Buscar en
Revista Médica del Hospital General de México
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Médica del Hospital General de México First isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Chromobacterium viol...
Información de la revista
Vol. 81. Núm. 2.
Páginas 66-71 (Abril - Junio 2018)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
4091
Vol. 81. Núm. 2.
Páginas 66-71 (Abril - Junio 2018)
Original Article
Open Access
First isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Chromobacterium violaceum from oysters in Mexico
Primer aislamiento y pruebas de susceptibilidad antimicrobiana de Chromobacterium violaceum en ostras en México
Visitas
4091
R. Berebichez-Fridmana, S. Solano-Gálvezb, N.I. Copitin-Niconovac, J.A. Ruy-Díaz Reynosod, T. Barrientos-Fortese, R. Vázquez-Lópezf,
Autor para correspondencia
rosalino.microbiologia@gmail.com

Corresponding author at: School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Anahuac University North Campus, Av. Universidad Anáhuac, no. 46, Col. Lomas Anáhuac, Huixquilucan, Edo. de México C.P. 52786, Mexico.
a School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Anahuac University North Campus, Huixquilucan, Mexico
b Titular Academic Technician and Microbiology and Parasitology professor at the Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Auto¿noma de Me¿xico, Mexico
c Titular Academic Technician at the Immunoparasitology Laboratory, Cell Physiology Institute, Universidad Nacional Auto¿noma de Me¿xico, Mexico
d Director of School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Anahuac University North Campus, Mexico
e Dean of Health Sciences Faculty, Anahuac University North Campus, Mexico
f Microbiology and Parasitology professor, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Anahuac University North Campus, Mexico
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Tablas (5)
Table 1. Biochemical test of BD BBL™ Crystal Identification System Enteric/Nonfermenter ID Kit and its abbreviations.
Table 2. Antibiotics used in the antimicrobial susceptibility test.
Table 3. Biotype and confidence factor of Chromobacterium violaceum isolations.
Table 4. Biochemical profiles of Chromobacterium violaceum strains isolated from oysters.
Table 5. Antimicrobial susceptibility test.
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Abstract
Introduction

Chromobacterium violaceum is a Gram-negative, facultative, anaerobic, non-sporing, fermentative and oxidase-positive coccobacillus. Human infections caused by Chromobacterium violaceum are infrequent. There are a few reported cases in several countries. Those infections appear after a skin contact with soil or contaminated water. Infections can progress to necrotizing metastatatic lesions and multiple abscesses of the lung, liver, skin, spleen, lymph nodes and brain with fatal septicemia. Infections caused by this bacterium have a high lethality rate, with a low recovery rate among survivors. It has been described that this bacterium is resistant to several antibiotics.

Materials and methods

Chromobacterium violaceum was isolated, cultivated, and identified from oysters from thirteen different restaurants in Mexico City and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed.

Results

Four isolations of Chromobacterium violaceum were obtained from oysters. Three of them corresponded to biotype 36 and all of them had a confidence factor of 0.987. All isolations were resistant to Carbencillin, Cephalothin and Cephotaxime. Two isolations were also resistant to Ampicillin and one was resistant to Amikacin. All isolations were sensitive to Ceftriaxone, Chloramphenicol, Gentamicin, Netilmicin, Nitrofurantoin, Pefloxacine and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole.

Conclusions

The presence of Chromabacterium violaceum in food obtained from salt marshes that usually are eaten fresh (like oysters) means a high potential risk for human health because this bacterium has been associated with high morbidity and mortality. In our report, this bacterium showed resistance to several antibacterial agents. Patients should be cautions when eating fresh seafood, and healthcare personnel should suspect an infection caused by Chromobacterium violaceum if the patient presents with sepsis, enteritis or abscesses and they have risk factors for acquiring this bacterium in order to provide prompt treatment and reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with the infection. This work represents the first isolation, cultivation and identification of Chromobacterium violaceum in Mexico.

Keywords:
Chromobacterium violaceum
Oyster
Enteritis
Septicemia
Abscess
Resumen
Introducción

Chromobacterium violaceum es un cocobacilo Gram negativo, facultativo, anaeróbico, no formador de esporas, fermentativo y oxidasa positivo. Las infecciones en humanos causadas por Chromobacterium violaceum son infrecuentes. Existen pocos reportes de casos en varios países. Estas infecciones aparecen después del contacto de la piel con el suelo o con agua contaminada. Las infecciones pueden progresar a lesiones necrotizantes metastásicas y múltiples abscesos en pulmón, hígado, piel, bazo, ganglios linfáticos y cerebro y septicemia letal. Las infecciones causadas por esta bacteria tienen una alta tasa de letalidad, con una baja tasa de recuperación entre los sobrevivientes. Se ha descrito que esta bacteria es resistente a varios antibióticos.

Material y métodos

Se aisló, cultivó e identificó Chromobacterium violaceum en ostras de trece distintos restaurantes de la Ciudad de México y se realizaron estudios de susceptibilidad antimicrobiana.

Resultados

Cuatro aislamientos de Chromobacterium violaceum fueron obtenidos de ostras. Tres de los aislamientos correspondieron al biotipo 36 y todos tuvieron un nivel de confianza de 0.987. Todos los aislamientos fueron resistentes a Carbenicilina, Cefalotina y Cefotaxima. Dos aislamientos fueron también resistentes a Ampicilina y uno fue resistente a Amikacina. Todos los aislamientos fueron sensibles a Ceftriaxona, Cloranfenicol, Gentamicina, Netilmicina, Nitrofurantoína, Pefloxacina y Trimetoprim-Sulfametoxazol.

Conclusiones

La presencia de Chromobacterium violaceum en alimentos obtenidos de marismas los cuales son ingeridos frescos (como las ostras), representa un alto potencial de riesgo para la salud humana, ya que esta bacteria se ha asociado con enteritis aguda, septicemia y con la formación de abscesos diseminados. En nuestro reporte, esta bacteria demostró una resistencia a varios agentes antimicrobianos. Los pacientes deben de ser cuidadosos al ingerir pescados y mariscos frescos, y el personal de salud debe de sospechar una infección causada por Chromobacterium violaceum si el paciente se presenta con sepsis, enteritis o abscesos, y si tiene los factores de riesgo para adquirir esta bacteria, con el objetivo de dar un tratamiento oportuno y reducir la morbi-mortalidad asociada con esta infección. Este trabajo representa el primer aislamiento, cultivo e identificación de Chromobacterium violaceum en México.

Palabras clave:
Chromobacterium violaceum
Ostra
Enteritis
Septicemia
Absceso
Texto completo
Introduction

Chromobacterium violaceum is a Gram-negative, facultative, anaerobic, fermentative and oxidase-positive coccobacillus.1–4 This bacterium is frequently found in the soil and water as part of the normal flora of tropical and subtropical climates. It is not part of the normal flora of the human.4–6

The first reported case of Chromobacterium violaceum infection in humans is from Malaysia and Lesslar described it in 1927 in a patient with fatal septicemia and a liver abscess.7 Eleven years later, Black and Shahan described the first case in the United States.8,9 Since then, only 150 cases have been reported. Human infections caused by Chromobacterium violaceum are infrequent and there are few cases reported in Brazil, Argentina, Cuba, India, Japan, Nigeria, Singapore, Taiwan, Sri Lanka, United States of America, Vietnam, Australia and other countries.1–16

The most common mode of entry of the bacteria appears to be the contact of injured skin and subcutaneous tissue with contaminated soil or water.3,17,18 The infection of Chromobacterium violaceum usually starts as a limited infection of the skin at the point of contact with the bacterium. Then it progresses to necrotizing metastatatic lesions and multiple abscesses of the lung, liver, skin, spleen, lymph nodes and brain.19–27 Fatal septicemia has been associated clinically in adults along with high fiver, diffuse abdominal pain, microabscesses with diffuse location in different organs, neutrophilia, alterations in hepatic and kidney function tests, altered mental status, thermodynamic changes and death.10,16,17,25,28–30 Other pathologies that are reported include chronic granulomatosis, cellulitis, osteomyelitis, septic spondylitis, diarrhea, peritonitis, conjunctivitis and periorbial and ocular infection.2,30–32,21 Of the reported cases most of them have a high lethality, with a low recovery rate among survivors.13,17,33

Chromobacterium violaceum can be misidentified with Burkholderia pseudomallei by some identification methods, so care must be taken during the diagnostic evaluation.34 There are some reports in which antimicrobial therapy was successful, particularly with ciprofloxacin together with Amikacin, Piperacillin-Tazobactam and Trimethoprim-Sulfametoxazole as reported in some cases.13,17,33–35 Nevertheless in many of the cases there have been reports of defects in empirical treatment.10,16,25

It has been reported that Chromobacterium violaceum is a bacterium that has multiple antimicrobial resistances, and since infection by this bacterium is rare, there are no clinical trials evaluating different treatments. Among the antibiotics to which the resistance has been observed in vitro are Ampicillin, Cephalothin, Cefoxitin, Cefriaxone, Cephotaxime and Ceftazidime. On the other hand, it appears to be sensitive in vitro to Gentamicin, Amikacin, Tobramycine, Chloramphenicol, Tetracycline, Trimethoprim-Sulfametoxazole, Ciprofloxacin, Imipenem and Cefepime.13,17,33–35 Antibiotics that have been used successfully to treat infection caused by Chromobacterium violaceum include Amikacine, Ciprofloxacine, Co-trimoxazole and Pefloxacin.13,17,33–38

The objectives of this work were to isolate and identify the bacteria Chromobacterium violaceum from oysters for the first time in Mexico and to perform a bacterial sensitivity and resistance investigation.

Materials and methods

We performed a transverse, observational, descriptive study in order to isolate, cultivate and identify Chromobacterium violaceum from oysters in Mexico.

Acquisition of samples

Samples of oysters were obtained directly from 13 restaurants in different locations of Mexico City. The samples were refrigerated, sealed and then transported in thermal boxes made of Styrofoam with gel refrigerants to the microbiology laboratory at the Anahuac University North Campus. The shells of the oysters were washed and disinfected. Then, in aseptic conditions the oysters were opened and the liquid was recollected completely with a sterile disposable syringe.

Microbiological culture

0.1ml of liquid content obtained from the oyster was inoculated in Alkaline Peptone water (Merck, Cat. 101800) with a pH of 9. 6h later, the second inoculums were made in Alkaline Peptone water for another 6h.

The third inoculums were made in Thiosulfate Citrate Bile Sucrose Agar (TCBS, Merck, Cat. 110263) and incubated for 24h at 37°C in aerobic conditions. The colonies obtained in TCBS were cultivated in 5% blood agar for 24h at 37°C in aerobic condition.

Bacterial identification

The cultures obtained in blood agar colonies were stained in Gram (Golden Bell Reactives TM DMACA TM, Cat. 261181) and indole (BBL TM DMACA TM, Cat. 261187) and biochemical tests for bacterial identification (BD BBL TM Crystal Identification System Enteric/Non-fermenter ID Kit, Cat. 245000).

The oxidase test was performed as the following: three drops of the reagent were added to the Whatman filter paper number 1 in sterile conditions and 3–4 pure colonies were pleated over it. After 10–30s the reading was performed and the results were interpreted: the violet color or purple color as a positive and without a change as a negative.

The indole test was achieved as the following: 3 drops of a reagent were deposited in Whatman filter paper number 1 in sterile conditions and 3–4 pure colonies were pleated over it. The reading took place after 2min and the results interpreted: blue-green color as a positive and pink or no change of color as a negative.

For the biochemical identification test, the pure colonies obtained in blood agar were taken and then deposited in one tube. The inoculums were adjusted to one scale of Mac Farland 1.0 in Nephelometer (BBL TM Crystal Spec tm Nephetometer Cat. 245009). The bacterial suspension was transferred then in sterile conditions to the Crystal system and incubated without CO2 with 40–60% of humidity at 37°C for 18h. (Table 1)

Table 1.

Biochemical test of BD BBL™ Crystal Identification System Enteric/Nonfermenter ID Kit and its abbreviations.

OXI: Oxidase  IND: Índole 
ARA: Arabinose  MNS: Mannose 
SUC: Sucrose  MEL: Melibiose 
RHA: Rhamnose  SOR: Sorbitol 
MNT: Manitol  ADO: Adonitol 
GAL: Galactose  INO: Inositol 
PHO: p-n-p Phosphate  BGL: p-n-p a b Glucoside 
NPG: p-n-p b Galactoside  PRO: Proline Nitroanilide 
BPH: p-n-p Dis-Phosphate  BXY: p-n-p Xyloside 
AAR: p-n-p a Arabinoside  PHC: p-n-p Phosphorylcholine 
GLR: p-n-p b Glucuronide  NAG: p-n-p N Acetyl Glucosiminide 
GGL: g-l-Glutamil P-Nitroanilida  ESC: Esculin 
PHE: p-n-dl-Phenylalanine  URE: Urea 
GLY: Glycine  CIT: Citrate 
MLO: Malonic acid  TTC: Triphenyl Tetrazolium Chloride 
ARG: Arginine  LIS: Lysine 

The results were read in BD BBLTM Crystal Auto Reader (Cat. 245300) applying BD BBL TM Crystal TM MIND Software (Cat. 441010).

Antimicrobial susceptibility test

4–5 colonies from the pure colonies obtained in blood agar were resuspended in a physiological solution and adjusted to one standard of Mac Farland of 0.5. The bacterial suspension was then transferred to the Muller Hinton medium (BD, Cat. 221177) using a sterile hyssop followed by Multidisc Gram Negative analysis (Bio Rad, Cat, 71080280). The analysis was performed in less then 15min taken from the last inoculation and to the plate. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 18–20h without CO2 (Table 2).

Table 2.

Antibiotics used in the antimicrobial susceptibility test.

Abbreviations  Antibiotic 
AK  Amikacin 
AM  Ampicillin 
CB  Carbencillin 
CF  Cephalothin 
CTX  Cephotaxime 
CRO  Ceftriaxone 
CL  Chloramphenicol 
GE  Gentamicin 
NET  Netilmicin 
NF  Nitrofurantoin 
PEF  Pefloxacine 
SXT  Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole 
ResultsBacterial identification

Small, light violet 2mm colonies isolated from TCBS medium were composed of Gram-negative bacillus. The pure colonies of 3–4mm approximately were obtained from blood agar. The biochemical identification test and the antimicrobial susceptibility tests were realized.

Among the samples taken from 13 different restaurants, 4 samples resulted positive to Chromobacterium violaceum, all isolations having a high confidence factor (Table 3).

Table 3.

Biotype and confidence factor of Chromobacterium violaceum isolations.

Number of sample  Bacterium  Biotype  Confidence Factor 
M5  Chromobacterium violaceum  36  0.9777 
M6  Chromobacterium violaceum  8277  0.987 
M12  Chromobacterium violaceum  36  0.9777 
M13  Chromobacterium violaceum  36  0.9777 

The biochemical profile between the four isolations of Chromobacterium violaceum was similar (Table 4). However, the differences in two substrates between 3 isolations of biotype 8277 were detected. The biotype 8277 showed that the positive oxidase reaction is weaker than the positive Malonic acid reaction, and could be different in this biotype without mentioning that it is a different species, as a confidence factor is 0.987.

Table 4.

Biochemical profiles of Chromobacterium violaceum strains isolated from oysters.

Biochemical test  OXI  IND  ARA  MNS  SUC  MEL  RHA  SOR  MNT  ADO  GAL  INO  PHO  BGL  NPG  PRO 
Bacterium
5 C. violaceum  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  − 
6 C. violaceum  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  − 
12 C. violaceum  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  − 
13 C. violaceum  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  −  − 
Biochemical test  BPH  BXY  AAR  PHC  GLR  NAG  GGL  ESC  PHE  URE  GLY  CIT  MLO  TTC  ARG  LYS 
Bacterium
5 C. violaceum  −  −  −  −  −  − 
6 C. violaceum  −  −  −  −  − 
12 C. violaceum  −  −  −  −  −  − 
13 C. violaceum  −  −  −  −  −  − 
Antimicrobial susceptibility tests

As it is shown in Table 5, all isolations were resistant to Carbenicillin, Cephalothin y Cephatoxime. Two isolations from biotype 36 (samples 12 and 13) and from biotype 8277 (sample 6) were resistant to Ampicillin; another isolation from biotype 36 (sample 5) was sensitive. With respect to Amikacin, only sample 12 (the biotype 36) resulted resistant. Finally, all isolations were sensitive to Ceftriaxone, Chloramphenicol, Gentamicin, Netilmicin, Nitrofurantoin, Pefloxacine and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole. In this case, no correlation was observed between antimicrobial resistance and the biotype studied.

Table 5.

Antimicrobial susceptibility test.

  Antimicrobial agent  AKAMCBCFCTXCROCLGENETNFPEFSXT
   
Sample  Bacterium and biotype                                                 
C. violaceum (36)  20  24  12  32  20  20  20  17  20  25 
C. violaceum (8277)  22  27  26  20  21  24  22  25 
12  C. violaceum (36)  14  21  29  20  15  21  20  27 
13  C. violaceum (36)  22  27  26  20  21  24  22  25 

Note: L, measure in millimeters of diameter of inhibition; I, interpretation; S, sensible; R, resistant.

Discussion and conclusions

For the first time in Mexico we isolated, cultivated and identified Chromobacterium violaceum with a high grade of confidence. The bacteria was isolated from oysters, which represent a principle source of disease and could play an important role in the development of infection associated with a high morbidity and mortality, especially because oysters are consumed fresh and raw. In addition to the isolation and identification of the bacteria, the antimicrobial susceptibility tests that were performed showed that this bacterium is resistant to many of the commonly used antibiotics, which should be taken into account when treating a patient infected by Chromobacterium violaceum.

The isolation and identification of a potentially pathogen microorganism with a high mortality rate that was found in seafood which is consumed fresh and raw, is of great importance to the public health.

The principal market in Mexico City supplies most restaurants working with seafood. Therefore we can suppose that bacteria and biotype in these foods have more or less the same pattern of distribution, as it was observed in biotype 36. Therefore, it is obvious that it is necessary to perform more studies about the frequency of those pathogens and other bacteria and make a correlation of those results and diseases associated with the consumption of these foods. In addition, the authorities should have stricter rules and laws regarding the distribution, refrigeration and consumption of seafood, to prevent diseases associated with their consumption.

Since this is the first isolation of Chromobacterium violaceum in Mexico, there is not much information about this bacterium in this country. Also, since the infection cause by this bacterium is uncommon, most of the diagnostic and treatment evidence is taken from case reports. Because of this lack of information, many cases of enteritis and septicemia with multiple abscesses receive inappropriate treatment as this bacterium showed a resistance to many antimicrobials.

Cases of suspected infection of Chromobacterium violaceum should prompt bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility tests so an adequate diagnosis can be made and efficient treatment provided.

There are some limitations of this study. First, the design of the study was transverse, which means that the samples were obtained in a given time. In the future, samples should be obtained at different times, so we can detect if the presence of the bacterium continues along time or there is only a particular time when this bacterium is present. Also, the presence of this bacterium in oysters does not necessarily traduce disease in humans, since we are not certain that the gastrointestinal tract is an entrance via of the bacterium that could cause severe disease. In addition, the sample of this study was small. In a future study a bigger and more representative sample should be used. Furthermore, a genomic assay should be performed to further classify and characterize Chromobacterium violaceum.

Finally, it is indispensable to perform further studies and implement effective hygiene and health practices in the processing of foods of sea origin, particularly those that are consumed fresh and raw, like oysters in order to reduce the risk of infection.

Ethical disclosureProtection of human and animal subjects

The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Confidentiality of data

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Right to privacy and informed consent

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References
[1]
P. Ray, J. Sharma, R.S. Marak, et al.
Chromobacterium violaceum septicemia from North India.
Indian J Med Res, 120 (2004), pp. 523-526
[2]
I.C. De Siqueira, J. Dias, H. Ruf, et al.
Chromobacterium violaceum: a case of diarrhea in Senegal.
Pediatr Infect Dis J, 21 (2002), pp. 573-574
[3]
M. Ravish.
Chromobacterium violaceum: a rare bacterium isolated from a wound over the scalp.
Int J Appl Basic Med Res, 2 (2012), pp. 70-72
[4]
C. Richard.
Chromobacterium violaceum, opportunist pathogenic bacteria in tropical and subtropical regions.
Bull Soc Pathol Exot, 86 (1993), pp. 169-173
[5]
J. Lee, J.S. Kim, C.H. Nahm, et al.
Two cases of Chromobacterium violaceum infection after injury in a subtropical region.
J Clin Microbiol, 37 (1999), pp. 2068-2070
[6]
D. Byamukama, A.H. Farnleitner, F. Kansiime, et al.
Contrasting occurrence of Chromobacterium violaceum in tropical drinking water springs of Uganda.
J Water Health, 3 (2005), pp. 229-238
[7]
A. Gómez, J. Devies, M. Rodríguez.
Infección por Chromobacterium violaceum. Descripción de un caso.
Rev Médica la Extensión Port – ULA, 4 (2010), pp. 30-34
[8]
P.H. Sneath, J.P. Whelan, Singh Bhagwan, et al.
Fatal infection by Chromobacterium violaceum.
Lancet, 265 (1953), pp. 276-277
[9]
M.E. Black, J. Shahan.
Bacillus violaceum infection in a human being.
J Am Med Assoc, 110 (1938), pp. 1270-1271
[10]
D.D. Sagin, P.T. Tan, J. Dolkadir.
Chromobacterium violaceum septicemia in Malaysia.
Singap Med J, 35 (1994), pp. 426
[11]
R. Martinez, M.A. Velludo, V.R. Santos, et al.
Chromobacterium violaceum infection in Brazil. A case report.
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo, 42 (2000), pp. 111-113
[12]
L. Vasconcelos, C. Silvany.
Chromobacterium violaceum in siblings, Brazil.
Emerg Infect Dis, 11 (2005), pp. 1443-1445
[13]
S.C. Kauffman, D. Cesaros, A. Schugurensky.
First case report from Argentina of fatal septicemia caused by Chromobacterium violaceum.
J Clin Microbiol, 23 (1986), pp. 956-958
[14]
M. Ballal, P. Kini, D. Rajeshwari, et al.
Chromobacterium violaceum diarrhea.
Indian J Pediatr, 67 (2000), pp. 388-389
[15]
S. Shenoy, S. Baliga, G. Wilson, et al.
Chromobacterium violaceum septicemia.
Indian J Pediatr, 69 (2002), pp. 363-364
[16]
C. Hore.
Important unusual infections in Australia: a critical care perspective.
Crit Care Resusc, 3 (2001), pp. 262-272
[17]
S.E. Huffam, M.J. Nowotny, B.J. Currie.
Chromobacterium violaceum in tropical northern Australia.
Med J Aust, 6 (1998), pp. 335-337
[18]
M.H. Kim, H.J. Lee, J.T. Suh, et al.
A case of Chromobacterium infection after car accident in Korea.
Yonsei Med J, 31 (2005), pp. 700-702
[19]
G. Slesak, P. Douangdala, S. Inthalad, et al.
Fatal Chromobacterium violaceum septicaemia in northern Laos, a modified oxidase test and post-mortem forensic family G6PD analysis.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob, 8 (2009), pp. 24
[20]
Y.L. Chou, P.Y. Yang, L. Huang, et al.
Fatal and non-fatal chromobacterial septicemia: report of two cases.
Chang Gung Med J, 23 (2000), pp. 492-497
[21]
P.L. Shao, P.R. Hsueh, Y.C. Chang, et al.
Chromobacterium violaceum infection in children: a case of fatal septicemia with nasopharyngeal abscess and literature review.
Pediatr Infect Dis J, 21 (2002), pp. 707-709
[22]
C.H. Chen, L.C. Lin, C.E. Liu, et al.
Chromobacterium violaceum bacteremia: a case report.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect, 36 (2003), pp. 141-144
[23]
Y. Ang.
A very rare and rapidly fatal case of Chromobacterium violaceum septicemia.
Med J Malays, 59 (2004), pp. 535-537
[24]
K.L. Brown, A. Stein, D.S. Morrell.
Ecthyma gangrenosum and septic shock syndrome secondary to Chromobacterium violaceum.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 54 (2006), pp. 224-228
[25]
J.P. Casalta, Y. Peloux, D. Raoult, et al.
Pneumonia and meningitis caused by a new nonfermentative unknown gram-negative bacterium.
J Clin Microbiol, 27 (1989), pp. 1446-1448
[26]
A. Chattopadhyay, V. Kumar, N. Bhat, et al.
Chromobacterium violaceum infection: a rare but frequently fatal disease.
J Pediatr Surg, 37 (2002), pp. 108-110
[27]
Y.L. Chou, P.Y. Yang, C.C. Huang, et al.
Fatal and non-fatal chromobacterial septicemia: report of two cases.
Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi, 23 (2000), pp. 492-497
[28]
M. Fombuena, J.E. Ballester, F. Pedro, et al.
Near-fatal septicemia with Chromobacterium violaceum.
Med J Aust, 19 (1989), pp. 720-721
[29]
D.D. Grier, J. Qiu, K. Rand, et al.
Pathologic quiz case: a 13-year-old boy with a 2-day history of fever, vomiting, and mental status changes. Chromobacterium violaceum bacteremia.
Arch Pathol Lab Med, 128 (2004), pp. 131-132
[30]
J. Martin, J. Brimacombe.
Chromobacterium violaceum septicemia: the intensive care management of two cases.
Anaesth Intensive Care, 20 (1992), pp. 88-90
[31]
S. Perera, P.M. Punchihewa, M.C. Karunanayake, et al.
Fatal septicemia caused by Chromobacterium violaceum.
Ceylon Med J, 48 (2003), pp. 26-27
[32]
A.Y. Teoh, M. Hui, K.Y. Ngo, et al.
Fatal septicemia from Chromobacterium violaceum: case reports and review of the literature.
Hong Kong Med J, 12 (2006), pp. 228-231
[33]
J. Watine, A. Courtade, E. Pham, et al.
Chromobacterium violaceum peritonitis: case report and literature review.
Ann Biol Clin, 64 (2006), pp. 327-330
[34]
S. Sirinavin, C. Techasaensiri, S. Benjaponpitak, et al.
Invasive Chromobacterium violaceum infection in children: case report and review.
Pediatr Infect Dis J, 24 (2005), pp. 559-561
[35]
H.P. Tee, A.L. Francis, S.H. How.
Chromobacterium violaceum infection.
Br J Hosp Med, 67 (2006), pp. 208-209
[36]
C.C. Moore, J.E. Lane, J.L. Stephens.
Successful treatment of an infant with Chromobacterium violaceum sepsis.
Clin Infect Dis, 15 (2001), pp. 107-110
[37]
N. Duran, F.M. Menck.
Chromobacterium violaceum: a review of pharmacological and industrial perspectives.
Crit Rev Microbiol, 27 (2001), pp. 201-222
[38]
S. Dutta, S.K. Dutta.
Multidrug resistant Chromobacterium violaceum: an unusual bacterium causing long standing wound abscess.
Indian J Med Microbiol, 21 (2003), pp. 217-218
Copyright © 2016. Sociedad Médica del Hospital General de México
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas