Buscar en
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (English Edition) Antimicrobial stewardship programs in pediatrics: A growing reality in our count...
Journal Information
Vol. 40. Issue 2.
Pages 51-52 (February 2022)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 40. Issue 2.
Pages 51-52 (February 2022)
Editorial
Full text access
Antimicrobial stewardship programs in pediatrics: A growing reality in our country
Programas de optimización del uso de antimicrobianos en pediatría: una realidad creciente en nuestro país
Visits
315
Aurora Fernández-Poloa, Pere Soler-Palacínb,
Corresponding author
psoler@vhebron.net

Corresponding author.
a Servei de Farmàcia, Hospital Infantil, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
b Unitat de Patologia Infecciosa i Immunodeficiències de Pediatria, Hospital Infantil, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
Related content
Pedro Brotons, Miquel Villaronga, Desirée Henares, Georgina Armero, Cristian Launes, Iolanda Jordan, Carmen Muñoz-Almagro
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2022;40:59-6510.1016/j.eimce.2021.05.012
Cristina Villanueva-Bueno, Elena Montecatine-Alonso, Francisco Jiménez-Parrilla, Cecilia M. Fernández-Llamazares, Silvia Manrique-Rodríguez, Elena Zamora-Flores, Elisenda Dolz, Aurora Fernández-Polo, Félix Catillo-Salinas, Juanjo Comuñas, Carmen Gallego-Fernández, María González-López, María-Teresa Gómez-Trevecedo Calvo, Rocío Gázquez-Pérez, Concepción Álvarez del Vayo-Benito, Maria-Victoria Gil-Navarro
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2022;40:78-8110.1016/j.eimce.2021.05.013
Silvia Simó Nebot, María G. López-Ramos, Eneritz Velasco-Arnaiz, Iolanda Jordan, Clàudia Fortuny, Antoni Noguera-Julian
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text

The current rise in antimicrobial resistance is a well-recognized global health threat. Antimicrobial use in human and animal health, as well as in other activities has been identified as a factor accelerating the emergence of resistance mechanisms. Forecasts for the coming years in this line are alarming, as it is estimated that antimicrobial resistance could lead to the premature death of some 300 million people worldwide, with a significant negative impact on the world economy.1

Resistance to antibiotics is also an important health problem in children. Data from the annual mortality report in Spain show that the third most frequent cause of mortality in infants younger than one year is infectious disease leading to neonatal early- and late-onset sepsis.2 Furthermore, an estimated 30% of deaths from sepsis in neonates worldwide is due to multi-resistant bacterial infections.3,4

In the last decade, efforts have been intensified to deal with what is already considered a silent pandemic at the global level. National and international government agencies have defined strategic plans to curb the growing emergence of resistance to antimicrobials. In this direction, the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products (AEMPS) has published the National Plan against Antibiotic Resistance (PRAN), which establishes an urgent need to put into practice antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) at different care levels to improve antimicrobial use.5

Although we have clear recommendations regarding ASPs for the adult population,6 there are still some unknowns about the best strategies to improve antimicrobial use in children.7 Several scientific societies and health organizations have recognized children as a key priority population group for the development of ASPs, and some recommendations have been drawn up for implementation of ASPs in children and newborns.8–11 These have been designed taking into consideration existing differences in the etiology and clinical features of infections in children, the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the agents used in this population, the incidence of infections due to resistant microorganisms, and the less extensive evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of some antibiotics in neonates and children.

Antimicrobial prescription in children's hospitals varies considerably between different centers and countries. It is estimated that more than 40% of hospitalized pediatric patients receive at least one antibiotic during admission, and in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) the prescription rate may rise above 60%.12,13 At the primary care level, several reports have noted an upward trend in inappropriate pediatric use of broad-spectrum antibiotics to treat acute respiratory infections, antibiotic prescription for viral respiratory infections, and treatments of unnecessarily long duration.14 Thus, there is an evident need for specific ASPs for this population, in which relevant and sustainable indicators for each healthcare level and age group are defined. These programs should allow continuous monitoring of antimicrobial use, but also attend to clinical and microbiological indicators to enable actions for improvement.15

Recently, Donà et al.16 conducted a systematic review of studies on pediatric ASPs published between 2007 and 2018, which confirmed that that implementation of these programs in pediatrics also has a significant impact on reducing the use of antibiotics, lowering health costs, and decreasing antimicrobial resistance. To date, pediatric ASPs have been developed mainly in the United States (only 28 of the 113 hospitals identified by Donà et al. were in European countries), but they are now emerging in Europe, although with important differences between countries.10

Thus, the presence of three articles in this issue of Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica related to various pediatric and neonatal ASPs carried out in Spain is particularly noteworthy. These studies cover both diagnostic aspects (Brotons et al.17) and monitoring of antimicrobial use in highly vulnerable, pediatric populations: neonatal patients (Villanueva-Bueno et al.18) and those admitted to PICUs (Simó Nebot et al.19).

In their study on the use of diagnostic tests in acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in children admitted to the PICU, Brotons et al.17 note that defining the etiology of ARIs is challenging in this population because of the non-specificity of the symptoms, especially in the youngest patients. The authors evaluate the usefulness of conducting microbiological screening upon admission using molecular biology techniques in respiratory samples, almost exclusively nasopharyngeal aspirates. This approach includes the main causes of viral ARIs in pediatrics, as well as Bordetella pertussis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Clamydophila pneumoniae. The authors found that routine addition of this study to their standard of care significantly increased the diagnostic yield, almost entirely because of virus detection, with a response time of less than 3h. Despite these results, the impact on antimicrobial prescription was modest, as is usually the case in high-risk patients such as those admitted to the PICU. The authors justify these findings by citing the practice of waiting until bacteriological results from standard studies are available before withdrawing empirical antibiotics. Nonetheless, it seems reasonable to advocate more proactive attitudes in patients who have no other risk factors for bacterial coinfection, which is rare according to the authors’ data. Reasoned use of clinical and analytical parameters can be of aid for better prescription of antimicrobials in these patients.17 In any case, the benefits of incorporating diagnostic stewardship programs to ASPs and infection control programs was demonstrated once again.

Although most objectives of ASPs in children are the same as those in the adult population, one of the main differences for their implementation is the need to use appropriate measures for this age group, especially for calculating antimicrobial consumption, with DOT (days of therapy) being the most widely used indicator.9,15

Regarding this aspect, at the same children's hospital in Barcelona, Simó Nebot et al.19 quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate the use of antimicrobials in their PICU for one year. Appropriate use of antimicrobials in pediatric and neonatal intensive care units is especially complicated due to several factors: the severity of the patients’ clinical course, the higher prevalence of multiresistant microorganisms, and the reluctance of treating physicians to withdraw empirical treatment despite negative microbiological results. This PICU study mainly involved surgical and community-acquired infections within a short time frame. Overall, the quality of prescription was acceptable, but a need to reduce both the spectrum of antibiotics used and their duration was manifested, especially in perioperative prophylaxis. Extension of this type of study to PICUs of other centers in our country would promote suitable benchmarking focused on detecting potential points of improvement in each center.

Finally, Villanueva-Bueno et al.18 investigate an alternative method to DOT for calculating antimicrobial consumption in the neonatal population, as they did within the KiDDDs group for children in 2018.20 The study was carried out using a Delphi method, and neonatologists and pharmacists from the main neonatal intensive care units in Spain participated. Although DOT is recognized as a standard measure for the pediatric and neonatal population, calculation of this parameter is not a simple task and requires the center to have computerized electronic prescription. As not all centers have data on microbial use in DOT, an adaptation of the defined daily dose (DDD), the measure generally used as the standard unit in adults, could provide them with an approximation of the data required for monitoring antimicrobial consumption in children and neonates. The unit of measurement proposed by Villanueva-Bueno et al.18 could be an alternative for quantifying antimicrobial consumption in this population at the hospital level, but it will require validation by scientific societies for generalized use.

These valuable studies related to specific ASPs for children and neonates should serve as a stimulus for other groups to develop their own programs and publish their results to bring to light points of improvement from intra- and inter-hospital comparisons. Initiatives such as creation of the VINCat PROA Pediatrics program in Catalonia and the ASP group of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases (SEIP) are vital to provide a definitive push toward generalization of healthcare quality programs considered essential by national and international healthcare organizations both at the hospital level and in primary care.

References
[1]
J.O’. Neill.
Antimicrobial resistance: tackling a crisis for the health and wealth of nations.
Rev Antimicrob Resist Chaired, (2014),
[2]
Ministerio de Sanidad. Patrones de mortalidad en España, 2017. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad, 2020.
[3]
L. Folgori, S.J. Ellis, J.A. Bielicki, P.T. Heath, M. Sharland, M. Balasegaram.
Tackling antimicrobial resistance in neonatal sepsis.
Lancet Glob Heal, 5 (2017), pp. e1066-e1068
[4]
L. Liu, S. Oza, D. Hogan, J. Perin, I. Rudan, J.E. Lawn, et al.
Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000–13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis.
[5]
Spanish Goverment, Ministry of Health consumption and social wellness. Plan estratégico y de acción para reducir el riesgo de selección y diseminación de la resistencia a. 2015.
[6]
J. Rodríguez-Baño, J.R. Paño-Pardo, L. Alvarez-Rocha, Á. Asensio, E. Calbo, E. Cercenado, et al.
Programas de optimización de uso de antimicrobianos (PROA) en hospitales españoles: documento de consenso GEIH-SEIMC, SEFH y SEMPSPH.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin, 30 (2012),
[7]
C. Tersigni, E. Venturini, C. Montagnani, E. Chiappini, M. de Martino, L. Galli.
Antimicrobial stewardship in children: more shadows than lights?.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther, 17 (2019), pp. 871-876
[8]
Policy Statement on Antimicrobial Stewardship by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:322–7.
[9]
V. Probst, F. Islamovic, A. Mirza.
Antimicrobial stewardship program in pediatric medicine.
Pediatr Investig, 5 (2021), pp. 229-238
[10]
A. Brett, J. Bielicki, J.G. Newland, F. Rodrigues, U.B. Schaad, M. Sharland.
Neonatal and pediatric antimicrobial stewardship programs in europe—defining the research agenda.
Pediatr Infect Dis J, 32 (2013), pp. e456-e465
[11]
E.J. Godbout, A.L. Pakyz, J.D. Markley, A.J. Noda, M.P. Stevens.
Pediatric antimicrobial stewardship: state of the art.
Curr Infect Dis Rep, 20 (2018), pp. 39
[12]
A. Versporten, J. Bielicki, N. Drapier, M. Sharland, H. Goossens, G.M. Calle, et al.
The worldwide antibiotic resistance and prescribing in european children (ARPEC) point prevalence survey: developing hospital-quality indicators of antibiotic prescribing for children.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 71 (2016), pp. 1106-1117
[13]
J.S. Gerber, J.G. Newland, S.E. Coffin, M. Hall, C. Thurm, P.A. Prasad, et al.
Variability in antibiotic use at children's hospitals.
Pediatrics, 126 (2010), pp. 1067-1073
[14]
A.L. Hersh, M.A. Jackson, L.A. Hicks.
Principles of judicious antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections in pediatrics.
Pediatrics, 132 (2013), pp. 1146-1154
[15]
J.S. Gerber, M.A. Jackson, P.D. Tamma, T.E. Zaoutis.
Antibiotic stewardship in pediatrics.
[16]
D. Donà, E. Barbieri, M. Daverio, R. Lundin, C. Giaquinto, T. Zaoutis, et al.
Implementation and impact of pediatric antimicrobial stewardship programs: a systematic scoping review.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control, 3 (2020), pp. 1-12
[17]
P. Brotons, M. Villaronga, D. Henares, G. Armero, C. Launes, I. Jordan, et al.
Clinical impact of rapid viral respiratory panel testing on pediatric critical care of patients with acute lower respiratory infection.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin, 40 (2022), pp. 53-58
[18]
C. Villanueva-Bueno, E. Montecatine-Alonso, F. Jiménez-Parrilla, C.M. Fernández-Llamazares, S. Manrique-Rodríguez, E. Zamora-Flores, et al.
Antimicrobial defined daily dose in neonatal population.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin, 40 (2022), pp. 59-65
[19]
S. Simó Nebot, M.G. López-Ramos, E. Velasco-Arnaiz, I. Jordan, C. Fortuny, A. Noguera-Julian.
Impact and quality of antimicrobial use in a referral pediatric intensive care unit.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin, 40 (2022), pp. 78-81
[20]
E. Montecatine-Alonso, M.V. Gil-Navarro, C.M. Fernández-Llamazares, A. Fernández-Polo, P. Soler-Palacín, J. Llorente-Gutiérrez, et al.
Antimicrobial defined daily dose adjusted by weight: a proposal for antibiotic consumption measurement in children.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin, 37 (2019), pp. 301-306
Copyright © 2021. Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

Quizás le interese:
10.1016/j.eimce.2023.06.005
No mostrar más