Research
Obstetrics
A large head circumference is more strongly associated with unplanned cesarean or instrumental delivery and neonatal complications than high birthweight

Presented at the annual meeting of the Israel Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, November 5–6, 2014, and the Annual Conference of the Society of Reproductive Investigation, March 25–28, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.045Get rights and content

Objective

Fetal size impacts on perinatal outcomes. We queried whether the fetal head, as the fetal part interfacing with the birth canal, might impact on obstetric outcomes more than birthweight (BW). We examined associations between neonatal head circumference (HC) and delivery mode and risk of perinatal complications as compared to high BW.

Study Design

This was an electronic medical records–based study of term singleton births (37-42 weeks’ gestation) from January 2010 through December 2012 (N = 24,780, 6343 primiparae). We assessed risks of unplanned cesarean or instrumental delivery and maternal and fetal complications in cases with HC or BW ≥95th centile (large HC, high BW) vs those with parameters <95th centile (normal). Newborns were stratified into 4 subgroups: normal HC/normal BW (reference, n = 22,548, primiparae 5862); normal HC/high BW (n = 817, P = 213); large HC/normal BW (n = 878, P = 265); and large HC/high BW (n = 537, P = 103). Multinomial multivariable regression provided adjusted odds ratio (aOR) while controlling for potential confounders.

Results

Infants with HC ≥95th centile (n = 1415) were delivered vaginally in 62% of cases, unplanned cesarean delivery 16%, and instrumental delivery 11.2%; 78.4% of infants with HC <95th centile were delivered vaginally, 7.8% unplanned cesarean, and 6.7% instrumental delivery. Odds ratio (OR) for unplanned cesarean was 2.58 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.22–3.01) and for instrumental delivery OR was 2.13 (95% CI, 1.78–2.54). In contrast, in those with BW ≥95th centile (n = 1354) 80.3% delivered vaginally, 10.2% by unplanned cesarean (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.01–1.44), and 3.4% instrumental delivery (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.34–0.62) compared to infants with BW <95th centile: spontaneous vaginal delivery, 77.3%, unplanned cesarean 8.2%, instrumental 7.1%. Multinomial regression with normal HC/normal BW as reference group showed large HC/normal BW infants were more likely to be delivered by unplanned cesarean (aOR, 3.08; 95% CI, 2.52–3.75) and instrumental delivery (aOR, 3.03; 95% CI, 2.46–3.75). Associations were strengthened in primiparae. Normal HC/high BW was not associated with unplanned cesarean (aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.91–1.54), while large HC/high BW was (aOR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.47–2.52). Analysis of unplanned cesarean indications showed large HC infants had more failure to progress (27.7% vs 14.1%, P < .001), while smaller HC infants had more fetal distress (23.4% vs 16.9%, P < .05).

Conclusion

A large HC is more strongly associated with unplanned cesarean and instrumental delivery than high BW. Prospective studies are needed to test fetal HC as a predictive parameter for prelabor counseling of women with “big babies.”

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

This was a cross-sectional study based on EMR performed in the Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Centers Jerusalem, comprising 2 campuses of a tertiary care center. Our institutional ethical review board reviewed and approved the study (#0085-13-HMO; Feb. 14, 2013). All singleton term deliveries (37+0-42+0) occurring from January 2010 through December 2012 were eligible for inclusion. Multiple births were excluded. Data were collected in blinded fashion by research staff who were not involved

Results

A total of 28,168 term singleton deliveries occurred at our hospitals during the study period. Electronic data for HC and/or BW were missing in a small number of files: 1588 (5.6%) had no HC, 20 (0.07%) no BW, and 8 had neither parameter recorded. These cases were excluded from further analysis. The remaining cohort of 26,560 was analyzed for percentiles cutoffs; infants found to have HC and/or BW ≤5th centile were excluded from further analysis. A total of 24,780 singleton births therefore

Principal findings of the study

In this study based on high-quality EMRs with data entered prospectively prepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum, we demonstrate that large HC showed stronger association as compared to high BW with perinatal complications. We showed that infants with HC ≥95th centile had higher risk for interventional delivery (instrumental or UCD). Large HC infants were delivered by UCD about twice as frequently as those with HC in normal range, regardless of BW. Among infants of primiparae the risk was

References (34)

  • A.T. Papageorghiou et al.

    International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project

    Lancet

    (2014)
  • A.B. Wittman et al.

    The evolutionary origins of obstructed labor: bipedalism, encephalization, and the human obstetric dilemma

    Obstet Gynecol Surv

    (2007)
  • J.C. Wells et al.

    The obstetric dilemma: an ancient game of Russian roulette, or a variable dilemma sensitive to ecology?

    Am J Phys Anthropol

    (2012)
  • J.C. Wells

    Between Scylla and Charybdis: renegotiating resolution of the ‘obstetric dilemma' in response to ecological change

    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci

    (2015)
  • C. Elvander et al.

    The influence of fetal head circumference on labor outcome: a population-based register study

    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand

    (2012)
  • M.M. Kennelly et al.

    Postpartum fetal head circumference and its influence on labor duration in nullipara

    J Obstet Gynaecol

    (2003)
  • A. Larson et al.

    Association of head circumference and shoulder dystocia in macrosomic neonates

    Matern Child Health J

    (2013)
  • Cited by (72)

    • Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetric measurements as predictors for emergent cesarean delivery in obstructed labor

      2023, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X
    • Association between birth weight and head circumference and obstetric anal sphincter injury severity

      2021, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several studies have investigated long term complications following OASI and found higher rates of anal incontinence and reduced sphincter tone in major (3c and 4th degree) perineal tears [6–9], while others observed no correlation between the extent of the anal sphincter defect and severity of fecal incontinence [10]. Although previous studies have investigated risk factors for pelvic floor disorders and OASI, such as nulliparity [11–16], operative vaginal delivery [16–21], birth weight (BW) [14–18] and head circumference (HC)[18,22] and presented prediction models for OASI [23], their focus was mostly on the occurrence of OASI as a sole outcome, without a specific evaluation of the anal sphincter tear degree and the unique risk factors for each degree. Few studies have categorized OASI into minor (3a-3b) and major injuries (3c and 4) [24]; however, a paucity of data exists on OASI risk factors with regard to the specific sub-categories of third-degree tear.

    • Intrapartum sonographic assessment of the fetal head flexion in protracted active phase of labor and association with labor outcome: a multicenter, prospective study

      2021, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      We do envisage that in these conditions any attempt to perform an instrumental VD should be balanced against the risks of “true” obstructed labor. However, more research is required to clarify whether the head circumference,48,49 the maternal height,50–53 or other sonographic indices may be considered in the individualized management of the laboring woman diagnosed as having protracted active phase of labor in cases characterized by non-OP position, wide OSA, narrow AoP, and long HPD. Regarding the degree of flexion of the fetal head in OP fetuses, this study describes a quantitative parameter—that is, the CCA—for the assessment of the degree of flexion of the fetal head, which we show to be associated with a fair sensitivity and NPV in the prediction of CD owing to labor dystocia.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors report no conflict of interest.

    Cite this article as: Lipschuetz M, Cohen SM, Ein-Mor E, et al. A large head circumference is more strongly associated with unplanned cesarean or instrumental delivery and neonatal complications than high birthweight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213:833.e1-12.

    View full text