x

Política de cookies

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso.

Más información
Permissions Requests - Help - - Sign up - Phone number 902 888 740
Search

2016 FI

2.103
© Thomson Reuters, Journal Citation Reports, 2016

Indexed in:

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Science Citation Index Expanded, Alerting Services and Neuroscience, Neuroscience Citation Index, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, IBECS, MEDES

Metrics

  • Impact Factor: 2,103 (2016)
  • CiteScore 2017: 0.06
    Read more
  • SCImago Journal Rank (SJR):0,104
  • Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP):0,019

© Thomson Reuters, Journal Citation Reports, 2017

Neurologia 2018;33:137-8 - DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2016.01.005
Letter to the Editor
Cognitive profile of a child with SOS1 mutation in Noonan syndrome
Perfil cognitivo de un niño con síndrome de Noonan con mutación genética SOS1
A. Martínez Planellóa,, , , M. Sotilloa, F. Rodríguez-Santosa,b
a Departamento de Psicología Básica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
b Equipo Específico de Discapacidad Motora, Consejería de Educación, Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Dear Editor:

We present the neuropsychological profile of a 7-year-old boy with Noonan syndrome (NS) and SOS1 mutation.1 Studies on NS usually present a general, non-specific image of cognitive impairment; in our opinion, this is due to the limited number of studies and the small samples included, which do not accurately represent the variability of the condition, since they group together patients with different mutations.2–5 The case we present is interesting due to the scarcity of literature on the differential cognitive characteristics observed in this mutation, in comparison with the disability reported in other, more frequent mutations.

We present the case of a boy who was diagnosed with NS at the age of 4 by means of the polymerase chain reaction method. The medical history suggested normal development of motor, communication, and language skills.

We assessed his performance in several cognitive processes. His general ability index was 131, and composite score (CS) was 98 on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV).

Attention. The patient obtained normal results in information processing speed (Conners’ Continuous Performance Test II [CPT-II] version 5: CS=61) and in cue-based tasks in WISC-IV (scaled score [SS]=11). He scored poorly (SS=6) in the symbol search subtest, which indicates difficulties in visual perception, confirmed by scores below the mean on the Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities (ITPA) (T-score=26). Variability of response time to stimuli (CPT-II: SS=51) and attentional vigilance (CS=50) were normal. Results for selective and focused attention (CPT-II) were normal, but with many omissions (CS=99), suggesting inattention. Results for response style were average (CPT-II: CS=55).

Perception. The patient obtained average results for visual discrimination (CPT-II score=51). In the perceptual reasoning subtests (WISC-IV), he scored highly in block design (SS=14) and picture concepts (SS=12), and very highly in matrix reasoning (SS=19). Visual processing (WISC-IV) scores were average in the block design+picture completion tests (CS=91). In the ITPA, he obtained lower scores on the visuomotor channel than on the auditory-vocal channel. Concept visual comprehension was very good (T-score=43, M=35) and comprehension of relationships between visual stimuli was average (T-score=34). At the automatic level, he scored poorly for visual integration (T-score=26).

Memory. Regarding working memory (WISC-IV), he obtained low-normal scores on the digit span (SS=8). He obtained a slightly below-average score for visual sequential memory (ITPA: T-score=32). Results in WISC-IV subtests for long-term memory (CS=99.6) and general information (CS=96) were excellent.

Language. Scores for verbal comprehension in the WISC-IV were high in similarities (SS=14), very high in vocabulary (SS=19), and average in the comprehension subtest (SS=11). In fluid verbal reasoning, he obtained high average scores (CS=95). Scores for lexical knowledge were high (99.6). The results on the auditory-vocal subtests in the ITPA representational level indicate an age equivalent to his age (mean=35). Story retelling (T-score=36, M=35) and verbal analogies (T-score=36) results were normal. He obtained average scores (STEN score=6) in verbal expression in the ENFEN test battery. In the automatic level of the ITPA, the patient scored highly for the knowledge and use of grammatical structures (T-score=38). He also obtained average scores (T-score=40) on word production, related to phonological awareness.

Executive functions. Scores in response inhibition and motor control (CPT-II) were average (S=42). Performance in perseveration (CPT-II) was good (CS=30); performance in visual search, attention, and cognitive flexibility was normal (STEN score=5) in basic tasks and poor in complex tasks (STEN score=1). In the ENFEN, results were very low (STEN score=2) in the planning test and extremely low in resistance to interference (STEN score=1).

Motor skills. Scores for motor skills on the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities (MSCA) suggest that his performance is below that expected for his age (CS=10).

Our results are relevant for the differential characterisation of NS cognitive functioning as well as for the psychological and educational approach to patients with SOS1 mutations. Further studies on the functional variability of the different mutations associated with NS should be performed.

References
1
F. Lepri,A. de Luca,L. Stella,C. Rossi,G. Baldassarre,F. Pantaleoni
SOS1 mutations in Noonan syndrome: molecular spectrum, structural insights on pathogenic effects and genotype-phenotype correlations
Hum Mutat, 32 (2011), pp. 760-772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/humu.21492
2
I. Van der Burgt,G. Thoonen,N. Roosenboom,C. Assman-Hulsmans,F. Gabreels,B. Otten
Patterns of cognitive functioning in school-age children with Noonan syndrome associated with variability in phenotypic expression
J Pediatr, 135 (1999), pp. 707-713
3
D.A. Lee,S. Portnoy,P. Hill,C. Gillberg,M.A. Patton
Psychological profile of children with Noonan syndrome
Dev Med Child Neurol, 47 (2005), pp. 35-38
4
E.I. Pierpont,M.E. Pierpont,N.J. Mendelsohn,A.E. Roberts,E. Tworog-Dube,M.S. Seidenberg
Genotype differences in cognitive functioning in Noonan syndrome
Genes Brain Behav, 8 (2009), pp. 275-282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2008.00469.x
5
T. Horiguchi,K. Takeshita
Neuropsychological developmental change in a case with Noonan syndrome: longitudinal assessment
Brain Dev, 25 (2003), pp. 291-293

Please cite this article as: Martínez Planelló A, Sotillo M, Rodríguez-Santos F. Perfil cognitivo de un niño con síndrome de Noonan con mutación genética SOS1. Neurología. 2018;33:137–138.

Corresponding author. (A. Martínez Planelló almudenaplanello@gmail.com)
Copyright © 2015. Sociedad Española de Neurología