Coronary artery disease
Meta-Analysis of Effect on Mortality of Percutaneous Recanalization of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions Using a Stent-Based Strategy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.10.034Get rights and content

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the all-cause mortality outcomes of successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTOs) with unsuccessful CTO-PCI, using a stent-based strategy. Multiple studies comparing successful CTO-PCI with unsuccessful CTO-PCI have reported variable outcomes. No systematic review or meta-analysis has been performed after stenting became the default strategy for CTO-PCI. Searching major electronic databases, 64 studies were identified using the keywords “CTO,” “PCI,” and “mortality.” Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses method, 13 studies met the criteria for inclusion in the present meta-analysis. The short-term (≤30 days) and long-term (≥1 year) mortality outcomes were analyzed comparing successful CTO-PCI and unsuccessful CTO-PCI. Coronary perforation and its association with CTO-PCI success was analyzed. A significant reduction in short-term mortality was noted with successful CTO-PCI compared to unsuccessful CTO-PCI (odds ratio 0.218, 95% confidence interval 0.095 to 0.498, Z = −3.61, p <0.001). A similar, significant reduction in long-term mortality was noted with successful CTO-PCI compared to unsuccessful CTO-PCI (odds ratio 0.391, 95% confidence interval 0.311 to 0.493, Z = −7.957, p <0.001). A significant association was present between coronary perforation and unsuccessful CTO-PCI (odds ratio 0.168, 95% confidence interval 0.104 to 0.271, Z = −7.333, p <0.001). In conclusion, successful CTO-PCI using a predominantly stent-based strategy is associated with a significant reduction in short- and long-term mortality compared to unsuccessful CTO-PCI. Coronary perforation was associated with CTO-PCI failure.

Section snippets

Methods

Our meta-analysis followed the method outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement.4 We searched the indexed studies using major databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The keywords included “chronic total occlusion,” “percutaneous coronary intervention,” and “outcomes.” Abstracts from major interventional cardiology meetings were searched using the same keywords.

The titles and abstracts of 64 relevant

Results

The search resulted in 64 studies. Of the 13 studies included in the present analysis, 65, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 had reported the mortality outcomes at ≤30 days of follow-up, and 12 studies5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 had reported the mortality outcomes at ≥1 year of follow-up for patients with successful versus unsuccessful CTO-PCI. Of the 13 studies, 6 studies8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 17 were prospective and 7 studies5, 6, 7, 10, 12, 15, 16 were retrospective. The studies reported by Suero et al

Discussion

CTOs are encountered in approximately 20% of patients referred for coronary angiography22 and have been associated with worse long-term outcomes.23, 24 The advent of better equipment, including tapered-tipped guidewires,25 hydrophilically coated specialty microcatheters, and dedicated devices,26 and a better understanding of the substrate and increasing operator experience has led to an improvement in the antegrade CTO-PCI success rates. Increasing adoption of the retrograde technique27 has

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References (30)

  • P. Fefer et al.

    Current perspectives on coronary chronic total occlusions: the Canadian Multicenter Chronic Total Occlusions Registry

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2012)
  • B.E. Claessen et al.

    Evaluation of the effect of a concurrent chronic total occlusion on long-term mortality and left ventricular function in patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention

    JACC Cardiovasc Interv

    (2009)
  • P.L. Whitlow et al.

    Use of a novel crossing and re-entry system in coronary chronic total occlusions that have failed standard crossing techniques: results of the FAST-CTOs (Facilitated Antegrade Steering Technique in Chronic Total Occlusions) trial

    JACC Cardiovasc Interv

    (2012)
  • A. Hoye

    Management of chronic total occlusion by percutaneous coronary intervention

    Heart

    (2012)
  • A. Liberati et al.

    The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

    PLoS Med

    (2009)
  • Cited by (50)

    • Comparison of successful percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion

      2019, Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      A previous study showed that incomplete revascularization by PCI leaving untreated CTOs led to higher 3-year mortality [12]. Many studies comparing successful CTO PCI versus failed CTO PCI also showed successful CTO PCI was associated with improved survival [6–8]. However, these studies are not direct data comparing the CTO PCI to medical treatment which might be essential to make decision for interventional cardiologists when they encounter patients with CTOs.

    • Percutaneous revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusion: Toward a reappraisal of the available evidence

      2017, Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Some meta-analyses included studies that used balloon angioplasty only [31,48]; the results of such studies cannot be extrapolated to the contemporary era of advanced stent technology and use of aggressive antithrombotic therapy. In one meta-analysis, the authors adopted the fixed-effect model, rather than the random-effects model, for analysis of outcome endpoints, despite the non-uniform distribution of effect sizes [49]. Moreover, in two meta-analyses, substantial heterogeneity existed among the included studies, for analysis of the index outcome [31,50].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    See page 524 for disclosure information.

    View full text