Buscar en
Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (English Edition) Quality of life and persistent symptoms after hospitalization for COVID-19. A pr...
Journal Information
Vol. 69. Issue 6.
Pages 326-335 (June - July 2022)
Visits
14
Vol. 69. Issue 6.
Pages 326-335 (June - July 2022)
Original article
Full text access
Quality of life and persistent symptoms after hospitalization for COVID-19. A prospective observational study comparing ICU with non-ICU patients
Calidad de vida y síntomas persistentes tras hospitalización por COVID-19. Estudio observacional prospectivo comparando pacientes con o sin ingreso en UCI
Visits
14
M. Taboadaa,
Corresponding author
manutabo@yahoo.es

Corresponding author.
, N. Rodríguezb, M. Diaz-Vieitoa, M.J. Domínguezc, A. Casala, V. Riveirob, A. Cariñenab, E. Morenod, A. Posec, L. Valdésb, J. Alvareza, T. Seoane-Pilladoe
a Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
b Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
c Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
d Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Ferrol, Ferrol, La Coruña, Spain
e Unidad de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Depatamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidade de A Coruña-INIBIC, A Coruña, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Abstract
Background

Hospitalized COVID-19 patients are prone to develop persistent symptoms and to show reduced quality of life following hospital admission.

Methods

Prospective cohort study of COVID-19 patients admitted to a hospital from March 1 to April 30, 2020. The primary outcome was to compare health related quality of life and persistent symptoms six months after hospital admission, of COVID-19 patients who required ICU admission with those who did not.

Results

Among the 242 patients hospitalized during the defined period of time, 44 (18.2%) needed ICU admission. Forty (16.5%) patients died during hospital admission. Two hundred and two (83.5%) patients were discharged alive from the hospital. At six months, 183 (75.6%) patients completed the questionnaires (32 ICU patients and 151 non ICU patients). Ninety-six (52.4%) reported decreased quality of life and 143 (78.1%) described persistent symptoms. More ICU patients showed worsening of their quality of life (71.9% vs 43.7%, P=0.004). There were no differences in the proportion of patients with persistent symptoms between ICU and non ICU patients (87.5% vs 76.2%, P=0.159). ICU patients showed more frequently dyspnea on exertion (78.1% vs 47.7%, P=0.02), dyspnea on light exertion (37.5% vs 4.6%, P<0.001), and asthenia (56.3 vs 29.1, P=0.003).

Conclusions

Survivors of COVID-19 needing hospitalization had persistent symptoms and a decline in the quality of life. ICU patients referred a large decrease of their quality of life compared with non ICU patients.

Keywords:
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
Critically ill patients
Acute respiratorydistress (ARDS)
Health-relatedquality of life
Functional status
Resumen
Antecedentes/Contexto

Existe una tendencia en los pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 a desarrollar síntomas persistentes y a presentar una disminución en su calidad de vida tras el ingreso hospitalario.

Métodos

Estudio de cohorte prospectivo de pacientes COVID-19 con ingreso hospitalario entre el 1 de marzo al 30 de abril de 2020. El objetivo primario fue comparar la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud y la presencia de síntomas persistentes seis meses después del ingreso, comparando los pacientes que requirieron ingreso en UCI con los que no lo precisaron.

Resultados

De los 242 pacientes hospitalizados durante el período de estudio, 44 (18,2%) necesitaron ingreso en UCI. 40 (16,5%) pacientes fallecieron durante el ingreso hospitalario. 202 (83,5%) pacientes fueron dados de alta del hospital. A los seis meses, 183 (75,6%) pacientes completaron los cuestionarios (32 pacientes UCI y 151 pacientes no UCI). 96 (52,4%) refirieron disminución de la calidad de vida y 143 (78,1%) describieron síntomas persistentes. Un número mayor de pacientes de UCI mostraron un empeoramiento de su calidad de vida (71,9% vs 43,7%, P=0,004). No hubo diferencias en la proporción de pacientes con síntomas persistentes entre los pacientes con UCI y sin UCI (87,5% vs 76,2%, P=0,159). Los pacientes de UCI mostraron con mayor frecuencia disnea de esfuerzo (78,1% vs 47,7%, P=0,02), disnea de pequeños esfuerzos (37,5% vs 4,6%, P<0,001) y astenia (56,3 vs 29,1, P=0,003).

Conclusiones

Los supervivientes de COVID-19 que necesitaron hospitalización presentaron síntomas persistentes y un deterioro de su calidad de vida. Los pacientes de UCI refirieron una mayor disminución de su calidad de vida en comparación con los pacientes que no precisaron UCI.

Palabras clave:
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
Pacientes críticos
Dificultad respiratoriaaguda (SDRA)
Calidad de vidarelacionada con lasalud
Estado funcional
Full Text
Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the infection caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is a newly recognized disease that has spread rapidly around the world1–4. The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 ranges from mild to critically ill cases. Although most patients present fever, cough, myalgia, or fatigue with favourable evolution, some patients develop dyspnoea and hypoxemia requiring hospitalization and/or intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The mode of transmission, general epidemiological findings, clinical presentation, treatments, and short-term outcomes, including mortality, have been described elsewhere. However, long-term outcomes in hospitalized patients have rarely been reported. These patients are prone to persistent symptoms and a reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) that impact their ability to care for themselves and to perform usual activities in the months following hospital discharge, especially those who have been admitted to the ICU. HRQoL is a major component of outcomes after hospital discharge, especially after intensive care admission, and should be systematically assessed. The aim of this study was to compare HRQoL and persistent symptoms 6 months after hospital admission among COVID-19 patients who required ICU admission and those who did not.

Methods

This prospective cohort observational study was performed at the University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, in Northwest Spain. The Galicia (Spain) ethics committee (CEImG) approved this study under number 2020-188. Informed consent was obtained from all participants by telephone. All adult patients admitted between 1 March and 30 April 2020 with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) performed on a nasopharyngeal sample were included. Clinical outcomes were monitored until 1 November 2020, the date of last follow-up.

Age, gender, medical history, home treatment, labs on admission, hospital treatment, need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ICU treatment, in-hospital outcome, and outcome at 6 months after hospital admission were collected.

Data from all patients who survived were included in order to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL), functional status, and persistent symptoms using a structured interview conducted by trained study investigators 6 months after hospital admission. HRQOL was assessed using the EuroQol Group Association 5-domain, 3-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L), which consists of 2 sections: the descriptive system and the visual analogue scale. The descriptive system measures 5 domains of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, and assesses each domain across 3 levels: no problems, some problems, or extreme problems. The individual domains were converted to a utility score (EQ-5D index) ranging from -0.59 to 1.00, with 1.00 indicating full health and 0 indicating a state as bad as being dead. The visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) ranges from 0=worst imaginable health state and 100=best imaginable health state5–7. Participants were also asked to describe persistent symptoms potentially correlated with COVID-19 (dyspnoea on exertion, dyspnoea on mild exertion, asthenia, apathy, myalgia, arthralgia, chest pain, anosmia, cough, sleep disorder, hair loss, memory loss, visual disturbances), and to evaluate their quality of life 1–3 months before COVID-19.

The primary outcome was to compare HRQoL and persistent symptoms 6 months after hospital admission in COVID-19 patients who required ICU admission with those who did not.

The secondary outcome was to determine factors associated with poor HRQOL in COVID-19 patients 6 months after hospital admission.

Statistical analyses

All analyses were performed using R (version 4.0.2; R Foundation for Statistical Computing) and IBM SPSS (version 26; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Quantitative variables are expressed as median, interquartile range (IQR) or mean, standard deviation (SD) and categorical variables as number (%). The means for continuous variables were compared using unpaired or paired t-tests when the data were normally distributed; otherwise, the Mann–Whitney U test or Wilcoxon test were used. Proportions for categorical variables were compared using Pearson’s chi square or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate; McNemar’s test was used to compare paired proportions.

Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with poor quality of life prior to and 6 months after hospitalization. Significant factors identified in the univariate analysis and clinically relevant variables were considered for inclusion in the multivariate models. All tests were 2-sided, with a significance level of P<0.05.

Results

Forty four (18.2%) of the 242 patients included during the study period required ICU admission. There were no differences between patients who did or did not require ICU admission in relation to demographics, comorbidities, or home treatment (Table 1). Table 1 shows the clinical course, and treatment administered during the hospital stay. ICU patients received corticosteroids and tocilizumab more frequently than non ICU patients. Mean (SD) APACHE II score in the 44 ICU patients was 13.09 (4.52), 21 (70.5%) patients required mechanical ventilation, and 8 (21.1%) required tracheostomy. Forty (16.5%) patients died (10 in ICU and 30 on the ward).

Table 1.

Demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatments during hospitalization (n=242).

Characteristics 
DemographicsAll hospitalized patients  ICU patients  Non ICU patients  P value 
No=242  No=44  No=198   
Age, mean (SD)65.94 (14.08)  66.07 (11.17)  65.91 (14.68)  0.987 
Age, n (%)  <50  32 (13.2)  5 (11.4)  27 (13.6)  0.710 
  50−70  113 (46.7)  23 (52.3)  90 (45.5)   
  >70  97 (40.1)  16 (36.4)  81 (40.9)   
Male sex, n (%)144 (59.5)  19 (43.2)  79 (39.9)  0.688 
Comorbidities, n (%)       
Hypertension107 (44.2)  22 (50.0)  85 (42.9)  0.393 
Hyperlipidaemia90 (37.2)  13 (29.5)  77 (38.9)  0.246 
Obesity (BMI30kgm−2)70 (28.9)  13 (29.5)  57 (28.8)  0.920 
Diabetes52 (21.6)  12 (27.3)  40 (20.3)  0.310 
Chronic pulmonary disease44 (18.2)  6 (13.6)  38 (19.2)  0.387 
Chronic Heart disease32 (13.2)  7 (15.9)  25 (12.6)  0.561 
Home treatments, n (%)       
ACE inhibitors26 (10.7)  8 (18.2)  18 (9.1)  0.103 
Anticoagulants21 (8.7)  4 (9.1)  17 (8.6)  0.999 
Antiplatelets29 (12.0)  2 (4.5)  27 (13.6)  0.093 
Statins90 (37.2)  13 (29.5)  77 (38.9)  0.246 
Laboratory parameters, median (IQR)       
Lymphocyte count, /μL800.00 (560.00−1250.00)  510.00 (380.00−800.00)  940.00 (630.00−1360.00)  <0.001 
Lactate dehydrogenase, U/L344.00 (250.50−493.50)  419.00 (298.75−748.50)  322.00 (241.00−427.50)  <0.001 
D-dimer, ng/mL719.50 (445.50−1261.75)  996.50 (603.75−1509.00)  653.50 (413.50−1148.75)  0.004 
C-reactive protein, mg/L7.00 (3.08−13.00)  13.00 (6.70−16.99)  6.28 (2.74−11.00)  <0.001 
Procalcitonin, ng/mL0.11 (0.07−0.20)  0.13 (0.10−0.66)  0.10 (0.06−0.18)  0.007 
Serum Ferritin, μg/L548.00 (320.00−1161.00)  1179.50 (504.00−920.00)  505.00 (258.50−937.50)  <0.001 
Hospital treatments, n (%)       
Lopinavir-ritonavir206 (85.5)  41 (95.3)  165 (83.3)  0.043 
Hydroxychloroquine232 (96.3)  41 (95.3)  191 (96.5)  0.664 
Azithromycin218 (90.8)  39 (92.9)  179 (90.4)  0.774 
Tocilizumab31 (12.8)  22 (50.0)  9 (4.5)  <0.001 
Corticosteroids91 (37.6)  40 (90.9)  51 (25.8)  <0.001 
Characteristics during hospitalization       
Died during ICU stay, n (%)10 (4.1)  10 (22.7)     
Died during hospitalization, n (%)30 (12.4)  11 (25.0)  29 (14.6)  0.094 
Length of hospital stay, days median (IQR)10.00 (7.00−17.00)  28.00 (18.00−43.00)  9.00 (7.00−12.75)  <0.001 
Invasive ventilation, n (%)31 (12.8)  31 (70.5)     
Tracheostomy, n (%)8 (3.3)  8 (21.1)     
Duration of MV, days, median (IQR)8.50 (0.00−18.00)  8.50 (0.00−18.00)     
Length of ICU stay, days, median (IQR)13.00 (7.25−30.50)  13.00 (7.25−30.50)     
APACHE II, mean (SD)13.09 (4.52)  13.09 (4.52)     
Characteristics after hospital discharge, n (%)       
Hospital readmission19 (8.3)  6 (13.6)  13 (7.0)  0.217 
Died after hospital discharge5 (2.1)  1 (2.3)  4 (2.0)  0.999 
Total died at 6 months45 (18.6)  12 (27.3)  33 (16.7)  0.089 

Data shown as number (percentage), median (interquartile range), or mean (standard deviation). ACE: Angiotensin-converting-enzyme; APACHE II: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health disease Classification System II; BMI: Body mass index; ICU: intensive care unit; IQR: interquartile range; MV: mechanical ventilation.

Two hundred and two patients were discharged from the Hospital. At 6 months, 183 patients completed the quality-of-life questionnaire (32 needed ICU admission and 151 did not). The study flow chart is shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1.

Flow chart for the study.

(0.31MB).

The results of the quality of life questionnaire (5Q-3D-3L) at the 6-month interview are shown in Tables 2 and 3. Ninety-six (52.4%) patients reported worsening in at least 1 of the 5 dimensions analysed in the EQ-5D-3L, and 44 (24%) patients reported worsening in 2 or more dimensions. The most frequently reported problems were anxiety/depression (37.7%) and pain/discomfort (35.0%). More women than men reported problems in performing their usual activities (25.0% vs 12.1%, P=0.024), pain/discomfort (45.2% vs 26.3%, P=0.007), and anxiety/depression (53.6% vs 24.2%, P<0.001). Need for mechanical ventilation during hospital admission was associated with worsened mobility (63.6 vs 17.4, P<0.001), performance of usual activities (40.9 vs. 14.9, P=0.006), pain/discomfort (59.1% vs 31.7%, P=0.011), and anxiety/depression (68.2 vs 33.5, P=0.002). Age, length of hospital stay and need of ICU admission were associated with worsening in all 5 dimensions studied.

Table 2.

Quality of life and functional status (n=183).

Quality of life (EQ-5D-3L)  Before COVID-19  6 months after COVID-19  P value  Before COVID-196 months after COVID-19
Characteristics:  No=183  No=183    ICU patients  Non ICU patients  P value  ICU patients  Non ICU patients  P value 
        No=32  No=151    No=32  No=151   
Mobility:                   
No problems  169 (92.3)  141 (77.0)  <0.001  31 (96.9)  138 (91.4)  0.470  13 (40.6)  128 (84.8)  <0.001 
Some problems/Unable to walk  14 (7.7)  42 (17.4)    1 (3.1)  13 (8.6)    19 (59.4)  23 (15.2)   
Self-care:                   
No problems  177 (96.7)  170 (92.9)  0.016  32 (100.0)  145 (96.0)  0.592  27 (84.4)  143 (94.7)  0.054 
Some problems/Unable to wash or dress myself  6 (3.3)  13 (7.1)    0 (0.0)  6 (4.0)    5 (15.6)  8 (5.3)   
Usual activities:                   
No problems  176 (96.2)  150 (82.0)  <0.001  32 (100.0)  144 (95.4)  0.608  20 (62.5)  130 (86.1)  0.002 
Some problems/Unable to perform  7 (3.8)  33 (18.0)    0 (0.0)  7 (4.6)    12 (37.5)  21 (13.9)   
Pain or discomfort                   
No pain or discomfort  165 (90.2)  119 (65.0)  <0.001  31 (96.9)  134 (88.7)  0.206  15 (46.9)  104 (68.9)  0.018 
Some or extreme pain or discomfort  18 (9.8)  64 (35.0)    1 (3.1)  17 (11.3)    17 (53.1)  47 (31.1)   
Anxiety or depression                   
Not anxious or depressed  171 (93.4)  114 (62.3)  <0.001  32 (100.0)  139 (92.1)  0.130  12 (37.5)  102 (67.5)  0.001 
Moderately or extremely anxious or depressed  12(6.6)  69 (37.7)    0 (0.0)  12 (7.9)    20 (62.5)  49 (32.5)   
EQ-5D index  0.9474 (0.1306)  0.8074 (0.2173)  <0.001  0.9859 (0.0554)  0.9392 (0.1402)  0.059  0.6724 (0.2504)  0.8360 (0.1991)  <0.001 
EQ-VAS (0−100)  85.81 (14.74)  72.51 (18.85)  <0.001  87.81 (10.08)  85.38 (15.55)  0.887  60.13 (14.70)  75.09 (18.65)  <0.001 

Data shown as n (%) or mean (SD). Quality of life measured using the EuroQol, 5-dimension, 3-level questionnaire, the EQ-5D index, and the EQ-VAS (0−100). Bold indicates statistical significance.

Table 3.

Percentage of EQ-5D problems reported.

    MobilitySelf-careUsual activitiesPain or discomfortAnxiety or depression
    Problems or unable  Problems or unable  Problems or unable  Some or extreme  Moderate or extreme 
Sex:  Male  19 (19.2)  0.189  7 (7.1)  0.985  12 (12.1)  0.024  26 (26.3)  0.007  24 (24.2)  <0.001 
  Female  23 (27.4)    6 (7.1)    21 (25.0)    38 (45.2)    45 (53.6)   
ICU  ICU  19 (59.4)  <0.001  5 (15.6)  0.039  12 (37.5)  0.002  17 (53.1)  0.018  20 (62.5)  0.001 
  Not ICU  23 (15.2)    8 (5.3)    21 (37.5)    47 (31.1)    49 (32.5)   
Comorbidity  No  16 (21.9)  0.787  3 (4.1)  0.199  12 (16.4)  0.648  24 (32.9)  0.628  28 (38.4)  0.882 
  Yes  26 (23.6)    10 (9.1)    21 (19.1)    40 (36.4)    41 (37.3)   
Obesity  No  31 (23.3)  0.851  9 (6.8)  0.753  26 (19.5)  0.384  45 (33.8)  0.599  50 (37.6)  0.960 
  Yes  11 (22.0)    4 (8.0)    7 (14.0)    19 (38.0)    19 (38.0)   
Hypertension  No  26 (24.5)  0.552  6 (5.7)  0.372  20 (18.9)  0.730  35 (33.0)  0.516  41 (38.7)  0.750 
  Yes  16 (20.8)    7 (9.1)    13 (16.9)    29 (37.7)    28 (36.4)   
Diabetes  No  33 (21.9)  0.388  10 (6.6)  0.467  26 (17.2)  0.480  50 (33.1)  0.201  59 (39.1)  0.476 
  Yes  9 (29.0)    3 (9.7)    7 (22.6)    14 (45.2)    10 (32.3)   
Chronic heart disease  No  39 (23.4)  0.676  11 (6.6)  0.317  30 (18.0)  0.999  58 (34.7)  0.824  63 (37.7)  0.986 
  Yes  3 (18.8)    2 (12.5)    3 (18.8)    6 (37.5)    6 (37.5)   
Chronic pulmonary disease  No  37 (23.7)  0.553  10 (6.4)  0.412  28 (17.9)  0.999  54 (34.6)  0.808  59 (37.8)  0.938 
  Yes  5 (18.5)    3 (11.1)    5 (18.5)    10 (37.0)    10 (37.0)   
Mechanical ventilation  No  28 (17.4)  <0.001  9 (5.6)  0.054  24 (14.9)  0.006  51 (31.7)  0.011  54 (33.5)  0.002 
  Yes  14 (63.6)    4 (18.2)    9 (40.9)    13 (59.1)    15 (68.2)   
Age, mean (SD)67.19 (11.05)  0.023  70.31 (9.94)  0.026  68.24 (11.15)  0.009  64.25 (12.81)  0.436  63.22 (13.60)  0.698 
Length of hospital stay, median (IR)18.0 (8.0−36.75)  <0.001  20.0 (12.5−68.0)  0.001  17.0 (11.0−37.5)  <0.001  12.0 (8.0−20.0)  0.003  12.0 (8.0−20.0)  0.005 

Data are shown as n (%), mean (SD), or median (IQR). ICU: Intensive care unit. Bold indicates statistical significance.

ICU patients reported a significantly reduced quality of life measured on the EQ-5D index score and VAS score compared with non ICU patients (Table 2). More ICU patients showed worsening in at least 1 of the 5 dimensions studied (71.9% vs 43.7%, P=0.004), or in 2 or more dimensions (59.4% vs 16.6%, P<0.001) compared with non ICU patients.

Table 4 shows persistent symptoms potentially correlated with COVID-19 observed in the 183 study patients. Only 40 (21.8%) patients were completely free of persistent symptoms at the 6-month interview. The most frequent persistent symptoms reported were dyspnoea on exertion (53.0%), asthenia (33.9%), sleep disorder (30.6%), hair loss (30.6%), arthralgia (30.1%) and myalgia (29.5). There were no differences between the proportion of ICU and non ICU patients with persistent symptoms (87.5% vs 76.2%, P= 0.159). Compared with non ICU patients, ICU patients reported more dyspnoea on exertion, dyspnoea on mild exertion, and asthenia (Table 4).

Table 4.

Persistent symptoms at six months after COVID-19 (n=183).

Persistent symptoms at 6 monthsOverall  ICU patients  Non ICU patients  P value 
No = 183  No = 32  No = 151   
Patients with any symptoms143 (78.1)  28 (87.5)  115 (76.2)  0.159 
  1 symtom  27 (18.9)  4 (14.3)  23 (20.0)  0.680 
  2 symptoms  29 (20.3)  5 (17.9)  24 (20.9)   
  3 or more symptoms  87 (60.8)  19 (67.9)  68 (59.1)   
Dyspnoea on exertion97 (53.0)  25 (78.1)  72 (47.7)  0.002 
Dyspnoea on mild exertion19 (10.4)  12 (37.5)  7 (4.6)  <0.001 
Asthenia62 (33.9)  18 (56.3)  44 (29.1)  0.003 
Apathy33 (18.0)  6 (18.8)  27 (17.9)  0.908 
Myalgia54 (29.5)  11 (34.4)  43 (28.5)  0.506 
Arthralgia55 (30.1)  10 (31.3)  45 (29.8)  0.871 
Chest pain15 (8.2)  0 (0.0)  15 (9.9)  0.077 
Anosmia19 (10.4)  3 (9.4)  16 (10.6)  0.999 
Cough23 (12.7)  4 (12.9)  19 (12.7)  0.999 
Sleep disorder56 (30.6)  6 (18.8)  50 (33.1)  0.109 
Hair loss56 (30.6)  10 (31.3)  46 (30.5)  0.930 
Memory loss48 (26.2)  7 (21.9)  41 (27.2)  0.538 
Visual disturbances10 (5.5)  1 (3.1)  9 (6.0)  0.999 

Data are shown as number (percentage). Bold indicates statistical significance.

Sex, age, length of hospital stay, comorbidity and need for ICU admission were included as independent variables in a multivariate logistic regression analysis (Table 5). Age was associated with greater risk of problems with mobility and usual activities. Female sex was associated with a higher risk of problems in performing usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. Length of hospital stay was associated with a higher risk of problems with mobility, self-care, performing usual activities, and pain or discomfort (Table 5).

Table 5.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the relationships between the 5 dimensions of the EQ-5D-3L, functional status, and influencing factors.

EQ-5D-3L dimensions    β  se (β)  P value  OR  IC 95% (OR) 
Mobility (Some problems/Unable to walk)  Female sex  0.366  0.411  0.373  1.442  0.644−3.228 
  Age  0.038  0.019  0.041  1.039  1.001−1.077 
  Length of Hospital stay  0.051  0.021  0.015  1.053  1.009−1.097 
  Comorbidity  −0.361  0.442  0.413  0.697  0.293−1.656 
  Need for ICU admission  1.015  0.618  0.100  2.760  0.822−9.262 
Self-care (Some problems/Unable to perform)  Female sex  −0.049  0.695  0.944  0.952  0.244−3.714 
  Age  0.047  0.032  0.137  1.048  0.985−1.114 
  Length of Hospital stay  0.111  0.037  0.003  1.117  1.038−1.201 
  Comorbidity  0.104  0.803  0.897  1.109  0.229−5.357 
  Need for ICU admission  −2.949  1.840  0.109  0.052  0.001−1.930 
Usual activities (Some problems/Unable to perform)  Female sex  0.960  0.454  0.034  2.613  1.074−6.355 
  Age  0.040  0.020  0.048  1.040  1.0004−1.082 
  Length of Hospital stay  0.074  0.023  0.001  1.077  1.029−1.125 
  Comorbidity  −0.176  0.475  0.711  0.839  0.330−2.126 
  Need for ICU admission  −0.702  0.806  0.384  0.496  0.102−2.406 
Pain/discomfort (Some or extreme)  Female sex  0.885  0.335  0.008  2.424  1.257−4.670 
  Age  0.005  0.014  0.730  1.005  0.978−1.031 
  Length of Hospital stay  0.041  0.018  0.021  1.042  1.006−1.079 
  Comorbidity  0.116  0.354  0.743  1.123  0560−2.249 
  Need for ICU admission  −0.144  0.591  0.808  0.866  0.271−2.759 
Anxiety/depression (Moderately or extremely)  Female sex  1.320  0339  0.000  3.744  1.925−7.280 
  Age  −0.004  0014  0.770  0.996  0.969−1.022 
  Length of Hospital stay  0.029  0018  0.098  1.030  0.994−1.065 
  Comorbidity  0.040  0.357  0.911  1.040  0.517−2.093 
  Need for ICU admission  0.549  0.586  0.349  1.731  0.548−5.464 

Quality of life was measured using the EuroQol, 5-dimension, 3-level questionnaire, the EQ-5D index, and the EQ-VAS (0−100). Bold values are statistically significant.

Discussion

In this cohort study, we observed that quality of life had declined at 6-month follow-up in patients who required hospitalization for COVID-19. Persistent symptoms such as dyspnoea on exertion, asthenia, myalgia, hair loss, and sleep disorder were frequently reported. We also found that patients who required ICU admission reported lower overall quality of life than patients admitted to general medical wards.

Our findings are similar to those reported in long-term follow-up studies of ARDS survivors due to other aetiologies, such as influenza A(H1N1)8, or other coronavirus diseases9–13. The long-term problems observed after Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in 2002 and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) in 2012 were reduced HRQoL, respiratory compromise, muscle weakness, fatigue, pain disorders, and depression10–15.

Long-term COVID-19 symptoms are a major concern among the general public. A new term – long Covid16– has recently been introduced to describe illness in people who have either recovered from COVID-19 but still report long-term effects of the infection or have had the usual symptoms far longer than would be expected. Tenforde et al.17, in a multistate telephone survey of non-hospitalized symptomatic COVID-19 adults, showed that 35% of patients had not returned to their usual health status when interviewed 2–3 weeks after testing, resulting in prolonged illness and persistent symptoms. Fatigue (71%), cough (61%), and headache (61%) were the most commonly reported symptoms. In another study with a 60-day follow-up, Carfi et al.18 reported that 87% of patients discharged from hospital after recovering from COVID-19 still experienced at least 1 symptom 60 days after onset. Fatigue (53%), dyspnoea (43%) and joint pain (27%) were the most frequent symptoms reported. In these 2 studies, COVID-19 patients were followed up for 14–21 and 60 days, respectively. Our study included a long follow-up to determine the persistence of symptoms and the HRQoL of patients hospitalized for COVID-19. We found that these patients had worse HRQoL overall, and that patients requiring ICU care reported significantly lower quality of life compared with patients who were admitted to general medical wards. ICU patients present potential risk factors that have a negative impact on quality of life, such as age, comorbidities, prolonged mechanical ventilation, ICU stay or hospital stay, decreased mobility, delirium or depression, malnutrition, and need for muscle relaxants or corticosteroids. Corticosteroids, which have been shown to help reduce mortality secondary to the inflammatory response in COVID-19 patients19,20, were used more often in our ICU patients (91%) than in those who did not require ICU admission (26%). Previous studies have shown that corticosteroids induce myopathy, muscle wasting and weakness 1year after hospitalization21,22, and this can significantly reduce the quality of life of ICU survivors. The cumulative effect of these factors on HRQoL is unknown, and could be the focus of future research. Our study supports findings from other authors reporting poor long-term outcomes in critically ill patients23,24; however, we have found few studies comparing the HRQoL of patients with the same disease who were admitted to either the ICU or the ward13,25. Batawi et al.19 studied the HRQoL of MERS survivors who required hospitalization, and observed that 1year after diagnosis, ICU patients reported lower HRQoL than non ICU patients. Tøien et al.25 showed that trauma patients admitted to the ICU for more of 24h had lower HRQoL questionnaire scores compared with non ICU patients. Although ICU patients might be expected to experience worse HRQoL or decreased functional status compared with non ICU patients, Feemster et al.26 found no significant differences in HRQoL among 3 groups of patients: non hospitalized, hospitalized non ICU, and hospitalized ICU, and observed that hospitalization was associated with an increased risk of impairment in HRQoL after discharge. No differences were found between ICU and non ICU patients.

Limitations of this study

This study has several limitations. First, it is a single-centre study with a limited number of patients. The results may not reflect the experience or outcomes of COVID-19 patients in other regions or countries. Second, 6 months after hospitalization patients were asked to evaluate their quality of life 1–3 months before COVID-19; we do not know whether their assessment may have been influenced by their clinical status at the time of the survey. Nevertheless, HRQoL was evaluated, and was found to correlate significantly with the EQ VAS and EQ-5D Index. Third, HRQoL and persistent symptoms were evaluated at 6 months after hospitalization, based on our hypothesis that the health problems presented at admission would have stabilized after 6 months, and that mortality beyond this date may be due to other factors. It would be important to assess these data at 1 and 5 years after hospitalization, because several authors have reported changes in HRQoL after that time22,27. A larger multicentre cohort study of patients with COVID-19 from Spain and other countries would help further define quality of life and persistent symptoms in the months or years following hospitalization.

Conclusions

In this prospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with COVID-19, a large proportion of patients had persistent symptoms and reduced quality of life. ICU patients presented a greater decline in their quality of life compared with non ICU patients. Persistent symptoms were frequent in both ICU and non ICU patients. Our data suggest that interventions are needed to improve HRQoL after COVID-19, including telephone follow-up, post-hospital discharge rehabilitation programmes, and pain management.

Clinical trial number

The ethics committee of Galicia, Spain (code 2020−188)

Funding statement

No funding provided.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the physicians and nurses from the participating hospitals.

References
[1]
N. Zhu, D. Zhang, W. Wang, X. Li, B. Yang, J. Song, et al.
A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019.
N Engl J Med, 382 (2020), pp. 727-733
[2]
C. Wu, X. Chen, Y. Cai, J. Xia, X. Zhou, S. Xu, et al.
Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China.
JAMA Intern Med, 180 (2020), pp. 934-943
[3]
G. Grasselli, A. Zangrillo, A. Zanella, M. Antonelli, L. Cabrini, A. Castelli, et al.
Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy.
JAMA, 323 (2020), pp. 1574-1581
[4]
M. Taboada, P. Rama, R. Pita-Romero, E. Moreno, S. Leal, M. Varela, et al.
Critically ill COVID-19 patients attended by anesthesiologists in northwestern Spain: a multicenter prospective observational study.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, 68 (2020), pp. 10-20
[5]
EuroQol Group.
EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.
Health Policy, 16 (1990), pp. 199-208
[6]
R. Rabin, F. de Charro.
EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group.
Ann Med, 33 (2001), pp. 337-343
[7]
F.A. Klok, G.J.A.M. Boon, S. Barco, M. Endres, J.J. Miranda Geelhoed, S. Knauss, et al.
The Post-COVID-19 Functional Status scale: a tool to measure functional status over time after COVID-19.
Eur Respir J, 56 (2020),
[8]
C.E. Luyt, A. Combes, M.H. Becquemin, C. Beigelman-Aubry, S. Hatem, A.L. Brun, et al.
Long-term outcomes of pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1)-associated severe ARDS.
Chest, 142 (2012), pp. 583-592
[9]
H. Ahmed, K. Patel, D.C. Greenwood, S. Halpin, P. Lewthwaite, A. Salawu, et al.
Long-term clinical outcomes in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus outbreaks after hospitalisation or ICU admission: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Rehabil Med., 52 (2020), pp. jrm00063
[10]
C.M. Tansey, M. Louie, M. Loeb, W.L. Gold, M.P. Muller, J.A. de Jager, et al.
One-year outcomes and health care utilization in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome.
Arch Intern Med, 167 (2007), pp. 1312-1320
[11]
D.S. Hui, K.T. Wong, F.W. Ko, L.S. Tam, D.P. Chan, J. Woo, et al.
The 1-year impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in a cohort of survivors.
Chest, 128 (2005), pp. 2247-2261
[12]
D.S. Hui, G.M. Joynt, K.T. Wong, C.D. Gomersall, T.S. Li, G. Antonio, et al.
Impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) on pulmonary function, functional capacity and quality of life in a cohort of survivors.
Thorax, 60 (2005), pp. 401-409
[13]
S. Batawi, N. Tarazan, R. Al-Raddadi, E. Al Qasim, A. Sindi, S. Al Johni, et al.
Quality of life reported by survivors after hospitalization for Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS).
Health Qual Life Outcomes, 17 (2019), pp. 101
[14]
S.H. Lee, H.S. Shin, H.Y. Park, J.L. Kim, J.J. Lee, H. Lee, et al.
Depression as a mediator of chronic fatigue and posttraumatic stress symptoms in middle east respiratory syndrome survivors.
Psychiatry Investig, 16 (2019), pp. 59-64
[15]
M. Lam, Y. Wing, M. Yu, C.M. Leung, R.C.W. Ma, A.P.S. Kong, et al.
Mental morbidities and chronic fatigue in severe acute respiratory syndrome survivors: long-term follow-up.
Arch Intern Med, 169 (2009), pp. 2142-2147
[16]
E. Mahase.
Covid-19: what do we know about "long covid"?.
BMJ, 370 (2020), pp. m2815
[17]
M.W. Tenforde, S.S. Kim, C.J. Lindsell, E. Billig Rose, N.I. Shapiro, D.C. Files, et al.
Symptom duration and risk factors for delayed return to usual health among outpatients with COVID-19 in a multistate health care systems network — United States, March–June 2020.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 69 (2020), pp. 993-998
[18]
A. Carfì, R. Bernabei, F. Landi.
Gemelli against COVID-19 post-acute care study group. persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19.
JAMA, 324 (2020), pp. 603-605
[19]
J.A.C. Sterne, S. Murthy, J.V. Diaz, A.S. Slutsky, J. Villar, WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group, et al.
Association between administration of systemic corticosteroids and mortality among critically ill patients with COVID-19: a meta-analysis.
JAMA, 324 (2020), pp. 1330-1341
[20]
The RECOVERY Collaborative Group.
Dexamethasonein hospitalized patients with Covid-19—preliminary report.
N Engl J Med, 384 (2021), pp. 693-704
[21]
T.J. Iwashyna, E.W. Ely, D.M. Smith, K.M. Langa.
Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis.
JAMA., 304 (2010), pp. 1787-1794
[22]
M.S. Herridge, A.M. Cheung, C.M. Tansey, A. Matte-Martyn, N. Diaz-Granados, F. Al-Saidi, et al.
Canadian Critical Care Trials Group; One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome.
N Engl J Med, 348 (2003), pp. 683-693
[23]
S. Yende, S. Austin, A. Rhodes, S. Finfer, S. Opal, T. Thompson, et al.
Long-term quality of life among survivors of severe sepsis: analyses of two international trials.
Crit Care Med, 44 (2016), pp. 1461-1467
[24]
T.J. Iwashyna, E.W. Ely, D.M. Smith, K.M. Langa.
Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis.
JAMA, 304 (2010), pp. 1787-1794
[25]
K. Tøien, I.S. Bredal, L. Skogstad, H. Myhren, O. Ekeberg, et al.
Health related quality of life in trauma patients. Data from a one-year follow up study compared with the general population.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 19 (2011), pp. 22
[26]
L.C. Feemster, C.R. Cooke, G.D. Rubenfeld, C.L. Hough, W.J. Ehlen-bach, D.H. Au, et al.
The influence of hospitalization or intensive care unit admission on declines in health-related quality of life.
Ann Am Thorac Soc, 12 (2015), pp. 35-45
[27]
M.S. Herridge, C.M. Tansey, A. Matté, G. Tomlinson, N. Diaz-Granados, A. Cooper, et al.
Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.
N Engl J Med, 364 (2011), pp. 1293-1304

Please cite this article as: Taboada M, Rodríguez N, Díaz-Vieito M, Domínguez MJ, Casal A, Riveiro V, et al. Calidad de vida y síntomas persistentes tras hospitalización por COVID-19. Estudio observacional prospectivo comparando pacientes con o sin ingreso en UCI. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2022;69:326–335.

Copyright © 2021. Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor
Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos