Coronary artery diseaseMeta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin as Compared to Antiplatelet Monotherapy for the Prevention of Vascular Events
Section snippets
Methods
We performed an electronic search of Medline (1966 to August 2006); the Cochrane Collaboration’s Central Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; and the American College of Physicians Journal Club database using medical subject headings and keywords related to aspirin and clopidogrel, cardiovascular disease (i.e., “unstable angina,” “ACS,” “myocardial infarction,” “stroke,” “percutaneous coronary intervention,” and
Results
Our search identified 370 reports, of which 8 reported on trials that met our inclusion criteria (Figure 1). Three studies each assessed patients with ACS and those who underwent PCI. The other 2 studies evaluated patients with recent ischemic strokes or transient ischemic attacks7 and those with established vascular disease or multiple atherothrombotic risk factors.8 All trials compared combined clopidogrel and aspirin with aspirin monotherapy, with the exception of the MATCH trial,7 which
Discussion
This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials demonstrates that the use of clopidogrel in combination with aspirin for patients with ACS or those who undergo PCI significantly reduces the odds of major coronary events and fatal or nonfatal MI, compared with aspirin alone. In contrast, dual-antiplatelet therapy does not reduce the odds of all-cause mortality in these patients, is not superior to antiplatelet monotherapy for patients with subacute vascular disease or recent stroke, and when
References (21)
- et al.
Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study
Lancet
(2001) - et al.
Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Lancet
(2004) - et al.
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
Control Clin Trials
(1996) - et al.
ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention—summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2006) - et al.
Long-term cost-effectiveness of early and sustained clopidogrel therapy for up to 1 year in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention after presenting with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation
Am Heart J
(2006) - et al.
Patients with prior myocardial infarction, stroke, or symptomatic peripheral arterial disease in the CHARISMA trial
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2007) - et al.
Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation
N Engl J Med
(2001) - et al.
Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial
Lancet
(2005) - et al.
Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation
N Engl J Med
(2005) - et al.
Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial
JAMA
(2002)
Cited by (110)
Rivaroxaban plus aspirin for cardiovascular protection: Rationale for the vascular dose and dual pathway inhibition
2019, Thrombosis ResearchCitation Excerpt :Despite antiplatelet regimens including dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), recurrent ischemic events are common with up to 11% of patients with ACS and 5% of patients with stable CAD or PAD having recurrent ischemic events each year [16]. Compared with aspirin alone, DAPT reduces cardiovascular mortality by about 30% in ACS patients, but at the price of a 1.8-fold increase in bleeding [17]. In the PEGASUS trial, differences in relative risk of major bleeding (RR = 1.66 in COMPASS versus RR = 2.32 in PEGASUS), in addition to the more pronounced relative reduction of the primary endpoint and the significant reduction in mortality in COMPASS when comparing both regimens, makes the COMPASS results very compelling.
Preoperative coronary angiography in vascular surgery patients with asymptomatic elevated high-sensitivity troponin T: a case series
2019, British Journal of AnaesthesiaTo clip or coil? Proposal of individual decision making
2019, Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case ManagementCan we stop the stuttering in stroke? Interventions in 40 patients with acute lacunes
2019, Journal of the Neurological Sciences