Buscar en
Porto Biomedical Journal
Toda la web
Inicio Porto Biomedical Journal Antihypertensive effects of two novel dihydropyridine derivatives
Journal Information
Vol. 2. Issue 5.
Pages 230 (September - October 2017)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 2. Issue 5.
Pages 230 (September - October 2017)
PS120
Open Access
Antihypertensive effects of two novel dihydropyridine derivatives
Visits
2248
M. khoramjouy1,
Corresponding author
khoramjou.mona@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, A. Feizi2, M. Mahmoudian3, M. Faizi4
1 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Pharmaceutical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, school of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text

Aim: Treatment of hypertension.

Introduction: Mebudipine and dibudipine are two novel derivations of dihydropyridine (DHP) Ca2+ channel blockers. Previous studies have shown that these two compounds have relaxant effects on vascular smooth muscles. In addition, DPHs are able to reduce contraction force of cardiac muscle in rat. In this study we decided to evaluate the antihypertensive effects of these two novel DHPs in hypertensive rat.

Methods: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were used in the study (8–10 weeks old). The rats were randomly divided to 4 groups of 10 rats (one control and 3 test groups). Blood pressure was measured by Tail cuff method. Left kidneys of the rats were removed by nephrectomy and sodium chloride 1% was added to the drinking water of animals and desoxycorticosterone acetate 20mg/kg (SC) were injected twice a week. During and after 4 weeks, blood pressure of animals was evaluated to confirm the hypertension. Blood pressure of the animals was measured before i.p. injection of mebudipine and dibudipine (1–8μmole/kg) and 2min after the drug administration.

Results: Mebudipine and dibudipine significantly reduced the systolic blood pressure. Mebudipine was more effective than dibudipine and nifedipine in hypertensive animals and has significant results.

Conclusion: Previous studies showed that i.p. injection and oral usage of mebudipine and dibudipine decrease systolic hypertension in normotensive animals, on the other hand vasodilation effects of DHPs have been proved on aorta. Both novel drugs showed significant reduction in systolic blood pressure in hypertensive animals and mebudipine was more potent than dibudipine and nifedipine (as a standard drug uses). It is remarkable that, two new DHPs have similar efficacy and safety profile, but have higher efficacy compared to nifedipine in present study. The brilliant point is that DHPs as calcium channel blockers are more effective in hypertensive animals compared to normotensive animals.

Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos