Buscar en
Allergologia et Immunopathologia
Toda la web
Inicio Allergologia et Immunopathologia Are we prescribing too much or too little immunotherapy for children with allerg...
Journal Information
Vol. 40. Issue 3.
Pages 135-137 (May - June 2012)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 40. Issue 3.
Pages 135-137 (May - June 2012)
Editorial
Full text access
Are we prescribing too much or too little immunotherapy for children with allergic rhinitis?
Visits
3221
L. Moral
Allergy and Respiratory Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text

You are an experienced paediatric allergist. A mother and child of school age come into your office. In a few minutes you know that he has been suffering an offending allergic rhinitis for the last years. He has been only partially relieved with antihistamines. He is sensitised to common allergens in your region. You have some immunotherapy prescription pads on a shelf close to your hand. Are you going to take one of those pads at that moment? If you are working in Spain, there is 57% probability of doing so, according to a paper published in this issue of Allergologia et immunopathologia, reporting the paediatric results of a nationwide survey among Spanish allergists.1 Is it too much? Is it too little?

Allergic rhinitis adversely affects the quality of life of as many as 10–20% of school age children in Spain, in an intermediate position in relation to other countries.2 Natural history of this disorder shows a growing prevalence with age,3 and increased risk of asthma in adult life.4 Those most severely affected cannot do well without some kind of everyday drug therapy. Nasal steroids are effective and, although not proven, their effect on the growth of children is a cause of concern. In the paper by Ibero et al., fewer than half of children achieved good control of the disease with the use of symptomatic agents. In order to choose the best treatment for these children, we look for help from evidence-based medicine.

The efficacy of immunotherapy has long been under scrutiny and controversy. Several systematic reviews and meta-analysis have endorsed the ability of specific immunotherapy to improve the quality of life of patients suffering from several allergic diseases, including rhinitis and asthma.5–7 Symptom relief can be fast, and similar or bigger than that obtained with pharmacotherapy.8 More importantly, immunotherapy is able to change the natural course of the disease, extending its benefits beyond the completion of treatment.9 Certainly, evidence in paediatric patients is scarcer (as in other fields of medicine).10 However, as time goes by, better trials in children are reaffirming the efficacy of the vaccination with allergens in paediatric age.11 Moreover, immunotherapy could be specially useful in children for some reasons. Firstly, the sooner the patient is treated, the fewer quality-adjusted life years (QALY) will be lost. Secondly, immunotherapy could perform more efficiently at the beginning of the disease, before remodelling makes it more resistant to treatment. Thirdly, the preventive effects of immunotherapy (for new sensitisations or for asthma) have been reported, although more studies are needed at this moment. Everything nice? Why are we not vaccinating everybody?

Upon looking closely over the trials on immunotherapy, some limitations arise. The evidence supporting the efficacy of immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in children and adolescents has been questioned,12 and the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating sublingual immunotherapy has been criticised.13,14 Placebo effect has revealed as a huge obstacle for all treatments to demonstrate efficacy. Although immunotherapy has got through it, the margin for improvement is short and immunotherapy does not cover it all: you get better but not cured. Evidence supporting subcutaneous immunotherapy for rhinitis due to perennial allergens is not as complete as with seasonal rhinitis and is being analysed.15,16 Choosing the allergens for immunotherapy in an individual patient can be more difficult than choosing a patient suitable for being vaccinated. Poly-sensitisation is a frequent problem and it is difficult to recognise if one allergen is responsible for the biggest part of the patient complaints (even though costly provocation tests are being used) or if several allergens are playing their part. The treatment is inconvenient due to the need to move to a sanitary facility for the shots, and the confidence in the adherence to treatment is the price to pay with the easier sublingual route.17 Adverse effects are frequent and, although severe reactions are rare, mild and moderate reactions are not insignificant for many patients.

