Original article
Inconsistency of a model aimed at predicting bacteremia in hospitalized patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90171-VGet rights and content

Abstract

Clinical prediction rules can help physicians determine the necessity for blood cultures in specific patients and/or in whom emp ric antibiotic treatment should be administered. Before adopting a prediction rule its validity must be evaluated in different settings. We revealed independent predictors of true bacteremia and developed a risk score based on them in one group of adult hospitalized patients (n = 474; derivation set). An attempt was made to validate this risk score in a second group of in-patients at the same hospital (n = 438; validation set). The derivation set included 540 blood culture episodes and the validation set 516. A blood culture episode was defined as one or more of all blood specimens withdrawn for culture from one patient over one 24 hour period. Independent multivariate predictors of true bacteremia' were: temperature of 39°C or higher, current immunosuppressive therapy, serum alkaline phosphatase > 100 IU and hospitalization in an intensive care unit. In the low risk group, defined by the absence of the said predictors, the rates of true bacteremia were 5.1 and 4.6% for the derivation and validation sets, respectively. As raised temperature is the main clinical feature guiding physicians to suspect bacteremia, we examined the probability of true bacteremia in patients with a temperature of less than 38°C and found it to be 5.6% in the two sets. The model identified high risk subset patient groups demonstrating true bacteremia in 38% of all episodes in the derivation set and the comparatively low rate of 12.1% (p < 0.01) for the validation set.' Application of a predictive model developed in our hospital was only partially successful in categorizing patients by risk of bacteremia. The risk in both sets, even among the patients at lowest risk, was judged too high to exclude collecting blood specimens for culture. These findings demonstrate the inconsistency of a model aimed at predicting bacteremia even within the same institution over different time periods.

References (8)

  • J.A. Washington et al.

    Blood cultures: issues and controversies

    Rev Infect Dis

    (1986)
  • H.J. Makadon et al.

    Fever in hospitalized medical patients: characteristic and significance

    J Gen Intern Med

    (1988)
  • D.W. Bates et al.

    Predicting bacteremia in hospitalized patients

    Ann Intern Med

    (1990)
  • J.H. Wasson et al.

    Clinical prediction rules. Application and methodological standards

    N Engl J Med

    (1985)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (31)

  • Concurrent external validation of bloodstream infection probability models

    2023, Clinical Microbiology and Infection
    Citation Excerpt :

    Studies came from multiple countries, were published between 1991 and 2015, and were evenly split between single or multicentred design. Four studies [19–22] were limited to specific diagnoses and three [19,20,23] excluded immunocompromized patients. Eight studies required that patients have at least two blood culture sets with the other studies [24,25] not specifying a required number of cultures.

  • Predicting bacteremia in the Emergency Room: How and why

    2022, Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia Clinica
  • Predicting bacteraemia in validated models-a systematic review

    2015, Clinical Microbiology and Infection
    Citation Excerpt :

    Yehezkelli et al. [29] tested the 2 models developed by Bates [8] and Leibovici [2] and also found significant deterioration in performance. Mozes et al. [16] suggested several factors contributing to these limitations of previous models: varying inclusion criteria, differences in definitions of predictors, overrepresentation of groups, varying practice styles and variation in measurement and interpretation of data. An example of differences between sites is that intravenous drug abuse was a strong predictor of bacteraemia in the Bates model, but there were few intravenous drug abusers where it was validated.

  • Blood cultures when fever?

    2010, Revista Clinica Espanola
  • The degree of chills for risk of bacteremia in acute febrile illness

    2005, American Journal of Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, these values are smaller than 0.78 of our model using a single predictor (degree of chills). Moreover, Mozes et al highlighted the limited usefulness of bacteremia prediction models of multiple predictors.7 Several studies showed that bacteremic patients had the higher concentrations of various pyrogenic cytokines than those without bacteremia.14,30

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text