metricas
covid
Buscar en
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Toda la web
Inicio Journal of Innovation & Knowledge Removing barriers to a sharing economy helps attain sustainable development goal...
Journal Information
Vol. 8. Issue 1.
(January - March 2023)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
694
Vol. 8. Issue 1.
(January - March 2023)
Open Access
Removing barriers to a sharing economy helps attain sustainable development goals in ASEAN countries
Visits
694
Shi-Zheng Huanga,b
a School of Economics and Management, Nanning Normal University, Nanning, China
b Faculty of Business, City University of Macau, Macau, China
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Achieving Sustainable Development and Energy Efficiency through Sharing Economy

Edited by: Marcin W. Staniewski

More info
Abstract

Globally, the barriers to the sharing economy are significant. They present a hurdle to attaining sustainable development goals (SDGs) and require the focus of policymakers and researchers. Hence, this article investigates the influence of removing economic, social and technical barriers on the achievement of SDGs. A supportive organizational climate is considered as a mediator, and its impact on the link between removing economic, social and technical barriers and SDG achievement in the tourism industry of ASEAN countries is examined. Adapted questionnaires are used to gather data from respondents, and Smart-PLS is applied to analyse the data. The findings show that removing economic, social and technical barriers positively influences the achievement of SDGs. The results also indicate that a supportive organizational climate positively and significantly mediates the association between removing economic, social and technical barriers, and the achievement of SDGs. The current research provides guidelines for regulators developing policies related to SDG achievement by removing the economic, social and technical barriers to the sharing economy.

Keywords:
Economic barriers
Sharing economy
Social barriers
Supportive organizational climate
Sustainable development goals
Technical barriers
Full Text
Introduction

As the population increases and there is expansion in economic activities, countries face many social and environmental issues which jeopardize their future growth. However, activities for social and environmental improvement are not always enough to change their situations. When considering the benefits of sustainable development and social and environmental concerns, state authorities engage in policy formation and carry out programmes with the objective of environmental and social welfare and financial development. The 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) presented by the UN General Assembly in 2015 constitute a plan for survival and future growth. They are a set of international guidelines to overcome the issues to which the global community is exposed. They present opportunities for peace, prosperity and human dignity over generations while preserving natural life and the planet. The sharing economy is considered to be one solution for the achievement of SDGs and this article examines the role of removing economic, social and technical barriers to the sharing economy and the achievement of SDGs.

The concept of sustainable development is highly rated in the literature, and every country and organization around the globe has some goals and has designed roadmaps to achieve these goals. There are several core factors that support these goals (Inegbedion et al., 2021; Li et al., 2021; Rojek-Adamek, 2021; Zhao et al., 2021), among them the sharing economy. Sometimes the weakness of one firm can be the strength of others, as the result of collaboration, which is the aim of a sharing economy. A sharing economy is basically the exchanging of resources to overcome weaknesses and achieve goals. The rise of sharing economy and peer-to-peer platforms offer chances to boost local economies and tourism by allowing people to rent out their homes to short-term guests or provide transportation services using their own vehicles. However, incumbent sectors face obstacles. Health issues such as COVID-19 strongly impact the entire globe (Galant & Cadez, 2017; Gil-Gomez et al., 2020; Matuszewska-Pierzynka, 2021; Tan et al., 2021). The ASEAN region has been particularly effected by this health crisis, which, due to their own negligence and a precipitous decline of tourism, has led to an estimated 64% drop in tourist arrivals by march 2020, hurting the livelihoods of millions who are dependant on tourist dollars (Beh & Lin, 2021; Polyzos et al., 2021; Sadiq et al., 2022a).

Before the crisis, ASEAN countries had a well-earned reputation for thriving tourism. Statistics show that, in 2018, 128.7 million international tourists arrived in the region, generating 121 billion euros. This led to almost 12.6% growth in the Southeast Asian economy, which opened avenues for employment for 38.1 million people, or 12.2% of employment. While the ASEAN region has varying socio-economic and political development, all the countries, to varying degrees, treat tourism as a source of income and employment. Various types of mass tourism expansion have resulted in an uneven distribution of economic gains, resource overexploitation and unregulated tourism development (Polyzos et al., 2021; Sadiq et al., 2022b; Tetrevova et al., 2021; Yousaf et al., 2021). The arrival of tourists is not distributed evenly across the area or within individual nations. Thailand and Malaysia, experienced rapid growths in international tourism, beginning in the 1960s. In recent years, the ratio of tourism in India has been growing, albeit at a slower pace, due to the wealth of biological and cultural resources in the region, and increased accessibility due to the development of low cost carriers. The development of tourism is a major target for Bali. Until recently, Philippines was not well connected by aircraft, however the growth of tourism has increased the number of choices. Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam did not open their doors to foreign tourists until the 1990s. As the example of Cambodia demonstrates, tourism growth is frequently restricted to only a few major places within a nation, with operations mostly centred on Angkor Wat/Siem Reap and the capital Phnom Penh. Tourism, rather than bridging the economic divide between city and rural areas, has the potential to exacerbate regional inequities (Huang et al., 2021a; Öztürk et al., 2019; Sirisuthikul, 2018).

In terms of ASEAN progress toward the SDGs, a recent UN report shows that none of the targets are due to be met at present rates. The ASEAN region has made progress on SDG#4 regarding education, SDG#7 regarding cheap and sustainable energy, and SDG#9 regarding industry, innovation and infrastructure. However, in the areas of decent employment and economic growth (SDG#8), climate action (SDG#13) and peace, justice and strong institutions (SDG#14), there has been a decline (Al Mamun et al., 2021; Kongbuamai et al., 2020; Sadiq et al., 2021). As stated, tourism is a key driver of the ASEAN economy, and therefore makes a significant contribution to the SDGs. The United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) has made significant efforts to demonstrate this relationship; after all, tourism is a global industry with a lot of untapped potential to help achieve SDGs (Drebee et al., 2020; Ma'ruf & Aryani, 2019; Moslehpour et al., 2022a; Wang et al., 2021). There is no doubt that tourism in the ASEAN region is directly tied to the 17 SDGs. However, with tourism coming to a total standstill during the COVID-19 crisis, the industry's ability to meet these goals is severely hampered. Tourism has become a moribund industry, particularly the international tourism which is critical to SDG success. The importance of the traveller's return increases tourism's involvement in achieving SDGs, even if it is not easy to look beyond its economic function. It is undeniable that tourism is a major source of revenue and jobs, particularly in nations with extensive cultural and natural resources. However, demonstrating the importance of tourism for overall development and actually establishing this relationship on the ground remain challenges (Kongbuamai et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2022b; Moslehpour et al., 2022b; Nguyen & Nguyen, 2021). Given that tourism's role in the past has not always been humanitarian, with health, education and gender empowerment sometimes considered by-products of tourist activities, understanding how tourism contributes to SDGs is complex. Tourism is one of the core industries of the ASEAN region, due to its geography. The gross domestic product (GDP) of any country defines its importance, and the contribution of tourism to ASEAN GDP is given in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Tourism contribution to ASEAN GDP.

(0.3MB).

The present study addresses some of the gaps that exist in the literature: (1) although the achievement of sustainable development in the ASEAN context has been researched a great deal, it has not reached its peak; (2) Bali Swain & Yang-Wallentin (2020)) study the strategies, predicaments and economic grounds for the achievement of SDGs whereas the present study examines the sharing economy and the achievement of SDGs using the mediator of supportive organizational climate (SOC) in the ASEAN context; (3) Zhang et al. (2018) interpret the practices of development and language barriers that prevent countries from attaining SDGs, whereas this study investigates the relationship between aspects of the sharing economy, i.e., the economic, social and technical barriers, and the achievement of SDGs using the mediator of SOC in the ASEAN context; (4) Guo et al. (2021) and Nowak (2021) investigate innovative approaches to removing social barriers to the achievement of SDGs, whereas this study evaluates multiple aspects of the sharing economy, i.e., economic, social and technical barriers and the achievement of SDGs in the ASEAN context; and (5) the model of removed economic barriers (REB), removed technical barriers (RTB), and removed social barriers (RSB), and their links to attaining sustainable goals, taking SOC as mediator, has not previously been determined in an ASEAN context.

The ASEAN economies have struggled for a long time for sustainable development and implementation of the UN SDGs. To a limited extent, these economies have made progress on the achievement of these goals, but there is much work to be done. In many areas, these economies have been successful to some extent, but many other areas have had no attention. There is a need to find new ways to achieve SDGs and the present article is an attempt to explore these ways in the maximum number of areas. The present study contributes to the literature in several ways: (1) the concept of SDGs has been researched a great deal but has not yet reached its peak; (2) it highlights the importance of settlement and achievement of SDGs in the ASEAN region; (3) it highlights the importance of a sharing economy in the context of achievement of SDGs; and (4) it helps policymakers formulate and implement better policy to achieve SDGs in organizations and countries. The study is divided into sections. In the first, the introduction to the study is presented. In the second, the evidence for removing economic barriers, technical barriers and social barriers, SOC and attaining sustainable goals is discussed in light of past studies. The third section discusses the methodology for data collection of REB, RTB, RSB, SOC, and the attainment of sustainable goals, along with its analysis and validity. The fourth section presents the findings of the study. The last section gives the implications, conclusion and recommendations of the study.

Literature review

Our world faces huge economic barriers, which are increased by a lack of sustainable policies (Huang et al., 2021b; Lv et al., 2017; Moslehpour et al., 2021; Sharma, 2020). Therefore, the SDGs of ASEAN countries could get a positive boost by removing economic barriers. Chien et al. (2022) and Vakulchuk & Knobel (2018) examine how economic trade is influenced by non-tariff barriers in the Eurasian economic unions. There are many economic barriers that affect sustainable development and create hurdles to attaining sustainable goals. Various approaches have been taken, such as the disaggregated model among elected factors. To achieve the SDGs relating to the economy, there is a dire need to remove the economic barriers. Similarly, Clauss et al. (2021) and Dosu et al. (2021) investigate the implications of economic and social barriers for the sustainability and maintainability of the economic policies of Ghana. For the achievement of sustainable goals related to the economy, policy plays a vital role which affects trade and the performance of the economy. Regression and correlation models are applied to elected factors of the economy and sustainable development. The results reveal that removing economic barriers is one step towards achieving SDGs. In addition, Dankiewicz et al. (2020) and Nosova (2017) interpret the relationship between reform policies in the economy and businesses, and the capital market of Kuwait. The empowerment of economic policies tends to be important for attaining business and economic growth. Therefore, economic barriers are the main factors that need to be eliminated, as interpreted by statistical tools and strategic policies. Removing economic barriers helps shape the economy and attain SDGs. Organizations and firms plan strategies to achieve their SDGs. Bali Swain & Yang-Wallentin (2020)) assess strategies and predicaments on economic grounds. Many of the barriers are framed by world economies for this purpose, and many policies are designed that state the robustness of grounds for development. The underlying pillars of the economy are analysed, and the environmental, social and economic conditions are assessed through structural equation modelling techniques. The findings indicate that developing countries could benefit from eliminating or restraining the prevailing barriers in their economies.

  • H1: REB significantly influences the attainment of sustainable development goals.

Among the many barriers in the developing world, technical barriers are the most numerous (Ferreira & Teixeira, 2019; Liu et al., 2021; Saunila, 2020; Cheba et al., 2020; Wei et al., 2021). Zhang et al. (2020) explore technical diffusion and spillover of knowledge among spatial economic interactions worldwide. There is a dire need for technical assistance for any economy to be boosted. Therefore, the technical barriers to the SDGs must be removed. Various statistical models are used to ascertain the relationships and impacts of elected factors. The study concludes that the effective removal of technical barriers significantly helps the attainment of SDGs. Dimian et al. (2021), Meloncon (2017) and Chien et al. (2021b) analyse the relationship between professional communication, professional development, writing instructions and contingent faculty, all noted barriers to development. Countries face many technical barriers and hurdles to SDGs that are assessed using regression and factor analysis. In order to achieve economic SDGs, there is a need to remove technical barriers. Khan et al. (2017) emphasize the role of women in training, vocational education and technical aspects in the Gulf States which are most disrupted due to technical barriers. A number of economic and technical reforms provide diversified knowledge that helps in sustainable development. Numerous statistical techniques are applied using macroeconomic and other technical factors. The results indicate that streamlining technical barriers could play a dominant role in attaining SDGs. Al Mamun et al. (2021) and Hennebry et al. (2019) assess the SDGs relating to migrant women workers who face many problems due to unresolved technical barriers. Women are considered integral to sustainable development and contribute much technical support which uplifts the economy. Therefore, the corresponding elected factors are examined using statistical approaches such as regression and correlation. The findings reveal a need to remove technical barriers to achieve SDGs.

  • H2: RTB significantly influences the attainment of sustainable development goals.

Social distancing and other social barriers are dominant hurdles to the SDGs of ASEAN countries. Huang et al. (2021c) and Zhang et al. (2018) interpret the practices of development and language barriers that disrupt countries’ efforts to attain SDGs. Social policies play a vital role in removing these communication and cultural barriers. Statistical tools play an important role in understanding the relationships among the macroeconomic and social aspects. SDGs should be taken into consideration after removing the social barriers. Townsend et al. (2021) and Lydeka & Karaliūtė (2021) analyse the facilitators of and barriers to social participation that disrupt the attainment of SGDs. Systematic social participation helps countries boost their economies by facilitating social barrier elimination. The corresponding elements are examined using linear regression and other statistical tools to identify the social barriers. The studies find that a friendly social environment has the best potential for achieving SDGs. There are multiple barriers faced by firms during their journey to achieving SDGs. Pelucha et al., (2017) and Mantikei et al. (2020) emphasize the social development and entrepreneurship barriers that create hurdles for sustainable development in the Czech Republic. Social development is the main tool for any economy to rise in international and local markets. Focusing on the removal of social barriers, various associated factors are analysed using statistical and strategic techniques. The results indicate that significant social support and removal of social barriers could help in sustainable development. Accordingly, Guo et al. (2021) and Mazur & Duchlinski (2020) investigate the innovative approaches to removing the social barriers to achieving SDGs. The massive presence of indifferent cultures and social activities creates a problem for countries striving for sustainable development. The corresponding factors of social barriers and sustainable development are assessed using econometric and statistical techniques. Significant effort must be made to remove the social barriers that impact the SDGs.

  • H3: RSB significantly influences the attainment of sustainable development goals.

In removing the barriers to the SDGs of ASEAN countries, SOC plays a vital role (Lan et al., 2022; Świadek & Gorączkowska, 2020). Mahmood et al. (2021) and Phua (2018) analyse the relationship between SDGs and economic barriers along with the role of SOC. The growing interest in sustainable development has considerably increased the idea that it is mediated by SOC. Strong linear regression and other statistical tools are applied to the roles of and relationships between elected factors. The finding indicate that SOC plays a significant mediating role explaining the impact of economic barriers on sustainable development. Voth Schrag et al. (2019) assess the relationship between mental health, economic hardship, economic abuse and SDGs. To remove any country's economic barriers, the role of SOC cannot be omitted. The relationships between and impacts of the elected factors are assessed using mediation analysis, regression analysis and bivariate correlation. The study indicates that the significant mediating effect of SOC is clear between sustainable development and economic barriers. The achievement of SDGs relies on the impact of social factors such as genderism. Gammage & Stevanovic (2019) and Liu et al. (2022a) explore the relationship between care deficit, migration, gender deficit and sustainable development. These factors are known to be economic barriers to sustainable development, and removing them is important, along with a positive role of SOC. Using the homogenous approaches of economy, SOC successfully mediates economic barriers and SDGs. Chien et al. (2021a) and Hatjidis et al. (2019) examine the relationship between change readiness, quality perception, organizational climate and tacit knowledge. The main factor of removing economic barriers plays a vital part in sustainable development, with the assistance and mediation of SOC. Various factors are taken into consideration to assess the relationship, which are interpreted using mediation analysis and regression analysis. The study shows the positive implications of SOC in removing the economic barriers to SDGs.

  • H4: SOC significantly mediates the relationship between REB and attaining sustainable development goals.

The cultures and the climates of organizations play a vital role in SDGs. In this context, He et al. (2021) and Kim & Park (2020) investigate the relationship between learning, organizational climate, knowledge sharing, and transformational leadership. This relationship reveals the mediating role of SOC which helps in removing technical barriers to SDGs. The corresponding elements of the elected variables are assessed using correlation and descriptive statistics. The findings indicate that removing technical barriers could enhance SDGs through the mediating effects of SOC. Khayatzadeh-Mahani et al. (2020) and Kikulwe & Asindu (2020) examine the relationship between solutions and barriers to the up-gradation of SDGs. These SDGs are directly associated with improving employment for disabled people who are technically professional. The factors associated with the barriers, and a goal with mediating effects, are analysed using Delphi and group techniques of statistics. The findings reveal that removing technical barriers in a country can promote the attainment of SDGs, along with the mediating effects of the organizational climate. Ingutia (2020) and Kamarudin et al. (2021) assess various aspects of the technical barriers that could influence SDGs. These technical barriers are mostly related to the marginalization of education and lack of interest in giving employment to the technical people of a country. Descriptive statistical analysis is performed using the corresponding elements of technical barriers and sustainable development. The results show that inefficiency in sustainable development could be due to unresolved technical barriers that require the mediation of SOC. Human factors play a vital role in the achievement of SDGs. The skills and talent of the country's youth are key factors in the achievement of SDGs. In this context, Flores & Chang (2020), Hussain et al. (2021) and King (2017) analyse the talent system in countries and organizations while considering supportive sustainable development perspectives. Most of the technical barriers in any country exist due to a lack of talent discernible by employees and a lack of priorities in technical education. Many factors are taken into consideration in the relationship between them, applying strong statistical techniques. The studies find that SOC has a strong mediating role in removing the technical barriers to SDGs.

  • H5: SOC significantly mediates the relationship between RTB and attaining sustainable development goals.

Organizational climate somewhat impacts SDGs in this context, and Chen et al. (2020) report that the effects of organizational climate and supportive behaviours of families enable the removing of social barriers. By removing social barriers, SDGs attain a considerable advantage. For this purpose, many factors are considered, including the corresponding elements assessed using correlation and regression analysis. The study reveals that SOC is dominant in removing social barriers to SDGs. The removal of social barriers is vital to attaining SDGs. Societal factors can be removed by supporting partnership between the firms. Koloba (2020) and Williams et al. (2018) investigate the fruitful partnership between SOC and social practices that help disable social barriers. There are many social barriers that negatively impact economic conditions internationally. Therefore, attaining SDGs while removing social barriers is assessed using statistical methods. The impact of removing social barriers is considerable upon SDGs, with a mediating effect of SOC. Degai & Petrov (2021) and Dlalisa & Govender (2020) explore the agenda for attaining SDGs while removing social barriers worldwide. Many countries have established policies for strengthening social feasibility. Therefore, upon the removal of social barriers, many corresponding factors are assessed using econometric and statistical techniques. The findings show that the engagement of the social climate is beneficial for SDGs and there is a mediating role for SOC. Moreover, Hayat & Afshari (2021) state that people working in most organizations face challenges of gender, culture and other discrimination. Therefore, the well-being of employees must not be omitted, and the need to remove social barriers is compulsory. Various factors related to social barriers are analysed using structural equation modelling techniques. The findings reveal that a SOC strongly mediates between removing social barriers and achieving SDGs.

  • H6: SOC significantly mediates the relationship between RSB and attaining sustainable development goals.

Research methods

This study examines the impact of the sharing economy in removing the economic, social and technical barriers to achieving SDGs, and the mediating role of SOC in the association between the sharing economy characteristic of removing barriers and the achievement of SDGs in the tourism industry in ASEAN countries. The study uses questionnaires to collect primary data from selected respondents. The questionnaires consist of five REB items: REB1 “sharing economy means you can get the expected financial results soon after implementation”; REB2 “sharing economy causes reduction in some capital costs”; REB3 “sharing economy reduces the time and cost consuming process”; REB4 “business organizations get some financial support from a sharing economy”; and REB5 “the sharing economy provides economic help to the organizations involved in this process”. These items are adapted from Govindan et al. (2020).

The questionnaire has eight RTB items: RTB1 “if two industries are planning to connect in a sharing economy grid, they need to identify a solid technology to stay connected and get help from each other”; RTB2 “the sharing economy provides experts who can assist and tackle the inherent problems that generally exist in organizations”; RTB3 “in a sharing economy, organizations share the technology and other sources that help both organizations”; RTB4 “sharing economy is an effective business model that provides facilities to all organizations involved in the sharing process”; RTB5 “there are interactive platforms provided by the sharing economy process for industrial partners to engage, communicate, and orient on sharing their resources with reliability”; RTB6 “sharing economy increases all organizations’ trust and reputation under the process”; RTB7 “implementing a sharing economy is a process of several value chain actors, and huge resources are involved that provide benefits to all the associated firms”; and RTB8 “sharing economy provides access to organizations’ previous records and their values and trust on the business chain”. These items are taken from Govindan et al. (2020).

The questionnaire includes five RSB items: RSB1 “sharing economy changes the concept of lack of willingness to change to the new system”; RSB2 “sharing economy reduces the barriers of proper communication channels and designs specific communication platforms for sharing economy transactions”; RSB3 “sharing economy creates a certain level of awareness among organizations regarding the shared resources and benefits”; RSB4 “sharing economy provides a platform that reduces differentiation in goals and opinions, unlike service sectors”; and RSB5 “sharing economy reduces the communication barriers to compete in the market”. These items are extracted from Govindan et al. (2020).

The questionnaire has eight SOC items: SOC1 “our company often encourages employees to propose new ideas”; SOC2 “employees in our company have been praised for their innovation behaviour”; SOC3 “employees in our company challenge each other's ideas through positive thinking”; SOC4 “superiors in our company expect that their staff can work in a more creative way”; SOC5 “our company offers a sufficient budget to support the development of an innovative project”. SOC6 “it is acceptable in our company for a staff member to fail to achieve the expected outcome while carrying out an innovative learning plan”; SOC7 “superiors in our company value the contribution made by each member of their staff”; and SOC8 “the staff in our company can freely exchange ideas”. These items are adapted from Balozi (2017).

The questionnaires also has 17 SDG items: ASDG1 “my organization takes part in poverty reduction”; ASDG2 “my organization plays a significant role in hunger-reduction”; ASDG3 “my organization is working for healthcare and wellness”; ASDG4 “my company provides quality education to their employees and employees’ families”; ASDG5 “my firm always works for gender equality”; ASDG6 “I have access to clean water and sewerage”; ASDG7 “my firm has accessible and non-polluting energy”; ASDG8 “my firm takes part in decent work and economic growth”; ASDG9 “my firm has innovation and effective infrastructure”; ASDG10 “my firm always works to reduce inequalities”; ASDG11“my firm is creating sustainable cities and communities”; ASDG12 “my firm has the ability of responsible consumption and production”; ASDG13 “my organization always considers weather care”; ASDG14 “my firm always cares about underwater life”; ASDG15 “my firm always cares for life in terrestrial ecosystems”; ASDG16 “my firm takes part in peacebuilding, justice and corruption-free institutions”; and ASDG17 “my organization strives to build alliances to achieve the above goals”. These items are taken from Zamora-Polo et al. (2019).

Employees in the tourism industry related to sharing economy activities were selected as respondents, using purposive sampling. The surveys were sent to selected employees using mail and personal visits. A total of 510 surveys were sent, and 290 responses were received, a 56.86% response rate. The research used Smart-PLS to test the validity and reliability of the items and constructs and the associations among the variables. This statistical tool effectively estimates complex frameworks and large sample sizes (Hair Jr et al., 2021). The study has three independent variables: REB, RSB, and RTB, and takes SOC as a mediating variable and achievement of SDGs as the dependent variable.

Research findings

The research tests the convergent validity of the correlation between items using composite reliability (CR), Cronbach's alpha, average variance extracted (AVE), and factor loadings. As shown in Table 1, the CR and alpha statistics are higher than 0.70, which verifies the convergent validity and shows a high correlation between items.

Table 1.

Convergent validity.

Item  Loading  Alpha  CR  AVE 
ASDG1  0.470  0.872  0.907  0.662 
ASDG10  0.685       
ASDG12  0.657       
ASDG13  0.658       
ASDG14  0.626       
ASDG15  0.671       
ASDG16  0.647       
ASDG17  0.717       
ASDG2  0.484       
ASDG3  0.677       
ASDG4  0.848       
ASDG5  0.768       
ASDG6  0.849       
ASDG7  0.845       
ASDG8  0.765       
ASDG9  0.845       
REB1  0.800  0.851  0.885  0.609 
REB2  0.842       
REB3  0.794       
REB4  0.767       
REB5  0.860       
RSB1  0.818  0.941  0.951  0.710 
RSB2  0.726       
RSB3  0.881       
RSB4  0.708       
RSB5  0.755       
RTB1  0.833  0.935  0.941  0.504 
RTB2  0.862       
RTB3  0.849       
RTB4  0.820       
RTB5  0.873       
RTB6  0.866       
RTB7  0.849       
RTB8  0.786       
SOC1  0.923  0.978  0.981  0.865 
SOC2  0.943       
SOC3  0.931       
SOC4  0.933       
SOC5  0.940       
SOC6  0.922       
SOC7  0.930       
SOC8  0.921       

Source: author's estimations.

The research tests the discriminant validity of the correlation between variables using the Fornell-Larcker criterion, cross-loadings, and heterotrait monotrait (HTMT) ratio. The outcomes show that the association with the variable itself is stronger than with other constructs (Table 2). These findings verify the discriminant validity and show a low correlation between variables.

Table 2.

Fornell-Larcker.

  ASDG  REB  RSB  RTB  SOC 
ASDG  0.710         
REB  0.766  0.813       
RSB  0.039  0.035  0.780     
RTB  0.469  0.447  −0.109  0.843   
SOC  0.557  0.456  −0.134  0.434  0.930 

Source: author's estimations.

The cross-loadings (Table 3) show that the association with the variable itself is stronger than with other constructs. These findings verify the discriminant validity and show a low correlation between variables.

Table 3.

Cross-loadings.

  ASDG  REB  RSB  RTB  SOC 
ASDG1  0.470  0.278  −0.086  0.204  0.358 
ASDG10  0.685  0.389  −0.083  0.356  0.344 
ASDG12  0.657  0.410  −0.131  0.333  0.403 
ASDG13  0.658  0.336  −0.027  0.308  0.306 
ASDG14  0.626  0.356  −0.103  0.359  0.322 
ASDG15  0.671  0.390  −0.138  0.354  0.332 
ASDG16  0.647  0.329  −0.099  0.318  0.307 
ASDG17  0.717  0.432  −0.040  0.337  0.398 
ASDG2  0.484  0.240  −0.116  0.237  0.337 
ASDG3  0.677  0.446  −0.115  0.364  0.429 
ASDG4  0.848  0.757  0.029  0.347  0.459 
ASDG5  0.768  0.711  0.040  0.392  0.442 
ASDG6  0.849  0.746  0.028  0.349  0.463 
ASDG7  0.845  0.762  0.025  0.350  0.462 
ASDG8  0.765  0.709  0.045  0.395  0.444 
ASDG9  0.845  0.751  0.029  0.347  0.458 
REB1  0.634  0.800  −0.071  0.349  0.386 
REB2  0.578  0.842  −0.032  0.359  0.324 
REB3  0.703  0.794  0.013  0.367  0.451 
REB4  0.524  0.767  −0.053  0.348  0.316 
REB5  0.643  0.860  −0.008  0.393  0.351 
RSB1  −0.027  −0.034  0.818  −0.073  −0.097 
RSB2  −0.015  0.008  0.726  −0.075  −0.075 
RSB3  −0.072  −0.070  0.881  −0.126  −0.158 
RSB4  0.046  0.036  0.708  −0.048  −0.070 
RSB5  −0.007  0.001  0.755  −0.047  −0.050 
RTB1  0.362  0.325  −0.089  0.833  0.351 
RTB2  0.396  0.387  −0.106  0.862  0.354 
RTB3  0.364  0.362  −0.112  0.849  0.346 
RTB4  0.381  0.393  −0.058  0.820  0.379 
RTB5  0.384  0.394  −0.096  0.873  0.369 
RTB6  0.425  0.407  −0.102  0.866  0.376 
RTB7  0.454  0.398  −0.094  0.849  0.392 
RTB8  0.381  0.340  −0.076  0.786  0.352 
SOC1  0.510  0.423  −0.151  0.406  0.923 
SOC2  0.514  0.430  −0.123  0.421  0.943 
SOC3  0.498  0.436  −0.123  0.432  0.931 
SOC4  0.519  0.436  −0.144  0.400  0.933 
SOC5  0.519  0.425  −0.120  0.419  0.940 
SOC6  0.535  0.407  −0.096  0.377  0.922 
SOC7  0.516  0.429  −0.143  0.399  0.930 
SOC8  0.532  0.406  −0.098  0.376  0.921 

Source: author's estimations.

Table 4 shows the results of the HTMT ratio. All values are lower than 0.90, which verifies the discriminant validity and shows a low correlation between variables.

Table 4.

Heterotrait monotrait ratio.

  ASDG  REB  RSB  RTB  SOC 
ASDG           
REB  0.774         
RSB  0.118  0.068       
RTB  0.499  0.491  0.105     
SOC  0.576  0.487  0.125  0.452   

Source: author's estimations.

The results of the direct path, shown in Table 5, reveal that the sharing the economy characteristic of removing economic and technical barriers has a positive nexus with the achievement of SDGs; thus H1 and H2 are accepted. In contrast, the sharing the economy characteristic of removing social barriers has an insignificant nexus with SDG achievement; thus H3 is rejected.

Table 5.

Direct path.

Relationship  Beta  SD  T Statistic  P Value  LL  UL 
REB -> ASDG  0.617  0.043  14.339  0.000  0.539  0.679 
REB -> SOC  0.329  0.062  5.266  0.000  0.200  0.413 
RSB -> ASDG  0.025  0.040  0.632  0.264  −0.048  0.082 
RSB -> SOC  0.092  0.055  1.669  0.049  0.179  1.009 
RTB -> ASDG  0.092  0.045  2.042  0.022  0.026  0.168 
RTB -> SOC  0.277  0.071  3.900  0.000  0.180  0.415 
SOC -> ASDG  0.239  0.064  3.728  0.000  0.136  0.352 

Source: author's estimations.

The findings related to the indirect path (Table 6) indicate that SOC significantly mediates the association of the sharing economy characteristics of removing economic, social and technical barriers to the achievement of SDGs for the tourism industry in ASEAN countries. Therefore, H4, H5 and H6 are accepted.

Table 6.

Indirect path.

Relationship  Beta  SD  T Statistic  P Value  LL  UL 
REB -> SOC -> ASDG  0.078  0.027  2.925  0.002  0.035  0.126 
RSB -> SOC -> ASDG  0.122  0.055  2.218  0.022  0.049  1.003 
RTB -> SOC -> ASDG  0.066  0.025  2.667  0.004  0.037  0.108 

Source: author's estimations.

Discussion

The results indicate that removing economic barriers, as a result of a sharing economy, has a positive link with attaining SDGs. The ASEAN economies face a lack of financial resources, and have a smaller number of other economic resources, weak financial management, and lower incomes rates. These economic barriers are removed with the help of a sharing economy and the SDGs covering economic areas can be achieved. These results are in line with Govindan et al. (2020), who reveals that all 17 SDGs proposed by the 2030 agenda need financial resources to be achieved. In the countries where a sharing economy is implemented to its full potential, the interested parties enjoy many economic benefits as the sharing economy saves the costs of goods and services. The resultant resources can be used to better the lives of human beings living in the country. Thus, the sharing economy removes economic barriers to SDG achievement and sustains economic growth. These results are supported by Ainou ett al. (2022) and Lyaskovskaya & Khudyakova (2021), who show that under the facility of a sharing economy, industrial or services enterprises can have access to the instruments needed for the production of goods and services and logistics for the transfer of goods and services without bearing the overall costs. This increases economic activity, improves employment opportunities and income levels, and reduces the poverty level, promoting the achievement of the SDGs related to production, economic progress, poverty and hunger.

The results indicate that removing technical barriers due to the sharing economy has a positive link with attaining SDGs. In many ASEAN economies there is lack of technological advancement, and where a number of technological instruments have been introduced many individuals and firms fail to adopt these technologies. Therefore, it is difficult to implement innovation, industry, economic development, high living standards, and many other SDGs. A sharing economy, by providing access to technologies and technical tools, removes technical barriers, making it easier to achieve SDGs. These results are in agreement with Melián-González et al. (2019), who find technological barriers to SDG achievement which can be removed through a sharing economy. In a sharing economy, technology is not used by a single hand at a specific time and later kept idle, but is rented out to other parties. The efficient use of and easy access to technology increases reformation, developmental, productive and innovative activities in social and economic enterprises. These activities contribute to SDG achievement. These results corroborate those of Revinova et al. (2020), who argue for the removal of technological barriers to SDG attainment through the sharing economy. The increase in personal vehicles for driving or transportation of luggage increases the use of energy, causing greenhouse gas emissions. The resultant climate change could be destroying ecosystems. Under a sharing economy, the use of vehicles is discouraged, and this contributes to the achievement of SDGs relating to climate change, human health and safety, and the protection of living creatures.

The results reveal that removing social barriers as a result of a sharing economy has an insignificant link to attaining SDGs. In many ASEAN economies, individuals and organizations have weak social relations to stakeholders and lack social development and prosperity. As many of the SDGs are based on societal development, social prosperity and strength of connections, the removal of social barriers by a sharing economy helps achieve SDGs. These results correspond with Asian et al. (2019), who state that several of the SDGs declared by the UN General Assembly have social criteria. As there may be many social barriers in ASEAN countries, it becomes difficult for them to attain SDGs. A sharing economy does not always develop social bonds among individuals, organizations, or between individuals and organizations. It does not necessarily create equality, justice, social wellbeing or partnership, which are part of the SDGs. These results are supported by Heinrich et al. (2020) and Olabi et al. (2022), who find that a sharing economy gives access to goods and services with limited financial resources, but does not promote social welfare activities such as bonding among the regions. Sharing transportation and access to infrastructure improves the conditions of social buildings, and gives control over pollution with minimal use of energy resources. Hence, removing social barriers is difficult through a sharing economy and does not help attain SDGs.

The results show SOC to be a mediator between REB due to a sharing economy and attaining SDGs. In ASEAN economies, many business organizations lack supportive environments, and the main reason is a lack of economic prosperity. When organizations overcome their economic problems through a sharing economy and enhance their capacity to spend on employees, they can create supportive environments helpful to achieving SDGs. Jabbour et al. (2020) suggest that, when an organization applies a sharing economy among its departments for the use of resources or technologies, efficient use of resources brings economic benefits with fewer costs and greater resultant profits. To encourage employees in their performance, organizational management, through effective initiatives and leadership, builds a supportive climate. In a supportive climate, all workers work cooperatively and implement environmentally-friendly projects effectively. Gössling & Michael Hall (2019) report that efficient utilization of resources through sharing processes and technology saves resources and reduces expenditure, providing economic benefits to the organization and motivating it to adopt a supportive behaviour to encourage efficiency. This supportive behaviour could be useful to reduce inequality, create innovation and improve production quality. Thus, it helps achieve the SDGs related to gender equality, equal income distribution, economic growth, innovation and responsible production.

The findings show that SOC is a mediator between the RTB resulting from a sharing economy and attaining SDGs. In ASEAN economies, many business organizations still face technical problems and there is a lack of support from organizations to their employees. When these technical issues are removed, the organizations become active in providing social and economic support to their employees, increasing their living standards and improving their efficiency, adding to SDG achievement. Karobliene & Pilinkiene (2021) find that the sharing economy can bring sustainability to firms’ economic development through energy efficiency and the appropriate use of technologies and technological changes. This creates a soft corner in organizational management and a supportive environment within the organization. This supportive environment contributes to the achievement of goals set for sustainable development. Chen et al. (2020) reveal that, in the sharing economy, organizational management and leadership adopt supportive behaviour towards employees with the purpose of sharing production and operational technologies or technical instruments efficiently with one another through proper division of timing and pieces of work. The supportive behaviour of the organization toward the employees motivates them to use technological instruments and other resources optimally. A SOC improves the economic and health benefits to employees and helps them perform effectively, saving resources which are useful for achieving SDGs.

The results show that SOC is a mediator between the RSB as a result of sharing economy and attaining SDGs. In ASEAN economies, many business organizations face social issues such as a lack of effective relations and weak communication networks which destroy organizational support. By removing social barriers through encouraging a sharing economy, organizations can provide supportive behaviour to employees. When employees have high levels of support from organizations, they cooperate to achieve SDGs. Scavarda et al. (2020) posit that a sharing economy within organizations builds an effective communication network, sharing ideas and cooperative behaviour creates SOC. Many of the SDGs linked to the performance of an economic enterprise are positively affected by the creation of SOC. Hence, SOC mediates between RSB as a consequence of a sharing economy and the attaining of SDGs. These results are in line with van Niekerk (2020), who indicates that an organizational climate where management and leaders show supportive behaviour towards stakeholders is more likely to be created if the social barriers to SDGs are removed by a sharing economy. Through this process, it becomes possible to achieve SDGs.

Theoretical and empirical implications

The current study has both theoretical and empirical implications. The study has great theoretical significance on account of the contribution to the literature. It addresses the role of a sharing economy in removing barriers to SDGs. This study examines the role of a sharing economy in removing three types of barriers to SDGs, economic barriers, technological barriers and social barriers, and their impact on the attainment of SDGs. The sharing economy is a novel economic concept that is a favourite of many researchers, and many authors present their views on the sharing economy's contribution to SDGs. Nonetheless, very few studies analyse individual sharing economies removing individual barriers to SDGs. The present study examines the benefits of the sharing economy such as removing economic, technological and social barriers and their role in achieving SDGs. This study is an addition to the literature as it, for the first time, examines the mediating role of SOC between the benefits of a sharing economy such as REB, RTB and RSB, and attaining SDGs.

The study has empirical significance in almost all countries, as each requires highly sustainable development to survive and compete with other economies on an international platform. Considering the need for sustainable development, the UN General Assembly proposed a set of 17 SDGs in its 2030 agenda. These SDGs are interconnected and based on social, economic and environmental wellbeing, but there may be some economic, technological and social barriers to SDGs. The study provides the information for governments and economists, who must focus on implementing sharing economies through effective policies in order to attain SDGs. This study suggests that the economic, technological and social barriers to SDGs can be removed through a sharing economy, and thus, the way to attain SDGs is clear. The study provides guidelines for the benefits of a sharing economy such as REB, RTB and RSB, which create SOC, making it more likely that the benefits of a sharing economy such as REB, RTB and RSB can help attain SDGs.

Conclusions and limitations

The ASEAN countries are developing economies, but an exponential increase in economic activities threatens the countries’ development in upcoming years. Although the SDGs have been proposed by the UN General Assembly in the 2030 agenda, the process of implementing them is slow because of various barriers. The aim of the current study is to examine the benefits of a sharing economy such as REB, RTB and RSB, and the impacts on attaining SDGs. The study's objective is to examine the relationship of SOC to the benefits of a sharing economy such as REB, RTB and RSB, and attaining SDGs. Through a quantitative survey of the manufacturing sector of ASEAN economies, the authors analyse SOC, the benefits of a sharing economy such as REB, RTB and RSB, and the achievement of SDGs. The results show that in a sharing economy, when resources or technologies are shared when performing tasks, or with outsiders, both the owners and the people who access the resources see economic benefits. In a country, the economic barriers to sustainable development can be removed by encouraging a sharing economy. Hence, a large number of SDGs can be attained. The results indicate that the sharing economy, on the one hand, encourages the sharing of technologies useful for performing tasks associated with constructive, developmental and productive programmes, while, on the other hand, reducing the overall use of technologies that cause pollution in the environment and removing technological barriers to SDGs. The results indicate that in a sharing economy, the social barriers to SDGs are removed though cooperation and collaboration among individuals, organizations, or between individuals and organizations, and with the encouragement of social welfare activities. This enables countries to achieve SDGs. The study concludes that the benefits of a sharing economy, such as REB, RTB and RSB, create SOC that leads to achieving SDGs.

The current study has great theoretical significance, but has several limitations, which it is hoped can be removed in future studies. Firstly, the study examines only the benefits of the sharing economy, REB, RTB and RSB to attain SDGs. The most important factors, environmental concerns, are ignored. Future researchers must explore the removal of environmental concerns through the sharing economy and its role in attaining SDGs. The current study takes data from the ASEAN countries, most of which are fast developing countries that can enforce sharing economies and achieve maximum SDGs. The study may not have equal validity in other countries. Future studies must choose diverse regions across the world for subject analysis.

Acknowledgement

This work was funded by the China Scholarship Councilprogram (202008440189), Philosophy and Social Science Research in Colleges and Universities in Guangdong Province of China (2019GXJK102), Guangdong Social Science Planning Project (GD20XGL11/GD20XGL20), Natural Science Research Projects of Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology (2020RC055).

References
[Ainou et al., 2022]
F.Z. Ainou, M. Ali, M. Sadiq.
Green energy security assessment in Morocco: Green finance as a step toward sustainable energy transition.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (2022),
[Al Mamun et al., 2021]
A. Al Mamun, R. Muniady, N.A.B.M. Nasir.
Effect of participation in development initiatives on competitive advantages, performance, and sustainability of micro-enterprises in Malaysia.
Contemporary Economics, 15 (2021), pp. 122-138
[Asian et al., 2019]
S. Asian, A. Hafezalkotob, J.J. John.
Sharing economy in organic food supply chains: A pathway to sustainable development.
International Journal of Production Economics, 218 (2019), pp. 322-338
[Bali Swain and Yang-Wallentin, 2020]
R. Bali Swain, F. Yang-Wallentin.
Achieving sustainable development goals: Predicaments and strategies.
International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 27 (2020), pp. 96-106
[Balozi, 2017]
M.A. Balozi.
Examining individual, job and perceived organizational climate factors in relation to the knowledge sharing behavior.
Universiti Utara Malaysia, (2017),
[Beh and Lin, 2021]
L.-.S. Beh, W.L. Lin.
Impact of COVID-19 on ASEAN tourism industry.
Journal of Asian Public Policy, 2 (2021), pp. 1-21
[Cheba et al., 2020]
K. Cheba, I. Bąk, K. Szopik-Depczyńska.
Sustainable competitiveness as a new economic category–definition and measurement assessment.
Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26 (2020), pp. 1399-1421
[Chen et al., 2020a]
G. Chen, M. Cheng, D. Edwards, L. Xu.
COVID-19 pandemic exposes the vulnerability of the sharing economy: A novel accounting framework.
Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 7 (2020), pp. 1-18
[Chen et al., 2020b]
Y.-.S. Chen, A.-.F. Huang, T.-.Y. Wang, Y.-.R. Chen.
Greenwash and green purchase behaviour: The mediation of green brand image and green brand loyalty.
Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 31 (2020), pp. 194-209
[Chien et al., 2021b]
F. Chien, M. Sadiq, H.W. Kamran, M.A. Nawaz, M.S. Hussain, M. Raza.
Co-movement of energy prices and stock market return: environmental wavelet nexus of COVID-19 pandemic from the USA, Europe, and China.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (2021),
[Chien et al., 2021a]
Chien, F., Sadiq, M., Nawaz, M. A., Hussain, M. S., Tran, T. D., & Le Thanh, T. (2021a). A step toward reducing air pollution in top Asian economies: The role of green energy, eco-innovation, and environmental taxes. Journal of environmental management, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113420
[Chien, Zhang, Sharif, Sadiq, & Hieu, 2022]
F. Chien, Y. Zhang, A. Sharif, M. Sadiq, M.V. Hieu.
Does air pollution affect the tourism industry in the USA? Evidence from the quantile autoregressive distributed lagged approach.
[Clauss et al., 2021]
T. Clauss, S. Kraus, F.L. Kallinger, P.M. Bican, A. Brem, N. Kailer.
Organizational ambidexterity and competitive advantage: The role of strategic agility in the exploration-exploitation paradox.
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6 (2021), pp. 203-213
[Dankiewicz, Ostrowska-Dankiewicz, & Bulut, 2020]
R. Dankiewicz, A. Ostrowska-Dankiewicz, C. Bulut.
The attitudes of entrepreneurs of the small and medium-sized enterprises sector in Poland to key business risks.
Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 15 (2020), pp. 511-536
[Degai and Petrov, 2021]
T.S. Degai, A.N. Petrov.
Rethinking Arctic sustainable development agenda through indigenizing UN sustainable development goals.
International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28 (2021), pp. 518-523
[Dimian, Apostu, Vasilescu, Aceleanu, & Jablonsky, 2021]
G.C. Dimian, S.A. Apostu, M.D. Vasilescu, M.I. Aceleanu, J. Jablonsky.
Vulnerability and resilience in health crises. Evidence from European countries.
Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27 (2021), pp. 783-810
[Dlalisa and Govender, 2020]
S.F. Dlalisa, D.W. Govender.
Challenges of acceptance and usage of a learning management system among academics.
International Journal of Ebusiness and Egovernment Studies, 12 (2020), pp. 63-78
[Dosu et al., 2021]
B. Dosu, S.M. Ofori Dei, M. Abubakari, G. Appiah.
The implications of social and economic barriers to safe drinking water for municipal level policy in Ghana.
Water International, 46 (2021), pp. 383-396
[Drebee et al., 2020]
H.A. Drebee, N.A.A. Razak, R.T. Shaybth.
The impact of governance indicators on corruption in Arab countries.
Contemporary Economics, 14 (2020), pp. 354-366
[Ferreira and Teixeira, 2019]
J.J. Ferreira, A.A. Teixeira.
Open innovation and knowledge for fostering business ecosystems.
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4 (2019), pp. 253-255
[Flores and Chang, 2020]
A. Flores, V. Chang.
Relación entre la demanda de transporte y el crecimiento económico: Análisis dinámico mediante el uso del modelo ARDL.
Cuadernos de Economía, 43 (2020), pp. 145-163
[Galant and Cadez, 2017]
A. Galant, S. Cadez.
Corporate social responsibility and financial performance relationship: A review of measurement approaches.
Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30 (2017), pp. 676-693
[Gammage and Stevanovic, 2019]
S. Gammage, N. Stevanovic.
Gender, migration and care deficits: What role for the sustainable development goals?.
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45 (2019), pp. 2600-2620
[Gil-Gomez et al., 2020]
H. Gil-Gomez, V. Guerola-Navarro, R. Oltra-Badenes, J.A. Lozano-Quilis.
Customer relationship management: Digital transformation and sustainable business model innovation.
Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33 (2020), pp. 2733-2750
[Gössling and Michael Hall, 2019]
S. Gössling, C. Michael Hall.
Sharing versus collaborative economy: How to align ICT developments and the SDGs in tourism?.
Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27 (2019), pp. 74-96
[Govindan et al., 2020]
K. Govindan, K.M. Shankar, D. Kannan.
Achieving sustainable development goals through identifying and analyzing barriers to industrial sharing economy: A framework development.
International Journal of Production Economics, 227 (2020), pp. 1-16
[Guo et al., 2021]
H. Guo, D. Liang, F. Chen, Z. Shirazi.
Innovative approaches to the sustainable development goals using big earth data.
Big Earth Data, 5 (2021), pp. 263-276
[Hair et al., 2021]
J.F. Hair Jr, G.T.M. Hult, C.M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt, N.P. Danks, S Ray.
Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook.
Springer Nature, (2021),
[Hatjidis et al., 2019]
D. Hatjidis, M. Griffin, M. Younes.
Linking universal network quality perception and change readiness.
International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27 (2019), pp. 1017-1035
[Hayat and Afshari, 2021]
A. Hayat, L. Afshari.
Supportive organizational climate: A moderated mediation model of workplace bullying and employee well-being.
Personnel Review, 50 (2021), pp. 1685-1704
[He, Meng, Chen, Yan, & Vasa, 2021]
L. He, P. Meng, D. Chen, M. Yan, L. Vasa.
Analysis of socio-economic spatial structure of urban agglomeration in China based on spatial gradient and clustering.
Oeconomia Copernicana, 12 (2021), pp. 789-819
[Heinrich et al., 2020]
N.E.L. Heinrich, D. Blaauw, A. Pretorius.
Investigating the Hungarian money demand function: Possible implications for monetary policy.
International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 12 (2020), pp. 71-87
[Hennebry et al., 2019]
J. Hennebry, K.C. Hari, N. Piper.
Not without them: Realising the sustainable development goals for women migrant workers.
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45 (2019), pp. 2621-2637
[Huang, Chien, & Sadiq, 2021b]
S.Z. Huang, F. Chien, M. Sadiq.
A gateway towards a sustainable environment in emerging countries: the nexus between green energy and human Capital.
Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, (2021),
[Huang, Chien, & Sadiq, 2021c]
S.Z. Huang, F. Chien, M. Sadiq.
A gateway towards a sustainable environment in emerging countries: the nexus between green energy and human Capital.
Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, (2021),
[Hussain, Szczepańska-Woszczyna, Kamarudin, Anwar, & Saudi, 2021]
H.I. Hussain, K. Szczepańska-Woszczyna, F. Kamarudin, N.A.M. Anwar, M.H.M. Saudi.
Unboxing the black box on the dimensions of social globalisation and the efficiency of microfinance institutions in Asia.
Oeconomia Copernicana, 12 (2021), pp. 557-592
[Inegbedion et al., 2021]
H. Inegbedion, E. Inegbedion, E. Obadiaru, A. Asaleye, S. Adeyemi, D. Eluyela.
Creativity and organisational efficiency: Empirical evidence from private organisations in Nigeria.
Creativity Studies, 14 (2021), pp. 461-487
[Ingutia, 2020]
R. Ingutia.
Does marginalisation in education stall the progress of sustainable development goals?.
Education, 48 (2020), pp. 495-511
[Jabbour et al., 2020]
C.J.C. Jabbour, P.D.C. Fiorini, C.W. Wong, D. Jugend, A.B.L.D.S. Jabbour, B.M.R.P. Seles, et al.
First-mover firms in the transition towards the sharing economy in metallic natural resource-intensive industries: Implications for the circular economy and emerging industry 4.0 technologies.
Resources Policy, 66 (2020), pp. 1015-1029
[Kamarudin, Anwar, Chien, & Sadiq, 2021]
Kamarudin, F., Anwar, N. A. M., Chien, F., & Sadiq, M. (2021). Efficiency of microfinance institutions and economic freedom nexus: empirical evidence from four selected ASIAN countries. Transformations in Business & Economics, 20(2b), 845-868
[Karobliene and Pilinkiene, 2021]
V. Karobliene, V. Pilinkiene.
The sharing economy in the framework of sustainable development goals: Case of European Union countries.
Sustainability, 13 (2021), pp. 8312-8321
[Khan et al., 2017]
F. Khan, W. Aradi, W. Schwalje, E. Buckner, M. Fernandez-Carag.
Women's participation in technical and vocational education and training in the Gulf States.
International Journal of Training Research, 15 (2017), pp. 229-244
[Khayatzadeh-Mahani et al., 2020]
A. Khayatzadeh-Mahani, K. Wittevrongel, D.B. Nicholas, J.D. Zwicker.
Prioritizing barriers and solutions to improve employment for persons with developmental disabilities.
Disability and Rehabilitation, 42 (2020), pp. 2696-2706
[Kikulwe and Asindu, 2020]
E. Kikulwe, M. Asindu.
Consumer demand and prospects for commercialization of nutritionally enhanced GM bananas in Uganda.
AgBioforum, 22 (2020), pp. 13-24
[Kim and Park, 2020]
E.-.J. Kim, S. Park.
Transformational leadership, knowledge sharing, organizational climate and learning: An empirical study.
Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41 (2020), pp. 761-775
[King, 2017]
K.A. King.
The talent climate.
Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 4 (2017), pp. 298-314
[Koloba, 2020]
H.A. Koloba.
Purchase intention towards environmentally friendly products among consumers in South Africa. Applying the theory of planned behaviour.
International Journal Of Business And Management Studies, 12 (2020), pp. 34-49
[Kongbuamai et al., 2020]
N. Kongbuamai, Q. Bui, H.M.A.U. Yousaf, Y. Liu.
The impact of tourism and natural resources on the ecological footprint: A case study of ASEAN countries.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27 (2020), pp. 19251-19264
[Lan, Khan, Sadiq, Chien, & Baloch, 2022]
J. Lan, S.U. Khan, M. Sadiq, F. Chien, Z.A. Baloch.
Evaluating energy poverty and its effects using multi-dimensional based DEA-like mathematical composite indicator approach: Findings from Asia.
[Li et al., 2021]
W. Li, F. Chien, H.W. Kamran, T.M. Aldeehani, M. Sadiq, V.C. Nguyen, F. Taghizadeh-Hesary.
The nexus between COVID-19 fear and stock market volatility.
Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, (2021),
[Liu, Lan, Chien, Sadiq, & Nawaz, 2022b]
Liu, Z., Lan, J., Chien, F., Sadiq, M., & Nawaz, M. A. (2022b). Role of tourism development in environmental degradation: A step towards emission reduction. Journal of environmental management, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114078
[Liu et al., 2021]
Z. Liu, Y.M. Tang, K.Y. Chau, F. Chien, W. Iqbal, M. Sadiq.
Incorporating strategic petroleum reserve and welfare losses: A way forward for the policy development of crude oil resources in South Asia. Resources Policy, (2021), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102309
[Liu, Yin, Surya Putra, & Sadiq, 2022a]
Z. Liu, T. Yin, Surya Putra, M. Sadiq.
Public spending as a new determinate of sustainable development goal and green economic recovery: policy perspective analysis in the Post-Covid ERA.
Climate Change Economics, (2022),
[Lv et al., 2017]
K. Lv, A. Yu, S. Gong, M. Wu, X. Xu.
Impacts of educational factors on economic growth in regions of China: A spatial econometric approach.
Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 23 (2017), pp. 827-847
[Lyaskovskaya and Khudyakova, 2021]
E. Lyaskovskaya, T. Khudyakova.
Sharing economy: For or against sustainable development.
Sustainability, 13 (2021), pp. 11056-11073
[Lydeka & Karaliute, 2021]
Z. Lydeka, A. Karaliute.
Assessment of the Effect of Technological Innovations on Unemployment in the European Union Countries.
Engineering Economics, 32 (2021), pp. 130-139
[Mahmood, Qadeer, Saleem, Han, & Ariza-Montes, 2021]
F. Mahmood, F. Qadeer, M. Saleem, H. Han, A. Ariza-Montes.
Corporate social responsibility and firms’ financial performance: A multi-level serial analysis underpinning social identity theory.
Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1-39 (2021), pp. 2447-2468
[Mantikei, Christa, Sintani, & Negara, 2020]
B. Mantikei, U.R. Christa, L. Sintani, D.J. Negara.
The Role of Responsible Leadership in Determining the Triple-Bottom-Line Performance of the Indonesian Tourist Industry.
Contemporary Economics, 14 (2020), pp. 463-474
[Ma'ruf and Aryani, 2019]
A. Ma'ruf, F. Aryani.
Financial inclusion and achievements of sustainable development goals (SDGs) in ASEAN.
Journal of Business and Economics Review, 4 (2019), pp. 147-155
[Matuszewska-Pierzynka, 2021]
A. Matuszewska-Pierzynka.
Relationship between corporate sustainability performance and corporate financial performance: Evidence from US companies.
Equilibrium Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16 (2021), pp. 885-906
[Mazur & Duchlinski, 2020]
P.S. Mazur, P. Duchlinski.
Credibility and creativity in network society.
Creativity studies, 13 (2020), pp. 53-63
[Melián-González et al., 2019]
S. Melián-González, J. Bulchand-Gidumal, I.G. Cabrera.
Tours and activities in the sharing economy.
Current Issues in Tourism, 7 (2019), pp. 1-6
[Meloncon, 2017]
L. Meloncon.
Contingent faculty, online writing instruction, and professional development in technical and professional communication.
Technical Communication Quarterly, 26 (2017), pp. 256-272
[Moslehpour et al., 2022b]
M. Moslehpour, K.Y. Chau, Y.T. Tu, K.L. Nguyen, M. Barry, K.D. Reddy.
Impact of corporate sustainable practices, government initiative, technology usage, and organizational culture on automobile industry sustainable performance.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 (2022), pp. 83907-83920
[Moslehpour, Ismail, Purba, & Wong, 2021]
M. Moslehpour, T. Ismail, B. Purba, W.K. Wong.
What Makes GO-JEK Go in Indonesia? The Influences of Social Media Marketing Activities on Purchase Intention.
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 17 (2021), pp. 89-103
[Moslehpour et al., 2022a]
M. Moslehpour, A. Shalehah, W.K. Wong, T. Ismail, P. Altantsetseg, M. Tsevegjav.
Economic and tourism growth impact on the renewable energy production in Vietnam.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 (2022), pp. 81006-81020
[Nguyen and Nguyen, 2021]
L.P. Nguyen, H.T. Nguyen.
Factors impacting tourism demand: An analysis of 10 ASEAN countries.
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8 (2021), pp. 385-393
[Nosova, 2017]
A. Nosova.
Business and economic reform policies in Kuwait: The case of the capital market authority.
Journal of Arabian Studies, 7 (2017), pp. 28-43
[Nowak, Rabczun, & Łopatka, 2021]
M. Nowak, A. Rabczun, P. Łopatka.
Impact of Electrification on African Development-Analysis with Using Grey Systems Theory.
Energies, 14 (2021), pp. 5181
[Olabi et al., 2022]
A. Olabi, K. Obaideen, K. Elsaid, T. Wilberforce, E.T. Sayed, H.M. Maghrabie, et al.
Assessment of the pre-combustion carbon capture contribution into sustainable development goals SDGs using novel indicators.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 153 (2022), pp. 111-120
[Öztürk et al., 2019]
M. Öztürk, A. Ihtiyar, O.N. Aras.
The relationship between tourism industry and economic growth: A panel data analysis for ASEAN member countries.
Quantitative tourism research in asia, Springer, (2019), pp. 35-58
[Pelucha et al., 2017]
M. Pelucha, J. Kourilova, V. Kveton.
Barriers of social entrepreneurship development – a case study of the Czech Republic.
Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 8 (2017), pp. 129-148
[Phua, 2018]
F.T.T. Phua.
The role of organizational climate in socially embedding construction firms’ sustainability goals.
Construction Management and Economics, 36 (2018), pp. 409-421
[Polyzos et al., 2021]
S. Polyzos, A. Fotiadis, A. Samitas.
COVID-19 tourism recovery in the ASEAN and East Asia region: Asymmetric patterns and implications.
ERIA Discussion Paper Series, 3 (2021), pp. 1-17
[Revinova et al., 2020]
S. Revinova, S. Ratner, I. Lazanyuk, K. Gomonov.
Sharing economy in Russia: Current status, barriers, prospects and role of universities.
Sustainability, 12 (2020), pp. 4855-4867
[Rojek-Adamek, 2021]
P. Rojek-Adamek.
The role of sharing creative ideas: Professional designers about their work.
Creativity Studies, 14 (2021), pp. 521-534
[Sadiq, Amayri, & Paramaiah, 2022b]
M. Sadiq, M.A. Amayri, C. Paramaiah, et al.
How green finance and financial development promote green economic growth: deployment of clean energy sources in South Asia.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (2022),
[Sadiq, Hsu, Zhang, & Chien, 2021]
M. Sadiq, CC. Hsu, Y. Zhang, FS. Chien.
COVID-19 fear and volatility index movements: empirical insights from ASEAN stock markets.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (2021),
[Sadiq et al., 2022a]
M. Sadiq, T.Q. Ngo, A.A. Pantamee, K. Khudoykulov, T.T. Ngan, L.L. Tan.
The role of environmental social and governance in achieving sustainable development goals: evidence from ASEAN countries.
Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, (2022),
[Saunila, 2020]
M. Saunila.
Innovation capability in SMEs: A systematic review of the literature.
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5 (2020), pp. 260-265
[Scavarda et al., 2020]
A. Scavarda, G. Daú, L.F. Scavarda, B.D. Azevedo, A.L. Korzenowski.
Social and ecological approaches in urban interfaces: A sharing economy management framework.
Science of the Total Environment, 713 (2020), pp. 134-149
[Sharma, 2020]
S.K. Sharma.
Financial development and economic growth in selected Asian economies: A dynamic panel ARDL test.
Contemporary Economics, 14 (2020), pp. 201-219
[Sirisuthikul, 2018]
V. Sirisuthikul.
Conceptualizing ASEAN tourism brand: Towards a coopetition framework.
Global Journal of Business and Social Sciences Review, 6 (2018), pp. 114-121
[Świadek and Gorączkowska, 2020]
A. Świadek, J. Gorączkowska.
The institutional support for an innovation cooperation in industry: The case of Poland.
Equilibrium Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 15 (2020), pp. 811-831
[Tan et al., 2021]
L.P. Tan, M. Sadiq, T.M. Aldeehani, S. Ehsanullah, P. Mutira, H.M. Vu.
How COVID-19 induced panic on stock price and green finance markets: global economic recovery nexus from volatility dynamics.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (2021),
[Tetrevova et al., 2021]
L. Tetrevova, M. Jelinkova, S. Munzarova.
Traditional and developing segments of the sharing economy from the point of view of customers.
Engineering Economics, 32 (2021), pp. 469-483
[Townsend et al., 2021]
B.G. Townsend, J.T.H. Chen, V.M. Wuthrich.
Barriers and facilitators to social participation in older adults: A systematic literature review.
Clinical Gerontologist, 44 (2021), pp. 359-380
[Vakulchuk and Knobel, 2018]
R. Vakulchuk, A. Knobel.
Impact of non-tariff barriers on trade within the Eurasian Economic Union.
Post-Communist Economies, 30 (2018), pp. 459-481
[van Niekerk, 2020]
A.J. van Niekerk.
Inclusive economic sustainability: SDGs and global inequality.
Sustainability, 12 (2020), pp. 5427-5439
[Voth Schrag et al., 2019]
R.J. Voth Schrag, S.R. Robinson, K. Ravi.
Understanding pathways within intimate partner violence: Economic abuse, economic hardship, and mental health.
Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 28 (2019), pp. 222-242
[Wang et al., 2021]
H. Wang, X. Yang, Q. Lou, X. Xu.
Achieving a sustainable development process by deployment of solar PV power in ASEAN: A SWOT analysis.
Processes, 9 (2021), pp. 21-35
[Wei et al., 2021]
C. Wei, J. Wu, Y. Guo, G. Wei.
Green supplier selection based on CODAS method in probabilistic uncertain linguistic environment.
Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27 (2021), pp. 530-549
[Williams et al., 2018]
V. Williams, B. Tarleton, P. Heslop, S. Porter, B. Sass, S. Blue, et al.
Understanding disabling barriers: A fruitful partnership between disability studies and social practices?.
Disability & Society, 33 (2018), pp. 157-174
[Yousaf et al., 2021]
Z. Yousaf, M. Radulescu, A. Nassani, A.M. Aldakhil, E. Jianu.
Environmental management system towards environmental performance of hotel industry: does corporate social responsibility authenticity really matter?.
Engineering Economics, 32 (2021), pp. 484-498
[Zamora-Polo et al., 2019]
F. Zamora-Polo, J. Sánchez-Martín, M. Corrales-Serrano, L. Espejo-Antúnez.
What do university students know about sustainable development goals? A realistic approach to the reception of this UN program among the youth population.
Sustainability, 11 (2019), pp. 1-19
[Zhang et al., 2018]
A. Zhang, C. Franklin, Q. Ji, Y. Chen, S. Jing, L. Shen.
Evidence-based practice in Chinese social work: Overcoming language and developmental barriers.
China Journal of Social Work, 11 (2018), pp. 41-55
[Zhang et al., 2020]
X. Zhang, G. Wan, J. Li, Z. He.
Global spatial economic interaction: Knowledge spillover or technical diffusion?.
Spatial Economic Analysis, 15 (2020), pp. 5-23
[Zhao, Zhang, Sadiq, Hieu, & Ngo, 2021]
L. Zhao, Y. Zhang, M. Sadiq, V.M. Hieu, T.Q. Ngo.
Testing green fiscal policies for green investment, innovation and green productivity amid the COVID-19 era.
Economic Change and Restructuring, (2021),
Copyright © 2022. The Author
Article options