Buscar en
Enfermería Intensiva
Toda la web
Inicio Enfermería Intensiva Registros de enfermería: convencional frente a informatizado. Unidad de cuidado...
Journal Information
Vol. 15. Issue 2.
Pages 53-62 (January 2004)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 15. Issue 2.
Pages 53-62 (January 2004)
Full text access
Registros de enfermería: convencional frente a informatizado. Unidad de cuidados críticos
Nursing records: conventional versus computerized. Critical care unit
Visits
12971
José Ángel González Sánchez1,1
Corresponding author
jgonzalezs.hcsc@salud.madrid.org

Correspondencia: José Ángel González Sánchez Unidad de Críticos I Hospital Clínico San Carlos Profesor Martín Lagos, s/n 28040 Madrid. España
, Onofre Cosgaya García1, María Jesús Simón García2, Antonio L. Blesa Malpica3
1 Enfermero. Unidad de Críticos I. Integrante del Comité de Configuración (CareVue 9000)
2 Supervisora. Unidad Críticos I. Hospital Clínico San Carlos. Madrid
3 Médico adjunto. Unidad de Medicina Intensiva. Integrante del Comité de Configuración (CareVue 9000). Hospital Clínico San Carlos. Madrid. España
This item has received
Article information
Resumen

En estos últimos años, se han incorporado al trabajo diario de la enfermería los sistemas de información clínica electrónica, para el empleo de registros en las unidades de hospitalización.

Entre los años 2001 y 2002 se configuró la aplicación informática que en la actualidad se ha convertido en la herramienta de trabajo en la unidad de Críticos I. Este proyecto tiene como objetivo conocer la opinión del personal de enfermería sobre el empleo del registro informatizado respecto del previo, «bolígrafo y papel».

Las encuestas diseñadas fueron cumplimentadas en un 90,5% por el personal de la unidad, y se obtuvo que para la enfermería el registro informatizado es mejor sistema de trabajo que el «bolígrafo y papel». Además, el registro informatizado se caracteriza por ser más completo, por permitir recoger mejor el trabajo y por ajustarse más fielmente a la labor de enfermería.

En conclusión, diremos que la percepción de enfermería tras la puesta en marcha del sistema informatizado de registros clínicos es haber mejorado frente al bolígrafo-papel. La percepción del tiempo destinado a cumplimentar los registros es mayor aunque paradójicamente genera más tiempo para la asistencia del paciente, según la opinión del personal; aun así es considerado un buen sistema de trabajo.

Palabras clave:
Cuidados intensivos
Cuidados críticos
Sistema de información clínica
Registro informatizado
Enfermería de cuidados intensivos
Summary

In these recent years, electronic clinical data systems have been incorporated into the daily nursing work for the use of records in the hospitalization units.

Between 2001 and 2002, the computer program that has presently become the work tool in the Critical Unit I was designed. This project aims to know the opinion of the nursing staff on the use of the computerized record versus the previous «pen and paper».

The surveys designed were filled out by 90.5% of the unit staff and it was found that for nursing group, the computerized record is a better work system than the «pen and paper». Further, the computerized record is characterized by being more complete, by making it possible to better gather the work and by adjusting more reliably to the nursing work.

In conclusion, we would say that the perception of nursing after the initiation of the clinical record computerized system is that it has improved versus the pen-paper. The perception of the time aimed at filling out the records is greater, although paradoxically, it generates more time for the patient’s care according to the staff opinion. Even so, it is considered to be a good work system.

Key words:
Intensive cares
Critical cares
Clinical information system
Computerized record
Intensive care nursing
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
J. Hammond, H.M. Johnson, R. Varas, et al.
A qualitative comparison of paper flowsheets vs a computer-based clinical information system.
Chest, 99 (1991), pp. 155-157
[2.]
R. Grewal, J. Arcus, J. Bowen, K. Fitzpatrick, W.E. Hammond, L. Hickey, et al.
Bedside computerization of the ICU, design issues: benefits of computerization versus ease of paper & pen.
Durham, NC: Duke University Medical, 91 (1992), pp. 793-797
[3.]
F.J. Ruiz López, A. Alegría Capel.
Sistema de información clínica en unidad de cuidados intensivos. ¿Qué supone para la enfermería?.
Enfermería Global, 1 (2002), pp. 1-8
[4.]
M.B. Holm, J.C. Rogers, L.D. Burgio, B.J. McDowell.
Observational data collection using computer and manual methods: which informs best?.
Top Health Inf Manage, 19 (1999), pp. 15-25
[5.]
PGH Metnitz, K. Lenz.
Patient data management systems in intensive care: the situation in Europe.
Intensive Care Med, 21 (1995), pp. 703-715
[6.]
C. Marasovic, C. Kenney, D. Elliott, D. Sindhusake.
A comparison of nursing activities associated with manual and automated documentation in an Australian intensive care unit.
Comput Nurs, 15 (1997), pp. 205-211
[7.]
A.D. Crew, KDC Stoodley, S. Old, G.D. Unsworth, W.N. Martin, K. Kincaid.
A sampling study of bedside nursing activity in a cardiac surgical intensive care unit. Part 1. Analysis of the elements of activity in the nursing workload, and its variation with patient age group and pathology.
Intensive Care Med, 13 (1987), pp. 119-125
[8.]
J. Hammond, H.M. Johnson, R. Varas, C.G. Ward, R. Dembiki, E. Marcial.
Clinical evaluation of a computer-based patient monitoring and data management system.
Heart Lung, 20 (1991), pp. 119-124
[9.]
L. Gordon, M.D. Pierpont, R.N. Debra Thilgen.
Effect of computerized charting on nursing activity in intensive care.
Crit Care Med, 23 (1995), pp. 1067-1073
[10.]
D. Allen, M. Davis.
A computerized CIS enhances bedside intensive care.
Nursing Management, 23 (1992), pp. I-112
[11.]
M.K. Pabst, J.C. Scherubel, A.F. Minnick.
The impact of computerized documentation on nurses’ use of time.
Comput Nurs, 14 (1996), pp. 25-30
[12.]
J. Torralbas, M. Selvas, J.L. Solas, M. Jiménez.
Sistemas informáticos en los registros de enfermería.
Rol de Enfermería, (1997), pp. 17-20
[13.]
D.J. Fraenkel, M. Cowie, P. Daley.
Quality benefits of an intensive care clinical information system.
Crit Care Med, 31 (2003), pp. 120-125
[14.]
A.D. Crew, KDC Stoodley, S. Old, G.D. Unsworth, W.N. Martin, K. Kincaid.
A sampling study of bedside nursing activity in a cardiac surgical intensive care unit. Part 2. The effect ot time and shift on nursing workload.
Intensive Care Med, 13 (1987), pp. 192-198
[15.]
M. Sleutel, M. Guinn.
As good as it gets? Going online with a clinical information system.
Comput Nurs, 17 (1999), pp. 181-185
[16.]
C. Newton.
A study of nurses’ attitudes and quality of documents in computer care planning.
Nursing Standard, 9 (1995), pp. 35-39
[17.]
T. Burkle, R. Kuch, A. Passian, U. Prokosch, J. Dudeck.
The impact of computer implementation on nursing work patterns: study design and preliminary results.
Medinfo, 8 (1995), pp. 1321-1325
[18.]
C.A. Murphy, M. Maynard, G. Morgan.
Pretest and posttest attitudes of nursing personnel toward a patient care information system.
Comput Nurs, 14 (1994), pp. 156-163
[19.]
C. Marasovic, C. Kenney, D. Elliott, D. Sindhusake.
Attitudes of Australian nurses toward the implementation of a clinical information system.
Comput Nurs, 15 (1997), pp. 91-98
[20.]
G. Simpson.
Nurses’ attitudes toward computerization in clinical practice in a British General Hospital.
Comput Nurs, 15 (1997), pp. 37-42
[21.]
E.A. McConnell, S.S. O’Shea, K. Kirchhoff.
RN attitudes towards computers.
Nursing Management, 7 (1989), pp. 36-40
[22.]
R. Scarpa, S.C. Smeltzer, B. Jasion.
Attitudes of nurses toward computerization: a replication.
Comput Nurs, 10 (1992), pp. 72-80
[23.]
M.J. Burkes.
Identifying and relatiog nurses’attitudes toward computer use.
Comput Nurs, 5 (1991), pp. 190-201
[24.]
F. Eurlings, A. Van Asten, H. Cozijn, K. Klaassen, R. Stokman, R. van Valkenburg, et al.
Effects of a nursing information system in 5 Dutch hospitals.
Stud Health Technol Inform, 46 (1997), pp. 50-55
Copyright © 2004. Elsevier España, S.L. y Sociedad Española de Enfermería Intensiva
Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos