Buscar en
Clínica e Investigación en Arteriosclerosis (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Clínica e Investigación en Arteriosclerosis (English Edition) Warning: a short circuit has been detected in the prescription of PCSK9 inhibito...
Journal Information
Vol. 33. Issue 6.
Pages 306-307 (November - December 2021)
Vol. 33. Issue 6.
Pages 306-307 (November - December 2021)
Editorial
Full text access
Warning: a short circuit has been detected in the prescription of PCSK9 inhibitors
Peligro: se ha detectado un cortocircuito en la prescripción de los inhibidores de PCSK9
Visits
293
Juan Pedro-Boteta,b,c,
Corresponding author
86620@parcdesalutmar.cat

Corresponding author.
, Elisenda Climenta,b
a Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
b Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
c Institut Hospital del Mar d’Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text

Pathophysiological awareness of atherosclerosis has been continuously progressing and is increasingly more accurate.1 The pillars of cardiovascular health include giving up smoking or not smoking at all; having a healthy heart diet; weight control; carrying out regular physical exercise; controlling stress, and having periodical check-ups for blood pressure, glycaemia and cholesterol. These seemingly simple steps are often ignored by the person affected and on no few occasions underestimated by healthcare professionals. This simple fact may explain, at least partially, why we are facing a CVD epidemic in our daily practice. As a result, it is easy to understand the concept of preventative interventions that reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) but it is difficult to implement them in clinical practice.

Clinical practice guidelines are a set of recommendations based on the systematic review of evidence and on the evaluation of the risks/benefits of different alternatives for optimising patient healthcare. If we apply this to the control of dyslipidaemias we have to take it for granted that therapeutic objectives in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol recommended by the joint 2019 guideline of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS)2 are obtainable with the available lipid lowering tools for effective cardiovascular disease prevention. However, different national3 and international4 studies repeatedly show an unacceptable low rate of achievement of therapeutic objectives in LDL cholesterol, particularly in patients with high/very high cardiovascular risk, making them one of the main goals of cardiovascular medicine.

Regarding control of dyslipidaemia and cardiovascular risk in healthcare practice, there are three clinical situations where this is more difficult or where ultimately a greater therapeutic effort is required to achieve LDL cholesterol targets. These are: patients with intolerance to statins; patients with very high levels of LDL cholesterol, such as cases of familial hypercholesterolaemia syndrome, and those who require extremely major LDL cholesterol reduction, such as patients with very high vascular risk.

Patients with established CVD are considered very high cardiovascular risk, and the 2019 European guideline for control of dyslipidaemias2 therefore recommends an LDL cholesterol < 55 mg/dL with a ≥ 50% reduction compared with baseline, as its therapeutic objective, supported by the findings from the IMPROVE-IT5, FOURIER6 and ODISSEY7 studies. Furthermore, this evidence points towards changing the terminology of the use of high-intensity statins for high-intensity cholesterol-lowering therapy8 and later for optimised lipid-lowering therapy, a term coined by the Spanish Society of Atherosclerosis (SEA for its initials in Spanish)9 which theoretically would lead to a reduction of at least 50% LDL cholesterol with an 80% adherence. We know that the main barrier in this clinical setting continues to be the lack of achievement of therapeutic goals in LDL cholesterol, resulting from under-treatment. There are different reasons as to why treatment is insufficient, but ultimately, in very high risk patients we cannot repeat enough times that the physician should plan the lipid-lower therapeutic strategy based on two parameters: the targeted LDL cholesterol according to the patient’s cardiovascular risk and the required percentile reduction required for choosing the best pharmacological treatment to ensure the desired objective is reached. It has been reported that prior therapeutic planning through the use of target-oriented cholesterol-lowering therapy tables,10 or the use of computerised tools incorporated into the medical history11 or the application of therapeutic algorithms12 significantly boost the rate of achievement of therapeutic objectives, particularly in patients with very high cardiovascular risk.13

Furthermore, using any therapeutic strategy in cardiovascular prevention must be based on three elements: the benefit obtained, the adverse effects and the economic, social and personal intervention efforts.14 On certain occasions, either due to price, side effects or the additional effort not accepted by the system or the individual, including, for example, a change to lifestyle in the treatment of obesity,15 an effective treatment may have very little success because of the therapeutic effort it requires. In this regard, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are very powerful, efficient, effective, lipid-lowering drugs, with an excellent safety profile and highly accepted by patients, but which for the time being we are only able to use in the higher cardiovascular risk patients with unacceptable LDL cholesterol levels. The SEA has recently proposed several prescription indications for PCSK9 inhibitors, assessing the number of patients needed to treat (NNT) to avoid a cardiovascular episode and therefore the absolute patient risk, the absolute drop in LDL cholesterol to be reached, the type of intervention planned and the baseline LDL cholesterol level prior to the therapeutic intensification.9 In keeping with the cost of other accepted interventions in Spain, all NNT at 5 years, < 25 was established as cost-effective and therefore indicatable.

The reality is that these new lipid-lowering therapies are under-used,4 and simulation studies are available which show that, for example, within 90 days after an acute coronary syndrome, over a third of patients would be potentially eligible for PCSK9 inhibitors,16 or that, even with the use of high-intensity statins to the maximum tolerated dose and ezetimibe, around half of the patients with myocardial infarction would be eligible for treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors, in keeping with the 2019 ESC/EAS17 guidelines.

In Spain, there are major limitations to the prescription of PCSK9 inhibitors from an administrative viewpoint and due to prescription restrictions. The butterfly effect project18 demonstrated a highly diverse usage profile in the different autonomous communities with the use of PCSK9 inhibitors being most extensive in the hospitals and areas with lipid units accredited by the SEA, and those without specific prescription control commissions. Furthermore, 78% of respondents said they had moderate or severe difficulties in prescribing PCSK9 inhibitors in their hospital centres. This is a relevant fact, given that there is an inverse relationship between difficulty and the number of prescriptions.

In this edition of Clínica e Investigación en Arteriosclerosis, Barrios et al.19 presented an analysis of the PCSK9 inhibitor prescription process in cardiology departments (IKIGAI study). A national representative sample revealed the under-usage of PCSK9 inhibitors, and among the main reasons from participants were that requests were not in keeping with the therapeutic positioning report (TPR) (52%); there was a lack of detection in patients /lack of time (47%); situations in which denial was foreseen (36%), or they were only used in those patients where they were very sure of the diagnosis (27%). Based on these results, the authors are putting forward proposals for improvement, among which are optimisation of the hospital discharge report and simplification of the application/approval forms. Given that the updating of the TPR of PCSK9 inhibitors should be considered a major breakthrough in the rational use of these drugs,9 it would be positive if there was greater dissemination of the actual recommendations of the Spanish Society of Cardiology20 among its members to achieve a higher penetration rate.

References
[1]
J. Borén, M.J. Chapman, R.M. Krauss, C.J. Packard, J.F. Bentzon, C.J. Binder, et al.
Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: pathophysiological, genetic, and therapeutic insights: a consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel.
Eur Heart J., 41 (2020), pp. 2313-2330
[2]
F. Mach, C. Baigent, A.L. Catapano, K.C. Koskinas, M. Casula, L Badimon, et al.
2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk.
Eur Heart J., 41 (2020), pp. 111-188
[3]
J. Pedro-Botet, J.M. Mostaza, X. Pintó, JR Banegas, en nombre del grupo de investigadores EDICONDIS-ULISEA.
Consecución del objetivo terapéutico del colesterol de las lipoproteínas de baja densidad en las unidades de lípidos y riesgo vascular de la Sociedad Española de Arteriosclerosis.
Clin Investig Arterioscler., 25 (2013), pp. 155-163
[4]
K.K. Ray, B. Molemans, W.M. Schoonen, P. Giovas, S. Bray, G. Kiru, et al.
EU-wide cross-sectional observational study of lipid-modifying therapy use in secondary and primary care: the DA VINCI study.
Eur J Prev Cardiol., 28 (2021), pp. 1279-1289
[5]
C.P. Cannon, M.A. Blazing, R.P. Giugliano, A. McCagg, J.A. White, P Theroux, et al.
Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes.
N Engl J Med, 372 (2015), pp. 2387-2397
[6]
M.S. Sabatine, R.P. Giugliano, A.C. Keech, N. Honarpour, S.D. Wiviott, S.A. Murphy, et al.
Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease.
N Engl J Med, 376 (2017), pp. 1713-1722
[7]
G.G. Schwartz, P.G. Steg, M. Szarek, D.L. Bhatt, V.A. Bittner, R Diaz, et al.
Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome.
N Engl J Med, 379 (2018), pp. 2097-2107
[8]
L. Masana, J. Pedro-Botet, F. Civeira.
IMPROVE-IT clinical implications. Should the "high-intensity cholesterol-lowering therapy" strategy replace the "high-intensity statin therapy"?.
Atherosclerosis, 240 (2015), pp. 161-162
[9]
J.F. Ascaso, F. Civeira, C. Guijarro, J. López Miranda, L. Masana, J.M. Mostaza, et al.
Indicaciones de los inhibidores de PCSK9 en la práctica clínica. Recomendaciones de la Sociedad Española de Arteriosclerosis (SEA), 2019.
Clin Investig Arterioscler, 31 (2019), pp. 128-139
[10]
L. Masana, N. Plana.
Actualización de las tablas de planificación terapéutica hipocolesterolemiante orientadas a la obtención de los objetivos terapéuticos.
Clin Investig Arterioscler., 31 (2019), pp. 271-277
[11]
A. Zamora, F. Fernández de Bobadilla, C. Carrion, G. Vázquez, G. Paluzie, R Elosua, et al.
Network of Lipid Units of Catalonia (XULA). Pilot study to validate a computer-based clinical decision support system for dyslipidemia treatment (HTE-DLP).
Atherosclerosis., 231 (2013), pp. 401-404
[12]
J. Pedro-Botet, E. Climent.
Colesterol LDL en un paso.
Med Clin (Barc)., 155 (2020), pp. 316-317
[13]
N. Ribas, L. Recasens, S. Pérez, V. Bazán, J. Pedro-Botet, S. Ruiz, et al.
Una nueva estrategia para alcanzar los niveles objetivos de colesterol LDL tras un síndrome coronario agudo.
Clin Investig Arterioscler, 31 (2019), pp. 93-100
[14]
F. Civeira, J. Pedro-Botet.
Evaluación del coste-efectividad de la utilización de los inhibidores de PCSK9.
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr., 68 (2021), pp. 369-371
[15]
GR Dutton, CE Lewis.
The Look AHEAD trial: implications for lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 58 (2015), pp. 69-75
[16]
B. Sarak, A. Savu, P. Kaul, F.A. McAlister, R.C. Welsh, A.T. Yan, et al.
Lipid testing, lipid-modifying therapy, and PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9) inhibitor eligibility in 27 979 patients with incident acute coronary syndrome.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 14 (2021),
[17]
A. Allahyari, T. Jernberg, E. Hagström, M. Leosdottir, P. Lundman, P. Ueda.
Application of the 2019 ESC/EAS dyslipidaemia guidelines to nationwide data of patients with a recent myocardial infarction: a simulation study.
Eur Heart J., 41 (2020), pp. 3900-3909
[18]
Guijarro C, Civeira F, López-Miranda J, Masana L, Pedro-Botet J, Pintó X, et al. Situación en 2020 de los requerimientos para la utilización de inhibidores de PCSK9 en España: resultados de una encuesta nacional. Clin Investig Arterioscler. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arteri.2021.07.002.
[19]
V. Barrios, C. Escobar, V. Arrarte, M. Bravo, A. del Campo, R. Hidalgo, et al.
Análisis del proceso de prescripción de inhibidores de PCSK9 en los servicios de cardiología de los hospitales españoles y propuesta de optimización. Estudio IKIGAI.
Clin Investig Arterioscler, (2021),
[20]
A. Cequier, V. Arrarte, R. Campuzano, A. Castro, A. Cordero, M.R. Fernández Olmo, et al.
Tratamiento hipolipemiante en los pacientes con enfermedad cardiovascular de riesgo muy elevado. Documento de consenso SEC sobre las indicaciones de losiPCSK9 en la práctica clínica.
REC CardioClinics, 56 (2021), pp. 39-48

Please cite this article as: Pedro-Botet J, Climent E. Peligro: se ha detectado un cortocircuito en la prescripción de los inhibidores de PCSK9. Clin Investig Arterioscler. 2021;33:306–307.

Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

Quizás le interese:
10.1016/j.artere.2020.07.001
No mostrar más