Original article
Kinematic Features of Rear-Foot Motion Using Anterior and Posterior Ankle-Foot Orthoses in Stroke Patients With Hemiplegic Gait

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Chen C-C, Hong W-H, Wang C-M, Chen C-K, Wu KP-H, Kang C-F, Tang SF. Kinematic features of rear-foot motion using anterior and posterior ankle-foot orthoses in stroke patients with hemiplegic gait.

Objective

To evaluate the kinematic features of rear-foot motion during gait in hemiplegic stroke patients, using anterior ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs), posterior AFOs, and no orthotic assistance.

Design

Crossover design with randomization for the interventions.

Participants

Patients with hemiplegia due to stroke (n=14) and able-bodied subjects (n=11).

Interventions

Subjects with hemiplegia were measured walking under 3 conditions with randomized sequences: (1) with an anterior AFO, (2) with a posterior AFO, and (3) without an AFO. Control subjects were measured walking without an AFO to provide a normative reference.

Main Outcome Measures

Rear-foot kinematic change in the sagittal, coronal, and transverse planes.

Results

In the sagittal plane, compared with walking with an anterior AFO or without an AFO, the posterior AFO significantly decreased plantar flexion to neutral at initial heel contact (P=.001) and the swing phase (P<.001), and increased dorsiflexion at the stance phase (P=.002). In the coronal plane, the anterior AFO significantly increased maximal eversion to neutral (less inversion) at the stance phase (P=.025), and decreased the maximal inversion angle at the swing phase when compared with using no AFO (P=.005). The posterior AFO also decreased the maximal inversion angle at the swing phase as compared with no AFO (P=.005). In the transverse plane, when compared with walking without an AFO, the anterior AFO and posterior AFO decreased the adduction angle significantly at initial heel contact (P=.004).

Conclusions

For poststroke hemiplegic gait, the posterior AFO is better than the anterior AFO in enhancing rear-foot dorsiflexion during a whole gait cycle. The anterior AFO decreases rear-foot inversion in both the stance and swing phases, and the posterior AFO decreases the rear-foot inversion in the swing phase when compared with using no AFO.

Section snippets

Participants

For this study, we recruited 14 stroke subjects with hemiplegia. The inclusion criteria for the study group were as follows: (1) diagnosis of unilateral hemiplegia caused by either hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke; (2) ability to follow simple verbal commands or instructions; and (3) ability to ambulate independently. Subjects were excluded if they had any of the following conditions: (1) medical problems other than stroke that would interfere with their gait; or (2) foot-related premorbid or

Results

Descriptive information regarding the 14 participants with hemiplegia is listed in table 1. Comparisons of demographic data, including age, sex, body height, and body weight between the stroke and normative subjects are listed in table 2. The hemiplegic stroke subjects walked at a significantly slower, self-selected, comfortable walking speed and had decreased step length and longer cycle times than the control group. When comparing the anterior AFO, posterior AFO, and barefoot conditions in

Discussion

The incidence of equinovarus foot in stabilized vascular hemiplegia was reported to be about 18%.17 The equinovarus foot shifts weight-bearing from the heel to the lateral plantar surface, which can cause loss of balance and reduce walking safety. This condition also has a strong correlation to the presence of claw toes.18, 19 An AFO has often been prescribed to facilitate ankle control for the equinus foot, the varus foot, or both. This study investigated the kinematic change in rear-foot

Conclusions

The results of our study suggest that for poststroke hemiplegic gait, the posterior AFO is better than the anterior AFO in enhancing rear-foot dorsiflexion during the whole gait cycle. The anterior AFO decreases rear-foot inversion in both the stance and swing phases, and the posterior AFO decreases the rear-foot inversion in the swing phase as compared with using no AFO. The choice between an anterior AFO and a posterior AFO should be made by considering not only the patients' preference and

References (28)

  • P. Levinger et al.

    Tibia and rearfoot motion and ground reaction forces in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome during walking

    Gait Posture

    (2007)
  • J.F. Lehmann et al.

    Gait abnormalities in hemiplegia: their correction by ankle-foot orthoses

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1987)
  • H. Abe et al.

    Improving gait stability in stroke hemiplegic patients with a plastic ankle-foot orthosis

    Tohoku J Exp Med

    (2009)
  • D.C. de Wit et al.

    The effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on walking ability in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial

    Clin Rehabil

    (2004)
  • Cited by (36)

    • The effects of anterior and posterior ankle-foot orthoses on sit-to-stand transfer performance in stroke patients

      2022, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      Studies suggested that relative to hemiparetic patients who did not use AFOs, those who did exhibit enhanced PCM while standing by enhancing the weight-bearing capacity of the paretic leg [11] and reducing the CoP sway amplitude while stance [12]. Existing studies focused on the effects of semirigid PAFOs on PCM during dynamic tasks that require minimal ankle range of motion (RoM), such as level walking [13]. Sankaranarayan et al. [14] suggested that a solid PAFO can improve walking speed but they did not assess its effects on the PCM measured by GRF and CoP parameters during level walking.

    • The effect of three dimensional printing hinged ankle foot orthosis for equinovarus control in stroke patients

      2022, Clinical Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, both A-AFO and posterior design AFO can improve equinus foot pattern during walking. When it comes to inversion deformity, research revealed that A-AFO decreased ankle inversion during both stance and swing phases, while posterior AFO can only correct ankle inversion during swing phase (Chen et al., 2010). The effect of ankle varus control in stance phase is minimal.

    • Effect of different designs of ankle-foot orthoses on gait in patients with stroke: A systematic review

      2018, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      In comparison between anterior AFO and posterior AFO, statically significant changes were reported in ankle, knee, and hip kinematics[16]. However, Chen et al. found that, compared with walking with an anterior AFO, posterior AFO significantly increased ankle dorsiflexion at the stance phase and decreased ankle plantar flexion to neutral at initial contact and the swing phase[22]. Nine studies found an increase in peak ankle dorsiflexion at foot initial contact with an AFO [18,21,24,29–34].

    • Effect of Anterior Ankle-Foot Orthoses on Weight Shift in Persons with Stroke

      2015, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by the National Science Council, Republic of China (grant no. NSC 98-2119-M-009-019).

    Reprints are not available from the author.

    View full text