metricas
covid
Buscar en
Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (English Edition) Uncemented knee arthroplasty: Supervivorship and long-term functional outcome
Journal Information
Vol. 54. Issue 2.
Pages 106-110 (March - April 2010)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 54. Issue 2.
Pages 106-110 (March - April 2010)
Original Article
Full text access
Uncemented knee arthroplasty: Supervivorship and long-term functional outcome
Supervivencia y resultado funcional a largo plazo de prótesis de rodilla no cementadas
Visits
1159
E.M. Ferrer-Santacreua, A.C. Moreno-Garcíaa,
Corresponding author
acmoreno@jet.es

Corresponding author.
, G. Arroyo-Salcedoa, J.L. Leal-Helmlinga, P. Díaz-Freirea, E. Fernándezb, M. Ruiz-Yagüea, S. Bello-Pratsa
a Knee Unit, Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery B Service, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
b Biostatistics Section, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Purpose

To analyze the long term survivorship and functional results of a model of uncemented knee prosthesis.

Materials and methods

We carried out a prospective observational study of patients implanted between 1989 and 1996 with the Low Contact Stress Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Replacement (Depuy, Warsaw, IN, USA). Variables studied included: age, gender, followup, Knee Society Score, implant survivorship and reasons for revision. A total of 96 arthroplasties out of 127 reached the end of follow-up. Mean age was 79 years. Mean follow-up was 14 years. Eleven prostheses were revised (6 following aseptic loosening and 5 because of problems with the mobile bearings). Survivorship curves were obtained considering length of follow-up, time elapsed between the primary and the revision surgery and the “revision following loosening of a metal component” and “need for revision” events.

Results

When “need for revision” was considered as the endpoint, survivorship curves revealed a survivorship rate of 96.45% at 9 years and 92.78% at 12 years. When the endpoint was the “need to revise metal components” 14.5-year survivorship was 93.75%. Mean Knee Society Score was 89.2 points.

Conclusion

The use of the uncemented LCS knee has resulted in excellent clinical and functional results as measured by the Knee Society Score, as well as 93.75% survivorship at 14 years and a half, considering the survivorship of the metal implant.

Keywords:
Uncemented arthroplasty
Knee Society Score functional
Long-term survival
Resumen
Objetivo

Analizar la supervivencia a largo plazo y el resultado funcional de un modelo de prótesis de rodilla no cementada.

Material y método

Realizamos un estudio prospectivo observacional de pacientes operados entre los años 1989 y 1996 con el modelo Low Contact Stress Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Replacement(r) (Depuy, Warsaw, IN, EE. UU.). Las variables estudiadas fueron edad, sexo, tiempo de seguimiento, puntuación del Knee Society Score (KSS), supervivencia del implante y motivos de la revisión. Un total de 96 artroplastias de 127 completaron el seguimiento. La media de edad fue de 79 años. La media de seguimiento fue de 14,5 años. Once prótesis se reintervinieron (6 por aflojamiento aséptico de implantes y 5 por problemas de componentes móviles). Se obtuvieron curvas de supervivencia al considerar el tiempo de seguimiento, el tiempo desde la cirugía primaria hasta la reintervención y el episodio “recambio por aflojamiento de componente metálico” y “necesidad de reintervención”.

Resultados

Las curvas de supervivencia arrojaron una supervivencia del 96,45% a los 9 años y del 92,78% a los 12 años, y se consideró la “necesidad de reintervención” como punto final. Al considerar la necesidad de recambio de componentes metálicos, la supervivencia a los 14 años y medio fue del 93,75%. La puntuación media del KSS funcional fue de 89,2.

Conclusión

En nuestra experiencia y con el modelo protésico utilizado, las prótesis totales de rodilla no cementadas proporcionan un resultado clínico y funcional excelente, valorado por el KSS, y una supervivencia del 93,75% a los 14 años y medio al considerar la supervivencia del implante metálico.

Palabras clave:
Artroplastia no cementada
Knee Society Score funcional
Supervivencia a largo plazo
Full text is only aviable in PDF
References
[1.]
J. Bellemans.
Osseointegration in porous coated knee arthroplasty. The influence of component coating type in sheep.
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl, 288 (1999), pp. 1-35
[2.]
D.J. Cloke, M. Khatri, I.M. Pinder, A.W. McCaskie, E.A. Lingard.
284 press-fit Kinemax total knee arthroplasties followed for 10 years: Poor survival of uncemented prostheses.
Acta Orthop, 79 (2008), pp. 28-33
[3.]
J.M. Hartford, T. Hunt, H. Kaufer.
Low contact stress mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty: Results at 5 to 13 years.
J Arthroplasty, 16 (2001), pp. 977-983
[4.]
R.A. Berger, J.H. Lyon, J.J. Jacobs, R.M. Barden, E.M. Berkson, M.B. Sheinkop, et al.
Problems with cementless total knee arthroplasty at 11 years followup.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 392 (2001), pp. 196-207
[5.]
A. Carlsson, A. Björkman, J. Besjakov, I. Onsten.
Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation: A randomized radiostereometric study comparing porouscoated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years.
Acta Orthop, 76 (2005), pp. 362-369
[6.]
A.W. McCaskie, D.J. Deehan, T.P. Green, K.R. Lock, J.R. Thompson, W.M. Harper, et al.
Randomised, prospective study comparing cemented and cementless total knee replacement: Results of press-fit condylar total knee replacement at five years.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80-B (1998), pp. 971-975
[7.]
M.S. Ali, S.R. Mangaleshkar.
Uncemented rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty: A 4-year to 12-year follow-up.
J Arthroplasty, 21 (2006), pp. 80-84
[8.]
S. Sharma, F. Nicol, M.G. Hullin, S.W. McCreath.
Long-term results of the uncemented low contact stress total knee replacement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 87-B (2005), pp. 1077-1080
[9.]
R.B. Sorrells, P.E. Voorhorst, J.A. Murphy, M.P. Bauschka, A.S. Greenwald.
Uncemented rotating-platform total knee replacement: A five to twelve-year follow-up study.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86-A (2004), pp. 2156-2162
[10.]
C.H. Huang, H.M. Ma, Y.M. Lee, F.Y. Ho.
Long-term results of low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee replacements.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 416 (2003), pp. 265-270
[11.]
R.W. Bassett.
Results of 1,000 performance knees: Cementless versus cemented fixation.
J Arthroplasty, 13 (1998), pp. 409-413
[12.]
L.A. Whiteside.
Modelos de prótesis de rodilla no cementados.
Rodilla. Tomo 2, pp. 1705-1716
[13.]
M.R. O’Rourke, J.J. Callaghan, D.D. Goetz, P.M. Sullivan, R.C. Johnston.
Osteolysis associated with a cemented modular posteriorcruciate- substituting total knee design: Five to eight-year follow-up.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 84-A (2002), pp. 1362-1371
[14.]
L. Ryd, U. Hansson, G. Blunn, A. Lindstrand, S. Toksvig-Larsen.
Failure of partial cementation to achieve implant stability and bone ingrowth: A long-term roentgen stereophotogrammetric study of tibial components.
J Orthop Res, 17 (1999), pp. 311-320
[15.]
D.A. Dennis, R.D. Komistek.
Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: Design factors in minimizing wear.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 452 (2006), pp. 70-77
[16.]
J.N. Insall, L.D. Dorr, R.D. Scott, W.N. Scott.
Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 248 (1989), pp. 13-14
[17.]
F.F. Buechel Sr., F.F. Buechel, M.J. Pappas, J. Dalessio.
Twenty-year evaluation of the New Jersey LCS Rotating Platform Knee Replacement.
J Knee Surg, 15 (2002), pp. 84-89
[18.]
F.F. Buechel, F.F. Buechel, M.J. Pappas, J. D’Alessio.
Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 388 (2001), pp. 41-50
[19.]
G.C. Landon, J.O. Galante, M.M. Maley.
Noncemented total knee arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 205 (1986), pp. 49-57
[20.]
O. Robertsson, K. Knutson, S. Lewold, L. Lidgren.
The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: An update with special emphasis on 41.223 knees operated on in 1988-1997.
Acta Orthop Scand, 72 (2001), pp. 503-513
[21.]
J. Sánchez-Sotelo, J.M. Ordoñez, S.B. Prats.
Results and complications of the low contact stress knee prosthesis.
J Arthroplasty, 14 (1999), pp. 815-821
[22.]
K.J. Bozic, J. Kinder, R.M. Meneghini, D. Zurakowski, A.G. Rosenberg, J.O. Galante.
Implant survivorship and complication rates after total knee arthroplasty with a third-generation cemented system: 5 to 8 years followup.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 430 (2005), pp. 117-124
[23.]
M.B. Vessely, A.L. Whaley, W.S. Harmsen, C.D. Schleck, D.J. Berry.
Long-term survivorship and failure modes of 1000 cemented condylar total knee arthroplasties.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 452 (2006), pp. 28-34
[24.]
J.A. Rand, R.T. Trousdale, D.M. Ilstrup, W.S. Harmsen.
Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85-A (2003), pp. 259-265
[25.]
L.R. Jordan, J.L. Olivo, P.E. Voorhorst.
Survivorship analysis of cementless meniscal bearing total knee arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 338 (1997), pp. 119-123
[26.]
J.M. Bert.
Dislocation/subluxation of meniscal bearing elements after New Jersey low-contact stress total knee arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 254 (1990), pp. 211-215
[27.]
J.K. Weaver, R.S. Derkash, A.S. Greenwald.
Difficulties with bearing dislocation and breakage using a movable bearing total knee replacement system.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 290 (1993), pp. 244-252
Copyright © 2010. Sociedad Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (SECOT). All rights reserved
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos