Información del artículo
Summary
Cervical incompetence is a clinical entity characterized by painless cervical dilatation which happens during the second trimester of pregnancy, with membranes bulging into the vagina. This is followed by premature rupture of the membranes and expulsion of the fetus. Recurrence in future pregnancies is typical. Treatment is surgical in the majority of cases with cervical cerclage. The diagnosis and indications por this procedure are under discussion.
Resumen
La incompetencia cervical es una entidad clínica que se caracteriza por dilatación cervical indolora que acontece durante el segundo trimestre del embarazo con prolapso de membranas y protrusión de éstas en la vagina, seguidos de rotura prematura de membranas y expulsión fetal. Es típica la recurrencia en futuros embarazos. El tratamiento en la mayoría de los casos es quirúrgico, a través de un cerclaje cervical, cuyos indicación y diagnóstico están en discusión.
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
L. Counsis.
Cervical incompetence: a time for reappraisal.
Clin Obstet Gynecol, 23 (1980), pp. 467-479
[2.]
WL Holcomb, JS. Smeltzer.
Cervical effacement: variation among clinicians.
Obstet Gynecol, 78 (1991), pp. 43-45
[3.]
P Buekens, S Alexander, M Boutsen, B Blondel, M Kaminski, M Reid, et al.
Randomised controlled trial of routine cervical examinations in pregnancy.
Lancet, 334 (1994), pp. 841-844
[4.]
F Bonilla-Musoles, V Rosciszewki, J Blanes, L Abad, F Bonilla, F Neuspiller, al. et.
La incompetencia cervical. ed Bonilla- Musoles F, editor. Ecografía vaginal.
[5.]
JE Brown, GA Thieme, DM. Shah.
Transabdominal and trasvaginal endosonography: evaluation of the cervix and lower uterine segment in pregnancy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 155 (1986), pp. 721-726
[6.]
HF. Andersen.
Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography of the uterine cervix during pregnancy.
J Clin Ultrasound, 19 (1991), pp. 77-83
[7.]
JD Soneck, J Iams, M. Blumenfeld.
Measurement of cervical length in pregnancy: comparison between vaginal ultrasonography and digital examination.
Obstet Gynecol, 162 (1990), pp. 1603-1610
[8.]
KW Fong, D. Farine.
Incompetencia cervical y parto pretérmino. ed: Rumack.
[9.]
B Miskovic, A Klobucar, M Kos, V. Latin.
Evaluación del cérvix durante el embarazo.
Ecografía en medicina materno-fetal,
[10.]
WH Mitchel, C Montgomery, J. Karo.
Ultrasound differentiation of the competent from the incompetent cervix: prevention of preterm delivery.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 154 (1986), pp. 537-546
[11.]
ER Guzmán, JC Rosemberg, C Houligan, J Ivan, R Waldron, R. Knuppel.
A new method using vaginal ultrasound and transfundal pressure to evaluate the asymptomatic incompetent cervix.
Obstet Gynecol, 83 (1994), pp. 248-252
[12.]
R Goldenberg, S Cliver, J. Bronstein.
Bed and rest in pregnancy.
Obstet Gynecol, 84 (1994), pp. 40-46
[13.]
HF Andersen, CE Nugent, SD Wanty, RH. Hayashi.
Predic- tion of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical lengh.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 163 (1990), pp. 589-593
[14.]
R Gómez, M Galasso, R. Romero.
Sonographic examination of the uterine cervix is a better predictor of the likelihood of preterm delivery than digital examination of the cervix in preterm labor with intact membranes.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 71 (1994), pp. 956-964
[15.]
A Welsh, K. Nicolaides.
Cervical screening for preterm delivery.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 14 (2002), pp. 195-202
[16.]
TR Varma, RH Patel, U. Pillai.
Ultrasonic assessment of cervix in at risk patients.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 65 (1986), pp. 147-152
[17.]
O Kushir, DA Vigil, L. Izquierdo.
Vaginal ultrasonographic assessment of cervical lengh changes during normal pregnancy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 162 (1990), pp. 991-993
[18.]
ER Guzmán, C Houlihan, A Vintzileos, J Ivan, C Benito, K. Kappy.
The significance of transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix in women treated with emergency cerclage.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 175 (1996), pp. 471-476
[19.]
V Tsatsaris, MV Senat, A Gervaise, H. Fernández.
Balloon replacement of fetal membranes to facilitate emergency cervical cerclage.
Obstet Gynecol, 98 (2001), pp. 243-246
[20.]
T Rechberger, G Pietras, A. Adamiak.
Emergency cerclage with concomitant amniocentesis as a method of treatment of membranes prolapse.
Ginekol Pol, 72 (2001), pp. 1112-1115
[21.]
SM Althuisius, GA Dekker, P Hummel, DJ Bekedam, HP. Van Geijn.
Final results of the Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial: therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 185 (2001), pp. 1106-1112
[22.]
SM Althuisius, GA Dekker, HP. Van Geijn.
Cervical incompetence: a reappraisal of an obstetric controversy.
Obstet Gynecol Surv, 57 (2002), pp. 377-387
[23.]
MS To, V Palaniappan, C Skentou, D Gibb, KH. Nicolaides.
Elective cerclage vs. ultrasound-indicated cerclage in highrisk pregnncies. Ultrasound.
Obstet Gynecol, 19 (2002), pp. 475-477
[24.]
A Strauss, IM Heer, U Janssen, C Dannecker, P Hillemanns, S. Muller-Egloff.
Routine cervical cerclage in higher order multiegestation –does it prolong the pregnancy?.
Twin Res, 5 (2002), pp. 67-70
[25.]
RB Newman, RS Krombach, MC Myers, DL. McGee.
Effect of cerclage on obstetrical outcome in twin gestations with a shortened cervical length.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 186 (2002), pp. 634-640
[26.]
HF. Andersen.
Prediction of cervical cerclage outcome by endovaginal ultrasonography.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 171 (1994), pp. 1102-1106
[27.]
JD Iams, RL Goldenberg, PJ. Meis.
The lengh of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery.
N. Engl J Med, 334 (1996), pp. 567-572
Copyright © 2003. Elsevier España, S.L.. Todos los derechos reservados
