultural, economic, and family-related as well as emotional, physical and psychological traits (Bulblitz et al., 2011). But, what does this relationship with food mean?

From an individual and a customer point of view, the human relationship with food has been described as multidimensional (Bulblitz et al., 2011; Fischler, 1988). For Fischler (1988), this relationship includes two dimensions with mixed elements: The first dimension ranges from the biological (nutritional function) to the cultural (symbolic function), while the second dimension ranges from the individual (psychological elements) to the collective (the social elements). Although the author does not describe these dimensions in detail, previous researchers have attempted to understand their elements. For instance, from an individual biological perspective, food has been commonly used as a way to obtain health benefits since it allows people to be free of illness; therefore, food could be used as part of the treatment of certain conditions or as a way of preventing them (Backett-milburn, Wills, & Roberts, 2010; Nyberg et al., 2018). On the other hand, from a cultural perspective, “food and eating focus on social values, meanings, and beliefs rather than on dietary requirements and nutritional values” (Murcott, 1982, p. 203). Culture dictates what individuals in that culture should be eating or cooking and what they should not, and as a result, it shapes people's relationship with food (de Garine, 1972; Gálvez Espinoza, Egaña, Masferrer, & Cerda, 2017).

Additionally, from a psychological perspective, emotional eating has called the attention of several researchers: overeating to overcome negative emotions has been widely published (Adam & Epel, 2007; Kemp, Bui, & Grier, 2013; Strien et al., 2013), whereas other studies have been conducted to demonstrate the relationship between positive emotion and food intake (Evers, Adriaanse, de Ridder, & de Witt Huberts, 2013). From a social perspective, food and eating represent a symbol of socialization and are closely related to the concepts of union, conflict, and social behavior (Coveney, 2002; Delaney & McCarthy, 2014; Neely, Walton, & Stephens, 2014).

While all the aforementioned research intends to shed light on the various elements present in the relationship of people with food, these studies mostly describe one dimension only, and they describe it mostly from an individual point of view. As eating behaviors go beyond individual decisions (Gardner et al., 2014), we argue that the relationship with food should be thought of similarly, that is, studied from a collective perspective. A clear definition of what the human relationship with food entails for families—a second level of influences of eating behaviors, according to the socioecological model (Quick et al., 2017)— is necessary to face current nutritional-related health problems.

Therefore, to address this gap, the aim of this qualitative study is to explore the relationship with food among Chilean families from low socioeconomic neighborhoods. Chile is considered a high-income country, with a low rate of poverty (3.7%), but has more than 30% of the population in a vulnerable situation (The World Bank, 2020). Even while Chile has relatively good health indicators, this setting is particularly relevant for the study, as it has been found that Chile has the highest rate of obesity among OECD countries (Organisation for Economic & Development, 2019). Among people over 15 years old, those who are of low socioeconomic status have the highest rate of obesity (Ministeriode Salud. Gobierno de Chile, 2017a). Furthermore, the latest National Eating Survey revealed not only that just 5.3% of the population has a healthy diet, but also that people of low socioeconomic status have less healthy diets than those of other socioeconomic groups (Universidad de Chile, 2012). On the other hand, the family perspective has been selected because it is here where health and disease happen; in addition, it has been demonstrated that well-being is related to the family context (Ross, Mirowsky, & Goldsteen, 1990). The family context is where health notions are learned, lived and experienced, and the place where the members of the family meet and respond to disease through life (Denham, 2003). It is within the family where people first learn eating behaviors and share eating patterns (Savage, Fisher, & Birch, 2007; Suggs, Della Bella, Rangelov, & Marques-Vidal, 2018). For Gillespie and Johnson-Askew (2009), “[a] family unit shares its own history of interactions with and about food, health, eating, and family role structures and patterns” (p. 4). Further, family has been recognized as a key element in several food guidelines (Ministeriode Salud. Gobierno de Chile, 2017b; Ministry of Health of Brazil, 2014; U.S. Department of Agriculture, n.d.). In previous research that we conducted in Chilean women of low socioeconomic status, family was highlighted as an important influence on eating behaviors (Galvez E et al., 2017; Galvez Espinoza et al., 2018; Vizcarra et al., 2019). Therefore, the relationship that family has with food could contribute to shaping family members’ eating behaviors. Understanding this relationship could ultimately contribute to designing more family interventions that focus on promoting healthy eating, especially in people of low socioeconomic status who have the highest rate of obesity in Chile.

Section snippets

Methods

This study corresponds to the first stage of a project that focused on the role of the family in women's diet and nutritional status. It uses a qualitative research approach to examine the relationship of families with food in depth (Creswell, 2013; Patton, 2002).

The University of Chile's Ethics Committee approved the study's protocol. All participants signed the informed consent prior to any activity (protocol approval #157-2018).

Results

From the participants’ narrative during the discussion groups, we identified five dimensions of the family relationship with food. These are: (1) identity dimension, (2) emotional dimension, (3) social dimension, (4) practical dimension, and (5) health dimension. Even though every dimension has its own distinctive characteristics, they do interact with each other to make the relationship meaningful. Fig. 1 defines and describes each dimension.

Discussion

This study contributes to the understanding of how families relate to food in Chile. In doing so, the present work aims to show that the family/food relationship goes beyond the explanation of what family members select to eat. As illustrated in the results section, the family relationship with food is complex. We identified five dimensions: identity, emotional, social, practical and health. Even though these dimensions are shown separately, the limits between dimensions are unclear and often

Conclusion

Chilean families related to food in a complex manner that goes beyond physical health. We identified their relationships are founded in five dimensions: identity, emotional, social, health, and practical. The family approach used in this study allowed for a more interpersonal analysis of the relationship with food and introduced new insights into this literature. Together, the five dimensions identified can guide researchers, health care providers, health planners, and policymakers interested

Funding

This work was supported by the National Agency for Research and Development (ANID) and its National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development (Fondecyt) program, (grant number: 11180370).

Ethical statement

This study obtained ethics approval by The Ethics Committee on Human Being Research at the Medicine College, Universidad de Chile (protocol approval #157-2018). All participants signed the informed consent prior to any activity.

Declaration of competing interest

None.

References (91)

  • S. Higgs et al.

    Social influences on eating

    Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

    (2016)
  • V. Inglis et al.

    Does modifying the household food budget predict changes in the healthfulness of purchasing choices among low-and high-income women?

    Appetite

    (2009)
  • R.G. Kuijer et al.

    Chocolate cake. Guilt or celebration? Associations with healthy eating attitudes, perceived behavioural control, intentions and weight-loss

    Appetite

    (2014)
  • G. Ma

    Food, eating behavior, and culture in Chinese society

    Journal of Ethnic Foods

    (2015)
  • M. Macht et al.

    Everyday mood and emotions after eating a chocolate bar or an apple

    Appetite

    (2006)
  • J. Mäkelä

    Meals: The social perspective

  • C.R. Markus et al.

    Does carbohydrate-rich, protein-poor food prevent a deterioration of mood and cognitive performance of stress-prone subjects when subjected to a stressful task?

    Appetite

    (1998)
  • E. Neely et al.

    Young people’ s food practices and social relationships. A thematic synthesis

    Appetite

    (2014)
  • G. O'Kane

    A moveable feast: Contemporary relational food cultures emerging from local food networks

    Appetite

    (2016)
  • L.S. Suggs et al.

    Is it better at home with my family? The effects of people and place on children's eating behavior

    Appetite

    (2018)
  • A.W. Watts et al.

    No time for family meals? Parenting practices associated with adolescent fruit and vegetable intake when family meals are not an option

    Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

    (2017)
  • I. Acocella

    The focus groups in social research: Advantages and disadvantages

    Quality and Quantity

    (2012)
  • G.M. Almerico

    Food and identity: Food studies, cultural, and personal identity

    Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies

    (2014)
  • American Psychological Association

    Stress and health disparities

    (2017)
  • K. Backett-milburn et al.

    Food and family practices: Teenagers, eating and domestic life in differing socio-economic circumstances

    Children's Geographies

    (2010)
  • S. Baker et al.

    My favorite recipes: Recreating emotions and memories through cooking

  • S. Bauer

    Eating away: A study of women’ s relationship with food in literature

  • A.G. Becuţ et al.

    Introduction. food history and identity: Food and eating practices as elements of cultural heritage, identity and social creativity

    International Review of Social Research

    (2017)
  • J. Berge et al.

    Momentary parental stress and food-related parenting practices

    Pediatrics

    (2017)
  • L.G. Block et al.

    From nutrients to nurturance: A conceptual introduction to food well-being

    Journal of Public Policy and Marketing

    (2011)
  • V. Braun et al.

    Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Qualitative Research in Psychology

    (2006)
  • M. Bulblitz et al.

    The quest for eating right: Advancing food well-being

    Journal of Research for Consumers

    (2011)
  • M. Coenen et al.

    Individual interviews and focus groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A comparison of two qualitative methods

    Quality of Life Research

    (2012)
  • J. Coveney

    What does research on families and food tell us? Implications for nutrition and dietetic practice

    Nutrition and Dietetics

    (2002)
  • J.W. Creswell

    Qualitative inquiry and research design

    (2013)
  • T. Delormier et al.

    Food and eating as social practice. Understanding eating patterns as social phenomena and implications for public health

    Sociology of Health & Illness

    (2009)
  • S. Denham

    Familial research reveals new practice model

    Holistic Nursing Practice

    (2003)
  • M.L. DeVault

    Feeding the family : The social organization of caring as gendered work

    (1991)
  • I. Etikan et al.

    Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling

    American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics

    (2016)
  • C. Fischler

    Food, self and identity

    Social Science Information

    (1988)
  • P. Gálvez Espinoza et al.

    Proposal for a conceptual model for the study of food environments in Chile [Propuesta de un modelo conceptual para el estudio de los ambientes alimentarios en Chile]

    Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública

    (2017)
  • P. Galvez Espinoza et al.

    “We eat in this way because…” Understanding eating behaviors of Chilean women of low socioeconomic status [“Comemos asi porque…” Entendiendo las conductas alimentarias de mujeres chilenas de bajos recursos]

    Revista Medica de Chile

    (2018)
  • P. Galvez E et al.

    The photo-elicitation of food worlds: A study on the eating behaviors of low socioeconomic Chilean women

    Appetite

    (2017)
  • P. Galvez et al.

    Communicating about eating behaviors. A qualitative study of Chilean women and their health-care providers

    International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being

    (2015)
  • D. Garcia-Huidobro et al.

    Model of comprehensive care in family and community health in primary care in Chile

    Revista Panamericana de Salud Públic

    (2018)
  • Cited by (5)

    • Identifying barriers to decreasing meat consumption and increasing acceptance of meat substitutes among Swedish consumers

      2021, Appetite
      Citation Excerpt :

      Concerns regarding animal welfare and health are also sometimes found to be stronger motivators to reduce meat consumption than environmental issues (Sanchez-Sabate & Sabaté, 2019), although Hielkema and Lund (2021) found that environmental concern was a strong driver for reducing meat consumption among Danish consumers. Food motives and choices also relate to issues of identity, status, social norms, and tradition (Cheah et al., 2020; Cuevas et al., 2021; Leroy & Praet, 2015; Stoll-Kleemann & Schmidt, 2017). For example, MacDiarmid et al. (2016) found that meat was perceived as essential for both health and tradition reasons among Scottish consumers, which contributed to their reluctance to change.

    • Multi-stakeholder perspectives on food labeling and health claims: Qualitative insights from South Africa

      2021, Appetite
      Citation Excerpt :

      As with accepted practice in qualitative research, interviews were completed until saturation was reached (Guest, Bunce, & Johnson, 2006); i.e. until no new insights were gained from additional interviews. This is similar to the process followed by Cuevas, Herrera, Morales, Aguayo, and Galvez (2021) and Rivera-Navarro et al. (2021). The interviews were audio-recorded using a portable digital recorder with the participants' permission, transcribed using Otter.ai (Otter.ai, Los Altos, California, United States), and analyzed using MAXQDA 2020 software (VERBI Software, Berlin, Germany).

    View full text