Original research
Patient Effort in Traumatic Brain Injury Inpatient Rehabilitation: Course and Associations With Age, Brain Injury Severity, and Time Postinjury

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.027Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To describe patients' level of effort in occupational, physical, and speech therapy sessions during traumatic brain injury (TBI) inpatient rehabilitation and to evaluate how age, injury severity, cognitive impairment, and time are associated with effort.

Design

Prospective, multicenter, longitudinal cohort study.

Setting

Acute TBI rehabilitation programs.

Participants

Patients (N=1946) receiving 138,555 therapy sessions.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Effort in rehabilitation sessions rated on the Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale, FIM, Comprehensive Severity Index brain injury severity score, posttraumatic amnesia (PTA), and Agitated Behavior Scale (ABS).

Results

The Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale effort ratings in individual therapy sessions closely conformed to a normative distribution for all 3 disciplines. Mean Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale ratings for patients' therapy sessions were higher in the discharge week than in the admission week (P<.001). For patients who completed 2, 3, or 4 weeks of rehabilitation, differences in effort ratings (P<.001) were observed between 5 subgroups stratified by admission FIM cognitive scores and over time. In linear mixed-effects modeling, age and Comprehensive Severity Index brain injury severity score at admission, days from injury to rehabilitation admission, days from admission, and daily ratings of PTA and ABS score were predictors of level of effort (P<.0001).

Conclusions

Patients' level of effort can be observed and reliably rated in the TBI inpatient rehabilitation setting using the Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale. Patients who sustain TBI show varying levels of effort in rehabilitation therapy sessions, with effort tending to increase over the stay. PTA and agitated behavior are primary risk factors that substantially reduce patient effort in therapies.

Section snippets

Study population

As part of a prospective observational investigation, we studied a cohort aged ≥14 years with complicated mild, moderate, and severe TBI from 9 IR centers located throughout the United States.2 Participants were enrolled from October 2008 to August 2011 and received interdisciplinary rehabilitation services that typically included physiatry, nursing, psychology/neuropsychology, case management, PT, OT, ST, and therapeutic recreation. Details of inclusion criteria, procedures, and enrollment

Participants

A total of 1981 patients were enrolled in 9 U.S. centers participating in the practice-based evidence study. After excluding from analysis patients who had a disorder of consciousness for most or all of their stay (n=35), the final sample had 1946 participants. Patient demographics and injury, time from injury, and severity characteristics at admission are summarized in table 1. The sample was diverse with regard to age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Most patients were injured as a result of motor

Discussion

In the United States there is a growing emphasis on providing patient-centered care, optimizing service utilization, and improving treatment effectiveness and efficiency.34, 35 In rehabilitation, understanding how patient factors impact treatment delivery and ultimately outcomes is a key to providing patient-centered care.36 Level of effort in therapies is considered an important mediator of therapeutic effectiveness; however, few studies have described patients' effort in TBI IR or identified

Conclusions

Our study provides evidence that patients' level of effort can be observed and reliably rated in the TBI IR setting using the single-item Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale effort rating criteria. Patients who sustain TBI show a wide range of effort levels in their IR therapies. The level typically improves over the course of their stay. Presence of PTA and agitated behavior are primary factors that substantially reduce patient effort.

Suppliers

  • a.

    SAS version 9.2; SAS Institute.

  • b.

    R statistics version 2.12.1; R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org.

Acknowledgments

We thank the contributions of the clinical and research staff at each of the 9 inpatient rehabilitation facilities represented in the Improving Outcomes in Acute Rehabilitation for TBI Study and Individualized Planning for the First Year Following Acute Rehabilitation, collectively known as the TBI Practice Based Evidence (TBI-PBE) study. We also thank the staff of the Institute for Clinical Outcomes Research, International Severity Information Systems, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT, who also

References (36)

  • N. Maclean et al.

    A critical review of the concept of patient motivation in the literature on physical rehabilitation

    Soc Sci Med

    (2000)
  • J.M. Fleming et al.

    Cluster analysis of self-awareness levels in adults with traumatic brain injury and relationshipto outcome

    J Head Trauma Rehabil

    (1998)
  • A. Lequerica et al.

    Psychometric properties of the Rehabilitation Therapy Engagement Scale when used among individuals with acquired brain injury

    Rehabil Psychol

    (2006)
  • A. Lequerica et al.

    Agitation in acquired brain injury: impact on acute rehabilitaion therapies

    J Head Trauma Rehabil

    (2007)
  • P.O. Pegg et al.

    The impact of patient-center information on patients' treatment satisfaction and outcomes in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation

    Rehabil Psychol

    (2005)
  • M.P. Dijkers et al.

    Team size in spinal cord injury inpatient rehabilitation and patient participation in therapy sessions: the SCIRehab project

    J Spinal Cord Med

    (2012)
  • R. Seel et al.

    The Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale

    (2002)
  • W.D. Gouvier et al.

    Reliability and validity of the Disability Rating Scale and the Levels of Cognitive Functioning Scale in monitoring recovery from severe head injury

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1987)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Acute Management of Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

      2024, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America
    • Factors Affecting Participation in Physical Therapy During Posttraumatic Amnesia

      2021, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Findings demonstrated that increased levels of agitation interfered with patients’ ability to engage in physical therapy and were associated with lower FIM-motor change after PTA. This provides support for the contention that agitation represents a significant barrier to rehabilitation and is associated with poorer patient outcome.20-22 Agitation was not related to the amount of therapy received, a pattern also previously observed for time in occupational therapy sessions during PTA.23

    • Multiple intubation attempts in the emergency department and in-hospital mortality: A retrospective observational study

      2020, American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is also possible that to save time during resuscitation with very ill patients, intubation was done promptly without spending time to draw medications. Similar to previous reports [22,23], older patients (adjusted OR 0.95, 95%CI 0.93–0.98, p < 0.01) and those with a brain injury (adjusted OR 0.15, 95%CI 0.04–0.56, p < 0.01) were less likely to be discharged home from the hospital. There are several limitations to our study.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research (grant no. 1R01HD050439-01), and the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (grant no. H133A080023).

    However, the contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.

    Publication of this article was supported by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.

    Disclosures: none.

    View full text