Elsevier

Injury

Volume 47, Supplement 1, January 2016, Pages S25-S27
Injury

Hip fracture programs: are they effective?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(16)30006-7Get rights and content

Abstract

This manuscript will evaluate the published evidence on efficacy of organized hip fracture programs to determine if they improve patient outcomes. A detailed literature search was conducted to find manuscripts published in the past 20 years about organized hip fracture care programs. Seventeen programs with published results were identified from this detailed search and these were evaluated and synthesized in the following manuscript.

Organized hip fracture programs offer significant benefits to patients, care providers and health systems. The more complex program designs have a more profound effect on improvement in outcomes for hip fracture patients. Most programs have reported reduced length of stay, reduced in-hospital mortality rates, and reduced complications. Some programs have reported reduced costs and reduced readmission rates after implementing an organized hip fracture program.

Introduction

Hip fracture is a common injury in older adults that is both greatly feared and harmful. Although the incidence of hip fracture has slightly decreased, the prevalence is increasing with the aging of the population. The outcomes of hip fracture care have improved little over the past 30 years despite improvements in anticoagulation, anesthetic management, hip fracture implants, and pharmacologic advances [1]. This situation has led many physicians and surgeons caring for hip fracture patients to look for other methods to improve patient outcomes. Altering the model of care has been one such improvement attempted in many centers. Over the past 20 years, several such models have been implemented and studied. Giusti and colleagues have already published a thoughtful and detailed analysis of these models and their attributes [2]. This manuscript will evaluate the published evidence on efficacy of organized hip fracture programs to improve patient outcomes.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

The author searched PubMed (1999–present) databases of the National Library of Medicine and Google Scholar (1999–present) for appropriate articles addressing the impact of hip fracture programs. The key words, which were searched, were the terms “geriatric fracture programs”, “hip fracture programs”, and “geriatric fracture centers”. Searching of the reference lists of potentially relevant original papers was also performed. Inclusion criteria: papers written in English in peer-reviewed

Results

From the above search strategy, 1403 results were obtained. Most of the articles were excluded by title or review of the abstract as being irrelevant to this search. This left 28 manuscripts that addressed the question of efficacy of organized hip fracture programs. When several manuscripts addressed the same model at the same institution, they were condensed into one. This left 17 programs with a reasonable quality of outcome reporting to examine in this manuscript. Programs reporting results

Discussion

Elements of highly organized hip fracture programs include standardized order sets [5], use of a clinical care pathway [5], comanagement with a medical physician and orthopaedic surgeon [5], early surgery [5, 6], use of lean business principles to optimize patient care [7], early mobility with weight bearing permitted [6], and early discharge planning [5]. Additionally, incorporation of “best practices” into each aspect of care is typically done in the most complex and organized hip fracture

Conclusions

Organized hip fracture programs offer significant benefits to patients, care providers and health systems. The more complex program designs have a more profound effect on improvement in outcomes for hip fracture patients. Most programs have reported reduced length of stay, reduced in-hospital mortality rates, and reduced complications. Some programs have reported reduced costs and reduced readmission rates after implementing an organized hip fracture program.

Conflict of interest

Grant support: PCORI, AOTrauma. Consultant: Surgical Excellence.

References (29)

  • TW Lau et al.

    The effectiveness of a geriatric hip fracture clinical pathway in reducing hospital and rehabilitation length of stay and improving short-term mortality rates

    Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil

    (2013)
  • CS Colon-Emeric

    Postoperative management of hip fractures: interventions associated with improved outcomes

    Bonekey Rep

    (2012)
  • CJ Dy et al.

    The medical orthopaedic trauma service: an innovative multidisciplinary team model that decreases in-hospital complications in patients with hip fractures

    J Orthop Trauma

    (2012)
  • M Gregersen et al.

    Geriatric intervention in elderly patients with hip fracture in an orthopedic ward

    J Inj Violence Res

    (2012)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Building a comprehensive geriatric fracture program and using evidence-based Nurses Improving Care for Healthsystem Elders (NICHE) best care practices

      2022, Geriatric Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our time from presentation in the emergency room to surgery averages 16 hours. Literature shows less than 48 hours (about 2 days) improves outcomes.2 The length of stay average ranging around 7 days.

    • 30-day mortality in patients after hip fracture surgery: A comparison of the Charlson Comorbidity Index score and ASA score used in two prediction models

      2021, Injury
      Citation Excerpt :

      Continuous improvements are made to optimize treatment for these patients. Changes have been made in surgical techniques, surgical implants and care systems in order to reduce mortality rates [4-6]. Guidelines recommend early surgery, early postoperative mobilization and use of standardized and orthogeriatric care [7].

    • Do standardized hip fracture care programs decrease mortality in geriatric hip fracture patients?

      2021, Injury
      Citation Excerpt :

      With the increasing evidence supporting SHFP across medicine, more institutions are developing and incorporating these pathways for select patient populations. Kates et al. [18] performed a review on the literature assessing SHFP between 2002 and 2014 and found 14 of the 17 studies were published after 2010. This review noted the heterogeneity and differences in the ‘standardized’ programs.

    • Effectiveness of regional clinical pathways on postoperative length of stay for hip fracture patients: A retrospective observational study using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database

      2020, Journal of Orthopaedic Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, effective use of healthcare resources and improvement in care quality are important issues. Several studies on the efficacy of clinical pathways for hip fracture patients suggest that implementation of clinical pathways is associated with a decrease in the length of stay (LOS) [6–10]. However, although research also indicates that postoperative LOS is associated with postoperative infection, venous thromboembolism and delirium, data on postoperative LOS in general are limited [11].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text