Buscar en
Allergologia et Immunopathologia
Toda la web
Inicio Allergologia et Immunopathologia Erythema multiforme to amoxicillin with concurrent infection by Epstein-Barr vir...
Journal Information
Vol. 34. Issue 2.
Pages 76-78 (March 2006)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 34. Issue 2.
Pages 76-78 (March 2006)
Full text access
Erythema multiforme to amoxicillin with concurrent infection by Epstein-Barr virus
Eritema multiforme por amoxicilina e infección recurrente por virus de Epstein-Barr
Visits
18964
Purificación González-Delgadoa, Mar Blanesb, Víctor Sorianoa, Dulce Montoroc, Carlos Loedac, Enrique Niveiroa
a Allergy Seccion. Hospital General de Alicante. Alicante. Spain.
b Dermatology Deparment. Hospital General de Alicante. Alicante. Spain.
c Pediatric Department. Hospital General de Alicante. Alicante. Spain.
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Background: The incidence of rashes following the intake of aminopenicillins during an acute episode of infectious mononucleosis is high, but severe cutaneous reactions as erythema multiforme or Stevens-Johnson syndrome are rare manifestations in childhood. Material and methods: We report the case of a 7 year old girl that developed a generalized purpuric rash with target shaped areas, 9 days after starting treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Laboratory investigation revealed a significant increase of Epstein Barr virus (EBV) specific IgM antibody. After skin biopse she was diagnosed as erythema multiforme syndrome. Prick, intradermal and patch tests were performed with penicilloylpolylysine, minor determinant mixture, benzylpenicillin, ampicillin, amoxicillin, cefazoline and cefotaxime, the 24 hours reading was positive for aminopenicillins. Patch tests were also positive only for aminopenicillins, other betalactams were negative. Conclusions: The interaction between an infectious agent (EBV) and amoxicillin could precipitate the severe skin reaction. Patch test and delayed intradermal reading with amoxicilllin were an useful tool for the diagnosis of the etiological agent in this reaction. The negative response to other beta-lactams, suggests that the aminobenzyl group of the side chain of amoxicillin plays a predominant role in this reaction.
Keywords:
Erythema multiforme
Epstein Barr virus
Amoxicillin
Intradermal test
Patch test
Cell mediated hypersensitivity
Antecedentes. La incidencia de reacciones exantemáticas tras tratamiento con aminopenicilinas durante un episodio de mononucleosis infecciosa es elevada, si bien las reacciones cutáneas graves tales como Eritema multiforme o Sd. de Stevens-Johnson son manifestaciones especialmente infrecuentes en la infancia. Material y métodos: niña de 7 años que desarrolló un rash purpúrico con lesiones en diana, 9 días después de estar recibiento tratamiento con amoxicilina-clavulánico por cuadro febril y amigdalitis. La analítica mostraba un aumento significativo de los anticuerpos IgM específicos a virus Epstein-Barr. La biopsia cutánea fue compatible con el diagnóstico de eritema multiforme. Se realizaron tests cutáneos mediante técnica de prick e intradermorreacción con PPL (peniciloilpolilisina), MDM (mezcla de determinantes antigénicos menores), penicilina G , ampicilina, amoxicilina, cefazolina y cefotaxima que fueron únicamente positivos para aminopenicilinas en lectura retardada. Los test epicutáneos con dichos preparados fueron igualmente positivos para aminopenicilinas también. Conclusiones. En este caso la interacción entre amoxicilina y el virus Epstein Barr pudo precipitar la reacción cutánea grave. Los tests cutáneos en lectura retardada así como los tests epicutáneos fueron útiles en el diagnóstico etiológico de esta reacción. La respuesta cutánea negativa a otros betalactámicos sugiere que el grupo aminobenzil de la cadena lateral de la amoxicilina juega un papel predominante en esta reacción.
Palabras clave:
Eritema multiforme, virus Eptein-Barr, amoxicilina, test intradérmicos, test epicutáneos, hipersensibilidad celular
Full Text

Maculopapular and urticarial rashes are nonimmediate manifestations common during aminopenicillin (AP) treatment, moreover the incidence of rashes following intake of the ampicillin during an acute episode of infectious mononucleosis rises in adults 28.8­69 %, with up to 100 % incidence reported in children 1, but severe cutaneous reactions as erythema multiforme or Stevens-Johnson syndrome are exceedingly rare. The reasons for this unusual high risk has not been elucidated, however, it is well known that viral infections enhace the risk of drug allergic reactions 2.

CASE REPORT

A seven year old girl, previously in good health had a clinical picture of fever, pharyngitis and lymphoadenopathy, that was treated with some doses of paracetamol and amoxicillin ­ clavulanic acid. Nine days after starting such antibiotic she developed a maculopapular rash. She was diagnosed as mononucleosic syndrome (she showed activated lymphocytes in periferal blood) and amoxicillin­clavulanic acid was withdrawn, but her clinical condition deteriorated, so she was admitted to the Department of Pediatrics. She had received amoxicillin-clavulanic previously with good tolerance.

Physical examination of the patient on admission revealed slight fever, oral enanthema and generalized macular rash on face, neck, chin and trunk that spread later to extremities, with tendency to coalescence and being purpuric in chin and neck; target-shaped lesions were also observed in some areas.

Laboratory investigation revealed normal complete blood count, urinalysis, liver and renal function test, electrolytes, coagulation study, serum immunoglobulin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 32 mm the first hour. Her antibodies against herpes virus (HSV) did not increased, but she showed an increase of EBV specific immunoglobulin M antibody.

Skin biopse of a lesion on the arm revealed lymphocyte accumulation at the dermal epidermal interface, with vacuolar degeneration of the basal layer, scattered necrotic keratinocytes, spongiosis, and extravasated erythrocytes and eosinophils, features consistent with the diagnosis of erythema multiforme. The patient started treatment with oral steroid for 12 days. Skin lesions healed with transitory hyperpigmentation.

Skin tests

Two months later, prick and intradermal test (IT) were carried out using penicilloyl-poly-L-lisyne (PPL) and minor determinant mixture (MDM) (both from Allergopharma, Reinbek, Germany) at concentrations of 5 x 10-5 and 2 x 10-2 mM respectively, initially diluted 1:100 in 0.9 % NaCl and as immediate reading was negative, testing were carried out with the undiluted solution, benzylpenicillin (BP) diluted in 0.9 % NaCl and administered at concentrations of 100 IU/ml and 10.000 IU/ml, amoxicillin (AX) (Beecham, Toledo, Spain) and ampicillin (AM) (Antibiotic SA, León, Spain) both at concentrations of 2 and 20 mg/ml, cefazolin (Normon, Spain) and cefotaxime (Aventis pharma S.A) both at 2 and 20 mg/ml also were carried out, the immediate readings were negative for all the reagents, but the 24 hours reading showed erythematous, indurated wheals larger than 10mm, reaching the maximum size at 48 hours for aminopenicillins (amoxicillin and ampicillin).

Patch tests (PT) were administered with PPL, MDM, AX, AM, cefazolin and cefotaxime with a concentration of 5 % in petrolatum, following the recommendations of Brockow et al 3. Only amoxicillin and ampicillin produced positive reactions (2 +) with erythema, infiltration, papules and vesicles.

No specific IgE to amoxicillin and to ampicillin was detected by CAP immunoassay (Pharmacia, Upsala, Sweden).

One year later, the patient was retested with the same allergen battery, showing a persistent positive response to aminopenicillins.

After the episode previously related, the patient took paracetamol with good tolerance.

DISCUSSION

Erythema multiforme (EM), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are mucocutaneous diseases associated with significant morbidity and mortality, being relatively uncommon disorders in children 4.

The causative factors of these disorders that have been identified include infectious agents and drugs. Herpes simplex and mycoplasma pneumoniae are the most common infectious agents and have been casually associated with EM and SJS. All three of the disorders have been linked to drugs, with TEN being exclusively attributed to this factor. More than 100 drugs have been associated with these diseases being sulphonamides, hydantoins, nonsteroidal antiinflamatory drugs and allopurinol the most common implicated agents 5. Studies examining the incidence in patients receiving amoxicillin therapy in particular, find that it is rare 6.

In some cases, both factors: drugs and infectious agents have been identified as possible precipitants to the disease. It is well known that viral infections enhance the risk of drug allergic reactions 2. Although the exact mechanism for this eruptions is not known, breakdown of tolerance or enhancement of the immune reaction to drugs following viral infection could involve two mechanism: a change in the antigenic expression of the drug or its metabolites probably due to changes in the expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes 7 or an alteration of immune regulation system 8. So in this case, as proposed previously in the literature, is biologically plausible that the interaction between Epstein Barr virus and amoxicillin could precipitate the skin reaction.

Levine 9 reported delayed positive IT, consisting of erythema and variable induration in patients with skin rashes after penicillin intake, since then a number of studies have reported that PT can also be used as a diagnostic procedure for studying nonimmediate reactions to drugs such as maculopapular exanthems, urticaria and/or angioedema, TEN, erythrodermia, erythema multiforme and generalized eczema 3. Both IT and PT seem valuable instruments for the diagnosis of NIR to AP.

Renn et al 10 also suggest that allergy testing may be helpful in patients with aminopenicillin-induced skin rashes in infectious mononucleosis and would enable to identify sensitized patient and to avoid severe exanthemas, especially in young adults an children.

In our patient, both patch test and delayed intradermal reading with aminopenicillins were an useful tool for the diagnosis of the aetiological agent in this unusual reaction to amoxicillin with concurrent Epstein Barn infection, moreover the positivity of such tests suggests a cell mediated hypersensitivity. The negative response to BP and cephalosporins indicates that amino-benzyl group plays a predominant role and the side-chain determinants would be the responsible of the reaction as suggested by other authors with larger series of patients 11,12.

Perhaps some reactions after treatment with aminopenicillins during an episode of mononucleosis represent true sensitizations to aminopenicillins and not a transient phenomenon as proposed by other authors 13, in this case skin tests performed again one year later, went on positives.


Correspondence:
Purificación González-Delgado, MD
Sección Alergia. Hospital General Alicante
Maestro Alonso, 109
03010 Alicante. Spain
E-mail: gonzalez_pur@gva.es

Bibliography
[1]
Adverse drug reaction and the skin. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1992.
[2]
Harvekos HW, Amsel Z, Drotman DP..
Adverse virus-drug interactions..
Rev Infect Dis, 13 (1991), pp. 697-704
[3]
Brockow K, Romano A, Blanca M, Ring J, Pichler W, Demolí P..
General considerations for skin test procedures in the diagnostic of drug hypersensitivity..
Allergy, 57 (2002), pp. 45-51
[4]
Forman R, Koren G, Shear N..
Erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in children. A review of 10 years' experience..
Drug Safety, 24 (2002), pp. 965-72
[5]
Roujeau JC; Kelly JP, Naldi L, Rzany B, Stem RS, Anderson T, et al..
Medication use and risk of Stevens Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis..
N England J Med, 333 (1995), pp. 1600-7
[6]
Levine LR..
Quantitative comparision of adverse reactions to cefaclor vs. amoxicillin in a surveillance study..
Pediatr Infect Dis, 4 (1985), pp. 358-61
[7]
Drug metabolism and drug allergy. In New trends in Allergy III. Heilderberg: Springer-Verlag; 1991.
[8]
Cohen AD, Friger M, Sarov B, Halvey S..
Which intercurrent infections are associated with maculopapular cutaneous drug reactions? A case control study..
Int J Dermatol, 40 (2001), pp. 41-4
[9]
Levine BB..
Immunologic mechanism of penicillin allergy. A haptenic model system for the study of allergic diseases of man..
N Engl J Med, 275 (1966), pp. 1115-25
[10]
Renn CN, Straff W, Dorfmuller A, Al-Masoudi T, Merk HF, Sachs B..
Amoxicillin-induced exanthema in young adults with infectious mononucleosis: demostration of drug-specific lymphocyte reactivity..
Br J Dermatol, 147 (2002), pp. 1166-70
[11]
Voorhorst R, Sparreboom S..
The use of stereoisomers in patch testing testing..
Ann Allergy, 45 (1980), pp. 100-3
[12]
Romano A, Quaratino D, Di Fonso M, Papa G, Venuti A, Gasbarrini G..
A diagnostic protocol for evaluating nonimmediate reactions to aminopenicillins..
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 103 (1999), pp. 1186-90
[13]
Levy M..
The combined effect of virus and drugs in drug-induced diseases..
Med Hypotheses, 14 (1984), pp. 239-6
Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos