Buscar en
Estudios Gerenciales
Toda la web
Inicio Estudios Gerenciales Estudio de los gastos de I+D :un análisis empírico en el sector del automóvil
Información de la revista
Vol. 28. Núm. 124.
Páginas 45-65 (Julio - Septiembre 2012)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 28. Núm. 124.
Páginas 45-65 (Julio - Septiembre 2012)
Open Access
Estudio de los gastos de I+D :un análisis empírico en el sector del automóvil
A review of R&D expenses: an empirical analysis of the automobile industry
Estudo das despesas com I+D :uma análise empírica no setor automóvel
Visitas
1548
Teresa Duarte Atoche
Autor para correspondencia
tduarte@us.es

Autor para correspondencia. Dirigir a: Departamento de Contabilidad y Economía Financiera, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Avenida Ramón y Cajal 1, Sevilla 41018, España.
Profesor Contratado, Departamento de Contabilidad y Economía Financiera, Universidad de Sevilla, España
José Ángel Pérez López
Profesor Titular de Universidad, Departamento de Contabilidad y Economía Financiera, Universidad de Sevilla, España
José Antonio Camúñez Ruiz
Profesor Titular de Universidad, Departamento de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Sevilla, España
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumen

La diferencia existente entre la información económico-financiera que divulgan las empresas y las necesidades informativas de los usuarios, han sido motivo de preocupación e interés creciente en el ámbito académico. La mayoría de las investigaciones sostienen que dicha diferencia viene explicada en gran medida por los activos intangibles desarrollados internamente, entre ellos los gastos de I+D .Actualmente sigue teniendo gran interés pues los organismos emisores de normas internacionales se encuentran en un proceso de armonización, en aras de revestir de utilidad de los actuales sistemas contables. El presente trabajo de investigación trata de contrastar la relevancia y fiabilidad de la información sobre I+D ,para ello, emplea, como función base, el modelo de Ohlson (1995). Los resultados rechazan la relevancia de los gastos de I+D corriente para valorar a las compañías cotizadas.

Keywords:
R&D expenses
International Accounting Standards
Ohlson's model
market value.
Palabras clave:
Gastos en I+D
Normas Internacionales de Contabilidad
modelo de Ohlson
valor de mercado.
Abstract

The difference between the financial information that companies disclose and the information needs of users, have been of growing concern and interest in the academic research. Most argüe that this difference is explained largely by the assets internally developed intangibles, including r&d. Currently, this still of great interest as the international standard-setters are in the process of harmonization, in order to take profit of the current accounting systems. The present research aims to examine the value relevance of r&d expenditures, using the Ohlson's model (1995). The results reject the relevance of current r&d expenditure used to valué listed companies.

Resumo

A diferenca existente entre a informacáo económico-financeira que as empresas apresentam e as necessidades informativas dos usuários foram um motivo crescente de preocupação e interesse no âmbito acadêmico. A principal causa dessa diferença é o crescimento experienciado nos ativos intangíveis não reconhecidos a nível contabilístico. Dado o anterior, surge a necessidade de haver uma evidência empírica para apoiar a decisão dos organismos internacionais sobre a direção que deveriam seguir as normas sobre I+D a nível internacional. O presente trabalho de investigacáo tenta comparar a relevância e confiabilidade da informacáo sobre I+D,empregando como função base o modelo de Ohlson (1995). Os resultados não comparam a relevância das despesas correntes com I+D para avaliar as empresas cotadas.

Palavras-chave:
Despesas com I+D
Normas Internacionais de Contabilidade
modelo de Ohlson
valor de mercado
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Referencias bibliográficas
[Aboody et al., 2005]
D. Aboody, J. Hughes, Liu. Jing.
Earnings Quality, Insider Trading, and Cost of Capital.
Journal of Accounting Research, 43 (2005), pp. 651
[Aboody and Lev, 1998]
D. Aboody, B. Lev.
The Valué Relevance of Intangibles: The Case of Software Capitalization.
Journal of Accounting Research, 36 (1998), pp. 161-191
[Ballester et al., 2003]
M. Ballester, M. García-Ayuso, J. Livnat.
The Economic Valué of the I+D Intangible Asset.
European Accounting Review, 12 (2003), pp. 605-633
[Barth, 2000]
M.E. Barth.
Valuation-based accounting research: Implications for fmancial reporting and opportunities for future research.
Accounting and Finance, 40 (2000), pp. 7-31
[Barth et al., 2005]
M. Barth, W. Beaver, J. Hand, W. Landsman.
Accruals, Accounting-Based Valuation Models, and the Prediction of Equity Values.
Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 20 (2005), pp. 311-345
[Barth and Clinch, 1998]
M.E. Barth, G. Clinch.
Revalued financial, tangible and intangible assets: associations with share prices and nonmarket-based value Estimates.
Journal of Accounting Research, 36 (1998), pp. 199-233
[Beaver, 1999]
W. Beaver.
Comments on’An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model.
Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26 (1999), pp. 35-42
[Bens et al., 2003]
Bens, D. A.; Hanna, J. D. y Zhang, X. F. (2003). Research and Development, Risk, and Stock Returns. Working paper, March.
[Boulton and Libert, 2000]
R. Boulton, B. Libert.
A Business Model for a New Economy.
Journal of Business Strategy, 21 (2000), pp. 29-36
[Bublitz and Ettedge, 1989]
B. Bublitz, M. Ettedge.
The Information in Discretionary Outlays: Advertising, Research, and Development.
The Accounting Review, 64 (1989), pp. 108-124
[Callen and Morel, 2001]
J. Callen, M. Morel.
Linear Accounting Valuation When Abnormal Earnings Are ar(2).
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 16 (2001), pp. 191-203
[Callen and Morel, 2005]
J. Callen, M. Morel.
The valuation relevance of I+D expenditures: Time series evidence.
International Review of financial Analysis, 14 (2005), pp. 304-325
[Callen and Segal, 2005]
J. Callen, D. Segal.
Empirical Tests of the Feltham-Ohlson (1995) Model.
Review of Accounting Studies, 10 (2005), pp. 409-429
[Cañibano et al., 2000]
L. Cañibano, M. García-Ayuso, P. Sánchez.
La valoración de los intangibles: Estudios de innovación vs información contable-financiera.
Análisis Financiero, 80 (2000), pp. 6-24
[Caro Fernández, 2004]
Caro Fernández, S. (2004). Los modelos de valoración basados en magnitudes contables: Análisis teórico y evaluación empírica de diferentes dinámicas de información lineal. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Sevilla.
[Cazavan-Jeny and Jeanjean, 2006]
A. Cazavan-Jeny, T. Jeanjean.
The Negative Impact of I+D Capitalization: A value Relevance Approach.
European Accounting Review, 15 (2006), pp. 37-61
[Chauvin and Hirschey, 1993]
D.W. Chauvin, M. Hirschey.
Advertising I+D Expenditures and the Market Value of the Firm.
Financial Management, 22 (1993), pp. 128-140
[Dechow et al., 1999]
P. Dechow, A. Hutton, R. Sloan.
An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model.
Journal of Accounting and Economics, (1999), pp. 1-34
[Fama and French, 1997]
E. Fama, D. French.
Industry Costs of Equity.
Journal of Financial Economics, 43 (1997), pp. 153-194
[Feltham and Ohlson, 1995]
G. Feltham, J. Ohlson.
Valuation and Clean Surplus Accounting for Operating and Financial Activities.
Contemporary Accounting Research, 11 (1995), pp. 689-731
[Feltham and Ohlson, 1996]
G. Feltham, J. Ohlson.
Uncertainty Resolution and the Theory of Deprecia-tion Measurement.
Journal of Accounting Research, 34 (1996), pp. 209-234
[Financial, 1974]
Financial Accounting Standards Board (1974). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, N° 2, Accounting for Research and Development Costs. fasb,Norwalk.
[Financial, 1985]
Financial Accounting Standards Board (1985). Statement N° 86. Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed. Norwalk, Connecticut.
[Garrod and Valentincic, 2005]
N. Garrod, A. Valentincic.
The Term Structure of Implicit Discount Rates in Security Valuation.
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32 (2005), pp. 1237-1274
[Gelb, 2002]
D. Gelb.
Intangible Assets and Firms’ Disclosures: An Empirical Investigation.
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29 (2002), pp. 457-476
[Gietzmann and Ireland, 2005]
M. Gietzmann, J. Ireland.
Cost of Capital, Strategic Disclosures and Accounting choice.
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32 (2005), pp. 599-641
[Giner Inchausti and Iñiguez Sánchez, 2006]
