TY - JOUR T1 - The utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values in the risk stratification of prostate cancer using a 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging without endorectal coil JO - Acta Urológica Portuguesa T2 - AU - Dias,João Lopes AU - Pina,João Magalhães AU - Costa,Nuno Vasco AU - Carmo,Sandra AU - Leal,Cecília AU - Bilhim,Tiago AU - Marques,Rui Mateus AU - Pinheiro,Luís Campos SN - 23414022 M3 - 10.1016/j.acup.2016.06.002 DO - 10.1016/j.acup.2016.06.002 UR - https://www.elsevier.es/en-revista-acta-urologica-portuguesa-214-articulo-the-utility-apparent-diffusion-coefficient-S2341402216300210 AB - PurposeTo evaluate the relationship between mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and post-surgical Gleason scores. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) on a 1.5T magnet in distinguishing low, intermediate and high-grade prostate tumors. Material and methodsThis is a retrospective institutional-review-board-approved, single-center study including 30 patients (median age, 60 years) who underwent mp-MRI before prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Using histological reports for guidance, the tumors were localized in ADC maps, and mean ADCs were measured and examined for correlation with Gleason scores. 2 patients had 2 measurable foci, so a total of 32 tumors were studied. The diagnostic accuracy of the mean ADC was assessed by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). ResultsIn the differentiation of tumors with a Gleason score of 6 from those with a Gleason score of at least 7, mean ADC yielded an AUC of 0.76 (95% confidence interval: 0.59, 0.93). In the differentiation of tumors with Gleason scores of 6 or 7 from those with a Gleason score of at least 8, mean ADC yielded an AUC of 0.94 (95% confidence interval: 0.86, 1.00). ConclusionMean ADC values may allow a correct assessment of the patient risk using a 1.5T magnet without ERC. ER -