Elsevier

Appetite

Volume 59, Issue 3, December 2012, Pages 859-865
Appetite

Research report
Brain structure predicts risk for obesity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.08.027Get rights and content

Abstract

The neurobiology of obesity is poorly understood. Here we report findings of a study designed to examine the differences in brain regional gray matter volume in adults recruited as either Obese Prone or Obese Resistant based on self-identification, body mass index, and personal/family weight history. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 28 Obese Prone (14 male, 14 female) and 25 Obese Resistant (13 male, 12 female) healthy adults. Voxel-based morphometry was used to identify gray matter volume differences between groups. Gray matter volume was found to be lower in the insula, medial orbitofrontal cortex and cerebellum in Obese Prone, as compared to Obese Resistant individuals. Adjusting for body fat mass did not impact these results. Insula gray matter volume was negatively correlated with leptin concentration and measures of hunger. These findings suggest that individuals at risk for weight gain have structural differences in brain regions known to be important in energy intake regulation, and that these differences, particularly in the insula, may be related to leptin.

Highlights

► Subjects at risk for obesity showed reduced gray matter volume in orbitofrontal cortex, cerebellum, and insula. ► Left insula volume was negatively correlated with plasma leptin concentration. ► Right insula volume was negatively correlated with scores of hunger after a meal. ► These results were not influenced by body fat mass.

Introduction

Obesity is a serious public health problem of dramatically rising prevalence in recent decades in the United States and the world, with currently over 65% of adults in the U.S. classified as either overweight or obese (Flegal et al., 2012, Shields et al., 2011). Early studies of obesity focused on metabolic differences between obese and non-obese persons; however, advances in structural and functional neuroimaging techniques have recently begun to shed light on neuroanatomical and neurophysiological factors that may be related to obesity.

Most functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies on obesity have focused on how the condition alters the cortical response to food cues (Carnell et al., 2012, Cornier, 2011, Cornier et al., 2009, Martin et al., 2010, McCaffery et al., 2009, Neary and Batterham, 2010, Rosenbaum et al., 2008, Rothemund et al., 2007, Stoeckel et al., 2008, Van den Eynde and Treasure, 2009, Wallner-Leibmann et al., 2010). These studies have generally found increased responses to both visual and olfactory cues associated with high-calorie foods in obesity. Regions of increased response include the limbic areas such as the hypothalamus, amygdala, hippocampus, orbitofrontal cortex, and insula (Martin et al., 2010, Rothemund et al., 2007, Stoeckel et al., 2008). Furthermore, in a study of reduced-obese persons, i.e. formerly obese subjects who have lost weight, a decreased ability to “turn off” response to food cues after overfeeding was observed compared to thin controls (Cornier et al., 2009). These studies suggest that obesity is not only associated with altered response to food cues, but also a deficit in the ability to modulate this response based on metabolic need.

In a small number of studies, MRI has also been used to examine brain structure in human obesity. Pannacciulli et al. (2006) found that obese subjects had reduced gray matter (GM) volume in cerebellum, frontal operculum, postcentral gyrus, putamen, and middle frontal gyrus. In the same subjects, leptin concentration was also found to be negatively correlated with GM volume in the inferior frontal operculum, postcentral gyrus, and putamen, and positively correlated with GM volume in the inferior temporal gyrus and cerebellum (Pannacciulli, Le, Chen, Reiman, & Krakoff, 2007). More recent studies have shown negative correlations between GM volume and waist circumference in a variety of anterior and posterior cortical areas (Kurth et al., 2012), a negative correlation of BMI and future BMI with overall brain volume (Yokum, Ng, & Stice, 2012) and an association between reduced orbitofrontal cortex volume and executive dysfunction in obese adolescents (Maayan, Hoogendoorn, Sweat, & Convit, 2011).

Although previous neuroimaging research has shown that the obese phenotype is associated with structural and functional brain alterations, it is unknown if these changes are a core feature of the condition that gives rise to an obese phenotype, i.e. are present in “at risk” individuals, or are simply a consequence of excess body fat. Current understanding of the condition suggests that both environmental and genetic factors confer risk of obesity (Hill et al., 2000, Peters et al., 2002); however, not everyone in a similar environment is obese or overweight, suggesting that resistance to the condition must be conferred through an endogenous mechanism (Bessesen, Bull, & Cornier, 2008). In the present study, we used whole brain voxel-based morphometry (VBM) to examine structural brain differences between Obese Prone (OP) and Obese Resistant (OR) individuals. Subjects were empirically classified as OR or OP based on personal and family weight history, as defined previously (Schmidt, Harmon, Sharp, Kealey, & Bessesen, 2012). Studying OP, as opposed to already obese or reduced-obese individuals, reveals structural brain differences that may precede weight gain and obesity and therefore could be a causative mechanism and/or be used as a predictor of obesity risk. In addition to the whole-brain VBM analysis, given previous findings implicating the insula in obesity (Carnell et al., 2012, Cornier et al., 2009), we hypothesized that GM volume in this region may relate to plasma leptin concentration and ratings of hunger after a meal. Specifically, we hypothesized that these factors would predict structural differences in the insula as well as other regions essential for maintenance and awareness of homeostatic balance.

Section snippets

Ethics statement

This study was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board. All patients provided written informed consent for the collection of samples and subsequent analysis.

Subjects

Subjects were healthy men and women without eating disorders aged 25–40 empirically classified as either obesity resistant (OR) or obesity prone (OP) as previously defined (Schmidt et al., 2012). Specifically, OR subjects responded to

Subject characteristics

Twenty-five OR (13M/12F, age 31.32 ± 3.45) and 28 OP (14M/14F, age 30.29 ± 3.81) subjects were studied. Compared to OR subjects, OP subjects had higher body fat mass (p = 0.012), percent body fat mass (p < 0.001), BMI (p < 0.001), and plasma leptin levels (p < 0.001) (Table 1). No significant difference was observed between OP and OR subjects in hunger ratings in response to a meal (p = 0.55, Table 1).

Comparison of regional GM between OR and OP subjects

Compared to OR subjects, OP subjects showed reduced GM volume in the orbitofrontal cortex {peak coordinate [x

Discussion

The primary findings of the present study are that, after controlling for age, sex, and total GM volume, (1) GM volume is reduced in the OFC, insula, and cerebellum in OP subjects relative to OR subjects, independent of fat mass (Fig. 1), (2) GM volume in the insula is inversely correlated with plasma leptin concentration (Fig. 2), (3) GM volume in the insula is inversely correlated with reported ratings of hunger after a meal (Fig. 3). These results suggest that structural architecture of the

References (64)

  • M.L. Kringelbach et al.

    The functional neuroanatomy of the human orbitofrontal cortex: evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychology

    Progress in Neurobiology

    (2004)
  • J.A. Maldjian et al.

    An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • J.M. McCaffery et al.

    Differential functional magnetic imaging response to food pictures in successful weight-loss maintainers relative to normal-weight and obese controls

    American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

    (2009)
  • N. Pannacciulli et al.

    Brain abnormalities in human obesity. A voxel-based morphometric study

    NeuroImage

    (2006)
  • N. Pannacciulli et al.

    Relationships between plasma leptin concentrations and human brain structure. A voxel-based morphometric study

    Neuroscience Letters

    (2007)
  • M.L. Pelchat et al.

    Images of desire. Food-craving activation during fMRI

    NeuroImage

    (2004)
  • K. Porubska et al.

    Subjective feeling of appetite modulates brain activity. An fMRI study

    NeuroImage

    (2006)
  • Y. Rothemund et al.

    Differential activation of the dorsal striatum by high-calorie visual food stimuli in obese individuals

    NeuroImage

    (2007)
  • L.E. Stoeckel et al.

    Widespread reward-system activation in obese women in response to pictures of high-calorie foods

    NeuroImage

    (2008)
  • M.P. St-Onge et al.

    Human cortical specialization for food. A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation

    Journal of Nutrition

    (2005)
  • F. Van den Eynde et al.

    Neuroimaging in eating disorders and obesity. Implications for research

    Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America

    (2009)
  • Y. Avraham et al.

    Leptin induces neuroprotectiong neurogenesis and angiogenesis after stroke

    Current Neurovascular Research

    (2011)
  • K. Baicy et al.

    Leptin replacement alters brain response to food cues in genetically leptin-deficient adults

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (2007)
  • M. Brett et al.

    Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox (abstract)

    NeuroImage

    (2002)
  • S. Carnell et al.

    Neuroimaging and obesity. Current knowledge and future directions

    Obesity Reviews

    (2012)
  • M. Chechlacz et al.

    Diabetes dietary management alters responses to food pictures in brain regions associated with motivation and emotion. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study

    Diabetologia

    (2009)
  • J.I. Cohen et al.

    Obesity, orbitofrontal structure and function are associated with food choice. A cross-sectional study

    BMJ Open

    (2011)
  • M.A. Cornier et al.

    The effects of overfeeding on the neuronal response to visual food cues in thin and reduced-obese individuals

    PLoS One

    (2009)
  • A.D. Craig

    How do you feel now? The anterior insula and human awareness

    Nature Reviews Neuroscience

    (2009)
  • A.D. Craig

    The sentient self

    Brain Structure and Function

    (2010)
  • A.D. Craig

    Significance of the insula for the evolution of human awareness of feelings from the body

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

    (2011)
  • M.B. Cuadra et al.

    Comparison and validation of tissue modelization and statistical classification methods in T1-weighted MR brain images

    IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

    (2005)
  • Cited by (46)

    • Female sweet-likers have enhanced cross-modal interoceptive abilities

      2021, Appetite
      Citation Excerpt :

      Resistant obesity profile is assumed to reflect a weaker inherent predisposition to obesity development along with a better ability to maintain a healthy body weight more effortlessly. Smucny et al. (2012) have linked increased grey matter volume in the insula, which is known to be important in interoceptive processes in the brain, with this ‘obesity resistant’ profile. Regarding our mediation analyses, only the relationship between sweet liker phenotype and emotional eating in response to positive and negative stimuli was fully explained by interoceptive performance.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Acknowledgments: We acknowledge and thank Debra Singel and Yiping Du of the University of Colorado Brain Imaging Center for their assistance with the MRI studies. We also thank the dietary services and metabolic kitchen of the University of Colorado Clinical Translational Research Center. This publication was supported by NIH/NCRR Colorado CTSI Grant No. UL1 RR025780, NIH/NIDDK Clinical Nutrition Research Unit Grant No. DK48520, and NIH/NIDDK Grant Nos. R01DK089095. Its contents are the authors’ sole responsibility and do not necessarily represent official NIH views. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    View full text