metricas
covid
Buscar en
Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental
Toda la web
Inicio Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental Biomarkers as proxies for cognitive reserve: The role of high density lipoprotei...
Journal Information
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
106
Original article
Full text access
Available online 6 July 2023
Biomarkers as proxies for cognitive reserve: The role of high density lipoprotein cholesterol in first episode of psychosis
Visits
106
Rebeca Magdaleno Herreroa,b, Nancy Murillo-Garcíaa,b, Ángel Yorca-Ruiza,b, Karl Neergaarda, Benedicto Crespo-Facorroc,d,e, Rosa Ayesa-Arriolaa,e,
Corresponding author
rayesa@humv.es

Corresponding author.
, PAFIP Group
a Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, IDIVAL, School of Medicine, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
b Doctoral School University of Cantabria (EDUC), Santander, Spain
c Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Department of Psychiatry, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
d Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Sevilla, IBiS, Spain
e Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain
This item has received
Received 17 October 2022. Accepted 05 March 2023
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Tables (4)
Table 1. Comparisons between FEP patients and healthy controls on sociodemographic data, CR proxies and levels of biological parameters.
Table 2. Linear regression models pertaining to FEP patients with SBP and HDL levels as dependent variables.
Table 3. Linear regression models pertaining to HC with SBP and HDL levels as the dependent variables.
Table 4. Total variance explained by comparing classic and biological CR in patients and controls.
Show moreShow less
Additional material (1)
Abstract
Introduction

The proxies used to compose cognitive reserve (CR) for patients of a first episode of psychosis (FEP) have varied in the literature. The development of FEP is linked to peripheral pathways of the central nervous system, yet despite this knowledge, no research has considered the introduction of biomarkers as proxies for CR. Meanwhile, schizophrenia has been linked to the metabolic system, indicating that alterations in the levels of biological parameters, in particular high-density lipoproteins (HDL), cause worse global functioning and cognitive impairment. For these reasons, the present study aimed to create a quantifiable and objective CR index that adjusts for the multifactorial nature of FEP.

Materials and methods

We included 668 FEP patients and 217 healthy controls. Participants were assessed for sociodemographic information, years of education, employment status, premorbid IQ and biological parameters: waist circumference, hypertension, and levels of HDL, triglycerides, and glucose.

Results

The findings suggest that the years of education proxy showed correlational and higher relationship with HDL levels for both FEP patients (r=0.23, b=0.185) and controls (r=0.31, b=0.342). We found that the CR index composed of years of education and HDL levels showed a higher explanatory power for the phenomenon than the classic CR index composed of years of education, employment status and premorbid IQ.

Conclusions

This article proposes an objective and quantifiable method to measure CR that is more the multifactorial nature of FEP.

Keywords:
Cognitive reserve
First episodes of psychosis
High-density lipoproteins
Years of education
Systolic blood pressure
Full Text
Introduction

Cognitive reserve (CR) is defined as a buffer against neuropathologies made possible through individual differences in neural networks that maintain efficient cognitive performance1 and thus actively compensate for the effects of a given disease.2 Previous research has shown that CR is a predictor of functionality and clinical and cognitive symptomatology.3–6 Thus, the higher the CR, the better the patient's performance in these areas, with CR functioning as a protective factor in patients with severe mental illness.7,8 CR is commonly estimated through the use of proxies and indices. One of the most common compositions of CR is composed of the proxies: years of education, premorbid IQ and employment status.6,9 Premorbid IQ proxy is related to patients’ functional outcomes10 and cognitive performance both at baseline and after disease onset,11 as well as to the levels of certain biomarkers12 Meanwhile, years of education and employment status are related to intellectual and environmental factors at different stages of life: years of education in early life, and employment status in middle and late life.13

Research focused on CR in Alzheimer's disease (AD) clarifies the importance of the proxy years of education, such that patients presenting with a higher level of education tended to have a lower incidence of developing the disease.14 Two explanations would justify this phenomenon. It is possible that highly educated patients have higher cognitive performance that would in turn require advanced pathology to be observed at clinical levels of symptomatology. It is possible as well that education stimulates neuroplasticity, providing resistance to adverse effects on brain function.15 Furthermore, previous heritability studies found that the genetic architecture of dementia was related to education,16,17 suggesting a causal effect on AD.18 However, neurological and psychiatric disorders are complex, polygenic and multifactorial. For this reason, endogenous and exogenous factors should be taken into account for the composition of CR. A recent line of research in the area of AD has recently developed to address this complexity. For instance, studies have integrated extra proxies into the measure of CR, such as the tau protein,13 the Aβ burden13 and the P300 latency.19

A previous study has described the influence of peripheral pathways in schizophrenia.20 This influence causes a link between schizophrenia and the metabolism. One reason for this link is that the probability of neuronal recruitment in the brain is related to the bioenergetic efficiency of neurons and astrocytes. There is thus a link between somatic metabolism and neurological deterioration, a relationship that is affected by external factors such as exercise and diet.21 Initial research reported that biomarkers of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), triglycerides, and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were predictive of global cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.22 Subsequently, it was clarified that cognition was predicted by total cholesterol and glucose together with the proxy years of education.23 Recently, a study has been published reporting that the prediction model for social functioning in schizophrenia was formed by HDL, triglycerides and FPG, while the biomarker systolic blood pressure (SBP) needed to be added to the model to predict cognitive impairment.24 To date, many studies have highlighted the importance of HDL levels in schizophrenia, indicating a relationship between low HDL levels and poorer global functioning, global cognition,25–27 poor social relationships,28 as well as increased suicidal behaviour.29 On the other hand, although it has been reported that HDL levels tends to remain stable during the first three years of the disease,30 any changes in these lipids could produce changes in brain structure and inhibition of synaptogenesis, and consequently neurodegenerative changes.31 This is because cholesterol plays an important role in the brain due to its involvement in myelination, synaptic growth and regeneration,31 and it has been shown that high levels of HDL may act as a protective factor against hippocampal atrophy.32

