Elsevier

The Lancet HIV

Volume 3, Issue 9, September 2016, Pages e410-e420
The Lancet HIV

Articles
Integrase inhibitor versus protease inhibitor based regimen for HIV-1 infected women (WAVES): a randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30016-9Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Women are under-represented in HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) studies. Guidelines for selection of ART as initial therapy in patients with HIV-1 infection do not contain sex-specific treatment. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the single tablet integrase inhibitor regimen containing elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate compared with a boosted protease inhibitor regimen of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir with emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

Methods

In this international, randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study (Women AntiretroViral Efficacy and Safety study [WAVES]), we recruited treatment-naive HIV-infected women with an estimated creatinine clearance of 70 mL/min or higher from 80 centres in 11 countries. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (integrase inhibitor regimen) or ritonavir-boosted atazanavir with emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (protease inhibitor based regimen); regimens were masked with matching placebos. Randomisation was done by a computer-generated allocation sequence (block size four) and was stratified by HIV-1 RNA viral load and race. Investigators, patients, study staff, and those assessing outcomes were masked to treatment group. All participants who received one dose of study drug were included in the primary efficacy and safety analyses. The main outcome was the proportion of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL at week 48 as defined by US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm (prespecified non-inferiority margin of 12%). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01705574.

Findings

Between Nov 28, 2012, and March 12, 2014, 575 women were enrolled. 289 were randomly assigned to receive the integrase inhibitor regimen and 286 to receive the protease inhibitor based regimen. 252 (87%) women in the integrase inhibitor group had plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL at week 48 compared with 231 (81%) women in the protease inhibitor group (adjusted difference 6·5%; 95% CI 0·4–12·6). No participant had virological failure with resistance in the integrase inhibitor group compared with three participants ([1%]; all Met184Val/Ile) in the protease inhibitor group. 19 women in the protease inhibitor group discontinued because of adverse events compared with five in the integrase inhibitor group.

Interpretation

WAVES shows that clinical trials of ART regimens in global and diverse populations of treatment-naive women are possible. The findings support guidelines recommending integrase inhibitor based regimens in first-line antiretroviral therapy.

Funding

Gilead Sciences.

Introduction

Half of the cases of HIV worldwide are in women, and the number of women acquiring HIV infection continues to rise.1 Research guidelines have long advocated for sex-based assessment of drug efficacy, toxicity, and tolerability profiles;2, 3 but women continue to be under-represented in clinical trials assessing efficacy and safety of antiretroviral treatment (ART) among HIV-1 infected people. One of the consequences of this restricted representation is the absence of definitive information about the specific efficacy and safety of ART in women.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 The selection of ART should be evidence based and take into account several factors, including regimen potency, side-effects, level of adherence required for efficacy, and quality of life specific to the population of patients. Current guidelines for first-line treatment of HIV-1 infection include the use of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus a third active drug from a different class.10, 11, 12 The integrase strand transfer inhibitor (elvitegravir, 150 mg) coformulated with cobicistat (150 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (300 mg) in a single-tablet regimen is a preferred ART regimen in treatment-naive patients and atazanavir (300 mg) boosted by ritonavir (100 mg) plus a preferred two-NRTI backbone (emtricitabine plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) is well tolerated in HIV-infected women13 and remains a preferred regimen during pregnancy.10, 11, 14

We did the first antiretroviral trial to enrol only women and aimed to assess safety and efficacy of two approved HIV-1 regimens, the single-tablet integrase inhibitor regimen containing elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate compared with the protease inhibitor regimen of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir with emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

Research in context

Evidence before this study

We searched PubMed for reports of large randomised clinical trials assessing antiretroviral treatment in ART-naive women and found no studies. Search terms included “HIV, “naive” AND “women” or “female” AND “antiretroviral” AND “randomized trial” and searches were limited to articles published in English between Jan 1, 1997, and Dec 31, 2015. Women account for half of the global HIV epidemic yet remain under-represented in HIV clinical trials. Current HIV treatment guidelines are based on data obtained mainly from men and might promote sex bias and inaccuracies in the paradigm of evidence-based medicine. To our knowledge, there are no published data from randomised clinical studies that focus primarily on antiretroviral treatment in women.

Added value of this study

This first all-women, randomised, double-blind clinical trial compared two approved ART regimens: integrase based (elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) and protease inhibitor based (ritonavir-boosted atazanavir with emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate). The integrase inhibitor group had superior efficacy to the protease inhibitor based, differing from previous clinical trials (with mostly male participants) in which the integrase inhibitor group was non-inferior in efficacy to the protease inhibitor group. Unanticipated regional differences in efficacy and tolerability were noted. The highest virological response was reported in Ugandan women and the lowest rate of viral suppression was seen in the USA, regardless of treatment group.

Interpretation

The WAVES study is the only completed randomised clinical trial to date done exclusively among women. The WAVES population was geographically and ethnically diverse, providing a better understanding of several factors that might affect clinical outcome. The randomised study groups were well matched and the outcome data indicate that in the setting of this clinical trial the integrase inhibitor group provided superior efficacy with increased tolerability, offering new insights and treatment information to clinicians caring for women with HIV infection.

Section snippets

Study design and participants

The Women AntiretroViral Efficacy and Safety study (WAVES) is an international, randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study done at 80 sites from Belgium, Dominican Republic, France, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Russia, Thailand, Uganda, the UK, and the USA. Women aged 18 years or older were eligible if they were HIV-1 infected had not received previous ART, had plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load 500 copies per mL or greater, and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of at least 70

Results

Between Oct 24, 2012, and Jan 28, 2014, 810 women were screened for eligibility. Of the 227 who did not meet the study entry eligibility criteria (screened participants could have more than one inclusion or exclusion criterion), 129 (57%) women were from Uganda. The most common screen fail reasons for the Uganda site include: eGFR less than 70 mL/min (64%), HIV-1 RNA less than 500 copies per mL (14%), abnormal haematology profile (11%), positive serum pregnancy (4%), screening genotype with

Discussion

The integrase inhibitor regimen (elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) had superior efficacy to the protease inhibitor based regimen (atazanavir, ritonavir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate). High virological responses were noted in most regions and across different HIV subtypes. No emergent resistance was detected in the integrase inhibitor group but was present in three women in the protease inhibitor group.

The higher response rate in this

References (33)

  • European AIDS Clinical Society Guidelines

  • Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents

  • Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection

  • M Johnson et al.

    A systematic review of the use of atazanavir in women infected with HIV-1

    Antivir Ther

    (2014)
  • Recommendations for Use of Antiretroviral Drugs in Pregnant HIV-1-Infected Women for Maternal Health and Interventions to Reduce Perinatal HIV Transmission in the United States

  • Guidance for Industry: Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Infection: Developing Antiretroviral Drugs for Treatment

  • Cited by (77)

    • Associations of modern initial antiretroviral drug regimens with all-cause mortality in adults with HIV in Europe and North America: a cohort study

      2022, The Lancet HIV
      Citation Excerpt :

      The introduction of integrase strand inhibitors (INSTIs) in 2007 was an important milestone in the history of ART.3 Most patients now start ART with an INSTI-based regimen following positive results from randomised trials.4–17 These trials showed superiority7,9,11,13–15 or non-inferiority6,8,10,12,16,17 of INSTI-based regimens for virological failure compared with other regimens, such as those containing efavirenz (a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor [NNRTI]) and atazanavir or darunavir (protease inhibitors).6–17

    • Design, synthesis, molecular docking and DFT computational insight on the structure of Piperazine sulfynol derivatives as a new antibacterial contender against superbugs MRSA

      2022, Journal of Molecular Structure
      Citation Excerpt :

      Piperazine sulfonamides are the most widely used antibacterial agents [11] in the world, chiefly because of their low cost, low toxicity, and excellent activity against common bacterial disease. Piperazine core moieties are important pharmacophores that can be found in many marketed drugs, such as the HIV protease inhibitor Crixivan [12-14] and the other drugs under development. Diphenylpiperazine derivatives possess broad pharmacological action on the central nervous system (CNS), especially on dopaminergic neurotransmission [15-18].

    • Updates in the Approach to Pediatric HIV Care and Prevention

      2023, Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text