Buscar en
Revista Clínica de Periodoncia, Implantología y Rehabilitación Oral
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Clínica de Periodoncia, Implantología y Rehabilitación Oral Oclusión terapéutica. Desde las escuelas de oclusión a la Odontología Basada...
Información de la revista
Vol. 6. Núm. 2.
Páginas 90-95 (Agosto 2013)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 6. Núm. 2.
Páginas 90-95 (Agosto 2013)
Open Access
Oclusión terapéutica. Desde las escuelas de oclusión a la Odontología Basada en Evidencia
Therapeutic occlusion. From occlusal schools of thought to Evidence-based Dentistry
Visitas
15074
M. Firmani1,
Autor para correspondencia
mfirmani@odontologia.uchile.cl

Correspondencia autor:
, N. Becerra2, C. Sotomayor2, G. Flores3, J.C. Salinas3
1 Instructora. Departamento de Prótesis, Área de Oclusión. Universidad de Chile. Chile
2 Ayudante. Departamento de Prótesis, Área de Oclusión. Universidad de Chile. Chile
3 Profesor Asistente. Departamento de Prótesis, Área de Oclusión. Universidad de Chile. Chile
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumen

Tanto en la práctica clínica como en la academia, siempre está presente la interrogante de cuál es la mejor posición mandibular para organizar una oclusión terapéutica y satisfacer los requerimientos estéticos y funcionales de los pacientes. Esta pregunta se podría responder desde la perspectiva de las diferentes escuelas de oclusión, siguiendo sus técnicas y utilizando su aparatología. Sin embargo, debido a que no existe suficiente evidencia científica que sustente la superioridad de una escuela sobre la otra, es preciso hacer una revisión donde se expongan los principios en que se basan las distintas filosofías oclusales, los autores que les dieron origen, la época en que surgieron y la terminología que usaron -desde el siglo pasado hasta nuestros días-, contrastándolas con la literatura científica actual. Esta no es una tarea fácil, ya que los estudios disponibles acerca de oclusión presentan gran variabilidad en la definición operacional de los términos, haciendo difícil su comparación. Se sugiere para el futuro buscar una estandarización de las definiciones y técnicas de registro, con el objeto de generar evidencia científica confiable, conducente a la creación de protocolos de recomendación para la toma de decisiones clínicas predecibles desde el punto de vista oclusal.

Palabras clave:
Oclusión
escuelas de oclusión
filosofías oclusales
Odontología Basada en Evidencia
Abstract

Both in clinical practice and academia, there is always the question about what is the best mandibular position to organize a therapeutic occlusion that satisfies functional and aesthetic requirements from patients. This question could be answered from the point of view of different occlusion schools of thought, following their techniques and using their apparatuses. However, due to the lack of scientific evidence to support the pre-eminence of a particular school over the rest, it is necessary to go through the princip les that provide the foundations for the different occlusal philosophies: the authors who gave birth to each school of thought, the time in which they were formed and the terminology they used, from the early 20th century to present times and making a comparison with current scientific literature. This is not an easy task, given that available studies about occlusion feature a great variability in the operational definition of terms, making comparison difficult. The article suggests that it would be necessary for the future to look for a standardization of recording definitions and techniques. The aim is to generate reliable scientific evidence for the creation of protocols of recommendation for predictable decision-making from an occlusal point of view.

Key words:
Occlusion
occlusion schools of thought
occlusal philosophies
Evidence-Based Dentistry
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Referencias Bibliográficas
[1.]
S. Davies, R. Gray.
What is occlusion?.
Brit Dent J, 191 (2001), pp. 235-245
[2.]
The glossary of prosthodontic, terms.
J.Prosthet Dent, 94 (2005), pp. 21-22
[3.]
J.R. Clark, R.D. Evans.
Functional occlusion: I a review.
J Orthod, 28 (2001), pp. 76-81
[4.]
H. Graf, A.H. Geering.
Rationale for critical application of differentes occlusal philosophies.
Oral Sci Rev, 10 (1977), pp. 1-10
[5.]
S.E. Forrester, S.J. Allen, R.G. Fresswood, A.C. Toy, M.T.G. Pain.
Neuromuscular function in healthy occlusion.
J Oral Rehabil, 37 (2010), pp. 663-669
[6.]
R. Ciancaglini, E.F. Gherlone, S. Redaelli, G. Radaelli.
The distribution of occlusal contacts in the intercuspal position and temporomandibular disorder.
J Oral Rehabil, 29 (2002), pp. 1082-1090
[7.]
G.E. Carlsson.
Some dogmas to prosthodontics, temporomandibular disorders and occlusion.
Acta Odontol Scand, 68 (2010), pp. 313-322
[8.]
G.E. Carlsson.
Dental occlusion: Modern concepts and their application in implant prosthodontics.
Odontology, 97 (2009), pp. 8-17
[9.]
J.R. Miller.
An endless discussion.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139 (2011), pp. 293
[10.]
A. Mackie, K. Lyons.
The role in temporomandibular disorders -a review of the literature.
New Zealand Dental Journal, 104 (2008), pp. 54-59
[11.]
P.H.R. Wilson, A. Banerjee.
Recording the retruded contact position: A review of clinical techniques.
Brit Dent J, 196 (2004), pp. 395-402
[12.]
J.C. Türp, C.S. Greene, J.R. Strub.
Dental occlusion: A critical reflection on past, present and future concepts.
J Oral Rehabil, 35 (2008), pp. 446-453
[13.]
P. Bracco, A. Deregibus, R. Piscetta.
Effects of different jaw relations on postural stability in human subjects.
Neuroscience Letters, 356 (2004), pp. 228-230
[14.]
S. Tecco, A. Polimeni, F. Festa.
Postural loads during walking after an imbalance of occlusion created with unilateral cotton rolls.
BMC Res Notes, 3 (2010), pp. 141
[15.]
Y. Ono, T. Yamamoto, L. Kubo, M. Onozuka.
Occlusion and brain function: Mastication as a prevention of cognitive dysfunction.
J Oral Rehabil, 8 (2010), pp. 624-640
[16.]
S.D. Crawford.
Condylar axis position, as determined by the occlusion and measured by the CPI instrument, and signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction.
Angle Ortho, 69 (1999), pp. 103-116
[17.]
J.P. Okeson.
Tratamiento de oclusión y afecciones temporomandibulares.
Elsevier, (2003),
[18.]
P. Saizar.
La oclusión, diferentes escuelas.
RAOA, 67 (1979), pp. 113-120
[19.]
M.J. Racich.
Orofacial pain and occlusion: Is there a link? An overview of current concepts and the clinical implications.
J Prosthet Dent, 93 (2005), pp. 189-196
[20.]
H.A. Gremillion.
The relationship between occlusion and TMD: An evidencebased discussion.
J Evid Base Dent Pract, 6 (2006), pp. 43-47
[21.]
S.J. Davies, R.M. Gray, P.W. Smith.
Good occlusal practice in simple restorative dentistry.
British Dental J, 191 (2001), pp. 365-381
[22.]
K. Gotfretdsen, A.W.G. Walls.
What dentition assures oral function?.
Clin Oral Impl Res, 18 (2007), pp. 34-45
[23.]
D. Armellini, J.A. Von Fraunhofer.
The shortened dental arch: A review of the literature.
J Prosthet Dent, 92 (2004), pp. 531-535
[24.]
G.J. Tarantola, I.M. Becker, H. Gremilion.
The reproductibility of centric relation: A clinical approach.
J Am Dent Assoc, 128 (1997), pp. 1245-1251
[25.]
A. Keshvad, R.B. Winstanley.
An appraisal of the literature on centric relation.
Part I. J Oral Rehabil, 27 (2000), pp. 823-833
[26.]
P.H. Pokorny, J.P. Wiens, H. Litvak.
Occlusion for fixed prosthodontics: A historical perspective of gnathological influence.
J Prosthet Dent, 99 (2008), pp. 299-313
[27.]
A. Keshvad, R.B. Winstanley.
An appraisal of the literature on centric relation Part II.
J Oral Rehabil, 27 (2000), pp. 1013-1023
[28.]
A. Keshvad, R.B. Winstanley.
An appraisal of the literature on centric relation Part III.
J Oral Rehabil, 28 (2000), pp. 55-63
[29.]
A. Keshvad, R.B. Winstanley.
Comparison of the replicability of routinely used centric relation registration techniques.
J Prosthodont, 12 (2003), pp. 90-101
[30.]
J. Truitt, R. Strauss, A. Best.
Centric relation: A survey study to determine whether a consensus exists between oral and maxillofacial surgeons and orthodontists.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 67 (2009), pp. 1058-1061
[31.]
A. Milosevic.
Occlusion I: Terms, mandibular movement and the factors of occlusion.
Dent Update, 30 (2003), pp. 359-361
[32.]
D. Rinchuse, S. Kandasamy.
Centric relation: A historical and contemporary orthodontic perspective.
JADA, 137 (2006), pp. 494-501
[33.]
C.M. Becker, D.A. Kaiser, C. Schwalm.
Mandibular centricity: Centric relation.
J Prosthet Dent, 83 (2000), pp. 158-160
[34.]
E. Rodríguez.
Centricidad mandibular.
Rev Fac Odont Univ Chile, 3 (1985), pp. 1
[35.]
M.M. Ash Jr..
Philosophy of occlusion: Past and present.
Dent Clin N Am, 39 (1995), pp. 233-255
[36.]
T.D. Taylor, J. Wiens, A. Carr.
Evidence-based considerations for removable prosthodontic and dental implant occlusion: A literature review.
J Prosthet Dent, 94 (2005), pp. 555-560
[37.]
D.J. Rinchuse, S. Kandasamy.
Myths of orthodontic gnathology.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136 (2009), pp. 322-330
[38.]
J.R. Benson.
Exploring the world of bioaesthetic dentistry. Interview by Damon Adams.
Dent Today, 98 (2011), pp. 100-103
[39.]
Posselt U. Fisiología de la oclusión y rehabilitación. Barcelona: Jimbs, 1973. Reimpresión 1981.
[40.]
U. Posselt.
Terminal hinge movement of the mandible.
J Prosthet Dent, 7 (1957), pp. 787-797
[41.]
H. Beyron.
Optimal occlusion.
Dent Clin N Am, 13 (1969), pp. 537-554
[42.]
C.H. Schuyler.
Freedom in centric.
Dent Clin N Am, 3 (1969), pp. 681-686
[43.]
E.N. Starcke.
The history of articulators: A critical history of articulators based on “geometric” theories of mandibular movement. Part IV: Needles, Wadsworth, and a look at some who followed.
J Prosthodont, 12 (2003), pp. 51-62
[44.]
M.M. Ash, S. Ramfjord.
Oclusión.
McGraw Hill, (1996),
[45.]
G.A. Dinham.
Myocentric. A clinical appraisal.
The Angle Orthodontist, 54 (1984), pp. 211-217
[46.]
B. Thilander.
Dentoalveolar development in subjects with normal occlusion. A longitudinal study between the ages of 5 and 31 years.
Eur J Orthodont, 31 (2009), pp. 109-120
[47.]
D.J. Rinchuse, S. Kandasamy, J. Sciote.
A contemporary and evidence - based view of canine protected occlusion.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132 (2007), pp. 90-102
[48.]
S.J. Davies, R.M.J. Gray, P.W. Smith.
Good occlusal practice in simple restorative dentistry.
Br Dent J, 191 (2001), pp. 535-581
[49.]
S.J. Davies, R.M.J. Gray, P.J. Sandler, H.D. O´Brien.
Orthodontics and occlusion.
Br Dent J, 191 (2001), pp. 539-549
[50.]
J.R. Clark, I. Hutchinson, J.R. Sandy.
Functional occlusion: II The role of articulators in orthodontics.
J Orthod, 28 (2001), pp. 173-177
[51.]
S.J. Lindauer, J. Sabol, R.J. Isaacson, M. Davidovitch.
Condylar movement and mandibular rotation during jaw opening.
Am J Orthod Dentofac, 107 (1995), pp. 573-577
[52.]
A. Farias, W. Mestriner, A. Carreiro.
Masticatory efficiency in denture wearers with bilateral balanced occlusion and canine guidance.
Braz Dent J, 21 (2010), pp. 165-169
[53.]
R. Ciancaglini, E.F. Gherlone, G. Radaelli.
Unilateral temporomandibular disorder and asymmetry of occlusal contacts.
J Prosthet Dent, 89 (2003), pp. 180-185
[54.]
F. Tovato, B. Orlando, M. Bosco.
Occlusal features and masticatory muscles activity. A review of electromyographic studies, Stomatologija.
Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal, 11 (2009), pp. 26-31
[55.]
A. Michelotti, M. Ferella, L.M. Gallo, A. Veltri, S. Palla, R. Martina.
Effect of occlusal interference on habitual activity of human masseter.
J Dent Res, 84 (2005), pp. 644-648
[56.]
S. Marklund, A. Wänman.
A century of controversy regarding the benefit or detriment of occlusal contacts on the mediotrusive side.
J Oral Rehabil, 27 (2000), pp. 553-562
[57.]
G.M. Tartaglia, T. Testori, A. Pallavera, B. Marelli, C. Sforza.
Electromyographic analysis of masticatory and neck muscles in subjects with natural dentition, teeth-supported and implant-supported prostheses.
Clin Oral Impl Rest, 19 (2008), pp. 1081-1088
[58.]
M.J. Campillo, R. Miralles, H. Santander, S. Valenzuela, M.J. Fresno, A. Fuentes, C. Zúñiga.
Influence of laterotrusive occlusal scheme on bilateral masseter EMG activity during clenching and grinding.
J Craniomandibular Pract, 4 (2008), pp. 263-273
[59.]
S. Valenzuela, M. Baeza, R. Miralles, G. Cavada, C. Zúñiga, H. Santander.
Laterotrusive occlusal schemes and their effect on supra-and infrahyoid electromyographic activity.
[60.]
R. Miralles, F. Gallardo, M. Baeza, S. Valenzuela, M.J. Ravera, G. Ormeño, G. Cavada.
Laterotrusive occlusal schemes and jaw posture tasks effects on supra-and infrahyoid EMG activity in the lateral decibitus position.
J Craniomandibular Pract, 25 (2007), pp. 106-113
[61.]
F. Luther.
TMD and occlusion part I, damned if we do? Occlusion: The interface of dentistry and orthodontics.
Br Dent J, 202 (2007), pp. 1-7
[62.]
Y. Kim, T.-J. Oh, C.E. Misch, H.-L. Wang.
Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: Clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale.
Clin Oral Impl Res, 16 (2005), pp. 26-35
[63.]
B.S. Sohn, S.J. Heo, J.Y. Koak, S.K. Kim, S.Y. Lee.
Strain of implants depending onocclusion types in mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses.
J Adv Prosthodont, 3 (2011), pp. 1-9
[64.]
M. Lewis, I. Klineberg.
Prosthodontic considerations designed to optimize outcomes for single-tooth implants. A review of the literature.
Aust Dent J, 56 (2011), pp. 181-192
[65.]
M.R. Wood, S.G. Vermilyea.
A review of selected dental literature on evidencebased treatment planning for dental implants: Report of the Committee on research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics.
J Prosthet Dent, 92 (2004), pp. 447-462
[66.]
M. Troelzsch, M. Troelzsch, R.J. Cronin, A.H. Brodine, R. Frankenberger, R. Messlinger.
Prevalence and association of headaches, temporomandibular joint disorders, and occlusal interferences.
J Prosthet Dent, 105 (2011), pp. 410-417
[67.]
J.M. Hudson.
Occlusal guidelines needed.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139 (2011), pp. 425
[68.]
M.M. Ash.
Occlusion: Reflections on science and clinical reality.
J Prosthet Dent, 90 (2003), pp. 373-384
[69.]
M.M. Ash.
Occlusion TMDs, and dental education.
Head Face Med, 3 (2007), pp. 1
[70.]
G.J. Christensen.
Is occlusion becoming more confusing?. A plea for simplicity.
JADA, 135 (2004), pp. 767-770
[71.]
S.J. Davies, R.M.J. Gray.
The examination and recording of the occlusion: Why and how.
Br Dent J, 191 (2001), pp. 291-302
[72.]
A.M. Cuccia.
Interrelationships between dental occlusion and plantar arch.
JBMT, 15 (2001), pp. 242-250
[73.]
K. Csadó, K. Márton, P. Kivovics.
Anatomical changes in the structure of the temporomandibular joint caused by complete edentulousness.
Gerodontology, (2011),
[74.]
S.J. Davies, R.M. Gray, J.F. McCord.
Good occlusal practice in removable prosthodontics.
Br Dent J, 191 (2001), pp. 491-502
[75.]
J. Li, T. Jiang, H. Feng, K. Wang, Z. Zhang, T. Ishikawa.
The electromyographic activity of masseter and anterior temporalis during orofacial symptoms induced by experimental occlusal highspot.
J Oral Rehabil, 35 (2008), pp. 79-87
[76.]
V.F. Ferrario, G.M. Tartarglia, A. Galletta, G.P. Grassi.
The influence of occlusion on jaw and neck muscle activity: A surface EMG study in healthy young adults.
J Oral Rehabil, 33 (2006), pp. 341-348
[77.]
N. Okano, K. Baba, T. Ohyama.
The influence of altered occlusal guidance on condylar displacement during submaximal clenching.
J Oral Rehabil, 32 (2005), pp. 714-719
[78.]
H. Seedorf, H. Weitendorf, A. Scholz, I. Kirsch, G. Heydecke.
Effect of non-working occlusal contacts on vertical condyle position.
J Oral Rehabil, 36 (2009), pp. 435-441
Copyright © 2013. Sociedad de Periodoncia de Chile, Sociedad de Implantología Oral de Chile y Sociedad de Prótesis y Rehabilitación Oral de Chile
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas