Buscar en
Revista Argentina de Microbiología
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Argentina de Microbiología Prevalence of Demodex spp. in patients with chronic blepharitis
Información de la revista
Vol. 56. Núm. 1.
Páginas 74-78 (Enero - Marzo 2024)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
283
Vol. 56. Núm. 1.
Páginas 74-78 (Enero - Marzo 2024)
Original article
Acceso a texto completo
Prevalence of Demodex spp. in patients with chronic blepharitis
Prevalencia de Demodex spp. en pacientes con blefaritis crónica
Visitas
283
Viviana Floresa,
Autor para correspondencia
dra.vivianaflores@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Marina Rufa, Silvia Paola Abad Farfana, Andrea Vanessa Suárez Echáveza, Dolores Pilar Bastarda, Maria Celeste Pugab, Luis Daniel Mazzuoccoloa
a Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Servicio de Dermatología, Buenos Aires, Argentina
b Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Departamento de Investigación, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Highlights

  • High prevalence of Demodex spp. blepharitis in patients older than 60 years old.

  • Meibomitis, dandruff, itching, epiphora were associated with blepharitis by Demodex spp.

  • Diagnosis of blepharitis by Demodex spp. allows for an adequate treatment.

Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (2)
Tablas (1)
Table 1. Clinical attributes, signs, and symptoms of patients with chronic blepharitis and parasitological study of eyelashes.
Abstract

Blepharitis is a very common disease in ophthalmology, dermatology and allergy practice. It generally follows a chronic course and is frequently associated with objective and/or subjective symptoms such as epiphora, red eye, dandruff, gritty sensation, itching, burning, photophobia, and blurred vision. The purpose of this study is to analyze the prevalence of Demodex spp. in patients with symptoms of chronic blepharitis. An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in the period between 2016 and 2020. All patients with symptoms of chronic blepharitis who underwent a parasitological test of eyelashes (Rapitest) in the Dermatology Department of the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires were included. Those with previously established blepharitis due to another infectious cause were excluded. We analyzed 972 patients. Sixty percent (n=585) underwent a positive Rapitest for the presence of Demodex spp. Seventy five percent (n=728) were women. There were no significant differences in the prevalence associated with sex (p=0.38). Among the patients positive for Demodex spp., 65% (n=628) were older than 60 years old. The most frequently associated symptom was itching, present in 35% (n=342). A statistically significant decrease in the number of consultations was observed during the cold months of the year (May–June–July–August). Our results show a high prevalence of Demodex spp. in patients with chronic blepharitis. As its presence reveals a direct association with age, we recommend looking for this parasite in this age group.

Keywords:
Demodex spp.
Chronic blepharitis
Dry eye
Eye pruritus
Meibomitis
Ectoparasites
Resumen

La blefaritis es una enfermedad muy frecuente en la consulta de oftalmología, dermatología y alergia. Generalmente, esta afección es de evolución crónica y, a menudo, se asocia con síntomas objetivos o subjetivos referidos por el paciente, como epífora, ojo rojo, caspa, sensación de arenilla, prurito, ardor, fotofobia y visión borrosa. El objetivo de este trabajo fue analizar la prevalencia de Demodex spp. en pacientes con síntomas de blefaritis crónica. Se realizó un estudio analítico de corte transversal en el período comprendido entre 2016 y 2020. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes con síntomas de blefaritis crónica que realizaron el estudio parasitológico de pestañas (Rapitest) en el Servicio de Dermatología del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires. Se excluyeron aquellos con blefaritis previamente establecida por otra causa infecciosa. El número total de pacientes incluidos fue de 972, el 60% de ellos (n=585) presentaron Rapitest positivo para la presencia de Demodex spp. El 75% (n=728) fueron mujeres. No hubo diferencias significativas en la prevalencia asociada al sexo (p=0,38). Entre los pacientes en los que se detectó Demodex spp., el 65% (n=628) eran mayores de 60 años, y el síntoma asociado con mayor frecuencia fue el prurito, presente en un 35% (n=342). Se observó una disminución estadísticamente significativa en el número de consultas durante los meses más fríos del año (mayo-junio-julio-agosto). Los resultados del presente estudio evidencian una alta prevalencia de Demodex spp. en pacientes con blefaritis crónica. El hallazgo de este agente tuvo una relación directa con la edad mayor de 60 años, por lo que sugerimos su búsqueda en este grupo etario.

Palabras clave:
Demodex spp.
Blefaritis crónica
Ojo seco
Prurito ocular
Meibomitis
Ectoparásitos
Texto completo
Introduction

Blepharitis is defined as an ocular surface disease commonly associated with eyelid inflammation and secondary eye irritation. It has a chronic clinical course with episodes of remission and exacerbation, and is usually difficult to manage4.

It is a very frequent disease in ophthalmology, dermatology and allergy practice. The reported symptoms are: presence of scales, loss of eyelashes, photophobia, tearing, blurred vision, burning or eye itching. It is associated with other eye diseases such as dry eye, Meibomian gland dysfunction, hordeolum, among others, as well as skin diseases, with rosacea and seborrheic dermatitis being the most frequent13. Blepharitis has multiple etiologies. Among them viral, mycotic and parasitic infections stand out; the latter include infection by Demodex spp.

The genus Demodex spp. includes mites belonging to the Animalia domain, Arthropoda phylum, Arachnida class, Demodicidae family. It has a universal distribution and can colonize different mammals. They are the most common permanent ectoparasites in humans. The transmission can be by human–human contact or with fomites contaminated with mites that are in different stages of the evolutionary cycle of the parasite7.

There are two species of Demodex (D.) spp. that can colonize humans: D. folliculorum and D. brevis. Their differential diagnosis is made under direct microscopic observation. The body of the adult D. folliculorum is between 250 and 400μm. Its vermiform abdomen (opisthosoma) is striated, elongated and can cover more than 7/10 of the total length, while the body of D. brevis is somewhat shorter (200–300μm) and its opisthosoma occupies up to 2/3 of the total body length7,12,13. D. folliculorum generally colonizes the pilosebaceous follicles of the seborrheic regions of the facial area, but can affect the anterior thorax, back, and extremities less frequently; while D. brevis lives in the Meibomian glands on the inner face of the eyelids7,8,13.

The main purpose of this study is to estimate the prevalence of Demodex spp. in patients with chronic blepharitis. Furthermore, we want to assess the most frequent clinical manifestations and the different variables that could interfere in the prevalence of this disease.

Materials and methods

All patients with suspected blepharitis associated with Demodex spp. referred to the Dermatology Department of the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires to run a Rapitest of eyelashes in the period between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020 were included.

Description of the Rapitest procedure: five lashes from the upper and lower eyelids of both eyes were extracted by traction, using sterile stainless-steel tweezers. The extracted eyelashes were observed under an optical microscope (100× and 400×) after the addition of 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution. Observation was conducted within 2h of making the preparation. It was considered positive if at least one of the evolutionary stages of Demodex spp. (egg, larva, protonymph, nymph, adult) was detected (Figs. 1 and 2). The differentiation between D. folliculorum and D. brevis was conducted by the analysis of the morphological characteristics, such as the total length of the adults (in μm) and the size of the opisthosoma, which vary among species. The measurement of the size of the mites was carried out using an ocular micrometer; those measuring more than 300μm were considered D. folliculorum.

Figure 1.

Microscope photography of an epilated eyelash showing adult Demodex folliculorum (100×).

(0,08MB).
Figure 2.

Microscope photography of epilated eyelashes showing adults and eggs of Demodex folliculorum (100×).

(0,1MB).

The following variables were collected: sex, age, month of visit, objective/subjective symptoms associated with the presence of the mite (meibomitis, epiphora, red eye, dandruff, sensation of grittiness, itching, burning, photophobia and blurred vision) and the association with dermatological conditions (rosacea, seborrheic dermatitis/oily skin).

For the purposes of the analysis, the months of the year in which the Rapitest sample was taken were divided into 3 groups according to the average ambient temperature:

  • Group 1: hot months (January/February/November/December)

  • Group 2: warm months (March/April/September/October)

  • Group 3: cold months (May/June/July/August)

Data were obtained from the review of the electronic medical records (EMR). Retrieved demographic data and clinical attributes were entered into an electronic database. Data entry was performed by five independent operators with their subsequent reconciliation by the principal investigator in order to detect missing information or inaccurate values. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Research Protocols of the Hospital Italiano.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were described as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range, based on the observed distribution. Categorical variables were described as absolute frequency and percentage. For the comparison of the categorical variables, the Fisher test was used and for the comparison of the continuous variables between multiple groups, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used, adjusted by Bonferroni. A value of p<0.05 was considered significant. The STATA 13.1 statistical package was used for the analysis.

Results

We analyzed 972 samples of eyelashes from patients with chronic blepharitis and clinical suspicion of blepharitis due to Demodex spp. The age ranged from 5 to 96 years old. They were treated at the Ophthalmology, Allergy and Dermatology Departments of the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires and referred to the Dermatology Department to run the parasitological test (Rapitest). Patients assessed from 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2020 were included. In 60% (n=585) of the assessed patients the presence of Demodex spp. was observed. The species found in 100% of the positive samples was D. folliculorum.

Table 1 describes the main clinical and epidemiological attributes of the patients assessed in the study. There was a predominance of female patients, who accounted for 75% of the total number of patients (n=728). If we only consider the positive Rapitest results for Demodex spp. (n=585), there were no significant differences in the prevalence associated with sex (p=0.38). The median age at the time of the Rapitest sample collection was 67 years old (IQR 53–75.5). Sixty five percent (n=411) of the patients with a positive result for the presence of Demodex spp. were over 60 years old.

Table 1.

Clinical attributes, signs, and symptoms of patients with chronic blepharitis and parasitological study of eyelashes.

Clinical attributes, signs and symptoms of the assessed patientsn=972 (100%)  Rapitest (−)n=387 (40%)  Rapitest (+)n=585 (60%)  p-Value 
Female728 (75%)  284 (39%)  444 (61%)  0.380 
60+ years old628 (65%)  217 (35%)  411 (65%)  <0.001 
Red eye151 (16%)  60 (40%)  91 (60%)  0.076 
Blurred vision20 (2%)  8 (40%)  12 (60%)  0.079 
Meibomitis202 (21%)  60 (30%)  142 (70%)  0.001 
Epiphora199 (20%)  77 (39%)  122 (61%)  0.099 
Gritty sensation in the eyes259 (27%)  99 (20%)  160 (80%)  0.074 
Photophobia10 (1%)  2 (20%)  8 (80%)  0.047 
Itching342 (35%)  138 (40%)  204 (60%)  0.074 
Soreness143 (15%)  60 (42%)  83 (58%)  0.054 
Cylindrical dandruff160 (16%)  40 (25%)  120 (75%)  <0.001 
Oily skin/seborrheic dermatitis88 (9%)  37 (42%)  51 (58%)  0.88 
Rosacea191 (20%)  60 (31%)  131 (69%)  0.030 

In patients with a positive result for the presence of Demodex spp., the most frequently reported symptom was itching (n=342), while the most frequently observed sign was meibomitis, observed in 21% (n=202) of cases. A significant difference was observed in the presence of cylindrical dandruff (p<0.001) in patients with blepharitis associated with the presence of the mite (n=120). A statistically significant association was detected (p=0.03) in patients with rosacea and positive results for the presence of Demodex spp.; history of seborrheic dermatitis/oily skin did not show statistically significant results for the presence of the mite (p=0.88). A statistically significant decrease in the number of patients with a positive result for Demodex spp. during the months with lower ambient temperature (Group 3), was observed (p=0.006). No significant difference was observed in the positive results throughout the different years of assessment: 2016 (55%), 2017 (57%), 2018 (61%), 2019 (59%), 2020 (66%).

Discussion

The prevalence of Demodex spp. in our population, patients with suspected blepharitis associated with Demodex spp. referred to the Dermatology Department of the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires to run a Rapitest of eyelashes in the period between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020, was 60%. This value is above that reported in similar studies. Velasco et al., documented 100 patients in 2017, observing an infection prevalence of 44%. On the other hand, Galvis et al., in 2011, reported a prevalence of 42% in 128 patients3,11 and Demirkazık et al detected Demodex spp.in 42.6% of the 335 patients in 2020 publication1.

In our study, a positive test was directly related to age, being close to 65% in patients over 60 years old. This data is consistent with the information reported by López-Ponce et al. in 2017, who observed that 94.55% of infected patients were over 71 years of age6. This may be associated with structural changes in the eyelid margin and decreased barrier function due to skin aging9. As reported by Mongi et al., in 2018, significant association was detected between the presence of the mite and patient gender7.

The most frequent sign was meibomitis, followed by cylindrical dandruff. The associated symptom reported in the largest number of patients was itching (35%), followed by grittiness (27%) and epiphora (20%). These results are comparable with the cases analyzed in other studies3,11. However, in a study conducted by Laspina et al., in 2015, it was shown that the most frequent signs and symptoms were burning and papillary hypertrophy, both in the group of patients with Demodex spp., and without it5.

The slight increase in positive tests for the presence of Demodex spp. in 2020 could be associated with the fact that only patients with severe symptoms attended the consultation because of mandatory isolation due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Ancillary studies were not carried out, the presence or absence of associated symptoms or signs referred to in the clinical history was considered.

The detection of Demodex spp. through the extraction of eyelashes by traction – selecting those presenting cylindrical dandruff, disorders in their arrangement (trichiasis, madarosis) and those easily detaching from the palpebral edge – has the advantage of being a simple and efficient method with minimal discomfort for the patient. Additionally, it optimizes the quality of the sample for microscopic examination, allowing a definitive diagnosis and adequate treatment2,10. A higher prevalence of mite presence was observed in patients with chronic blepharitis during the hot/warm months. This factor should be taken into account upon suspicion of this disease.

Our results show a high prevalence of Demodex spp. in patients older than 60 years old with symptoms of chronic blepharitis not associated with other infectious diseases. The relevance of a definitive diagnosis in this population is highlighted by carrying out a parasitological examination of the eyelashes (Rapitest), a technique that allows an adequate treatment and the improvement of the patients’ quality of life13.

Ethical disclosureProtection of individuals and animals

The authors declare that no experiments have been performed on humans or animals for this research.

Data confidentiality

The authors declare that they have followed their institutional policy on the publication of patient data.

Right to privacy and informed consent

The authors declare that they have followed their institutional policy on the publication of patient data.

Funding

This research has not received specific aids from public sector agencies, the commercial sector or non-profit entities.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References
[1]
M. Demirkazık, İ.S. Koltaş.
Blepharitis caused by Demodex.
Turkiye Parazitol Derg, 44 (2020), pp. 21-24
[2]
S.R. Fromstein, J.S. Harthan, J. Patel, D.L. Opitz.
Demodex blepharitis: clinical perspectives.
Clin Optom, 10 (2018), pp. 57-63
[3]
V. Galvis-Ramírez, A. Tello-Hernández, L. Álvarez-Osorio, J.J. Rey-Serrano.
Prevalencia de infección por Demodex folliculorum en pacientes que acuden a consulta general de oftalmología.
Rev Salud Pública, 13 (2011), pp. 990-997
[4]
K. Hosseini, L.B. Bourque, R.D. Hays.
Development and evaluation of a measure of patient-reported symptoms of blepharitis.
Health Qual Life Outcomes, 16 (2018), pp. 11
[5]
F. Laspina, M. Samudio, M. Arrúa, R. Sanabria, N. Fariña, L. Carpinell, D. Cibils, H. Mino de Kaspar.
Demodex spp. en pacientes con blefaritis crónica.
Rev Chilena Infectol, 32 (2015), pp. 37-42
[6]
D. López-Ponce, F. Zuazo, C. Cartes, D. Salinas-Toro, C. Pérez-Valenzuela, F. Valenzuela, L. Traipe-Castro, R.O. López-Solís.
Alta prevalencia de infestación por Demodex spp. en pacientes con blefaritis posterior: correlación con edad y caspa cilíndrica.
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol, 92 (2017), pp. 412-418
[7]
F. Mongi, L. Laconte, R.D. Casero.
Ácaros del género Demodex: ¿parásitos colonizadores de personas sanas o asociados a patología ocular?.
Rev Argent Microbiol, 50 (2018), pp. 369-373
[8]
O. Murphy, V. O’Dwyer, A. Lloyd-McKernan.
Ocular Demodex folliculorum: prevalence and associated symptoms in an Irish population.
Int Ophthalmol, 39 (2019), pp. 405-417
[9]
E. Tilki, E. Zeytun, S. Doğan.
Prevalence and density of Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis (Acari: Demodicidae) in Erzincan Province.
Turkiye Parazitol Derg, 41 (2017), pp. 80-86
[10]
W. Trattler, P. Karpecki, Y. Rapoport, E. Sadri, S. Schachter, W.O. Whitley, E. Yeu.
The prevalence of Demodex blepharitis in US eye care clinic patients as determined by collarettes: a pathognomonic sign.
Clin Ophthalmol, 16 (2022), pp. 1153-1164
[11]
L.A. Velasco, E.T. Villaseñor-Fierro, L.R. Saucedo-Rodriguez, C.I. Apreza-González, R. De la Rosa-Bibiano, E.D. Rubio-Arellano.
Prevalencia de demodicosis periocular en el Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde.
Rev Méd MD, 8.9 (2017), pp. 51-56
[12]
E. Zeytun, Y. Karakurt.
Prevalence and load of Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis (Acari: Demodicidae) in patients with chronic blepharitis in the province of Erzincan, Turkey.
J Med Entomol, 56 (2019), pp. 2-9
[13]
A.C. Zhang, A. Muntz, M.T.M. Wang, J.P. Craig, L.E. Downie.
Ocular Demodex: a systematic review of the clinical literature.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 40 (2020), pp. 389-432
Copyright © 2023. Asociación Argentina de Microbiología
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos