Buscar en
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (English Edition) Chronic ESBL-Klebsiella pneumoniae prostatitis treated with once-daily tigecycli...
Journal Information
Vol. 41. Issue 3.
Pages 195-196 (March 2023)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 41. Issue 3.
Pages 195-196 (March 2023)
Scientific letter
Full text access
Chronic ESBL-Klebsiella pneumoniae prostatitis treated with once-daily tigecycline monotherapy in home hospitalization
Tratamiento con tigeciclina administrada una vez al día en monoterapia de una prostatitis crónica causada por Klebsiella pneumoniae productora de beta-lactamasas de espectro extendido
Visits
108
Andrea Pinilla-Relloa, Daniel Echeverria-Esnalb,c, Francisca Sánchez-Martínezc,d, Santiago Grau-Cerratob,c,e,
Corresponding author
sgrau@psmar.cat

Corresponding author.
a Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
b Pharmacy Department, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
c Infectious Pathology and Antimicrobials Research Group (Ipar) Institut Hospital Del Mar d’Investigacions Mèdiques (Imim), Barcelona, Spain
d Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
e Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text
Dear Editor,

We present the case of a 79-year-old male with a history of low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome diagnosed in 2013, currently without specific treatment. He required a resection of the terminal ileum due to hemorrhagic ileitis in 2014. Afterwards, he presented several episodes of urinary tract infections (UTI). The first consisted of an acute prostatitis in 2015 caused by an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Thereafter, he suffered from prostatic and seminal vesicle abscesses requiring bilateral orchiectomy in 2016. Abscesses were drained, and the patient received empirically linezolid and meropenem. Treatment was switched to ertapenem according to culture results, for a total of 21 days. No new episodes of prostatic or seminal vehicle abscesses have been observed. In 2017, he was admitted twice for sepsis secondary to prostatitis due to the ESBL-K. pneumoniae. In November 2020, he was diagnosed with voiding syndrome, being prescribed two months of fosfomycin-trometamol 3g every 48h with good tolerance. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was <16mg/L at the beginning of the treatment, with development of resistance after the antibiotic course (MIC>256mg/L). In December 2020, he was admitted because of persistence of lower UTI symptoms with the presence of ESBL-K. pneumoniae, being treated with ertapenem 1g/24h for one week.

In February 2021, he was readmitted with astheny, general malaise, dysuria and vesical tenesmus, low-grade fever (37.5°C) and perianal discomfort, being diagnosed of recurrent prostatitis. A new course-treatment of ertapenem (1g/24h) was started (glomerular filtration rate 31mL/min/1.73m2). After 3 days, urine culture showed ESBL-K. pneumoniae susceptible to carbapenems, without other potential alternatives. Clinical follow-up was satisfactory, with resolution of voiding symptoms and improvement of analytical parameters including glomerular filtration rate. However, on the 13th day of treatment, the patient presented neutropenia (initial neutrophils 5.8×103u/mcl, nadir 0.43×103u/mcl), and diarrhea, which caused hypernatremia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, and hypocalcemia. Intravenous fluids and electrolyte replacement were required. Clostridioides difficile associated diarrhea was ruled out, so side effects were attributed to ertapenem. Treatment was firstly switched to tigecycline 100mg followed by 50mg/12h. After the change, a significant improvement was noticed. Diarrhea went away, ion values were corrected, and neutropenia improved (although one dose of filgrastim was administered). After 48h with tigecycline, the patient was discharged to home hospitalization with tigecycline 100mg/24h for 14 days to complete 4 weeks of antibiotic treatment. The patient did not present any recurrence nine months after this episode, with negative control urine cultures. Unfortunately, semen culture was not requested at any time.

We present the first case of chronic prostatitis due to ESBL-K. pneumoniae treated with once-daily tigecycline. This approach resolved the adverse events caused by ertapenem and allowed the patient to be early discharged.

Carbapenems are associated with diarrhea, neutropenia or astheny.1 In our case, ertapenem caused numerous adverse events, with a probable causal relationship according to the Naranjo Scale. Due to the absence of therapeutic alternatives, need for prolonged antibiotic duration, penetration issues, risk of adverse effects and possibility of discharge, tigecycline was chosen as a potential alternative.2

Tigecycline is a third generation tetracycline whose use in UTI is controversial due to its limited urinary excretion (5–35%).3,4 However, it may be an alternative in the treatment of prostatitis.2

In terms of pharmacokinetics, tigecycline presents an excellent tissue penetration, showing a high volume of distribution (7–9L/kg).5–7 Prostate penetration depends on the lipophilicity and degree of ionization of the drug. Tetracyclines, due to their high lipophilicity, penetrate up to 90–100% in the prostatic tissue, although specific data for tigecycline are lacking.5–7 Other interesting characteristics include its long elimination half-life (42h), allowing the once-daily administration.7,8 This dosing has shown optimal therapeutic levels (maximum concentration 1.5mg/L), considering that, for Enterobacterales, its pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index is the area under the curve/MIC15–20. These concentrations guarantee sufficient levels based on the established cut-off of 0.5mg/L.5–8 However, this approach is experimental with very limited clinical evidence.7,8

Tigecycline has demonstrated clinical and microbiological cure in complicated UTIs (77.4–78.6% and 85.7%, respectively).3,9 Concerning prostatitis, some cases have demonstrated its clinical effectiveness without safety issues.3,6,9,10

In our case, the use of tigecycline for the treatment of ESBL-K. pneumoniae prostatitis optimized tolerability, avoiding ertapenem-associated adverse effects while maintaining clinical effectiveness. Once-daily administration regimen allowed early hospital discharge to home hospitalization, reducing the risk of nosocomial complications, and improving patient's quality of life.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest or source of funding for the present study.

References
[1]
K.Z. Vardakas, G.D. Kalimeris, N.A. Triarides, M.E. Falagas.
An update on adverse drug reactions related to β-lactam antibiotics.
Expert Opin Drug Saf, 17 (2018), pp. 499-508
[2]
B.A. Lipsky, I. Byren, C.T. Hoey.
Treatment of bacterial prostatitis.
Clin Infect Dis, 50 (2010), pp. 1641-1652
[3]
K. Brust, A. Evans, R. Plemmons.
Tigecycline in treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacillus urinary tract infections: a systematic review.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 69 (2014), pp. 2606-2610
[4]
D. Nix, K. Matthias.
Should tigecycline be considered for urinary tract infections?. A pharmacokinetic re-evaluation.
J Infect Dis, 198 (2008), pp. 1243-1246
[5]
D. Bates, M. Parkins, R. Hellweg, K. Gibson, J.M. Bugar.
Tigecycline treatment of urinary tract infection and prostatitis: case report and literature review.
Can J Hosp Pharm, 65 (2012), pp. 209-215
[6]
E.L. Priore, D.M. Livermore, N. Buetti, P. Jent, N. Pelzer, C. Casanova, et al.
Successful treatment of acute prostatitis caused by multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli with tigecycline monotherapy.
Open Forum Infect Dis, 7 (2020), pp. 1-2
[7]
B.A. Cunha, J. Baron, C.B. Cunha.
Once daily high dose tigecycline – pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic based dosing for optimal clinical effectiveness: dosing matters, revisited.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther, 15 (2017), pp. 257-267
[8]
J. Baron, S. Cai, N. Klein, B. Cunha.
Once daily high dose tigecycline is optimal: tigecycline PK/PD parameters predict clinical effectiveness.
J Clin Med, 7 (2018), pp. 49
[9]
Y.X. Liu, K.J. Le, H.Y. Shi, Z.L. Zhang, M. Cui, H. Zhong, et al.
Efficacy and safety of tigecycline for complicated urinary tract infection: a systematic review.
Transl Androl Urol, 10 (2021), pp. 292-299
[10]
D.M. Drekonja, J.R. Johnson.
Tigecycline treatment for urinary tract infections: case report and literature review.
J Chemother, 23 (2011), pp. 168-170
Copyright © 2022. Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

Quizás le interese:
10.1016/j.eimce.2020.06.012
No mostrar más