To the best of our knowledge, no previous study has assessed the relationship between biological parameters and CR proxies in first-episode psychosis (FEP). This lack of knowledge justifies the present study, which focused on the search for neurobiological proxies of CR.

Based on the scientific evidence, we hypothesised that HDL levels are related to CR proxies and specifically, that HDL levels could be an extra proxy for CR in patients with FEP. The aim of this study was to construct an index of CR that is objective, quantifiable and multifactorial.

Materials and methodsParticipants

The sample of the present study were individuals with a FEP of non-affective psychosis treated in a longitudinal and epidemiological programme called Programa de Atención a Fases Iniciales de Psicosis (PAFIP), carried out at the Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital (Santander, Spain). Further details of the description of PAFIP have been described in previous papers.33,34

The patient group consisted of 668 participants with a first episode of non-affective psychosis recruited from February 2001 to January 2017. Participation in PAFIP was voluntary, and they were free to withdraw from the programme at any time. Participants were informed about the study and signed the informed consent form, which complied with international standards for research ethics and was approved by the local review board institution. The inclusion criteria for all participants were as follows: (1) were between the ages of 15 and 50 at the time of inclusion in the PAFIP programme; (2) maintained habitual residence in Cantabria, the area where the programme is carried out; (3) presented a first episode of non-affective psychosis, defined as those subjects with non-affective psychotic symptomatology, regardless of the time of evolution of their psychotic symptoms, who contact for the first time a specialised mental health team; (4) had no prior treatment with antipsychotic medication or, if previously treated, a total lifetime of antipsychotic treatment of <6 weeks. That is, only individuals are included drug-naïve; and (5) followed the criteria set out in DSM-IV for schizophrenia spectrum disorders: schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, schizoaffective disorder, brief psychotic disorder, and other psychotic disorders not otherwise specified, excluding these types of psychotic disorder.35 Participants were excluded for any of the following reasons: (1) met the criteria for drug dependence of DSM-IV; (2) met the criteria for mental retardation (IQ below 70) of DSM-IV; or (3) had a history of neurological disease or head injury. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I)36 was used to confirm the diagnoses, realised by an experienced psychiatrist within six months from the baseline visit.

The control group consisted of 217 healthy volunteers recruited from the community through advertisements. Of the control group the inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) over 15 years of age, (2) good domain of the Spanish language, and (3) ability to give informed consent in writing. Exclusion criteria included an absence of history of psychiatric diagnoses related to psychotic illness spectrum, absence of organic brain pathology, and an absence of intellectual disability or substance use disorders according to DSM-V criteria.

Sociodemographic variables

To collect the sociodemographic information, we interviewed the patients and their relatives. The measures collected were sex, age, age at psychosis onset (defined as the age when the emergence of the first continuous psychotic symptom occurred), area of residence (“urban” vs. “rural”), relationship status (“single” vs. “other”), socioeconomic status (SES) derived from their parent's occupation (“low qualification worker” vs. “other”), first-degree family history of psychosis, cohabitation with parents or family (“yes” or “no”) and the mean chlorpromazine equivalent dose.

Proxies of cognitive reserve

Proxies for CR vary throughout the literature. In this research, we used the proxies premorbid IQ, education and occupation, as in previous research by González-Ortega et al.6 and our own group.9

As in previous studies,2–6,9,35 premorbid IQ was evaluated using the vocabulary subtest of the WAIS-III37 as a measure of crystallised intelligence.

The proxy education was collected through the participants’ years of education classified according to the Spanish education system. Meanwhile, the proxy occupation, in this case a dichotomous measure (unemployment: “yes” or “no”), was obtained through information on the employment situation of the participants.

Assessment of biological disturbances

The biological parameters selected for this research are those used for the pre-established criteria for the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome: abdominal obesity, cholesterol, triglycerides, hypertension, and hyperglycemia.38 We selected these biological parameters based on two recent meta-analyses that reported how the presence of these parameters was related to greater global cognitive impairment in patients with schizophrenia.39,40

The physical examination included: abdominal obesity (waist circumference: >102cm in men or >88cm in women) and hypertension (systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥130mmHg). While laboratory investigations included: hyperglycemia (fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥110mg/dl), triglycerides levels (≥150mg/dl) and blood HDL cholesterol (<40mg/dl in men and <50mg/dl in women). These evaluations were carried out according to the following NCEP criteria.41

Data analyses

Statistical analyses were performed with the Statistical Package for Social Science version 23.0.42 The first step was to compare patients and HC in terms of sociodemographic data, CR proxies and biological parameters. Qualitative dichotomous variables were performed using chi-square and quantitative variables using univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA).

We then performed Pearson correlations to explore whether there was a relationship between CR proxies and biological parameters.