B. Giner Inchausti, R. Iñiguez Sánchez.
Aplicación de los modelos Feltham-Ohlson a la valoración de activos en el mercado español.
Economía Financiera, 35 (2006), pp. 729-759
[Grabowski and Mueller, 1974]
Grabowski, H.G. y Mueller, D.C. (1974). Rates of Return on Corporate Investment, Research & Development and Advertising. Working Paper. Cornell University
[Green et al., 1996]
J.P. Green, A.W. Stark, M. Hardy.
uk Evidence on the Market Valuation of Research and Development Expenditure.
Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 23 (1996), pp. 191-216
[Han and Manry, 2004]
B. Han, D. Manry.
The value-relevance of I+D and advertising expenditures: Evidence from Korea.
The International Journal of Accounting, 39 (2004), pp. 155-173
[Healy and Palepu, 2001]
P.M. Healy, K.G. Palepu.
Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature.
Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31 (2001), pp. 405-440
[Healy and Myers, 2002]
P. Healy, S. Myers, C. Howe.
r&d Accounting and the trade off between Relevance and Objectivity.
Journal of Accounting Research, 40 (2002), pp. 677-710
[Holthausen and Watts, 2001]
R.W. Holthausen, R.L. Watts.
The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting.
Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31 (2001), pp. 3-75
[Johnson and Pazderka, 1993]
L.D. Johnson, B. Pazderka.
Firm Value and Investment in I+D.
Managerial and Decision Economics, 14 (1993), pp. 14-24
[Jones, 2000]
Jones, D. (2000). The relative importance of earnings and other information in the valuation of I+D intensive firms. Tesis. University of Colorado.
[Kamien and Schwartz, 1975]
M. Kamien, N. Schwartz.
Market Structure and Innovation: A Survey.
Journal of Economic Literature, (1975), pp. 1-37
[Kothari, 2001]
S. Kothari.
Capital Market research in accounting.
Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31 (2001), pp. 105-231
[Kothari et al., 2002]
S.P. Kothari, T.E. Laguerre, J.L. Andrew.
Capitalization versus Expensing: Evidence on the Uncertainty of Future Earnings from Capital Expenditures Versus I+D Outlays.
Review of Accounting Studies, 7 (2002), pp. 355-382
[Lev and Sougiannis, 1996]
B. Lev, T. Sougiannis.
The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of I+D.
Review of Accounting Studies, 7 (1996), pp. 355-382
[Lev and Sougiannis, 1999]
B. Lev, T. Sougiannis.
Penetrating the book-to market black box: The I+D effect.
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 26 (1999), pp. 419-449
[Lev and Zarowin, 1999]
B. Lev, P. Zarowin.
The Boundaries of Financial Reporting and How to Extend Them.
Journal of Accounting Research, 37 (1999),
[Mccrace and Nilsson, 2001]
M. Mccrace, H. Nilsson.
The explanatory and predictive power of different specifications of the Ohlson (1995) valuation models.
The European Accounting Review, 10 (2001), pp. 315-341
[Mejías et al., 2006]
Mejías, E., Montes, C. y Montilla, O. (2006). Comparación del tratamiento contable de activos intangibles según diferentes organismos reguladores. Estudios Gerenciales, 99(2), 89-104. Recuperado de: http://www.icesi.edu.co/revistas/index.php/estudios_gerenciales/article/view/193/html.
[Morel, 2003]
M. Morel.
Endogenous Parameter Time Series Estimation of the Ohlson Model: Linear and Nonlinear Analysis.
Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 30 (2003), pp. 1341-1363
[Ohlson, 1995]
J. Ohlson.
Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation.
Contemporary Accounting Research, 11 (1995), pp. 661-687
[Ohlson, 2001]
J. Ohlson.
Earnings, Book Values Dividends in Equity Valuation: An Empirical Perspective.
Contemporary Accounting Research, 18 (2001), pp. 107-120
[Sharpe, 1964]
W. Sharpe.
Capital Asset Prices. A Theory of Market Equilibrium under conditions of Risk.
The Journal of Finance, 19 (1964), pp. 425-442
[Shortridge, 2004]
T. Shortridge.
Market Valuation of Successful versus Non-successful I+D Efforts in the Pharmaceutical Industry.
Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 31 (2004),
[Silva, 2011]
Silva, B. (2011). Valor Razonable: un modelo de valoración incorporado en las Normas Internacionales de Información Financiera. Estudios Gerenciales, 27(118), 97-114. Recuperado de http://www.icesi.edu.co/revistas/index.php/estudios_gerenciales/article/view/393.
[Sougiannis, 1994]
T. Sougiannis.
The Accounting Based Valuation of Corporate I+D.
The Accounting Review, 69 (1994), pp. 44-68
[White, 1980]
H. White.
A Heteroscedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test of Heroscedasticity.
Econometrica, 48 (1980), pp. 817-818
[Zhao, 2002]
R. Zhao.
Relative Value Relevance of I+D Reporting: An International Comparison.
Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 13 (2002), pp. 153-174
Copyright © 2012. Universidad ICESI
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas