Regístrese
¿Aún no está registrado?
Información relevante

Consulte los artículos y contenidos publicados en éste medio, además de los e-sumarios de las revistas científicas en el mismo momento de publicación

Máxima actualización

Esté informado en todo momento gracias a las alertas y novedades

Promociones exclusivas

Acceda a promociones exclusivas en suscripciones, lanzamientos y cursos acreditados

Crear Mi cuenta
Buscar en
Journal of Applied Research and Technology. JART
Toda la web
Inicio Journal of Applied Research and Technology. JART The effect of grounding system modeling on lightning-related studies of transmis...
Journal Information
Vol. 15. Num. 6.
Pages 513-632 (December 2017)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
1237
Vol. 15. Num. 6.
Pages 513-632 (December 2017)
Original
DOI: 10.1016/j.jart.2017.06.003
Open Access
The effect of grounding system modeling on lightning-related studies of transmission lines
Visits
1237
Reza Shariatinasab
Corresponding author
Shariatinasab@birjand.ac.ir

Corresponding author.
, Javad Gholinezhad
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
This item has received
1237
Visits

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (15)
Show moreShow less
Tables (9)
Table 1. Statistical parameters of the lightning negative-polarity strokes (Chowdhuri et al., 2005).
Table 2. Line conductor characteristic.
Table 3. The effect of span length on the calculated overvoltages (kV).
Table 4. Outage rate (flashes/100km/year) of TL for different modeling of rod-shape grounding system.
Table 5. Outage rate (flashes/100km/year) of TL for different modeling of grid-shape grounding system.
Table 6. Outage rate (flashes/100km/year) of TL for different modeling of counterpoise-grid grounding system.
Table 7. Length (km) of subsections of transmission lines based on resistivity of each region.
Table 8. The unavailability and failure rate index of transmission lines.
Table 9. The unavailability index of transmission line for different grounding system modeling.
Show moreShow less
Abstract

Un-accurate modeling of power system may cause to under or over-design the insulation, which in turn, leads to increase in the investment and/or maintenance cost of the network protection against lightning overvoltages. The grounding system is an effective parameter on the magnitude of the lightning overvoltages and insulation coordination of high voltage transmission lines (TLs). This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of the effect of grounding electrode impedance on the estimation of overvoltages caused by lightning strokes, in which both the vertical and non-vertical strokes are considered. In the presented study, static and wide-band model of the tower-footing grounding system is adopted assuming the soil electrical parameters to be either constant or frequency dependent. Also, the effect of modeling type of grounding system is considered on the TLs’ reliability indices. The study was performed on a typical 400-kV transmission line which is modeled in EMTP-RV. From the simulation results, it is found that the outage rate of TLs is markedly affected by the model of the tower footing grounding system. This effect is more pronounced when the soil electrical parameters are frequency dependent. It is also concluded that, in addition to the lightning overvoltages, the unavailability of the TLs is significantly affected by wide-band model of grounding system, non-vertical lightning strokes and soil resistivity.

Keywords:
Lightning overvoltage
Transmission lines
Grounding system
Non-vertical strokes
Reliability indices
Full Text
1Introduction

Lightning is one of the main factors causing the insulation failure and line outage and then imposes high costs to power utilities for the maintenance and replacement of damaged equipment. Surge arresters and shield wires are the main protective devices against lightning surges. In the case of shield wire installation, there is still the probability of Back-Flashover (BF) and Shielding Failure Flashover (SFFOR) which can result in insulation failure (Hileman, 1999). Consequently, using arresters is an efficient solution to improve the lightning performance and reliability of power networks.

The back flashover rate (BFR) is considered as one of the main factors in designing the lightning protection of TLs and high voltage (HV) substations. The analytical methods, in the design of lightning protection schemes, have been utilized in many researches (Araújo, Flauzino, Altafim, Batista, & Moraes, 2015; Christodoulou, Ekonomou, Papanikolaou, & Gonos, 2014; Ekonomou, Gonos, & Stathopulos, 2003; Shariatinasab, Safar, & Falaghi, 2014).

The main lightning parameters affecting on the resultant overvoltages are the peak current magnitude, and the front and tail time of the current waveform. Besides, the tower footing grounding impedance is effective on the lightning related overvoltages. The higher tower footing resistance, the severe lightning overvoltage is produced. So, it is important to perform the accurate modeling of grounding system for calculation the lightning performance of TLs. Usually, a simple linear or nonlinear resistance is conventional for modeling of tower footing resistance (Araújo et al., 2015; Banjanin, Savić, & Stojković, 2015; Mamiş, Keleş, Arkan, & Kaya, 2016; Shariatinasab et al., 2014; Tossani et al., 2015). In conventional modeling, the magnitude of tower footing resistance is only varied with the lightning current magnitude flowing through the tower footing into the ground. However, the electrical parameters of the soil, i.e. permittivity (??) and resistivity (ρ) are frequency dependence. This means that not only the current magnitude, but also the frequency range associated with each lightning waveform must be taken into account for accurate estimation of lightning overvoltage.

In Ekonomou et al. (2003) the Wenner method has been used for measurement of the soil resistivity of the ground and the distance between two sequential electrodes was continuously varied in order to record the lack of homogeneity of the ground. The calculation of the parameters of grounding structure is considered as an optimization problem and tower footing resistance is calculated considering soil resistivity and the geometric characteristics of the grounding system. Recently, the effect of frequency dependence modeling of soil resistivity and permittivity on the response of grounding electrodes due to lightning surges has been analyzed (Alipio & Visacro, 2014; Shariatinasab, Gholinezhad, Sheshyekani, & Alemi, 2016)

This paper presents a comprehensive study to accurate modeling of the grounding systems and analyzing the lightning performance of TLs. In this study both the vertical and non-vertical lightning stroke have been considered and the effect of different modeling of grounding system on outage rate of TL is investigated. Also, as transmission lines transfer a large amount of energy, a reliability assessment is vital and can be used as a reference to design the proper lightning protection scheme. Therefore, the effect of wide-band modeling of grounding system on the reliability indices of TLs has been introduced. In order to go through this, a probabilistic evaluation on outage rates and reliability indices of a 400kV transmission line is introduced by establishing a link between MATLAB environment and EMTP-RV software. The results are analyzed for different grounding system models and various soil resistivity.

2Lightning overvoltages2.1Lightning parameters

From the field data on lightning strokes, the probability of occurrence of each lightning parameter x can be obtained by a log-normal probability density function as below (Chowdhuri et al., 2005):

where σlnx and x¯ are the standard deviation and average of variable x, respectively. The parameters of log-normal distribution of the lightning negative-polarity are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Statistical parameters of the lightning negative-polarity strokes (Chowdhuri et al., 2005).

Parameters  First strokeSubsequent stroke
  Median  σlnx  Median  σlnx 
Peak current Ip (kA)  31.1  0.48  13  0.6447 
Rise time tf (μs)  3.83  0.55  0.32  0.6677 
Time to half value th (μs)  75  0.58  20  0.69 
Correlation coefficient ρc (Ip, tf0.470

Having parameters of the lightning surge, a Heidler function can be used to represent the lightning current waveform (Heidler, Cvetic, & Stanic, 1999):

where Ip, n and η are the peak current, the current steepness factor and the peak current correction factor, respectively; and k=t/τ1; τ1 and τ2 are time constants that rise and decay time of the lightning are determined based on, respectively.

2.2Determination of termination point of stroke

The termination point of the lightning stroke (i.e. the phase conductor, shield wire or ground) is determined with the aid of electro geometric model (EGM), in which is established based on IEEE Std. 1243. The striking distances were calculated by:

where RC and Rg are the striking distances to the conductor and the ground, respectively, and I is lightning current amplitude and β=0.8615. The EGM for the test tower is shown in Fig. 1 (Shafaei, Gholami, & Shariatinasab, 2012).

Fig. 1.

Electro geometric model.

(0.16MB).

The number of direct lightning strokes to the TL is related to distribution of coordination of lightning strokes on the so-called struck area and the lightning parameters that are generated by means of Monte Carlo simulation. The convergence of Monte Carlo method is obtained after 30,000 runs.

3Transmission line modeling3.1Transmission tower

Fig. 2(a) and (b) shows a typical 400kV transmission line and its resultant multistory model consisting of two lines with distributed-parameters. The value of the R and L of each part showing traveling-wave attenuation and distortions are given by (Ametani & Kawamura, 2005):

where c=300m/μs is the light velocity in free space, h (m) is tower height, α1=α2=0.89 attenuation along the tower and τ=h/c is traveling time along the tower. In this paper, the tower top to the phase arm impedance Zt1 is assumed 200Ω and the phase arm to the tower bottom impedance Zt2=is equal to 150Ω.

Fig. 2.

(a) Tower configuration (values in brackets are midspan heights) and (b) multistory model of transmission tower.

(0.12MB).

The representation of insulator string is based on the integration method model. This method is shown as (Datsios, Mikropoulos, & Tsovilis, 2014):

where V0 (kV) is the required minimum voltage, DE (kVkμs) is the disruptive effect of the applied impulse voltage, t0 (μs) is the instant that the instantaneous voltage V(t) exceeds than V0 and k is a factor accounting for the effect of the applied voltage amplitude and time on DE.

3.2Tower footing impedance

In the lightning studies, the tower footing impedance usually modeled by a simple linear or non-linear resistance (Datsios et al., 2014; Sarajcev, 2015). However, the frequency dependence of soil electrical parameters is ignored (Visacro, Alipio, Vale, & Pereira, 2011).

In this paper, the frequency dependence of soil electrical parameters is considered based on Longmire and Smith analytical formula (Longmire & Smith, 1975):

where ρ0 is the low-frequency resistivity, p is the water percentage of soil, f is the frequency rang that varies from DC to 2MHz and ρ(f) and ??r(f) are the soil resistivity and relative permittivity, respectively.

Variation of relative permittivity and soil resistivity with the frequency is shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

(a) Relative permittivity and (b) soil resistivity.

(0.11MB).

In this paper, the grounding system is modeled in three different ways: the wide-band model assuming constant (CP wide-band) and frequency-dependent (FD wide-band) electrical parameters and also a simple resistor (Static model). However, the soil ionization due to the high impulse current injected into the tower-footing grounding system is neglected.

4Modeling of grounding system4.1Types of the grounding system

Lightning is one of the main important overvoltage generated in grounding systems, transformers and other power system components. Studies show that it is possible to model a conductor in soil as a series-parallel equivalent circuit (Fig. 4) (Alipio & Visacro, 2014).

Fig. 4.

Theoretical model of grounding electrode.

(0.03MB).

To include the soil ionization, linear resistors in Fig. 4 are replaced by non-linear resistors. In this paper, the analyses are performed for four tower-footing grounding system structures; a one-port vertical and horizontal rod, a four-port simple square grid and a one-port counterpoise grid, as shown in Fig. 5 (Grcev & Popov, 2005).

Fig. 5.

(a) One-port 12m vertical rod, (b) one-port 12m horizontal rod, (c) four-port 6m×6m square grid and (d) one-port 4m×4m, depth 1m counterpoise grid, used for tower-footing grounding systems.

(0.09MB).

If the transmission line is excited from one-side, while the far-end is opened, the grounding impedance is as follow:

where ZC and γ are respectively characteristic impedance and propagation constant. The grounding impedance for the vertical rod is given by:

And in the case of horizontal rod,

Soil resistance for the case of vertical and horizontal rod in f=50Hz is,

where l (m), a (m), ρm) and d (m) are the rod length, geometric radius of the electrode, soil resistivity and the grounding rod depth, respectively.

If conductor radius (a) and grounding rod depth (d) was ignored in comparison with the rod length (L), i.e. (La, d); the counterpoise grid resistance is (Scott, 1966):

The counterpoise impedance equations are shown in (Scott, 1966) for different arrangements.

4.2Frequency dependent behavior of grounding electrodes

To analysis the frequency dependent behavior of the grounding system, vertical and horizontal copper rods are considered with a 7.5cm radius, 12m length and 1m depth. Also, soil resistivity and relative permittivity are assumed 100Ωm and 10, respectively. The frequency dependent impedance of horizontal rod Z() is presented in Fig. 6, in which the ratio of Z() to the value of low frequency Zg is shown. It is clear that the impedance is almost constant and frequency-independent in low frequencies (up to 100kHz). However, the impedance varies for greater frequency range and depending to the ratio of Z()/Zg the behavior of grounding system can be concluded. If Z()/Zg be less, greater or equal to 1, the capacitive, inductive or resistive behavior of grounding system is concluded, respectively.

Fig. 6.

Frequency dependent impedance of the horizontal electrode.

(0.06MB).

The effect of electrode length and soil resistivity on the inductive and capacitive behavior of grounding system are shown in Fig. 7. Owing the results, one can conclude the capacitive behavior of grounding system is dominant in the case of soil with high resistivity and short length of the electrodes. From Fig. 7, it is obvious that for decreasing the inductive behavior of grounding electrode, shorter electrodes must be used; so that for the electrode of shorter than 2m length, the grounding system is totally capacitive. However, practically for achieving low resistances in power frequency, longer electrodes are needed.

Fig. 7.

The inductive and capacitive behavior of the vertical grounding electrode.

(0.06MB).

The impedance magnitude of the counterpoise grid is shown in Fig. 8 for one conductor with length of 75m and 300m, two conductors with length of 75m and four conductors with length of 75m. The results show that the decrement of the impedance magnitude of the counterpoise grid consisting of several short conductors is more than the case of the grid consisting of one but long conductor.

Fig. 8.

The magnitude of grounding impedance of counterpoise grid (ρ=1000Ωm, radius is 1cm).

(0.09MB).
5Simulation results

The Monte Carlo method has been utilized to analyze the lightning performance of TLs. The approach is performed by establishing a link between MATLAB environment and EMTP-RV software to calculate the lightning flashover rate (LFOR) that is sum of the back flashover (BFR) and shielding failure flashover rate (SFFOR):

where Ng (flashes/km2year) is the ground flash density, N is number of runs, d is the maximum width of impact area; Fg and Fp are the number of flashovers caused by strokes to shield wire and phase conductor, respectively (See (Shafaei, et al.,) for more details).

5.1Frequency domain simulation

Figs. 9 and 10 present the impedance magnitude and phase for a vertical copper rod with a radius of 7.5cm, buried in the soil with ρ=100Ωm and relative permittivity 10. The tower footing grounding impedance is represented as a function of the frequency for different rod length and soil resistivity. It can be seen that the grounding impedance is constant up to 100kHz and increases with the frequency increasing because of inductive behavior of the soil. Also the impedance increases with increasing the electrode length.

Fig. 9.

The grounding impedance magnitude for different vertical electrode length.

(0.09MB).
Fig. 10.

The grounding impedance phase for different vertical electrode length.

(0.11MB).

Figs. 11 and 12 show the impedance magnitude and phase for a vertical copper rod that is buried in the soil with different resistivity. The results indicate that the grounding impedance increases with the soil resistivity. Also it is seen that the soil with high resistivity (ρ=1000Ωm) has capacitive behavior at first, and shows the inductive behavior in high frequency ranges.

Fig. 11.

The grounding impedance magnitude for different soil resistivity.

(0.08MB).
Fig. 12.

The grounding impedance phase for different soil resistivity.

(0.09MB).
5.2Time domain simulation

After generating all the statistical variables of lightning related study, every set of variables was applied to the case test to calculate the resultant overvoltages and LFOR. The line configuration of the case test is shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Line conductor characteristic.

  Type  Diameter (cm)  Resistance (Ω/km) 
Phase conductors  CURLEW  3.163  0.05501 
Shield wire  94S  1.26  0.642 

It should be mentioned that subsequent strokes are simulated only for the flashes where the first stroke did not cause flashover; also the subsequent strokes hit to the same path of the first stroke.

For example, Fig. 13 shows the overvoltages developed across the insulator string in the case of lightning strokes to shield wire. It is clear that the grounding system model is significantly effective on the maximum overvoltages produced across the insulator string. This effect is more pronounced when the soil electrical parameters are considered to be frequency dependent.

Fig. 13.

Overvoltages across insulator string in rod-shape grounding system. Return stroke (100kA/3.83μs/75μs), left column: ρ=100Ωm, right column: ρ=1000Ωm.

(0.19MB).

In the case of soil with low resistivity, the difference between the maximum values of generated overvoltages across the insulator string by different modeling of grounding system is about 100kV, i.e. 5%. For the soil with high resistivity, ρ=1000Ωm, the maximum value of the calculated overvoltage belongs to the static model and Ekonomou method (Ekonomou et al., 2003). In this case, the difference between the maximum value of generated overvoltages is 500kV, i.e. 17%. It is also seen that generated overvoltages due to static model and Ekonomou method are approximately the same.

In order to analyze the influence of the span length of the transmission line on the calculated overvoltages, a sensitivity analysis based on the procedure described in the previous sections was performed, in which the results are shown in Table 3. Owing the results, apart away the modeling type of grounding system, the generated overvoltages across the insulator string decrease with increasing span length for the lightning strokes to the phase conductor and increase for lightning strokes to the shield wires. However, it is seen that there is not a meaningful variation among the overvoltages, either increasing or decreasing, depending on different models of grounding system.

Table 3.

The effect of span length on the calculated overvoltages (kV).

Span length (m)  Stroke to phase conductorStroke to shield wire
  ST  CP  FD  ST  CP  FD 
250  6554  6550  6589  1833  1754  1552 
300  6535  6530  6566  1842  1761  1555 
350  6515  6510  6555  1850  1768  1566 
400  6495  6496  6547  1855  1778  1572 
450  6478  6487  6538  1865  1787  1576 
500  6470  6479  6530  1867  1789  1577 

In general, the lightning strokes are considered vertical, while in fact they hit to the transmission lines non-vertically (See Martinez & Castro-Aranda, 2006 for further information). Therefore, in order to increase the accuracy of the calculation in this study, the lightning strokes assumed to be non-vertical. Tables 4–6 show the outage rates of TL for different models of grounding system. The rod-shape, grid-shape and counterpoise-shape of grounding system are included in this study.

Table 4.

Outage rate (flashes/100km/year) of TL for different modeling of rod-shape grounding system.

Soil resistivity (Ωm)  Grounding system models  Vertical strokesNon-vertical strokes
    BFR  SFFOR  LFOR  BFR  SFFOR  LFOR 
ρ=100ST  4.377  3.007  7.38  4.203  3.830  8.03 
CP  4.881  3.007  7.88  4.610  3.830  8.44 
FD  4.820  3.007  7.82  4.490  3.830  8.32 
ρ=500ST  8.656  2.982  11.63  8.601  3.692  12.29 
CP  8.818  2.982  11.80  8.792  3.692  12.48 
FD  8.379  2.982  11.36  8.276  3.692  11.96 
ρ=1000ST  11.429  2.945  14.37  11.400  3.680  15.08 
CP  10.887  2.945  13.83  10.812  3.680  14.49 
FD  10.100  2.955  13.05  10.043  3.680  13.72 
Table 5.

Outage rate (flashes/100km/year) of TL for different modeling of grid-shape grounding system.

Soil resistivity (Ωm)  Grounding system models  Vertical strokesNon-vertical strokes
    BFR  SFFOR  LFOR  BFR  SFFOR  LFOR 
ρ=100ST  5.828  1.979  7.80  5.732  2.946  8.67 
CP  6.320  1.979  8.29  6.218  2.946  9.16 
FD  6.254  1.979  8.23  6.140  2.946  9.08 
ρ=500ST  8.697  1.979  10.67  8.582  2.946  11.52 
CP  8.793  1.979  10.77  8.692  2.946  11.63 
FD  8.546  1.979  10.52  8.454  2.946  11.40 
ρ=1000ST  10.48  1.979  12.45  10.37  2.946  13.31 
CP  10.05  1.979  12.02  9.950  2.946  12.89 
FD  9.138  1.979  11.11  9.024  2.946  11.97 
Table 6.

Outage rate (flashes/100km/year) of TL for different modeling of counterpoise-grid grounding system.

Soil resistivity (Ωm)  Grounding system models  Vertical strokesNon-vertical strokes
    BFR  SFFOR  LFOR  BFR  SFFOR  LFOR 
ρ=100ST  5.883  1.979  7.86  5.771  2.944  8.71 
CP  5.807  1.979  7.78  5.700  2.944  8.64 
FD  5.599  1.979  7.57  5.489  2.944  8.43 
ρ=500ST  9.951  1.979  11.93  9.842  2.944  12.78 
CP  9.094  1.979  11.07  8.980  2.944  11.92 
FD  8.141  1.979  10.12  8.036  2.944  10.98 
ρ=1000ST  11.835  1.979  13.81  11.728  2.944  14.67 
CP  10.970  1.979  12.94  10.874  2.944  13.81 
FD  8.610  1.979  10.58  8.515  2.944  11.45 

From results it can be seen in rod-shape and grid-shape grounding systems, for the soil with low resistivity (ρ=100Ωm), the LFOR in the case of wide-band modeling of grounding system is higher than the static model. While, for the soil with high resistivity (ρ=1000Ωm), the wide band modeling of grounding system leads to decrement of the LFOR than to the static model. In the case of counterpoise-grid grounding system, the wide-band modeling leads to decrement of the LFOR for all soils. However, the LFOR in the soils with high resistivity is more affected by the modeling type of grounding system. Also, the SFFOR is not dependent to the modeling type of the grounding systems.

Besides, the results show that considering non-vertical lightning strokes, the SFFOR increases and BFR decreases than to the vertical strokes. Furthermore, if lightning strokes was assumed non-vertical, apart from the variation of BFR and SSFOR, the LFOR increases in all cases.

Lightning can also affect on the reliability of the network, in which some reliability indices can be employed to analyze the impact of different tower footing grounding system models in TL reliability. In order to go through this, a typical transmission grid reliability model is established. The typical network contains 12 buses and 12 transmission lines, as shown in Fig. 14. The following indices can be used for n components in series or a series failure event (Billinton & Allan, 1992):

where λ is failure rate; r and U are repair time and unavailability, respectively. It must be mentioned that the effect of busbar and circuit breakers failures on network reliability is ignored.

Fig. 14.

The transmission grid topology used for reliability study.

(0.04MB).

In order to evaluate the mentioned reliability indices, the transmission lines in Fig. 14 are divided into some sections of different length, based on the soil resistivity (see Table 7). The rod-shape grounding system was used in each region. The repair time is considered equal to 0.25h.

Table 7.

Length (km) of subsections of transmission lines based on resistivity of each region.

Line number  Total length of line (km)  Soil resistivity of each section
    ρ=100 (Ωm)  ρ=500 (Ωm)  ρ=1000 (Ωm) 
1–3  70km  40km  30km 
2–3  50km  30km  10km  10km 
3–4  15km  10km  5km 
4–5  70km  50km  20km 
5–6  60km  60km 
5–7  40km  40km 
5–8  120km  40km  40km  40km 
8–9  180km  80km  100km 
8–10  140km  40km  100km 
9–10  50km  30km  20km 
10–11  100km  100km 
11–12  110km  60km  50km 

The transmission lines reliability indices in rod-shape grounding system illustrated in Table 8, for different grounding system modeling and various regions.

Table 8.

The unavailability and failure rate index of transmission lines.

Line number  Grounding system modeling  Failure rate (f/year)Unavailability (h/year)Line number  Failure rate (f/year)Unavailability (h/year)
    Vertical  Non-vertical  Vertical  Non-vertical    Vertical  Non-vertical  Vertical  Non-vertical 
1–3ST  6.44  6.89  1.61  1.72  5–8  13.35  14.16  3.33  3.54 
CP  6.69  7.12  1.67  1.78    13.40  14.16  3.35  3.54 
FD  6.53  6.92  1.63  1.73    12.89  13.61  3.22  3.40 
2–3ST  4.81  5.14  1.20  1.28  8–9  20.27  21.50  5.06  5.37 
CP  4.92  5.22  1.23  1.30    20.13  21.24  5.03  5.31 
FD  4.78  5.06  1.19  1.26    19.30  20.37  4.82  5.09 
3–4ST  1.88  1.98  0.47  0.49  8–10  19.02  19.99  4.75  4.99 
CP  1.87  1.97  0.46  0.49    18.55  19.48  4.63  4.87 
FD  1.78  1.88  0.44  0.47    17.59  18.51  4.39  4.62 
4–5ST  8.68  9.16  2.17  2.29  9–10  4.54  4.86  1.13  1.21 
CP  8.66  9.13  2.16  2.28    4.72  5.02  1.18  1.25 
FD  8.29  8.73  2.07  2.18    4.61  4.89  1.15  1.22 
5–6ST  8.62  9.04  2.15  2.26  10–11  14.37  15.08  3.59  3.77 
CP  8.29  8.69  2.07  2.17    13.83  14.49  3.45  3.62 
FD  7.83  8.39  1.95  2.09    13.05  13.72  3.26  3.43 
5–7ST  4.65  4.91  1.16  1.22  11–12  14.16  14.91  3.53  3.72 
CP  4.72  4.99  1.18  1.24    13.99  14.73  3.49  3.68 
FD  4.54  4.79  1.13  1.19    13.34  14.05  3.33  3.51 

Table 9 shows the effect of grounding system modeling upon unavailability index, briefly. It is clear that the wide-band modeling of grounding system has significantly effect on unavailability index when the soil electrical parameters is assumed to be frequency dependent compared to static model. Also it is seen that unavailability index increases by considering non-vertical lightning strokes.

Table 9.

The unavailability index of transmission line for different grounding system modeling.

Grounding system modelingST  CP  FD 
Total unavailability (h/year)Vertical strokes  30.15  29.9  28.58 
Non-vertical strokes  31.86  31.53  30.19 

Fig. 15 shows the influence of the ground flash density Ng on the TL unavailability index. The analysis was performed for rod-shape grounding system. From Fig. 15 it can be concluded that the unavailability index increases with increasing the soil resistivity and increasing ground flash density. Also, one can conclude that the effect of modeling of grounding system on the unavailability index is more pronounced only for the soil with high resistivity (ρ=1000Ωm) and the great Ng.

Fig. 15.

Variations of unavailability index by increasing ground flash density.

(0.07MB).
6Conclusion

A probabilistic evaluation based on Monte Carlo simulation has been carried out for the investigation of the effect of frequency dependent soil resistivity and permittivity on lightning performance of transmission lines. In this method, random lightning parameters and termination point of impact were calculated firstly; thereafter, the lightning overvoltages has been evaluated by EMTP-RV simulation.

The effect of soil electrical parameters and different types of the grounding system on the lightning performance of TLs were analyzed. The results show that the wide-band modeling of grounding system effects on the generated overvoltages (either decrease or increase) across the insulator string.

The results show that the frequency dependence of tower footing impedance leads in decrement of the outage rate and the unavailability index of TLs. The decrement is more in the case of soil with high resistivity and increasing the ground flash density. Also, LFOR and unavailability index of TLs increase considering non-vertical lightning strokes compared to the vertical lightning strokes.

The reliability indices are also calculated for different soil resistivity and grounding system modeling. Owing the results, the accurately modeling of grounding system (wide-band modeling and frequency dependence of soil electrical parameters) should be considered because it strictly affects on the power system reliability indices and, consequently, on the insulation coordination studies. The reliability assessment can be used as a reference to design the proper lightning protection scheme for transmission lines, in which large amount of energy is transferred with them.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgement

Research reported in this paper is supported by Research Grant No. 1395-D-5778, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.

References
[Alipio and Visacro, 2014]
R. Alipio, S. Visacro.
Impulse efficiency of grounding electrodes: Effect of frequency-dependent soil parameters.
IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 29 (2014), pp. 716-723
[Ametani and Kawamura, 2005]
A. Ametani, T. Kawamura.
A method of a lightning surge analysis recommended in Japan using EMTP.
IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 20 (2005), pp. 867-875
[Araújo et al., 2015]
M.A. Araújo, R.A. Flauzino, R.A. Altafim, O.E. Batista, L.A. Moraes.
Practical methodology for modeling and simulation of a lightning protection system using metal-oxide surge arresters for distribution lines.
Electric Power Systems Research, 118 (2015), pp. 47-54
[Banjanin et al., 2015]
M.S. Banjanin, M.S. Savić, Z.M. Stojković.
Lightning protection of overhead transmission lines using external ground wires.
Electric Power Systems Research, 127 (2015), pp. 206-212
[Billinton and Allan, 1992]
R. Billinton, R.N. Allan.
Reliability evaluation of engineering systems: Concepts and techniques.
2nd ed., Plenum Press, (1992),
[Chowdhuri et al., 2005]
P. Chowdhuri, J.G. Anderson, W.A. Chisholm, T.E. Field, M. Ishii, J.A. Martinez, et al.
Parameters of lightning strokes: A review.
IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 20 (2005), pp. 346-358
[Christodoulou et al., 2014]
C.A. Christodoulou, L. Ekonomou, N. Papanikolaou, I.F. Gonos.
Effect of the grounding resistance to the behaviour of high-voltage transmission lines’ surge arresters.
IET Science, Measurement & Technology, 8 (2014), pp. 470-478
[Datsios et al., 2014]
Z.G. Datsios, P.N. Mikropoulos, T.E. Tsovilis.
Estimation of the minimum shielding failure flashover current for first and subsequent lightning strokes to overhead transmission lines.
Electric Power Systems Research, 113 (2014), pp. 141-150
[Ekonomou et al., 2003]
L. Ekonomou, I.F. Gonos, I.A. Stathopulos.
An improved backflashover model for estimating the lightning performance of transmission lines.
UPEC, Thessaloniki, Greece, pp. 109-112
[Grcev and Popov, 2005]
L. Grcev, M. Popov.
On high-frequency circuit equivalents of a vertical ground rod.
IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 20 (2005), pp. 1598-1603
[Heidler et al., 1999]
F. Heidler, J.M. Cvetic, B.V. Stanic.
Calculation of lightning current parameters.
IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 14 (1999), pp. 399-404
[Hileman, 1999]
A.R. Hileman.
Insulation coordination for power systems.
Marcel Dekker, (1999),
[Longmire and Smith, 1975]
C.L. Longmire, K.S. Smith.
A universal impedance for soils (No. MRC-N-214).
Mission Research Corp., (1975),
Rep. DNA3788T
[Mamiş et al., 2016]
M.S. Mamiş, C. Keleş, M. Arkan, R. Kaya.
Lightning surge analysis of Faraday cage using alternative transient program-electromagnetic transients program.
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 10 (2016), pp. 1016-1022
[Martinez and Castro-Aranda, 2006]
J.A. Martinez, F. Castro-Aranda.
Influence of the stroke angle on the flashover rate of an overhead transmission line.
Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, pp. 1-6
[Sarajcev, 2015]
P. Sarajcev.
Monte Carlo method for estimating backflashover rates on high voltage transmission lines.
Electric Power Systems Research, 119 (2015), pp. 247-257
[Scott, 1966]
J.H. Scott.
Electrical and magnetic properties of rock and soil (No. 83-915)..
US Geological Survey, Dep. of the Interior, (1966),
[Shafaei et al., 2012]
A. Shafaei, A. Gholami, R. Shariatinasab.
Probabilistic evaluation of lightning performance of overhead transmission lines, considering non-vertical strokes.
Scientia Iranica, 19 (2012), pp. 812-819
[Shariatinasab et al., 2014]
R. Shariatinasab, J.G. Safar, H. Falaghi.
Optimisation of arrester location in risk assessment in distribution network.
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 8 (2014), pp. 151-159
[Shariatinasab et al., 2016]
R. Shariatinasab, J. Gholinezhad, K. Sheshyekani, M.R. Alemi.
The effect of wide band modeling of tower-footing grounding system on the lightning performance of transmission lines: A probabilistic evaluation.
Electric Power Systems Research, 141 (2016), pp. 1-10
[Tossani et al., 2015]
F. Tossani, F. Napolitano, A. Borghetti, C.A. Nucci, G.P. Lopes, M.L.B. Martinez, et al.
Estimation of the influence of direct strokes on the lightning performance of overhead distribution lines.
PowerTech, IEEE Eindhoven, pp. 1-7
[Visacro et al., 2011]
S. Visacro, R. Alipio, M.H.M. Vale, C. Pereira.
The response of grounding electrodes to lightning currents: The effect of frequency-dependent soil resistivity and permittivity.
IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 53 (2011), pp. 401-406

Peer Review under the responsibility of Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Copyright © 2017. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Centro de Ciencias Aplicadas y Desarrollo Tecnológico
Article options
Tools
es en pt
Política de cookies Cookies policy Política de cookies
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.