Subsequently, through multiple regression analysis, we searched for the causes of the relationships between CR and biological parameters at baseline. The dependent variables included in the model were waist circumference, levels of HDL, triglycerides, fasting plasma glucose, and systolic blood pressure. Backward stepwise model selection was used to determine the final model. This entailed the first model containing all predictors, while subsequent models were constructed through elimination of individual predictors based on the F-statistic criterion.

Finally, in line with the methodology used in recent years in CR research, principal component analysis (PCA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were carried out to create a “composite CR score”4 for each participant, referred to as biological CR. In both, HC and patients, the reliability, validity and consistency of the creation of the new CR were explored.43–45 Bartlett's test of specificity was performed to test the correlations between the proxies. Secondly, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure (KMO) was performed as a test of sampling adequacy and Cronbach's alpha test was used to measure internal consistency. Finally, the final percentages of variance was used to verify that our biological CR explained more than 50% of the phenomenon and that, in addition, the components of biological CR contributed more than 0.30 to the composite CR score.

All statistical tests, which were two-tailed with significance at p=0.05, were performed with independent Z-scores between patients and HC.

ResultsSociodemographic characteristics of the sample

The total sample consisted of 668 FEP patients and 217 HC. There were no differences between patients and HC in terms of sex, area of residence, socioeconomic status of their parents and if they were living with their parents. However, as shown in Table 1, we found significant differences in relationship status (p<0.001), age (p=0.015), and cohabitation with family (couple and/or parents) (p=0.001), such that patients were more frequently single, older, and more likely to cohabit with their family.

Table 1.

Comparisons between FEP patients and healthy controls on sociodemographic data, CR proxies and levels of biological parameters.

  FEP patientsHealthy controlsValue  p  Post hoc 
  N  Mean (SD)  N  Mean (SD)       
Sex (male): N (%)  668  374 (56.00)  217  132 (60.80)  x2=1.57  0.210   
Age  668  30.85 (9.96)  208  29.03 (7.54)  F=5.89  0.015  HC 
Urban area: N (%)  667  482 (72.30)  87  62 (71.30)  x2=0.38  0.845   
Single: N (%)  661  480 (72.60)  161  66 (41.00)  x2=58.05  <0.001  HC 
SES of parents (low): N (%)  651  358 (55.00)  201  123 (61.20)  x2=2.40  0.121   
Living with parents: N (%)  659  344 (52.20)  86  43 (50.00)  x2=0.15  0.701   
Living with family: N (%)  659  482 (73.10)  86  77 (89.50)  x2=10.91  0.001  HC 
Age at psychosis onset  653  29.70 (9.67)  NA  NA       
DUP  653  13.66 (32.93)  NA  NA       
Family psychiatric history: N (%)  663  165 (24.90)  NA  NA       
Chlorpromazine equivalent  665  206.10 (79.88)  NA  NA       
Cognitive reserve
Education years  661  10.11 (3.28)  216  10.77 (2.72)  F=7.31  0.007  HC>FEP 
Premorbid IQ  449  95.98 (13.56)  201  99.03 (10.78)  F=7.92  0.005  HC>FEP 
Unemployed: N (%)  658  283 (43.00)  161  37 (23.00)  x2=21.80  <0.001  HC 
Biological parameters
Waist circumference  397  83.24 (11.63)  158  86.99 (12.79)  F=11.08  0.001  HC>FEP 
HDL  575  52.33 (14.84)  153  56.42 (15.57)  F=8.97  0.003  HC>FEP 
Triglycerides  580  83.89 (41.90)  153  93.10 (52.43)  F=5.23  0.022  HC>FEP 
SBP  526  118.46 (15.16)  152  107.05 (12.21)  F=72.57  <0.001  HC 
FPG  656  86.04 (14.89)  153  84.45 (8.97)  F=1.61  0.205   

Abbreviations: NA: not applicable; HC: healthy controls; FEP: FEP patients; DUP: duration of untreated psychosis; IQ: intelligence quotients; HDL: high density lipoprotein; SBP: systolic blood pressure; FPG: fasting plasma glucose.

Differences between FEP patients and healthy controls

Table 1 provides the comparisons between participants in terms of proxies of CR and biological parameters.

Proxies of CR

All CR proxies showed significant differences between patients and HC. The patients presented higher unemployment rates (p=<0.001), lower premorbid IQ (p=0.005) and fewer years of education (p=0.007) than the HC.

Biological parameters

The results showed significant differences in all but hyperglycemia. On the one hand, we found that patients had more dysregulated levels of HDL (p=0.003) and SBP (p<0.001) than HC. On the other hand, HC had higher waist circumference (p=0.001) and triglycerides levels (p=0.022) than the patients.

Relationships between CR proxies and HDL and SBP levels

We explored the correlations between CR and the biological parameters in both groups, as you can see in Fig. 1. As shown in the figures, the patient group only showed significant relationships in HDL and SBP levels.

Fig. 1.

Correlations between classic CR or its proxies and HDL and SBP levels separately or together. Post hoc Bonferroni group differences with significance: *p<0.05; **p<0.005; ***p<0.001.

(0.32MB).

The first figure shows the correlations between the classic CR (proxies: premorbid IQ, years of education and unemployment) and HDL and SBP levels, both separately and together. For patients, the highest correlation was between classic CR and the composite of HDL and SBP levels (r=0.23; p<0.001), while for HC the strongest correlation was between CR and HDL (r=0.31; p<0.001).

In the next figure we observed that the strongest correlations in both groups were between the proxies premorbid IQ and years of education. In terms of the relationships involving HDL and SBP levels, the strongest correlation for patients was found with the composite of premorbid IQ and years of education (r=0.22; p<0.001), whereas the strongest correlation for the HC group was with years of education (r=0.33; p<0.001).

The last figure shows that the strongest correlation for patients was between HDL and the composite of years of education and unemployment (r=0.21; p<0.001). Meanwhile for HC, the strongest correlation was between years of education with HDL (r=0.34; p<0.001).

Predictive value of CR proxies on biological parameters

Following the line of the previous results, we performed multiple regression analyses to explore the predictive capacity of CR proxies with HDL and SBP levels as dependent variables among patients (see Table 2) and HC (see Table 3).

Table 2.

Linear regression models pertaining to FEP patients with SBP and HDL levels as dependent variables.

  b (95% CI)  t (df)  β  p  r  R2 adjusted  F  p 
SBP (N=350)
Model 1          0.169  0.020  3.39  0.018 
Years of education  −0.13 (−0.24 – −0.01)  −2.07 (0.06)  −0.124  0.039         
Premorbid IQ  −0.08 (−0.20 – 0.04)  −1.26 (0.06)  −0.075  0.210         
Unemployed  0.04 (−0.07 – 0.153)  0.79 (0.06)  0.042  0.430         
Model 2          0.164  0.021  4.78  0.009 
Years of education  −0.12 (−0.24 – −0.00)  −2.01 (0.06)  −0.119  0.046         
Premorbid IQ  −0.07 (−0.19 – 0.05)  −1.20 (0.06)  −0.071  0.232         
Model 3          0.151  0.020  8.13  0.005 
Years of education  −0.15 (−0.26 – −0.05)  −2.85 (0.05)  −0.151  0.005         
HDL (N=378)
Model 1          0.243  0.052  7.85  <0.001 
Years of education  0.20 (0.08–0.30)  3.33 (0.06)  0.187  0.001         
Unemployed  0.14 (0.03–0.24)  2.52 (0.05)  0.129  0.012         
Premorbid IQ  −0.01 (−0.12 – 0.11)  −0.08 (0.06)  −0.005  0.935         
Model 2          0.243  0.054  11.80  <0.001 
Years of education  0.19 (0.09–0.30)  3.64 (0.05)  0.185  <0.001         
Unemployed  0.14 (0.03–0.24)  2.52 (0.05)  0.128  0.012         

Abbreviations: IQ: intelligence quotients; HDL: high density lipoprotein; SBP: systolic blood pressure.

Bold values: group differences with Bonferroni post hoc with significance p < 0.05.

Table 3.

Linear regression models pertaining to HC with SBP and HDL levels as the dependent variables.

  b (95% CI)  t (df)  β  p  r  R2 adjusted  F  p 
SBP (N=148)
Model 1          0.213  0.025  2.27  0.083 
Years of education  −0.22 (−0.40 – −0.04)  −2.45 (0.09)  −0.222  0.015         
Premorbid IQ  0.13 (−0.06 – 0.32)  1.34 (0.10)  0.118  0.183         
Unemployed  −0.02 (−0.19 – 0.16)  −0.17 (0.09)  −0.015  0.862         
Model 2          0.212  0.032  3.41  0.036 
Years of education  −0.23 (−0.40 – −0.05)  −2.58 (0.09)  −0.226  0.011         
Premorbid IQ  0.13 (−0.06 – 0.32)  1.35 (0.10)  0.118  0.179         
Model 3          0.182  0.026  4.98  0.027 
Years of education  −0.18 (−0.34 – −0.02)  −2.23 (0.08)  −0.182  0.027         
HDL (N=149)
Model 1          0.343  0.100  6.46  <0.001 
Years of education  0.33 (0.15–0.50)  3.74 (0.09)  0.331  <0.001         
Unemployed  0.04 (−0.13 – 0.20)  0.46 (0.08)  0.037  0.645         
Premorbid IQ  0.00 (−0.18 – 0.19)  0.03 (0.09)  0.002  0.978         
Model 2          0.343  0.106  9.76  <0.001 
Years of education  0.33 (0.17–0.49)  4.13 (0.08)  0.332  <0.001         
Unemployed  0.04 (−0.13 – 0.20)  0.46 (0.08)  0.037  0.644         
Model 3          0.342  0.111  19.41  <0.001 
Years of education  0.34 (0.19–0.49)  4.41 (0.08)  0.342  <0.001         

Abbreviations: IQ: intelligence quotients; HDL: high density lipoprotein; SBP: systolic blood pressure.

Bold values: group differences with Bonferroni post hoc with significance p < 0.05.

FEP patients

As shown in Table 2, the three resulting models for SBP levels were significant (p<0.05), as were the two models for HDL levels (p<0.001). Of the five resulting models, we observed that there was greater predictive value for HDL levels, with Model 2 being the most significant (F=11.80; p<0.001). Model 2, formed by the proxies years of education and unemployment, had a higher predictive power, explaining 5.4% of HDL levels. Meanwhile, the two proxies were statistically significant (years of education: p<0.001; unemployment: p=0.012), with years of education having a higher relationship (β=0.185) than unemployment (β=0.128).