But evidence-based medicine (or practice) is not only composed of trials and papers. Two additional aspects play an important role in evidence-based decisions: individual clinical expertise and patient values and expectations. Experienced paediatric allergists (such as the one in our vignette) are used to prescribe immunotherapy and to observe the problems and benefits that it produces in their young patients. As a matter of fact, a child should be referred to an allergist once the troubles produced by the rhinitis or the treatment required for its control are considered unacceptable. Some allergists will be prone to administer immunotherapy soon, provided the patient is expected not to improve any more that his current state. Some others may, as depicted by Ibero et al., adopt a “wait-and-see” approach, possibly with the idea of observing the course of the disease in their patients, sometimes fluctuating over time, to get the best from patient education, avoidance measures (when applicable) and drug therapy, before becoming convinced that immunotherapy is a good option for them. This implies that, beyond the first visit, more than that 57% will be prescribed allergen vaccines.

Last, but not least, the patient and, in paediatric age, the family has a lot to say. Each family is a little world, difficult to be understood in a brief interview. Patient and family priorities, perceived loss of quality of life and attitudes towards drugs are important factors to be considered before deciding to prescribe immunotherapy. Previous knowledge and expectations of a child, a teenager, a mother or other family members, about allergic diseases and their treatment with vaccines are not easy to perceive. As an example of the factors involved in those expectations, given the partially genetic nature of atopic diseases, more than a few parents of a child with allergic rhinitis will be suffering the same disease and, possibly, will have been treated with immunotherapy. Their own experience will be an important factor favouring or difficulting the prescription in their children. Costs are an important point for families and for society and, although few works have addressed this issue, they have found a favourable balance.18,19 Form a societal point of view it should be important to know what we are obtaining (economic savings and quality of life) when we invest our money in vaccinating children with allergic rhinitis. But things can be different when we evaluate the cost-benefit ratio among different countries and even between different individuals in the same city. Again, family preferences and characteristics must be taken into account.

Another Spanish survey among paediatric allergists found a rate of prescription of immunotherapy for children with allergic rhinitis of 35%.20 In the present survey, adults were prescribed immunotherapy a little less frequently (48%) than children.21 Similar frequencies of immunotherapy prescription in patients attending allergy specialists were observed in France or Italy.22,23 From a population point of view, 3% of newly diagnosed allergy rhinitis children in Florida were prescribed immunotherapy.24 It is estimated that with regional variations, 1–5% of European children with allergic rhinitis are treated with specific immunotherapy.10

Concluding, is there an answer for the question entitling this editorial? Possibly not, we do not have enough data or a gold standard to measure it. So, what to do with our rhinitic child? Only face-to-face with the patient and the family can we choose the deemed best option for him. A complex algorithm incorporating all the mentioned aspects of evidence based practice is inside every paediatric allergist's brain: they are the most qualified to offer the best treatment for children suffering from moderate to severe allergic rhinitis.

References
[1]
M. Ibero, J.L. Justicia, M. Álvaro, O. Asensio, O. Domínguez, J. Garde, et al.
Diagnosis and treatment of allergic rhinitis in children: results of the PETRA study.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr), 40 (2012), pp. 138-143
[2]
N. Aït-Khaled, N. Pearce, H.R. Anderson, P. Ellwood, S. Montefort, J. Shah, et al.
Global map of the prevalence of symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis in children: the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) phase three.
[3]
T. Keil, A. Bockelbrink, A. Reich, U. Hoffmann, W. Kamin, J. Forster, et al.
The natural history of allergic rhinitis in childhood.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol, 21 (2010), pp. 962-969
[4]
J.A. Burgess, E.H. Walters, G.B. Byrnes, M.C. Matheson, M.A. Jenkins, C.L. Wharton, et al.
Childhood allergic rhinitis predicts asthma incidence and persistence to middle age: a longitudinal study.
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 120 (2007), pp. 863-869
[5]
M.A. Calderon, B. Alves, M. Jacobson, B. Hurwitz, A. Sheikh, S. Durham.
Allergen injection immunotherapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (2007),
[6]
S. Radulovic, M.A. Calderon, D. Wilson, S. Durham.
Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (2010),
[7]
M.J. Abramson, R.M. Puy, J.M. Weiner.
Injection allergen immunotherapy for asthma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (2010),
[8]
P.M. Matricardi, P. Kuna, V. Panetta, U. Wahn, A. Narkus.
Subcutaneous immunotherapy and pharmacotherapy in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a comparison based on meta-analyses.
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 128 (2011), pp. 791-799
[9]
G. Passalacqua.
Specific immunotherapy: beyond the clinical scores.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 107 (2011), pp. 401-406
[10]
A. Bufe, G. Roberts.
Specific immunotherapy in children.
Clin Exp Allergy, 41 (2011), pp. 1256-1262
[11]
D.E.S. Larenas-Linnemann, D.R. Pietropaolo-Cienfuegos, M.A. Calderón.
Evidence of effect of subcutaneous immunotherapy in children: complete and updated review from 2006 onward.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 107 (2011), pp. 407-416
[12]
E. Röder, M.Y. Berger, H. de Groot, R.G. van Wijk.
Immunotherapy in children and adolescents with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: a systematic review.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol, 19 (2008), pp. 197-207
[13]
A. Nieto, A. Mazon, R. Pamies, L. Bruno, M. Navarro, A. Montanes.
Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic respiratory diseases: an evaluation of meta-analyses.
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 124 (2009), pp. 157-161
[14]
C.M.A. de Bot, H. Moed, M.Y. Berger, E. Röder, R.G. van Wijk, J.C. van der Wouden.
Sublingual immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis: quality of systematic reviews.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol, 22 (2011), pp. 548-558
[15]
E. Compalati, G. Passalacqua, M. Bonini, W. Canonica.
The efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy for house dust mites respiratory allergy: results of a GA2LEN meta-analysis.
[16]
M.A. Calderon, V.A. Carr, JacobsonM, A. Sheikh, S. Durham.
Allergen injection immunotherapy for perennial allergic rhinitis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (2008),
[17]
D. Vita, L. Caminiti, P. Ruggeri, G.B. Pajno.
Sublingual immunotherapy: adherence based on timing and monitoring control visits.
[18]
B. Bruggenjurgen, T. Reinhold, R. Brehler, E. Laake, G. Wiese, U. Machate, et al.
Cost-effectiveness of specific subcutaneous immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 101 (2008), pp. 316-324
[19]
C.S. Hankin, L. Cox, D. Lang, A. Bronstone, P. Fass, B. Leatherman, et al.
Allergen immunotherapy and health care cost benefits for children with allergic rhinitis: a large-scale, retrospective, matched cohort study.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 104 (2010), pp. 79-85
[20]
J.M. Garde, M.D. Ibáñez.
Allergy in patients under fourteen years of age in Alergológica 2005.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immnunol, 19 (2009), pp. 61-68
[21]
A. Valero, J.L. Justicia, E. Antón, T. Dordal, B. Fernández-Parra, M. Lluch, et al.
Epidemiology of allergic rhinitis caused by grass pollen or house-dust mites in Spain.
Am J Rhinol Allergy, 25 (2011), pp. e123-e128
[22]
M. Miqueres, J.F. Fontaine, T. Haddad, M. Grosclaude, F. Saint-Martin, D. Bem David, et al.
Characteristics of patients with respiratory allergy in France and factors influencing immunotherapy prescription: a prospective observational study (REALIS).
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol, 24 (2011), pp. 387-400
[23]
L. Antonicelli, M.C. Braschi, M.B. Bilò, A. Angino, A.P. Pala, S. Baldacci, et al.
Congruence between international guidelines and mite specific immunotherapy prescribing practices.
Respir Med, 105 (2011), pp. 1441-1448
[24]
C.S. Hankin, L. Cox, D. Lang, A. Levin, G. Gross, G. Eavy, et al.
Allergy immunotherapy among Medicaid enrolled children with allergic rhinitis: patterns of care, resource use, and costs.
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 121 (2008), pp. 227-232
Copyright © 2012. SEICAP
Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos