Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health
  3. Article

Barriers related to non-adherence in a mammography breast-screening program during the implementation period in the interior of São Paulo State, Brazil

  • Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 07 February 2015
  • Volume 5, pages 211–219, (2015)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Barriers related to non-adherence in a mammography breast-screening program during the implementation period in the interior of São Paulo State, Brazil
Download PDF
  • René Aloisio Costa da Vieira1,2,6,
  • Tânia Silveira Lourençco2,3,
  • Edmundo Carvalho Mauad1,3,
  • Valter Gonçalves Moreira Filho3,
  • Stela Verzinhasse Peres4,
  • Thiago Buosi Silva3 &
  • …
  • Maria do Rosário Dias Oliveira de Lattore4,5 
  • 108 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Mammography is the best exam for early diagnosis of breast cancer. Developing countries frequently have a low income of mammography and absence of organized screening. The knowledge of vulnerable population and strategies to increase adherence are important to improve the implementation of an organized breast-screening program. A mammography regional-screening program was implemented in a place around 54.238 women, aged 40–69 years old. It was proposed to perform biannual mammography free of cost for the women. We analyze the first 2 years of the implementation of the project. Mammography was realized in 17.964 women. 42.1% of the women hadn’t done de mammography in their lives and these women were principally from low socio-economic status (OR = 2.99), low education (OR = 3.00). The best strategies to include these women were mobile unit (OR =1.43) and Family Health Program (OR =1.79). The incidence of early breast tumors before the project was 14.5%, a fact that changed to 43.2% in this phase. Multivariate analysis showed that the association of illiterate and the mobile unit achieve more women who had not performed mammography in their lives. The strategies to increase adherence to mammography must be multiple and a large organization is necessary to overpass the barriers related to system health and education.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Breast Cancer
  • Cancer Prevention
  • Cancer Screening
  • Disease prevention
  • Policy Implementation
  • Population Screening
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson BO, Jakesz R. Breast cancer issues in developing countries: an overview of the Breast Health Global Initiative. World J Surg 2008;32:2578–85.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:74–108.

    Google Scholar 

  4. DeSantis C, Siegel R, Bandi P, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2011. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:409–18.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brasil. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA). Tipos de câncer: Câncer de Mama. Rio de Janeiro/RJ: INCA 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee BL, Liedke PE, Barrios CH, Simon SD, Finkelstein DM, Goss PE. Breast cancer in Brazil: present status and future goals. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:e95–e102.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vieira RAC. Estudo comparativo entre pacientes de Hospital Oncológico no Brasil e População Americana. Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatu: Universidade Estadual Paulista Ju´lio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP); 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  8. De Castro Mattos JS, Mauad EC, Syrjanen K, Longatto-Filho A, Haikel RL, Da Costa Vieira RA, et al. The impact of breast cancer screening among younger women in the Barretos region, Brazil. Anticancer Res 2013;33:2651–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haikel Jr RL, Mauad EC, Silva TB, Mattos JS, Chala LF, Longatto-Filho A, et al. Mammography-based screening program: preliminary results from a first 2-year round in a Brazilian region using mobile and fixed units. BMC Womens Health 2012;12:32.

    Google Scholar 

  10. George SA. Barriers to breast cancer screening: an integrative review. Health Care Women Int 2000;21:53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Censo Demográfico 200. Brasília/DF: IBGE; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rosa WA, Labate RC. Family health program: the construction of a new care model. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem 2005;13:1027–34.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Associação Brasileira das Empresas de Pesquisa (ABEP). Critério de classificação econômica Brasil. São Paulo: ABEP; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shapiro S, Strax P, Venet L. Periodic breast cancer screening in reducing mortality from breast cancer. JAMA 1971;215:1777–85.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gotzsche PC, Nielsen M. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009: CD001877.

  16. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, Fryback DG, Clarke L, Zelen M, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353: 1784–92.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smith RA, Brooks D, Cokkinides V, Saslow D, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2013: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines, current issues in cancer screening, and new guidance on cervical cancer screening and lung cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 2013;63:88–105.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lima-Costa MF, Matos DL. Prevalence and factors associated with mammograms in the 50–69-year age group: a study based on the Brazilian National Household Sample Survey (PNAD-2003). Cad Saude Publica 2007;23:1665–73.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Programa das Nações Unidas para o desenvolvimento (PNUD). Atlas do Desenvolvimento Humano no Brasil. Brasilia; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lourenco TS, Mauad EC, Vieira RA. Barriers in the breast cancer screening and the role of nursing: an integrative review. Rev Bras Enferm 2013;66:585–91.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marinho LAB, Cecatti JG, Osis MJD, Gurgel MSC. Knowledge, attitude and practice of mammography among women users of public health services. Rev Saúde Pública 2008;42:200–7.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lourenço TS, Vieira RAC, Mauad EC, Silva TB, Costa AM, Peres SV. Barriers related to the non-adherence to the mammography screening program in DRS-5 of the state of São Paulo. Rev Bras Mastol 2009;19:2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Tornberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition – summary document. Ann Oncol 2008;19:614–22.

  24. Thuler LC. Considerações sobre a prevenção do câncer de mama feminino. Rev Bras Cancerol 2003;49:227–38.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Menke CH, Pádua Filho AF, Carvalho AER, Santos CC, Studart C, Carneiro SM. Rastreamento do câncer de mama na mulher brasileira. In SBM, editor, Reunião Nacional de Consenso. Sociedade Brasileira de Mastologia. São Paulo: SBM; 2008. p. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rubenstein L. Strategies to overcome barriers to early detection of cancer among older adults. Cancer 1994;74: 2190–3.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kelaher M, Stellman JM. The impact of medicare funding on the use of mammography among older women: implications for improving access to screening. Prev Med 2000;31: 658–64.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Young RF, Severson RK. Breast cancer screening barriers and mammography completion in older minority women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005;89:111–8.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ward E, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, Singh GK, Cardinez C, Ghafoor A, et al. Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. CA Cancer J Clin 2004;54: 78–93.

    Google Scholar 

  30. de Sousa MF, Hamann EM. Family Health Program in Brazil: an incomplete agenda? Cien Saude Colet 2009;14(Suppl. 1): 1325–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Barretos Cancer Hospital, Brazil

    René Aloisio Costa da Vieira & Edmundo Carvalho Mauad

  2. Botucatu School of Medicine, UNESP, Brazil

    René Aloisio Costa da Vieira & Tânia Silveira Lourençco

  3. Prevention Department, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Brazil

    Tânia Silveira Lourençco, Edmundo Carvalho Mauad, Valter Gonçalves Moreira Filho & Thiago Buosi Silva

  4. Nucleus for Researcher Support, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Brazil

    Stela Verzinhasse Peres & Maria do Rosário Dias Oliveira de Lattore

  5. Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, University of Saã Paulo, Brazil

    Maria do Rosário Dias Oliveira de Lattore

  6. Hospital de Câncer de Barretos — Fundação Pio XII, Rua Antenor Duarte Villela, No. 1.331, Bairro Dr. Paulo Prata, CEP 14.784-400, Barretos, SP, Brazil

    René Aloisio Costa da Vieira

Authors
  1. René Aloisio Costa da Vieira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tânia Silveira Lourençco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Edmundo Carvalho Mauad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Valter Gonçalves Moreira Filho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stela Verzinhasse Peres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Thiago Buosi Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Maria do Rosário Dias Oliveira de Lattore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to René Aloisio Costa da Vieira.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Vieira, R.A.C., Lourençco, T.S., Mauad, E.C. et al. Barriers related to non-adherence in a mammography breast-screening program during the implementation period in the interior of São Paulo State, Brazil. J Epidemiol Glob Health 5, 211–219 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2014.09.007

Download citation

  • Received: 02 March 2014

  • Revised: 14 September 2014

  • Accepted: 15 September 2014

  • Published: 07 February 2015

  • Issue Date: January 2015

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2014.09.007

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Breast neoplasms
  • Cancer early detection
  • Mass screening
  • Community health planning
  • Developing countries

Profiles

  1. Stela Verzinhasse Peres View author profile
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature