Buscar en
Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition) Prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. New tool for s...
Journal Information
Vol. 40. Issue 2.
Pages 82-87 (March 2016)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
5
Vol. 40. Issue 2.
Pages 82-87 (March 2016)
Original article
Prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. New tool for selecting candidates for adjuvant radiation therapy
Predicción de recidiva bioquímica tras prostatectomía radical. Nueva herramienta para la selección de candidatos a radioterapia adyuvante
Visits
5
F. Herranz-Amo
Corresponding author
felipeherranz@telefonica.net

Corresponding author.
, R. Molina-Escudero, G. Ogaya-Pinies, D. Ramírez-Martín, F. Verdú-Tartajo, C. Hernández-Fernández
Servicio de Urología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Tables (3)
Table 1. Clinical and pathological variables of the series.
Table 2. Univariate and multivariate analysis of the pathological variables.
Table 3. Estimation according to Kaplan–Meier of the percentage of biochemical relapse free survival (BRFS) according to the pathological variables predicting BR and the sum of risk at 5, 8, and 10 years (score 1: Gleason sum 7 [4+3], PSM, and pT3b stage; score 2: Gleason sum ≥8).
Show moreShow less
Abstract
Objective

To design a risk summation to select patients for adjuvant radiation therapy after prostatectomy.

Materials and method

A retrospective study was conducted on 629 patients with localized prostate cancer (pN0–pNx) who were treated with prostatectomy and with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value <0.2ng/ml at 2–3 months. Biochemical recurrence was defined as a PSA >0.4ng/ml. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed. A score (0–2) was assigned according to the hazard ratio of the significant variables. The score summation defined the risk summation.

Results

A total of 19.7% of the patients were pT3, 24.2% had a Gleason score ≥8, and 26.3% had positive surgical margins. The median follow-up was 82 months. Some 26.6% of the patients experienced biochemical recurrence. The identified prognostic variables independent of biochemical recurrence were a Gleason score =7 (4+3) (HR, 2.01; p=.008), a Gleason score ≥8 (HR, 3.07; p<.001), a pT3b stage (HR, 1.93; p=.008) and a positive surgical margin (HR, 2.20; p<.001). We assigned 0 points to patients without risk prognosis variables; 1 point to patients with Gleason scores=7 (4+3), pT3b or positive surgical margins; and 2 points to patients with Gleason scores ≥8. The patients with a risk summation ≤2 had >50% survival free of biochemical recurrence at 5 and 8 years. In contrast, the patients with a risk summation ≥3 had <44% survival free of biochemical recurrence.

Conclusion

The patients with a risk summation ≤2 did not benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy, while the patients with a risk summation ≥3 might benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy.

Keywords:
Prostate cancer
Biochemical recurrence
Prognostic factors
Adjuvant radiation therapy
Resumen
Objetivo

Diseñar un sumatorio de riesgo para la selección de pacientes para radioterapia adyuvante después de prostatectomía.

Material y método

Estudio retrospectivo de 629 pacientes con cáncer de próstata localizado y pN0-pNx tratados con prostatectomía y con un PSA a los 2-3 meses <0,2ng/ml. Recidiva bioquímica si PSA > 0,4ng/ml. Análisis multivariante mediante regresión de Cox. Asignación de puntuación (0-2) en función del HR de las variables significativas. El sumatorio de las puntuaciones definió el sumatorio de riesgo.

Resultados

El 19,7% pT3, 24,2% Gleason ≥8 y el 26,3% de márgenes quirúrgicos positivos. Mediana de seguimiento de 82 meses. Recidiva bioquímica el 26,6%. El Gleason=7 (4+3) (HR=2,01, p=0,008), el Gleason ≥8 (HR=3,07, p<0,001), el estadio pT3b (HR=1,93, p=0,008) y el margen quirúrgico positivo (HR=2,20, p<0,001) se identificaron como variables pronosticas independientes de recidiva bioquímica. Se asignó 0 puntos a los pacientes sin variables pronósticas de riesgo, un punto a los pacientes con Gleason=7 (4+3), pT3b o márgenes quirúrgicos positivos y 2 puntos si Gleason ≥8. Los pacientes con un sumatorio de riesgo ≤2 tuvieron una supervivencia libre de recidiva bioquímica a los 5 y 8 años superior al 50%, en cambio, los pacientes con un sumatorio de riesgo ≥3 tuvieron una supervivencia libre de recidiva bioquímica inferior al 44%.

Conclusión

Los pacientes con un sumatorio de riesgo ≤2 no se beneficiarían de radioterapia adyuvante, mientras que los pacientes con un sumatorio de riesgo ≥3 pudieran beneficiarse de radioterapia adyuvante.

Palabras clave:
Cáncer de próstata
Recidiva bioquímica
Factores pronósticos
Radioterapia adyuvante

Article

These are the options to access the full texts of the publication Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition)
Subscriber
Subscriber

If you already have your login data, please click here .

If you have forgotten your password you can you can recover it by clicking here and selecting the option “I have forgotten my password”
Subscribe
Subscribe to

Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition)

Purchase
Purchase article

Purchasing article the PDF version will be downloaded

Price 19.34 €

Purchase now
Contact
Phone for subscriptions and reporting of errors
From Monday to Friday from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. (GMT + 1) except for the months of July and August which will be from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.
Calls from Spain
932 415 960
Calls from outside Spain
+34 932 415 960
E-mail
Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos