Transactions of the 71st Annual Meeting of the Central Association of Obstetricians and GynecologistsTiming of prophylactic antibiotic administration in the uninfected laboring gravida: A randomized clinical trial
Section snippets
Material and methods
In this prospective randomized study, women were eligible if they were in active labor and subsequently required a cesarean section. Patients were excluded if they had acute chorioamnionitis, allergy to penicillin or cephalosporins, cesarean section without labor, or the administration of systemic antibiotics within the past 2 weeks. Group B Strep prophylaxis (aqueous penicillin 5 million units IV then 3 million units q 4 hours), was allowed, and all patients, if indicated, received the same
Results
Over a 30-month period 342 patients with singleton pregnancies entered the trial. Twenty-three women in the skin incision group (A) and 21 in the cord clamp group (B) were found to have exclusion factors (Figure), leaving 153-group A, 149-group B. Patients were excluded if on final analysis, they were not in true, active labor (A = 12, B = 12), delivered vaginally before abdominal birth was performed (A = 4, B = 1). Chorioamnionitis was diagnosed (A = 4, B = 4), or antibiotics usage was confirmed during
Comment
Traditionally, prophylactic antibiotics are given preoperatively in obstetric/gynecologic procedures, and this is in keeping with general surgical principles. In 1961, Burke et al first demonstrated in an animal model that infection rates were decreased in contaminated skin wounds when antibiotics were given before contamination of the wound.11 This intuitive finding is widely accepted among the medical community and has been confirmed in many human studies. However, in the case of cesarean
References (16)
- et al.
Obesity as an independent risk factor for infectious morbidity in patients who undergo cesarean delivery
Obstet Gynecol
(2002) - et al.
Complications of cesarean deliveries: rates and risk factors
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2004) - et al.
Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis 1: relative effects of recommended antibiotics on gram-negative pathogens
Obstet Gynecol
(2002) - et al.
Cefazolin compared with cefoxitin for cesarean section prophylaxis: the use of a two-stage study design
J Clin Epidemiol
(1993) - et al.
Neonatal sepsis and death caused by resistant Escherichia coli: possible consequences of extended maternal ampicillin administration
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1999) - et al.
Complications following cesarean section
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen
(1990) - et al.
Risk-factors for surgical-site infections following cesarean section
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
(2001) - et al.
High risk factors for cesarean febrile morbidity
J MSMA
(1987)
Cited by (77)
Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infection Following Cesarean Delivery
2023, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North AmericaWhat's the optimal time of cesarean section antibiotic prophylaxis, before skin incision or after umbilical cord clamping? A prospective randomized study
2016, Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la ReproductionA multifaceted prevention program to reduce infection after cesarean section: Interventions assessed using an intensive postdischarge surveillance system
2015, American Journal of Infection ControlIs the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical procedures decreasing? Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials
2019, Infection Control and Hospital EpidemiologyEffect of prophylactic use of cefazolin in caesarean section on postoperative infection: A meta-analysis
2024, International Wound Journal
Presented at the 71st Annual Meeting of the Central Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, October 13-16, 2004, Washington, DC.
Reprints not available from the authors.