Healthy controls

As you can see in Table 3, three models were significant (p<0.05) with SBP as the dependent variable, while all three HDL models were significant (p<0.001). As with the patient group, of the five significant models in the HCs, Model 3 on the dependent variable HDL was the most prominent. Model 3 showed the highest predictive power with 11.6% of explanation of HDL levels. We see that this model was composed of years of education proxy with a relationship of β=0.342.

The results on waist circumference and levels of triglycerides and hyperglycemia in the HC group can be found in supplementary Table S1.

Biological cognitive reserve

The next step in the analyses was to carry out PCA and EFA with the most significant variables obtained in the regression models. After several attempts combining all possible components, exploratory analyses showed that the most optimal variables for the composite CR score were years of education and HDL levels.

The two CR models in both groups obtained adequate levels of KMO (KMO>0.05) and significance in Bartlett's test of specificity (p<0.001) (see online supplementary Table S2). The results reported that neither the classic CR nor our biological CR reached the established Cronbach's alpha levels for either patients or HC (p<0.70) (see online supplementary Table S2).

As shown in Table 4, results of total variance explained indicated that biological CR would have a greater explanatory power for the phenomenon than classic CR for both groups of participants. Among the group of patients, classic CR explained 51.79% of the variance, while biological CR explained 59.06%. This percentage increase also occurred in the control group, where classic CR explained 51.04%, while biological CR increased to 67.12%.

Table 4.

Total variance explained by comparing classic and biological CR in patients and controls.

  Initial eigenvaluesExtraction sums of squared loadings
  Total  % of variance  Cumulative %  Total  % of variance  Cumulative % 
Patients
Components of classic CR
1.56  51.79  51.79  1.56  51.79  51.79 
0.91  30.22  82.02       
0.54  17.98  100.00       
Components of the biological CR
1.17  59.06  59.06  1.17  59.06  59.06 
0.81  40.94  100.00       
Controls
Components of classic CR
1.45  51.04  51.04  1.45  51.04  51.04 
0.86  30.15  81.19       
0.53  18.81  100.00       
Components of the biological CR
1.37  67.12  67.12  1.37  67.12  67.12 
0.67  32.88  100.00       

The results show that for both groups of participants the unemployment proxy in the classic CR had a degree of extraction lower than 0.30. These low values mean that this proxy did not provide sufficient information to be part of the classic CR. In contrast, the years of education proxy provided the largest information to the classic CR (>0.70), while providing a balanced contribution to the biological CR with its counterpart HDL, for both patients and HC (see online supplementary Table S3).

Discussion

The main objective of the present study was to explore an objective and quantifiable CR, taking into account endogenous and exogenous factors. Following this line of work, it is interesting to note that, for both groups of participants, the results found that the proposed biological CR has a greater explanatory value of the phenomenon than the classic CR commonly found in the literature. Therefore, we can affirm that introducing HDL levels, as a biological proxy, together with the years of education proxy, is a way of obtaining a CR adjusted to the multifactorial nature of psychosis. Furthermore, it was found that in the classic CR the proxy unemployment did not provide the necessary information load to be taken into account in the total index.

Our research has found that years of education is the variable that best predicts HDL levels. These results are supported by previous studies suggesting that years of education in combination with HDL are necessary to form predictive models of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.22–24 The fact that years of education is an indispensable proxy may be due to the fact that it often has an early onset, which makes it more important to take into account lived experiences and cognitive enrichment at an early age.46 Another reason why the need for this proxy might be justified is that education stimulates neuroplasticity before the development of the disease, which would promote cognitive protection against the adverse effects of psychosis.15

Furthermore, the need to include HDL levels is supported by previous arguments reporting its relationship with cognitive performance and patient functionality,25,28 independently of the effect of practice, lifestyle, improvements in clinical symptomatology or levels of other biological parameters.32 The introduction of HDL levels in CR implies taking into account biochemical processes that have not been considered until now, since, at the brain level, HDL is located in the hippocampus and is related to the performance of cognitive domains.32,47–49 If we know that an imbalance in HDL levels causes hippocampal atrophy32 with consequent cognitive impairment and increased neurodegenerative speed,31 it is conceivable that it also affects the alternative neural networks referred to in the definition of CR.1 Ultimately, these problems could explain the patients’ inabilities to cope with the onset of their first episode of psychosis and subsequent cognitive declines. This fact supports the claim that CR is a protective factor for the development of severe mental illness, as suggested by previous research.7,8

The combination of years of education and HDL levels seems to have an important implication for CR. On the one hand, if a patient has low cognitive enrichment due to a low level of education, this influences the patient's understanding, learning and reasoning about their health and achieving problem-solving skills to prevent alterations in their biological parameters and future chronic diseases.50 Moreover, if a patient has low HDL levels, it will start an inhibition of synaptogenesis and lead to neurodegenerative changes31 that in turn lead to worse cognitive functioning, making it difficult for the patient to increase their years of education. Therefore, as we can see, the relationship between these two proxies appears to be reciprocal.

Another notable finding of our research is that the proxies premorbid IQ and employment status (unemployment) were discarded. One possible explanation is that years of education and HDL levels can be considered secondary. The results indicated a strong relationship between premorbid IQ and years of education, which leads us to believe that, if a patient has a low educational level, his or her cognitive enrichment will be poor and therefore will not reach a high premorbid IQ. Thus, we come to the possible conclusion that years of education is a predictor of the patient's crystallised intelligence, making the premorbid IQ proxy redundant in the CR composite score. On the other hand, having low HDL levels is related to poorer performance in the domains of verbal learning and memory.47–49 These domains represent the receiving, processing and storing of long-term knowledge, suggesting that low HDL affects the development of crystallised intelligence and, as a result, premorbid IQ. Secondly, if functionality is impaired, as predicted by low HDL levels, it will be more difficult for the patient to find a job, which helps to explain the relationship between HDL and employment.

This paper cannot end without mentioning some limitations and strengths. One of the main limitations lies in not being able to explore the relationship with CR in other inflammatory or neuroimmune biomarkers such as interleukin receptor SHC signalling, hematopoietic cell lineage, interleukin-1/2 family signalling51 and activation of HERV-W.20 We also did not take into account the hormone levels of the participants and especially of the patients. Previous research has shown how antipsychotic medication influences hormone production and how hormones mediate HDL production.52 Another possible limitation lies in the collection of blood tests, as they were not performed on all participants. We also consider it a limitation that due to the lack of uniform information for occupation, it was used as a dichotomous variable (unemployed vs. active). As a final limitation, we can mention that we have not taken into account other factors that could potentially interfere with the results, such as habitual physical exercise, diet, substance use and type of antipsychotic. However, our study has several strengths consisting in the size and homogeneity of the samples, which allows us to consider our results for future CR research. To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the relationships and predictions between CR proxies with biomarkers, as well as to explore their use as an additional proxy. The gap in the literature justified the present study's focus on the search for neurobiological CR proxies, as patients with FEP tend to have unhealthy lifestyle habits that alter their metabolisms53,54 and thus their CR. Future research is needed to expand the use of biological CR based on years of education and HDL levels.

In conclusion, this study proposes a new composition of CR with exogenous and endogenous factors, consisting of the proxies years of education and HDL levels. We showed that, in patients and HC, the strongest correlations were between years of education and HDL levels. In fact, years of education outperformed the other variables in terms of predicting HDL levels. A notable observation was that our proposed biological CR had a higher percentage of explanation of the phenomenon with only two proxies compared to the classic CR consisting of three proxies. In addition, its two proxies contributed information in a balanced way to the CR composite score. These findings allowed us to develop a quantifiable, objective and multifactorial CR. The possible impact of the biological CR is that is provides a more precise composition taking into account biomarkers through a question and a blood test, or, desirably, through non-invasive measures yet to be developed. These insights will allow for the selection and establishment of the most appropriate treatments for each FEP patient.

Authors’ contributions

All the authors have participated and have made substantial contributions to this paper.

RMH: conception, design, statistical analysis, interpretations of data and drafting the article.

NMG, AYR, BCF: interpretations of data and revising the article.

KN: editing.

RAA: conception, design, interpretations of data and revising the article.

Funding

The PAFIP project carried out on Marqués de Valdecilla Research Institute was supported by the Carlos III Health Institute (PI14/00639 and PI14/00918). In addition, this work was financed by a Miguel Servet from the Carlos III Health Institute contract (Dra. Rosa Ayesa-Arriola) (CP18/00003), and a predoctoral contract (Rebeca Magdaleno Herrero) (PREVAL22/03) from the Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute and the University of Cantabria. No pharmaceutical company has financially supported the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all “Programa de Atención a Fases Iniciales de Psicosis” (PAFIP) research team, and especially to all patients and family members who participated in the study.

Appendix B
Supplementary data

The following are the supplementary data to this article:

