Buscar en
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (English Edition) Association of prenatal antibiotics and the etiology of early neonatal sepsis in...
Journal Information
Vol. 36. Issue 7.
Pages 460-461 (August - September 2018)
Vol. 36. Issue 7.
Pages 460-461 (August - September 2018)
Letter to the Editor
Full text access
Association of prenatal antibiotics and the etiology of early neonatal sepsis in a neonatal care unit
Asociación de antibióticos prenatales y etiología de la sepsis neonatal temprana en una unidad de cuidados neonatales
Visits
1235
Juan Carlos Lona-Reyesa,
Corresponding author
carloslona5@hotmail.com

Corresponding author.
, René Oswaldo Pérez-Ramíreza, Edith Adriana Benítez-Vázqueza, Virginia Rodríguez-Patiñoa, Ana Rosa González-Sáncheza, Andrea Karina Montero de Andab, Cuauhtli Emmanuel Arambul-Carrillob
a Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Dr. Juan I. Menchaca, División de Pediatría, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
b Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (1)
Table 1. Microorganisms isolated in patients with early-onset neonatal sepsis in patients with or without prenatal antibiotics.
Full Text
Dear Editor,

Early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) is caused by microorganisms that colonise the birth canal.1 Using prenatal antibiotics has been found to alter the vaginal microbiota2,3 and promote neonatal infections caused by Gram-negative bacilli.4,5 We present a prospective cohort study intended to determine the aetiological agents of EONS depending on the use of prenatal antibiotics and their association with resistance to first-line antimicrobial agents.

The study was conducted between January 2016 and August 2017. All newborns at Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Dr. Juan I. Menchaca in Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, were enrolled. The unit had no programme for prenatal maternal diagnosis of group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection. Prenatal antibiotics were prescribed in the obstetrics and gynaecology department in cases of urinary infection, premature membrane rupture, chorioamnionitis and maternal fever and as prophylaxis in births by Caesarian section.

EONS was diagnosed when newborns showed clinical signs of sepsis and microbial growth in cultures of blood and/or CSF before 72h of age.6 Information was gathered on administration of prenatal antibiotics by interviewing the mother and reviewing the clinical files. Administration was classified as pre-partum (in the 72h before labour) or intra-partum.

During the study, 13,899 births were recorded; 39.3% of which were by Caesarian section. This high frequency was probably due to the study hospital being a specialist facility. Newborns had a gestational age <37 weeks in 13.6% of cases, and in 3.3% of cases there were maternal risk factors for infection: unexplained fever (n=6), chorioamnionitis (n=11), urinary tract infection (n=109) and premature membrane rupture (n=333).

Prenatal antibiotics were received in 24.2% of cases (n=3370). The most commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents were cefalotin (70.4%), ampicillin (20.3%) and clindamycin (4%). Administration was more common in births by Caesarian section (53.8% vs 5.1%; p<0.001), multiple births (60.5% vs 23.1%; p<0.001), premature births (40.7% vs 21.7%; p<0.001), newborns with a weight ≤2500g (38% vs 21.6%; p<0.001) and children of mothers with risk factors for infection (59.5% vs 23%; p<0.001).

Of the 72 EONS events diagnosed (incidence 5.18 per 1000 live newborns), 11 were polymicrobial (Table 1). The most common cause of EONS was enterobacteria (53%). Overall, there was resistance to ampicillin in 88.2% of cases, to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim in 20.5%, to ceftriaxone in 15.9%, to piperacillin-tazobactam in 15.8%, to gentamicin in 13.6%, to meropenem in 9.1% and to amikacin in 2.3%. The most commonly isolated microorganism was Klebsiella pneumoniae (24.1%). This was consistent with patterns of resistance to antimicrobial agents in recent years on our unit.7

Table 1.

Microorganisms isolated in patients with early-onset neonatal sepsis in patients with or without prenatal antibiotics.

Microorganisms  Total
n=83 (100%) 
Prenatal antibioticsp 
    Present
n=37 (%) 
Absent
n=46 (%) 
 
Enterobacteria  44 (53%)  24 (64.9%)  20 (43.5%)  0.05 
Klebsiella pneumoniae  20  12   
Escherichia coli  10   
Enterobacter cloacae   
Citrobacter freundii   
Klebsiella oxytoca   
Raoultella ornithinolytica   
Cronobacter sakazakii   
Enterococcus spp.  14 (16.9%)  5 (13.5%)  9 (19.6%)  0.46 
Enterococcus faecalis   
Enterococcus faecium   
Enterococcus gallinarum   
Staphylococcus spp.  9 (10.8%)  1 (2.7%)  8 (17.4%)  0.03 
Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus   
Staphylococcus aureus   
Streptococcus spp.  6 (7.2%)  0 (0%)  6 (13%)  0.04 
Group B Streptococcus  –   
Streptococcus pneumoniae  –   
Non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli  7 (8.4%)  5 (13.5%)  2 (4.3%)  0.1 
Sphingomonas paucimobilis   
Acinetobacter baumannii   
Other  3 (3.6%)  2 (5.4%)  1 (2.2%)  0.4 
Listeria monocytogenes   
Haemophilus influenzae   
Aeromonas hydrophila   

Similar to that seen by Mayor-Lynn et al.,8 patients infected with Gram-negative bacilli had a lower gestational age (mean 34.3 weeks, p=0.03) and a lower birth weight (mean 2048g, p=0.03); use of intra-partum antibiotics (85.7% vs 54.5%; p<0.05) was also more common in these patients.

When the link between EONS and use of prenatal antibiotics was examined, adjusting for gestational age and weight, no significant association was found (OR 1.4; 95% CI: 0.9–2.4). However, when the relationship between intra-partum antibiotics and EONS due to Gram-negative bacilli was evaluated, it was believed to be significant (OR 4; 95% CI: 1.1–14.2) regardless of age and weight.

When antimicrobial resistance was compared depending on exposure to prenatal antibiotics, resistance rates in enterobacteria were found to be no different. Infections with Enterococcus species featured higher rates of resistance to ampicillin (40% vs 0%, p=0.07) and vancomycin (20% vs 0%; p=0.3), but the relationships were not significant. All strains of Streptococcus spp. (n=6) were isolated in patients with no prenatal antibiotics (p=0.04), all were sensitive to penicillin and, as reported by Capanna et al.,9 there was a high prevalence of resistance to clindamycin in GBS.

Similar to that reported by Stoll et al.,5 a stronger likelihood of infection with Gram-negative bacilli was seen in newborns exposed to antibiotics during labour. Schrag et al.10 found a stable frequency of EONS due to E. coli in premature births with exposure to prenatal antibiotics.

In regions where the primary aetiology of EONS is GBS, prenatal antibiotics have been shown to have a protective effect.4 However, in places were the primary cause is enterobacteria, this effect is uncertain.

References
[1]
K.A. Simonsen, A.L. Anderson-Berry, S.F. Delair, H.D. Davies.
Early-onset neonatal sepsis.
Clin Microbiol Rev, 27 (2014), pp. 21-47
[2]
A. Sullivan, C. Edlund, C.E. Nord.
Effect of antimicrobial agents on the ecological balance of human microflora.
Lancet Infect Dis, 1 (2001), pp. 101-114
[3]
I. Solt.
The human microbiome and the great obstetrical syndromes: a new frontier in maternal-fetal medicine.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 29 (2015), pp. 165-175
[4]
R.S. Baltimore.
Consequences of prophylaxis for group B streptococcal infections of the neonate.
Semin Perinatol, 31 (2007), pp. 33-38
[5]
B.J. Stoll, N. Hansen, A.A. Fanaroff, L.L. Wright, W.A. Carlo, R.A. Ehrenkranz, et al.
Changes in pathogens causing early-onset sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants.
N Engl J Med, 347 (2002), pp. 240-247
[6]
Consejo de Salubridad General.
Prevención, diagnóstico y tratamiento de sepsis y choque séptico del recién nacido en el segundo y tercer nivel de atención.
Secretaria de Salud, (2012),
[7]
J.C. Lona Reyes, M.Á. Verdugo Robles, R.O. Pérez Ramírez, J.J. Pérez Molina, E.P. Ascencio Esparza, E.A. Benítez Vázquez.
Etiology and antimicrobial resistance patterns in early and late neonatal sepsis in a neonatal intensive care unit.
Arch Argent Pediatr, 113 (2015), pp. 317-323
[8]
K. Mayor-Lynn, V.H. González-Quintero, M.J. O'Sullivan, A.I. Hartstein, S. Roger, M. Tamayo.
Comparison of early-onset neonatal sepsis caused by Escherichia coli and group B Streptococcus.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 192 (2005), pp. 1437-1439
[9]
F. Capanna, S.P. Emonet, A. Cherkaoui, O. Irion, J. Schrenzel, B. Martinez de Tejada.
Antibiotic resistance patterns among group B Streptococcus isolates: implications for antibiotic prophylaxis for early-onset neonatal sepsis.
Swiss Med Wkly, 143 (2013), pp. w13778
[10]
S.J. Schrag, M.M. Farley, S. Petit, A. Reingold, E.J. Weston, T. Pondo, et al.
Epidemiology of invasive early-onset neonatal sepsis, 2005 to 2014.
Pediatrics, 138 (2016), pp. e20162013

Please cite this article as: Lona-Reyes JC, Pérez-Ramírez RO, Benítez-Vázquez EA, Rodríguez-Patiño V, González-Sánchez AR, Montero de Anda AK, et al. Asociación de antibióticos prenatales y etiología de la sepsis neonatal temprana en una unidad de cuidados neonatales. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2018;36:460–461.

Copyright © 2018. Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos