American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Case reportNonextraction treatment of a skeletal Class III malocclusion
Section snippets
Diagnosis and etiology
The patient was a boy, aged 16 years 4 months, whose chief complaint was the anterior crossbite. He had Class III canine and molar relationships on both sides, 5-mm negative overjet, 1-mm anterior open bite, bilateral crossbite with the maxillary midline coincident to the midsagittal plane, and a 1-mm deviation of the mandibular midline to the right. Both dental arches had about 2 mm of excess space, and there was slight facial asymmetry (Fig 1, Fig 2, Fig 3). Cephalometrically, there were a
Treatment objectives
Treatment objectives included correction of the posterior and anterior crossbites, improvement of the dentoalveolar and maxillomandibular relationships, improvement of facial esthetics, and establishment of a stable occlusion.
Treatment alternatives
Three treatment options were suggested to the patient and his parents. The first alternative consisted of combined surgical and orthodontic treatment with a high LeFort procedure and mandibular osteotomy to improve maxillary and facial appearance.
The second consisted of maxillary expansion and extraction of the mandibular first premolars. This would correct the Class III dental relationship, but it would also involve retraction of the mandibular incisors without protrusion of the maxillary
Treatment progress
Treatment began with placement of a banded rapid palatal expander on the maxillary first molars and premolars (Fig 5). The patient was instructed to activate the appliance .5 mm every day for 2 weeks. Subsequently, he received a facemask for maxillary protraction with a forward and downward force directed approximately 30° to 40° to the maxillary occlusal plane. The patient was instructed to wear it for 18 hours a day (Fig 6). A force of 400 g on each side was delivered by elastics attached to
Treatment results
The posttreatment extraoral photographs show general improvement in the facial profile. The posttreatment intraoral photographs and dental casts show satisfactory dental alignment, Class I canine and molar relationships on both sides, and normal overjet, overbite, and transverse relationships (Fig 8, Fig 9). There was significant improvement in the maxillomandibular relationship as cephalometrically shown by changes in the ANB angle, Wits appraisal, and overjet. The maxillary arch moved
Discussion
The treatment objectives were attained with the nonextraction treatment protocol. Usually, use of a facemask to correct Class III malocclusions through maxillary protraction is indicated in the deciduous and mixed dentitions.9 Little maxillary protraction is expected when it is used in the permanent dentition.1 However, there might be some exceptions in compliant patients, when clinically significant maxillary advancement can be obtained, as in this patient. Because there was a 9.8-mm increase
Conclusions
Successful occlusal and esthetic correction of a Class III malocclusion in the permanent dentition can be accomplished with a protraction facemask and Class III intermaxillary elastics when the patient's compliance in using the elastics is satisfactory. Once the correction is successful, active retention and follow-up are essential if the patient is still growing.
References (20)
- et al.
Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
(2004) - et al.
The psychological and social aspects of orthognathic treatment
Am J Orthod
(1982) - et al.
Nonsurgical and nonextraction treatment of skeletal Class III open bite: its long-term stability
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
(2000) - et al.
Skeletal Class III oligodontia patient treated with titanium screw anchorage and orthognathic surgery
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
(2005) - et al.
Treatment mechanics in Class III open bite malocclusion with tip edge technique
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
(1996) - et al.
Long-term stability of skeletal Class III patients treated with splints, Class III elastics, and chincup
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
(2003) Early application of chincap therapy to skeletal Class III malocclusion
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
(2002)- et al.
Long-term effects of chincap therapy on skeletal profile in mandibular prognathism
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
(1990) - et al.
Skeletal effects of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
(1998) - et al.
Facial growth in females 14 to 20 years of age
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
(1992)
Cited by (0)
The authors report no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.