Portable coagulometer devices in the monitoring and control of oral anticoagulation therapy: a systematic review

Published in Aten Primaria. 2011;43:148-56. - vol.43 núm 03

Abstract

Objective

To compare portable coagulometer devices and conventional coagulometers. The clinical validity will be estimated via anticoagulation control (maintenance of therapeutic range), patient satisfaction, thrombotic or haemorrhagic events and mortality. Analytical validity will be studied in quality control terms.

Design

Systematic review.

Data sources

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, CRD, Cochrane, EMEA, FDA, EuroScan and the ClinicalTrials.gov.

Methods

Inclusion criteria were studied in patients on anticoagulation therapy who used portable coagulometer devices. In an additional undertaking, the comparison with lab references was looked for, in order to evaluate the effectiveness. The quality of selected studies was assessed according to CASPe check-list. As meta-analysis was not possible, a qualitative synthesis was made.

Results

Four evaluation reports and 7 systematic reviews were selected (two of them with meta-analysis). After these, 22 original articles were included for this review and they had high or very high score for CASPe check-list (≥7/10). Almost all of the studies found very high correlations between portable coagulometer devices and conventional coagulometers (r>90), and clinical advantages such as lower incidence of thromboembolism events. Three systematic reviews showed a lower mortality index.

Conclusions

The analytical-validity related articles show that portable coagulometers have an equivalent effectiveness to conventional coagulometers. Studies that include patient-reported outcomes show that self-monitoring patients, by means of portable coagulometers, have better analytical measurement results and fewer rates of thromboembolic events. Survival was analysed in very few studies; nevertheless, all of these show lower mortality. Similarly, the minority of selected articles includes economic evaluations, although they suggest a better cost-effectiveness of portable coagulometers compared to the conventional mode.

Key words: Oral anticoagulation therapy. Coagulometer. Point of care systems. Health technology assessment. Systematic review.

Lea el contenido completo de este artículo

¿Ya estás registrado?

Compre este artículo por 22 €

Accederá de inmediato al texto completo del artículo. Además, lo tendrá accesible para siempre desde su cuenta de usuario.

Suscríbase a la revista

Acceda a todos los artículos de la revista "Atención Primaria" sin limitaciones.

Caballero-Villarraso, Javiera,b; Villegas-Portero, Románb; Rodríguez-Cantalejo, Fernandoa

aServicio de Análisis Clínicos, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, España

bAgencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias de Andalucía (AETSA), Sevilla, España