References
[1]
Y. Stern.
Cognitive reserve.
Neuropsychologia, 47 (2009), pp. 2015-2028
[2]
S. Amoretti, A.R. Rosa, G. Mezquida, et al.
The impact of cognitive reserve, cognition and clinical symptoms on psychosocial functioning in first-episode psychoses.
Psychol Med, 52 (2020), pp. 526-537
[3]
S. Amoretti, M. Bernardo, C.M. Bonnin, et al.
The impact of cognitive reserve in the outcome of first-episode psychoses: 2-year follow-up study.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol, 26 (2016), pp. 1638-1648
[4]
S. Amoretti, B. Cabrera, C. Torrent, et al.
Cognitive reserve as an outcome predictor: first-episode affective versus non-affective psychosis.
Acta Psychiatr Scand, 138 (2018), pp. 441-455
[5]
E. de la Serna, S. Andrés-Perpiñá, O. Puig, et al.
Cognitive reserve as a predictor of two year neuropsychological performance in early onset first-episode schizophrenia.
Schizophr Res, 143 (2013), pp. 125-131
[6]
I. González-Ortega, A. González-Pinto, S. Alberich, et al.
Influence of social cognition as a mediator between cognitive reserve and psychosocial functioning in patients with first episode psychosis.
Psychol Med, 50 (2019), pp. 2702-2710
[7]
I. Forcada, M. Mur, E. Mora, E. Vieta, D. Bartrés-Faz, M.J. Portella.
The influence of cognitive reserve on psychosocial and neuropsychological functioning in bipolar disorder.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol, 25 (2015), pp. 214-222
[8]
I. Grande, J. Sanchez-Moreno, B. Sole, et al.
High cognitive reserve in bipolar disorders as a moderator of neurocognitive impairment.
J Affect Disord, 208 (2017), pp. 621-627
[9]
R. Magdaleno Herrero, V. Ortiz-García de la Foz, N. Murillo-García, et al.
Sex differences in cognitive reserve among first episode of psychosis patients.
Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, (2021),
[10]
V.C. Leeson, T.R.E. Barnes, S.B. Hutton, M.A. Ron, E.M. Joyce.
IQ as a predictor of functional outcome in schizophrenia: a longitudinal, four-year study of first-episode psychosis.
Schizophr Res, 107 (2009), pp. 55-60
[11]
V.C. Leeson, P. Sharma, M. Harrison, M.A. Ron, T.R.E. Barnes, E.M. Joyce.
IQ trajectory, cognitive reserve, and clinical outcome following a first episode of psychosis: a 3-year longitudinal study.
Schizophr Bull, 37 (2011), pp. 768-777
[12]
D.M. Rentz, E.C. Mormino, K.V. Papp, R.A. Betensky, R.A. Sperling, K.A. Johnson.
Cognitive resilience in clinical and preclinical Alzheimer's disease: the association of amyloid and tau burden on cognitive performance.
Brain Imaging Behav, 11 (2017), pp. 383-390
[13]
F. Yasuno, H. Minami, H. Hattori.
Interaction effect of Alzheimer's disease pathology and education, occupation, and socioeconomic status as a proxy for cognitive reserve on cognitive performance: in vivo positron emission tomography study.
Psychogeriatrics, 20 (2020), pp. 585-593
[14]
J. Dumurgier, C. Paquet, S. Benisty, et al.
Inverse association between CSF Aβ 42 levels and years of education in mild form of Alzheimer's disease: the cognitive reserve theory.
Neurobiol Dis, 40 (2010), pp. 456-459
[15]
D.E. Vance, A.J. Roberson, T.M. McGuinness, P.L. Fazeli.
How neuroplasticity and cognitive reserve protect cognitive functioning.
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv, 48 (2010), pp. 23-30
[16]
A. Okbay, J.P. Beauchamp, M.A. Fontana, et al.
Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment.
Nature, 533 (2016), pp. 539-542
[17]
C.A. Rietveld, S.E. Medland, J. Derringer, et al.
GWAS of 126,559 individuals identifies genetic variants associated with educational attainment.
Science, 340 (2013), pp. 1467-1471
[18]
S.C. Larsson, M. Traylor, R. Malik, M. Dichgans, S. Burgess, H.S. Markus.
Modifiable pathways in Alzheimer's disease: Mendelian randomisation analysis.
BMJ, 359 (2017), pp. j5375
[19]
E. Khachatryan, B. Wittevrongel, M. Perovnik, J. Tournoy, B. Schoenmakers, M.M. Van Hulle.
Electrophysiological proxy of cognitive reserve index.
Front Hum Neurosci, 15 (2021), pp. 690856
[20]
M. Leboyer, J. Oliveira, R. Tamouza, L. Groc.
Is it time for immunopsychiatry in psychotic disorders?.
Psychopharmacology, 233 (2016), pp. 1651-1660
[21]
A.M. Stranahan, M.P. Mattson.
Metabolic reserve as a determinant of cognitive aging.
[22]
A. Wysokiński, M. Dzienniak, I. Kłoszewska.
Effect of metabolic abnormalities on cognitive performance and clinical symptoms in schizophrenia.
Arch Psych Psych, 15 (2013), pp. 13-25
[23]
H. Nandeesha, N. Keshri, M. Rajappa, V. Menon.
Association of hyperglycaemia and hyperlipidaemia with cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia spectrum disorder.
Arch Physiol Biochem, 129 (2020), pp. 1-8
[24]
J.V. Sánchez-Ortí, V. Balanzá-Martínez, P. Correa-Ghisays, et al.
Specific metabolic syndrome components predict cognition and social functioning in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and severe mental disorders.
Acta Psychiatr Scand, 146 (2022), pp. 215-226
[25]
K. Adamowicz, J. Kucharska-Mazur.
Dietary behaviors and metabolic syndrome in schizophrenia patients.
[26]
S. Grover, R. Padmavati, R.P. Sahoo, et al.
Relationship of metabolic syndrome and neurocognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia.
Psychiatry Res, 278 (2019), pp. 56-64
[27]
J.P. Lindenmayer, A. Khan, S. Kaushik, et al.
Relationship between metabolic syndrome and cognition in patients with schizophrenia.
Schizophr Res, 142 (2012), pp. 171-176
[28]
A. Storch Jakobsen, H. Speyer, H.C.B. Nørgaard, et al.
Associations between clinical and psychosocial factors and metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders – baseline and two-years findings from the CHANGE trial.
Schizophr Res, 199 (2018), pp. 96-102
[29]
R. Ayesa-Arriola, M. Canal Rivero, M. Delgado-Alvarado, et al.
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and suicidal behaviour in a large sample of first-episode psychosis patients.
World J Biol Psychiatry, 19 (2018), pp. S158-S161
[30]
J. Vázquez-Bourgon, M. Ibáñez Alario, J. Mayoral-van Son, et al.
A 3-year prospective study on the metabolic effect of aripiprazole, quetiapine and ziprasidone: a pragmatic clinical trial in first episode psychosis patients.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol, 39 (2020), pp. 46-55
[31]
M. Orth, S. Bellosta.
Cholesterol: its regulation and role in central nervous system disorders.
Cholesterol, 2012 (2012), pp. e292598
[32]
P.B. Gjerde, C.E. Simonsen, T.V. Lagerberg, et al.
Improvement in verbal learning over the first year of antipsychotic treatment is associated with serum HDL levels in a cohort of first episode psychosis patients.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci, 270 (2020), pp. 49-58
[33]
B. Crespo-Facorro, R. Pérez-Iglesias, M. Ramirez-Bonilla, O. Martínez-García, J. Llorca, J. Luis Vázquez-Barquero.
A practical clinical trial comparing haloperidol, risperidone, and olanzapine for the acute treatment of first-episode nonaffective psychosis.
J Clin Psychiatry, 67 (2006), pp. 1511-1521
[34]
J.M. Pelayo-Terán, R. Pérez-Iglesias, M. Ramírez-Bonilla, et al.
Epidemiological factors associated with treated incidence of first-episode non-affective psychosis in Cantabria: insights from the Clinical Programme on Early Phases of Psychosis.
Early Interv Psychiatry, 2 (2008), pp. 178-187
[35]
R. Ayesa-Arriola, V. Ortíz-García de la Foz, N. Murillo-García, et al.
Cognitive reserve as a moderator of outcomes in five clusters of first episode psychosis patients: a 10-year follow-up study of the PAFIP cohort.
Psychol Med, (2021), pp. 1-15
[36]
M. First, R. Spitzer, M. Gibbon, J. Williams.
User's guide for the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders SCID-I: clinical version.
New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Department, (2001),
[37]
D. Wechsler.
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III.
The Psychological Corporation, (1997),
[38]
R.H. Eckel, S.M. Grundy, P.Z. Zimmet.
The metabolic syndrome.
Lancet, 365 (2005), pp. 1415-1428
[39]
K. Hagi, T. Nosaka, D. Dickinson, et al.
Association between cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive impairment in people with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
JAMA Psychiatry, 78 (2021), pp. 510
[40]
W. Zheng, W.-L. Jiang, X. Zhang, et al.
Use of the RBANS to evaluate cognition in patients with schizophrenia and metabolic syndrome: a meta-analysis of case–control studies.
Psychiatr Q, 93 (2022), pp. 137-149
[41]
Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults.
Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III).
JAMA, 285 (2001), pp. 2486-2497
[42]
IBM Corp..
IBM SPSS Statistic for Windows, version 23.0.
IBM Corp., (2015),
[43]
S. Cortés, S. Burgos, H. Adaros, B. Lucero, L. Quirós-Alcalá.
Environmental health risk perception: adaptation of a population-based questionnaire from Latin America.
IJERPH, 18 (2021), pp. 8600
[44]
A. Kagaigai, A. Anaeli, A.T. Mori, S. Grepperud.
Do household perceptions influence enrolment decisions into community-based health insurance schemes in Tanzania?.
BMC Health Serv Res, 21 (2021), pp. 162
[45]
M. Melkamu Asaye, K.A. Gelaye, Y.H. Matebe, H. Lindgren, K. Erlandsson.
Valid and reliable neonatal near-miss assessment scale in Ethiopia: a psychometric validation.
Global Health Action, 15 (2022), pp. 2029334
[46]
H. Ko, S. Kim, K. Kim, et al.
Genome-wide association study of occupational attainment as a proxy for cognitive reserve.
Brain, 145 (2022), pp. 1436-1448
[47]
M. Antoniades, T. Schoeler, J. Radua, et al.
Verbal learning and hippocampal dysfunction in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 86 (2018), pp. 166-175
[48]
C. Lancon, D. Dassa, J. Fernandez, R. Richieri, R. Padovani, L. Boyer.
Are cardiovascular risk factors associated with verbal learning and memory impairment in patients with schizophrenia? A cross-sectional study.
Cardiovasc Psychiatry Neurol, 2012 (2012), pp. 204043
[49]
C.A. Tamminga, A.D. Stan, A.D. Wagner.
The hippocampal formation in schizophrenia.
Am J Psychiatry, 167 (2010), pp. 1178-1193
[50]
L. Gottfredson, I.J. Deary.
Intelligence predicts health and longevity, but why?.
Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 13 (2004), pp. 1-4
[51]
B.S. Fernandes, Y. Dai, P. Jia, Z. Zhao.
Charting the proteome landscape in major psychiatric disorders: from biomarkers to biological pathways towards drug discovery.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol, 61 (2022), pp. 43-59
[52]
S. Giménez.
Colesterol y mujer.
Farmacia Profesional, 19 (2005), pp. 54-59
[53]
C. Arango, J. Bobes, B. Kirkpatrick, M. Garcia-Garcia, J. Rejas.
Psychopathology, coronary heart disease and metabolic syndrome in schizophrenia spectrum patients with deficit versus non-deficit schizophrenia: findings from the CLAMORS study.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol, 21 (2011), pp. 867-875
[54]
L.F. Van Gaal.
Long-term health considerations in schizophrenia: metabolic effects and the role of abdominal adiposity.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol, 16 (2006), pp. S142-S148
Copyright © 2023. The Author(s)
Article options
Tools
Supplemental materials
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos