Regístrese
Buscar en
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (English Edition) Assessment of biofilm production in Candida isolates according to species and or...
Journal Information
Vol. 35. Issue 1.
Pages 37-40 (January 2017)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
483
Vol. 35. Issue 1.
Pages 37-40 (January 2017)
Brief report
DOI: 10.1016/j.eimce.2017.01.011
Full text access
Assessment of biofilm production in Candida isolates according to species and origin of infection
Determinación de la producción de biopelícula en aislados de Candida de acuerdo con las especies de Candida y el origen de la infección
Visits
483
María Guembea,
Corresponding author
mariaguembe@hotmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Raquel Crucesa, Teresa Peláeza,b, Patricia Muñoza,b,c, Emilio Bouzaa,b,c, on behalf of the GEIDI study group
a Servicio de Microbiología Clínica y Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
b Medicine Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
c CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES CD06/06/0058), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
This item has received
483
Visits
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Tables (1)
Table 1. Description of biofilm production according to Candida spp. and clinical specimens.
Abstract

The biofilm production (BP) of 200 clinical strains of Candida isolated during 2010–2013 were assessed using an in vitro model and a comparison of the results was made between species and between origins of the infections. The BP was assessed using the crystal violet assay, and the strains were classified as low, moderate, or high biofilm producers. Candida tropicalis had the highest values for BP, which varied depending on the origin of the infection. Assessment of BP is a key diagnostic tool that enables us to better understand Candida infections.

Keywords:
Candida
Biofilm production
Clinical samples
Crystal violet binding assay
Cut-off
Resumen

Desde 2010 a 2013 evaluamos la producción de biopelícula (PB) en 200 cepas clínicas de Candida y comparamos los resultados de las especies de Candida entre los orígenes de la infección mediante un modelo in vitro. La PB se determinó con el ensayo de cristal violeta y las cepas se clasificaron como baja, moderada o altamente productoras de biopelícula. C. tropicalis tuvo los valores más altos de PB, y la PB en Candida varió dependiendo del origen de la infección. La determinación de la PB es una herramienta diagnóstica importante para entender mejor las infecciones por Candida.

Palabras clave:
Candida
Producción de biopelícula
Muestras clínicas
Tinción cristal violeta
Punto de corte
Full Text
Introduction

Candida albicans is the most common cause of oropharyngeal and cutaneous candidiasis, and non-albicans species are increasingly associated with invasive candidiasis.1Candida bloodstream infection is one of the main nosocomial infections, with high morbidity and mortality. The ease with which some Candida strains adhere to natural or artificial surfaces to create aggregates (biofilm) increases their virulence and the likelihood of chronic infection.2

Biofilm production (BP) by Candida species has been assessed mainly using the crystal violet binding assay. However, most studies report BP without a standard cut-off and are generally based on Candida species isolated from patients with candidemia.3–6 Data regarding BP in Candida species isolated from different sites are scarce.

Our objective was to test BP in clinical strains of Candida and compare the results between Candida species and between different sites of infection.

Methods

We performed a prospective in vitro study of BP in 200 clinical strains of Candida species isolated from 155 patients admitted to our institution during 2010–2013. The Candida species were distributed as follows: C. albicans, 41 (20.5%); C. parapsilosis, 40 (20.0%); C. krusei, 40 (20.0%); C. glabrata, 39 (19.5%); C. tropicalis, 22 (11.0%); and C. guilliermondii, 18 (9.0%). The sources of the Candida isolates were as follows: urine, 33 (16.5%); biopsy specimens, 28 (14.0%); respiratory tract, 26 (13.0%); blood, 24 (12.0%); sterile liquids, 18 (9.0%); wound, 13 (6.5%); abscess, 10 (5.0%); catheter, 8 (4.0%); prosthetic material, 3 (1.5%); and other, 37 (18.5%).

The yeasts were identified using the ID 32C system (bioMérieux).

BP was assessed using the crystal violet binding assay.3,7

Laboratory procedure

Isolates were grown on Sabouraud dextrose agar for 24h at 37°C. Two or three colonies from each plate were inoculated into 20mL of yeast peptone dextrose (YPD) medium and incubated for 18h at 30°C on an orbital shaker. They were then centrifuged at 3500rpm for 5min, washed twice with 10mL of phosphate-buffered saline, and re-suspended in RPMI 1640 medium. After being standardized to 1×106CFU/mL in RPMI, 100μL of the suspension was placed in the wells of a 96-well, flat-bottomed microtiter plate and incubated for 24h at 37°C. The suspensions were discarded, and the wells were washed 3 times with sterile phosphate-buffered saline and filled with crystal violet for 15min. The wells were then washed and the residue solubilized with acetic acid. The suspension was transferred to clean wells, and absorbance was detected in the spectrophotometer at 550nm. Each experiment was performed in triplicate, and the average value was used for the analysis.

Statistical analysis

The qualitative variables appear with their frequency distributions. Values for continuous variables are expressed as the mean (SD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) when applicable. Categorical variables were evaluated using the chi-square or 2-tailed Fisher exact test. Normally distributed continuous variables were compared using the t test. We determined the cut-offs for BP using a ROC curve. The Games–Howell test was used to compare BP between the species and between the types of samples. The comparison between BP and origin of the infection was made irrespective of the Candida species.

Statistical significance was set at p <0.05 (2-tailed). All statistical tests were performed using SPSS version 21.0.

Ethics

The study was approved by the local ethics committee.

Results

Of the 155 patients, 129 (83.2%) had only 1 Candida species isolated in 1 clinical specimen and 26 (16.8%) had 2 or more isolates at the same or different sites (mean [SD] no. of isolates per patient, 1.26 [0.75]). Only 6 patients (3.9%) had the same Candida species in different clinical specimens.

After the analysis using the crystal violet assay, we determined the following cut-offs for BP in Candida strains: low, <1; moderate, 1–2; and high, >2.

BP was low in 53.0% of isolates, moderate in 24.0%, and high in 23.0%. The mean (SD) BP for the different Candida species was as follows: C. albicans, 1.8 (0.5); C. parapsilosis, 1.3 (0.9); C. krusei, 0.4 (0.3); C. glabrata, 0.3 (0.4); C. tropicalis, 2.4 (0.7); and C. guilliermondii, 0.6 (0.5) (Table 1 and Fig. 1). Analysis of the degree of BP in the different Candida species showed that most C. albicans were high or moderate biofilm producers (92.6%) and that C. parapsilosis were mainly low or moderate biofilm producers (72.5%). In contrast, almost all C. krusei, C. glabrata, and C. guilliermondii were low biofilm producers (92.5%, 92.3%, and 77.8%, respectively). The highest BP values were found for C. tropicalis (72.7%).

Table 1.

Description of biofilm production according to Candida spp. and clinical specimens.

Specie (n, %)BPp
Mean (SD)  LowaN (%)  ModeratebN (%)  HighcN (%) 
          <0.001 
C. albicans (41, 20.5)  1.8 (0.5)  3 (7.3)  19 (46.3)  19 (46.3)   
C. parapsilosis (40, 20.0)  1.3 (0.9)  15 (37.5)  14 (35.0)  11 (27.5)   
C. krusei (40, 20.0)  0.4 (0.3)  37 (92.5)  3 (7.5)  0 (0.0)   
C. glabrata (39, 19.5)  0.3 (0.4)  36 (92.3)  3 (7.7)  0 (0.0)   
C. tropicalis (22, 11.0)  2.4 (0.7)  1 (4.5)  5 (22.7)  16 (72.7)   
C. guilliermondii (18, 9.0)  0.6 (0.5)  14 (77.8)  4 (22.2)  0 (0.0)   
Clinical specimens (n, %)
          <0.001 
Urine (33, 16.5)  0.8 (0.7)  21 (63.6)  9 (27.3)  3 (9.1)   
Biopsy (28, 14.0)  1.5 (0.8)  8 (28.6)  10 (35.7)  10 (35.7)   
Respiratory tract (26, 13.0)  0.4 (0.4)  24 (92.3)  1 (3.8)  1 (3.8)   
Blood (24, 12.0)  1.4 (0.9)  8 (33.3)  8 (33.3)  8 (33.3)   
Normally sterile fluids (18, 9.0)  1.6 (1.1)  6 (33.3)  4 (22.2)  8 (44.4)   
Wound (13, 6.5)  0.9 (0.8)  9 (69.2)  3 (23.1)  1 (7.7)   
Abscess (10, 5.0)  1.3 (1.0)  5 (50.0)  2 (20.0)  3 (30.0)   
Catheter (8, 4.0)  1.7 (0.6)  2 (25.0)  2 (25.0)  4 (50.0)   
Prosthetic material (3, 1.5)  1.8 (0.8)  0 (0.0)  2 (66.7)  1 (33.3)   
Other (37, 18.5)  0.9 (0.8)  23 (62.2)  7 (18.9)  7 (18.9)   
Total (200)    106 (53.0)  48 (24.0)  46 (23.0)   

BP, biofilm production; SD, standard deviation.

a

Low, <1.

b

Moderate, 1–2.

c

High, >2.

Fig. 1.

Comparison of biofilm production between Candida species.

(0.09MB).

Comparison of Candida BP between clinical specimens revealed that high-biofilm-producing species were those colonizing normally sterile body fluids, biopsy specimens, and catheter samples, whereas low-biofilm-producing species of Candida strains were those colonizing urine and respiratory tract samples (Table 1). Comparison of BP according to the origin of the isolates revealed statistically significant differences only between BP in blood and respiratory tract samples (mean BP, 1.4 vs. 0.4; p=0.002) and between respiratory tract and sterile fluids (mean BP, 0.4 vs. 1.6; p=0.010), biopsy specimens (mean BP, 0.4 vs. 1.5; p<0.001), and catheter (mean BP, 0.4 vs. 1.7; p=0.009).

Discussion

BP in Candida varies with the species and is highest with C. tropicalis. In addition, higher BP correlates with deep-seated infection.

BP is an important virulence factor of Candida species, and the methodology used to test it has not been well standardized. A recent study by Marcos-Zambrano et al.3 was the first to assess the BP of Candida species isolated from blood by comparing biomass production and metabolic activity to establish tentative cut-offs so that isolates could be classed as low-, moderate-, or high-biofilm-producing. In our study, we used the crystal violet assay to detect BP and obtained similar cut-offs to classify Candida strains according to BP.

Analysis of differences in the degree of BP by Candida species revealed that C. tropicalis was the highest biofilm producer and that C. albicans and C. parapsilosis were moderate or high producers, as previously described.8,9

BP is highly dependent on the conditions under which the biofilm is formed (e.g., type of implanted device and its location); therefore, its values can differ between sites of infection.10,11 Shin et al.12 compared BP in Candida isolated from blood and from other anatomical sites and demonstrated that Candida species isolated from blood produced higher amounts of biofilm than Candida species isolated from other sites (57% vs. 32%, p<0.001). However, they did not classify BP as low, moderate, or high. In our study, we only found statistically significant differences in BP between blood and respiratory tract samples (mean BP, 1.4 vs. 0.4; p=0.002). Moreover, we showed that Candida species isolated from samples from patients with deep-seated infection (normally sterile fluids, biopsy specimens, and catheter samples) produced more biofilm than those isolated from urine and respiratory tract samples (mean BP, 1.5 vs. 0.8; p<0.001).

Therefore, our findings demonstrate that, as BP was higher among C. tropicalis and among clinical specimens from deep tissues, it may play a key role in clinical outcome by acting as a reservoir for re-infection. Early detection of Candida BP can be useful in predicting the severity of the infection and in clinical decision making.

One of the main limitations of the study was that the methodology for testing BP could have influenced the results, as we did not test BP in parallel with the metabolic activity of Candida biofilms. Moreover, as the methodologies differ between studies, the results may not be comparable. Another limitation was that we could not compare the differences between species according to the clinical specimens because of the small numbers of isolates in the subgroups. However, our study is the first in which Candida species isolated from several clinical samples are classified according to the degree of BP and in which BP was evaluated according to species of Candida and type of clinical specimens. Research is currently under way in studies based on the XTT assay and larger samples.

Our data demonstrate that BP varies according to the Candida species and the site of the infection. Consequently, the capacity of Candida species to produce biofilm may be a reflection of the pathogenic potential of the isolates.

Financial support

M. Guembe is supported by the Miguel Servet Program (ISCIII-MICINN) from the Health Research Fund (FIS), of the Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII), Madrid Spain, partially financed by the by the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) “A way of making Europe”. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgement

We thank Thomas O’Boyle for his help in the preparation of the manuscript.

References
[1]
P.G. Pappas, C.A. Kauffman, D.R. Andes, C.J. Clancy, K.A. Marr, L. Ostrosky-Zeichner, et al.
Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Clin Infect Dis, 62 (2016), pp. e1-e50
[2]
R. Rajendran, L. Sherry, C.J. Nile, A. Sherriff, E.M. Johnson, M.F. Hanson, et al.
Biofilm formation is a risk factor for mortality in patients with Candida albicans bloodstream infection-Scotland, 2012–2013.
Clin Microbiol Infect, 22 (2016), pp. 87-93
[3]
L.J. Marcos-Zambrano, P. Escribano, E. Bouza, J. Guinea.
Production of biofilm by Candida and non-Candida spp. isolates causing fungemia: comparison of biomass production and metabolic activity and development of cut-off points.
Int J Med Microbiol, 304 (2014), pp. 1192-1198
[4]
M. Guembe, J. Guinea, L.J. Marcos-Zambrano, A. Fernandez-Cruz, T. Pelaez, P. Munoz, et al.
Micafungin at physiological serum concentrations shows antifungal activity against Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis biofilms.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 58 (2014), pp. 5581-5584
[5]
M. Tumbarello, B. Fiori, E.M. Trecarichi, P. Posteraro, A.R. Losito, A. De Luca, et al.
Risk factors and outcomes of candidemia caused by biofilm-forming isolates in a tertiary care hospital.
[6]
M. Tumbarello, B. Posteraro, E.M. Trecarichi, B. Fiori, M. Rossi, R. Porta, et al.
Biofilm production by Candida species and inadequate antifungal therapy as predictors of mortality for patients with candidemia.
J Clin Microbiol, 45 (2007), pp. 1843-1850
[7]
G.A. O’Toole.
Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay.
J Vis Exp, 30. (2011),
[8]
V. Mohandas, M. Ballal.
Distribution of Candida species in different clinical samples and their virulence: biofilm formation, proteinase and phospholipase production: a study on hospitalized patients in southern India.
J Glob Infect Dis, 3 (2011), pp. 4-8
[9]
A.V. Ferreira, C.G. Prado, R.R. Carvalho, K.S. Dias, A.L. Dias.
Candida albicans and non-C. albicans Candida species: comparison of biofilm production and metabolic activity in biofilms, and putative virulence properties of isolates from hospital environments and infections.
Mycopathologia, 175 (2013), pp. 265-272
[10]
R.M. Donlan.
Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces.
Emerg Infect Dis, 8 (2002), pp. 881-890
[11]
J.W. Song, J.H. Shin, D.H. Shint, S.I. Jung, D. Cho, S.J. Kee, et al.
Differences in biofilm production by three genotypes of Candida parapsilosis from clinical sources.
Med Mycol, 43 (2005), pp. 657-661
[12]
J.H. Shin, S.J. Kee, M.G. Shin, S.H. Kim, D.H. Shin, S.K. Lee, et al.
Biofilm production by isolates of Candida species recovered from nonneutropenic patients: comparison of bloodstream isolates with isolates from other sources.
J Clin Microbiol, 40 (2002), pp. 1244-1248
Copyright © 2016. Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

es en pt
Política de cookies Cookies policy Política de cookies
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.