COVID-19
Regístrese
The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
Buscar en
The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
Toda la web
Inicio The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context A contrastive analysis of the factorial structure of the PCL-R: Which model fits...
Journal Information
Back to article

Statistics

Follow this link to access the full text of the article

A contrastive analysis of the factorial structure of the PCL-R: Which model fits best the data?
Análisis de contraste de la estructura factorial de la PCL-R: ¿qué modelo se ajusta mejor a los datos?
Beatriz Péreza, Juan Herreroa, Judith Velascob, Francisco Javier Rodriguez-Díaza
a University of Oviedo, Spain
b University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Read
20924
Times
was read the article
1933
Total PDF
18991
Total HTML
Share statistics
Article information
ISSN: 18891861
Original language: English
DOI:10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.10.001
The statistics are updated each day
Year/Month Html Pdf Total
2024 April 121 17 138
2024 March 167 14 181
2024 February 119 10 129
2024 January 177 11 188
2023 December 170 14 184
2023 November 250 15 265
2023 October 278 24 302
2023 September 160 16 176
2023 August 105 8 113
2023 July 141 10 151
2023 June 200 12 212
2023 May 225 22 247
2023 April 237 29 266
2023 March 179 12 191
2023 February 130 20 150
2023 January 127 21 148
2022 December 125 10 135
2022 November 119 20 139
2022 October 78 23 101
2022 September 53 27 80
2022 August 60 14 74
2022 July 55 22 77
2022 June 71 16 87
2022 May 79 16 95
2022 April 104 18 122
2022 March 74 10 84
2022 February 61 6 67
2022 January 93 17 110
2021 December 66 17 83
2021 November 62 15 77
2021 October 102 10 112
2021 September 79 13 92
2021 August 118 11 129
2021 July 124 15 139
2021 June 78 10 88
2021 May 105 11 116
2021 April 392 60 452
2021 March 340 23 363
2021 February 231 22 253
2021 January 126 17 143
2020 December 140 18 158
2020 November 127 10 137
2020 October 95 10 105
2020 September 81 77 158
2020 August 88 10 98
2020 July 85 4 89
2020 June 54 5 59
2020 May 87 14 101
2020 April 101 3 104
2020 March 109 4 113
2020 February 65 6 71
2020 January 23 1 24
2019 December 16 8 24
2019 November 6 4 10
2019 October 21 7 28
2019 September 34 6 40
2019 August 11 5 16
2019 July 16 11 27
2019 June 20 19 39
2019 May 112 14 126
2019 April 163 14 177
2019 March 141 16 157
2019 February 121 7 128
2019 January 100 16 116
2018 December 130 11 141
2018 November 164 8 172
2018 October 91 4 95
2018 September 203 1 204
2018 August 159 2 161
2018 July 127 6 133
2018 June 167 8 175
2018 May 165 3 168
2018 April 158 6 164
2018 March 160 14 174
2018 February 117 11 128
2018 January 124 7 131
2017 December 114 5 119
2017 November 165 3 168
2017 October 112 7 119
2017 September 127 8 135
2017 August 110 14 124
2017 July 192 6 198
2017 June 166 16 182
2017 May 226 9 235
2017 April 144 11 155
2017 March 218 11 229
2017 February 242 11 253
2017 January 144 9 153
2016 December 178 22 200
2016 November 275 32 307
2016 October 300 28 328
2016 September 446 31 477
2016 August 596 31 627
2016 July 277 29 306
2016 June 179 26 205
2016 May 188 34 222
2016 April 201 24 225
2016 March 221 26 247
2016 February 204 38 242
2016 January 175 33 208
2015 December 174 34 208
2015 November 184 38 222
2015 October 128 16 144
2015 September 121 10 131
2015 August 130 12 142
2015 July 401 6 407
2015 June 581 37 618
2015 May 640 53 693
2015 April 582 51 633
2015 March 741 45 786
2015 February 509 46 555
2015 January 438 73 511
Show all

Follow this link to access the full text of the article

Subscribe to our newsletter

Special content about COVID-19
The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context is a member and subscribes the principles of, the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
www.publicationethics.org.